Rv2709 Still unknown · low auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2709 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002883 · 148 aa · 3044254–3044700 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_217225.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand Rv2693c (Rv2693c) — dark: DUF3159 domain-containing protein Rv2694c (Rv2694c) — family_assigned: OB-fold nucleic acid binding domain-containing protein Rv2695 (Rv2695) — requalified: alpha/beta fold hydrolase Rv2696c (Rv2696c) — dark: DUF3710 domain-containing protein Rv2698 (Rv2698) — dark: DUF3093 domain-containing protein Rv2699c (Rv2699c) — dark: DUF4193 domain-containing protein cei (Rv2700) — requalified: envelope integrity protein Cei suhB (Rv2701c) — requalified: inositol-1-monophosphatase SuhB suhB ppgK (Rv2702) — family_assigned: ROK family protein sigA (Rv2703) — requalified: RNA polymerase sigma factor sigA Rv2704 (Rv2704) — family_assigned: RidA family protein Rv2705c (Rv2705c) — dark: DUF952 domain-containing protein Rv2706c (Rv2706c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2707 (Rv2707) — family_assigned: YihY/virulence factor BrkB family protein Rv2707 Rv2709 (Rv2709) — dark: DUF3099 domain-containing protein sigB (Rv2710) — family_assigned: sigma-70 family RNA polymerase sigma factor SigB sigB ideR (Rv2711) — family_assigned: iron-dependent transcriptional regulator IdeR Rv2712c (Rv2712c) — dark: DUF4192 domain-containing protein Rv2712c sthA (Rv2713) — requalified: Si-specific NAD(P)(+) transhydrogenase sthA Rv2714 (Rv2714) — family_assigned: PAC2 family protein Rv2714 Rv2715 (Rv2715) — family_assigned: alpha/beta hydrolase Rv2715 Rv2716 (Rv2716) — family_assigned: PhzF family phenazine biosynthesis protein Rv2717c (Rv2717c) — family_assigned: FABP family protein nrdR (Rv2718c) — family_assigned: transcriptional regulator NrdR chiZ (Rv2719c) — requalified: cell wall hydrolase ChiZ lexA (Rv2720) — requalified: transcriptional repressor LexA Rv2721c (Rv2721c) — family_assigned: LGFP repeat-containing protein Rv2721c 3 036 kb 3 040 kb 3 044 kb 3 048 kb 3 052 kb 3 056 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transmembrane protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDUF3099 domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Conserved hypothetical protein; DUF domain(s) DUF3099. Function unknown.
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Curation note: P16.24 (2026-08-17): le catalogue Ribo-RET de Smith et al. 2022 (classe "Isoform", traductome H37Rv en culture standard log-phase) place un site de demarrage a 3021857 au lieu du start annote 3021839 (delta +18 nt = 6 codon(s) en aval), MEME stop codon (3022285) donc MEME cadre de lecture -- candidat de mauvais START annote, PAS un changement de fonction (verdict dark maintenu). Aucune densite ribosomique ni peptide MS chiffres pour cette classe dans le supplement (colonnes vides pour "Isoform", contrairement a "Novel"): preuve = appel de pic Ribo-RET seul, non hierarchisable. Ribo-RET ne couvre qu'une condition de croissance : ceci ne dit rien sur les autres dark sans signal ici. Source: Smith C, Canestrari JG, Wang AJ et al., "Pervasive translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis", eLife 2022;11:e73980 (doi:10.7554/eLife.73980; PMC9094748), Supplementary File 1A, classe "Isoform". P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). A full-text search does however find 5 paper(s) naming this gene in their body text — see the full-text field below. The gene remains dark on function, but it is not unmentioned, and this page no longer claims that it is.

Named in the body of 5 paper(s), though in no title or abstract. Searched as Rv2709, Mb2728, ML1015c, MMAR_2004, MSMEG_2753, MAB_3027 in Europe PMC full text (2026-09-08).

A full-text hit means the gene is NAMED in the body of a paper — very often in a genome-wide supplementary table — not that it is characterised. This field exists to retract an absence claim, never to assert a function. Read the hits before concluding anything. Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions. A hit whose full text is not open access is counted in n_unverifiable, not listed: the API cannot read it, so it is neither a proof of mention nor a proof of absence.

Second-source check (tbmonitor): 0 paper(s) against 0 for the PubMed sweep — no mention in either source.

Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 0 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 0 — no mention in either source. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.

Full-text-only mention found (Europe PMC), not visible to the title/abstract sweep above.

A full-text-only hit (absent from the title+abstract sweep) placed Rv2709 in a structural-homology paragraph (FUGUE threading vs a mammalian carbonyl reductase, 22% identity -- itself weak evidence). Checked before any requalification: the paper's own abstract states unambiguously that its actual subject is “MSMEG4722 (ortholog of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv2509)”, not Rv2709. Rv2509 is already annotated in this atlas as `requalified/high`, gene=cmrA, “Mycolate reductase” (Pfam adh_short/KR/adh_short_C2) -- an exact match to the paper's own title (“a gene encoding a reductase... in mycolic acid biosynthesis”). The Rv2709 mention picked up by the full-text sweep is a locus-tag transcription/extraction artefact (2-5-0-9 vs 2-7-0-9, single-digit substitution).

NOT requalified. Same locus-tag confusion class already documented on this atlas (cf. Rv1083, Rv2712c): the paper's real subject, Rv2509/cmrA, is already correctly annotated. Rv2709 remains dark: nothing ties it to reductase activity.

Flagged as a candidate neighbour by phase140_locus_transposition_check.py, but initially deprioritised because the threading evidence (22% identity) looked weak in isolation -- it was reading the primary paper's own abstract, not the threading score, that settled the case. Lesson: check flagged neighbours even when the citing evidence looks individually weak.

Europe PMC full-text sweep (P16.2a-septies wave 2, phase138, 2026-08-17), verified against the primary paper's own abstract and against this atlas's existing high-confidence annotation on the locus flagged as a neighbour by phase140_locus_transposition_check.py (Rv2509).

Scope of the sweep: Extended 2026-08-17 (P16.2a-septies pilot): also swept in Europe PMC FULL TEXT. One full-text-only hit (weak structural-homology mention) traced to the primary source's own abstract and found to actually describe Rv2509/cmrA (already correctly annotated), not this gene -- see `full_text_lead`.

An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) dark by construction (IDR-orphan)

Predicted disorder60% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 57.2
Disordered regions2 IDR(s), longest 49 aa [0-40, 99-148]

both sequence (metapredict) and structure (low AlphaFold pLDDT) indicate little stable globular structure: this gene is dark BY CONSTRUCTION — there is no confident fold for structure/homology search to match, so its obscurity is expected, not a pipeline failure

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -0.39 (95% CI -1.85 to 1.59). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.405 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2728 · 99.3% identity
M. leprae ML1015c · 75.2% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2004 · 84.8% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_2753 · 67.5% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002793 · 99.3% identity
M. abscessus MAB_3027 · 63.3% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt I6YA25 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameProbable conserved transmembrane protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionProtein of unknown function (DUF3099)
Orthologous group2EGIC

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 11 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacteriaceae

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 73.4% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Mycobacteriaceae) · mean identity 63.0%
detected in the sister family Mycobacteriaceae (M. abscessus) but not in the broader Corynebacteriales — a Mycobacteriaceae-restricted gene (single-genome rung: interpret with care)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callGA · growth-advantage
What the call meansgrowth-advantage: insertions enriched
TA sites (Himar1) 12 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 12 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.917, mean read count 264.545454545. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 12 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness after prolonged in vitro passage (in vitro passage) -2.740.027 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 8 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance30.8 ppm · rank 2055/3519 (41.6th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (2 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)2

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length148 aa
Molecular weight16.8 kDa
Theoretical pI10.46
GRAVY-0.284 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index86.5
Aromaticity0.095
Instability index58.5 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DUF3099PF11298.14 8.5e-2833–104 Protein of unknown function (DUF3099)

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 57.2, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2708c (- strand, 42 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)sigB (+ strand, 175 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2782) expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 182.8)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 79.58) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (3 TF) Rv0135c (activates) · trcR (represses) · devR (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2708c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 820, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 64 partners at medium confidence (5 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 64 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2708c hypothetical protein 820 820 ctx neighborhood:788
Rv2164c hypothetical protein 770 770 ctx cooccurence:769
Rv3909 dark hypothetical protein 751 751 ctx cooccurence:751
Rv3835 hypothetical protein 749 749 ctx cooccurence:741
Rv0007 membrane protein 682 682 ctx cooccurence:680
Rv2520c dark membrane protein 679 679 ctx cooccurence:679
Rv2710 sigB RNA polymerase sigma factor SigB 678 678 ctx neighborhood:676
Rv1209 hypothetical protein 669 669 ctx cooccurence:669
Rv0339c iniR transcriptional regulator 666 666 ctx cooccurence:665
Rv1638A hypothetical protein 664 664 ctx cooccurence:662
Rv2843 hypothetical protein 637 637 ctx cooccurence:636
Rv2468c hypothetical protein 635 635 ctx cooccurence:634
Rv1109c hypothetical protein 634 635 ctx cooccurence:631
Rv1853 ureD urease accessory protein UreD 629 629 ctx cooccurence:629
Rv0343 iniC iIsoniazid inductible protein IniC 624 625 ctx cooccurence:619

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Partners predicted by a published screen (co-evolution + structure, prediction) predicted, not measured

Contact predicted by a published co-evolution and structure screen; this is a prediction, not a measured interaction; the authors validated 6 of the 12 predictions they tested experimentally (cases they chose), which is a ceiling on precision, not a floor.

PartnerPartner status in this atlasScreen scoreNovel per authorsSTRING score (any channel)Predicted model
Rv2193 ctaE
Heme-copper oxidase subunit III. Pfam: COX3 (PF00510.24).
Family assigned 0.994 yes no STRING row ma-bak-evip-0274

Source: Humphreys et al. 2024, Nat Microbiol, DOI 10.1038/s41564-024-01791-x (PMID 39294458), Supplementary Data 1 (final table of 3613 high-confidence pairs) and the ModelArchive deposit 10.5452/ma-bak-evip; read on 2026-10-10. The authors validated experimentally 6 of the 12 predictions they tested (cases chosen by the authors): that rate is a ceiling for this channel, not a floor. The screen score is the screen's own confidence for the pair; no interface score is shown because none is calibrated for this atlas. A predicted partner orients a hypothesis and does not assign a function; it does not change the verdict of this gene or the partner chosen by the STRING section.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: transmembrane protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF3099 domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DUF3099 PF11298.14 (E=8e-28)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
  • Ribo-RET (Smith 2022, classe Isoform): site de demarrage alternatif a 3021857 vs start annote 3021839 (delta +18 nt, meme cadre, meme stop 3022285) -- candidat de mauvais START annote

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217225.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF3099 (PF11298.14)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2EGIC
  • Curated reference: UniProt I6YA25 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 64 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2708c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam SZ, et al. (2018). A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core Journal of Molecular Biology. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002883|Rv2709|
MWDSRVMKHGLRLGFNGQFDDFDDFDDKGRPVLITAAAPSYEVEHRTRVRKYLTLMAFRVPALILAAIAYGAWHNGLISLLIVAASVPLPWMAVLIANDRPPRRADEPRRFDVARRRIPLFPTAERPALEPRRQPAERSAPRGFADHG