lexA Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2720 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002894 · 236 aa · 3054203–3054913 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_217236.2

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • Le TSS mesure tombe du mauvais cote (aval) du candidat start reannote que cette meme ligne propose, ce qui rend new_utr_bp negatif : anomalie arithmetique interne heritee de la table source (Cortes 2013 Table S3), sous investigation en P49 (couche tss, requalifiee par phase233 le 2026-09-15 mais pas garantie exacte sur toutes les lignes). Score bass negatif sur les 16 fiches concernees, coherent avec un appel TSS de faible confiance. Non reparee ici (P46.11), renvoyee a P49. (tss utr negative, 2026-09-22)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand Rv2705c (Rv2705c) — dark: DUF952 domain-containing protein Rv2706c (Rv2706c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2707 (Rv2707) — family_assigned: YihY/virulence factor BrkB family protein Rv2707 Rv2709 (Rv2709) — dark: DUF3099 domain-containing protein sigB (Rv2710) — family_assigned: sigma-70 family RNA polymerase sigma factor SigB sigB ideR (Rv2711) — family_assigned: iron-dependent transcriptional regulator IdeR Rv2712c (Rv2712c) — dark: DUF4192 domain-containing protein Rv2712c sthA (Rv2713) — requalified: Si-specific NAD(P)(+) transhydrogenase sthA Rv2714 (Rv2714) — family_assigned: PAC2 family protein Rv2714 Rv2715 (Rv2715) — family_assigned: alpha/beta hydrolase Rv2715 Rv2716 (Rv2716) — family_assigned: PhzF family phenazine biosynthesis protein Rv2717c (Rv2717c) — family_assigned: FABP family protein nrdR (Rv2718c) — family_assigned: transcriptional regulator NrdR chiZ (Rv2719c) — requalified: cell wall hydrolase ChiZ lexA (Rv2720) — requalified: transcriptional repressor LexA Rv2721c (Rv2721c) — family_assigned: LGFP repeat-containing protein Rv2721c Rv2722 (Rv2722) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2723 (Rv2723) — family_assigned: TerC/Alx family metal homeostasis membrane protein Rv2723 fadE20 (Rv2724c) — family_assigned: acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family protein fadE20 dapF (Rv2726c) — requalified: diaminopimelate epimerase dapF miaA (Rv2727c) — requalified: tRNA (adenosine(37)-N6)-dimethylallyltransferase MiaA miaA Rv2728c (Rv2728c) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv2729c (Rv2729c) — family_assigned: DMT family transporter Rv2729c Rv2730 (Rv2730) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2731 (Rv2731) — family_assigned: DUF349 domain-containing protein Rv2731 3 044 kb 3 048 kb 3 052 kb 3 056 kb 3 060 kb 3 064 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)repressor LexA
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationtranscriptional repressor LexA
Revised (this work)Transcriptional repressor LexA. Pfam: LexA_DNA_bind (PF01726.23), Peptidase_S24 (PF00717.29).
Functional category (TubercuList)regulatory proteins

Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=True).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 50 publications

50 TB publications mention this gene. 50 publications discuss this gene. Queried separately, 41 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 15 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 15-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (15), M. leprae (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (each with its own context filter), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 50: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Iron supplementation potentiates oxidative stress, modulates gene expression and enhances killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis treated with rifampicin and vitamin C. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2026.102765 2026
Deciphering the Role of pafBC in Mycobacteriophage Resistance and Biofilm Formation. doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.5c00627 2025
Cyclic di-AMP regulates genome stability and drug resistance in Mycobacterium through RecA-dependent and RecA-independent recombination. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae555 2024
Conditional protein splicing of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA intein in its native host. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71248-y 2024
Anti-mutagenic agent targeting LexA to combat antimicrobial resistance in mycobacteria. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107650 2024
54 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 50 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv2720, lexA, Mb2739, ML1003c, MMAR_1992, MSMEG_2740, MAB_3038 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Iron supplementation potentiates oxidative stress, modulates gene expression and enhances killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis treated with rifampicin and vitamin C. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2026.102765 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2026
Deciphering the Role of pafBC in Mycobacteriophage Resistance and Biofilm Formation. doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.5c00627 ACS Infect Dis 2025
Cyclic di-AMP regulates genome stability and drug resistance in Mycobacterium through RecA-dependent and RecA-independent recombination. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae555 PNAS Nexus 2024
Conditional protein splicing of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA intein in its native host. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71248-y Sci Rep 2024
Anti-mutagenic agent targeting LexA to combat antimicrobial resistance in mycobacteria. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107650 names it J Biol Chem 2024
Conditional protein splicing of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA intein in its native host. doi:10.1101/2024.04.15.589443 bioRxiv 2024
Insights into the presence of multiple RecQ helicases in the ancient cyanobacterium, Nostoc sp. strain PCC7120: bioinformatics and expression analysis approach. doi:10.1007/s00438-022-01963-6 Mol Genet Genomics 2023
In silico analysis of promoter regions to identify regulatory elements in TetR family transcriptional regulatory genes of Mycobacterium colombiense CECT 3035. doi:10.1186/s43141-022-00331-6 J Genet Eng Biotechnol 2022
Division of labor between SOS and PafBC in mycobacterial DNA repair and mutagenesis. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1169 Nucleic Acids Res 2021
Real-time kinetic studies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA-DNA interaction. doi:10.1042/BSR20211419 names it Biosci Rep 2021
Real-time kinetic studies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA-DNA interaction. doi:10.1042/BCJ20210434 names it Biosci Rep 2021
Dissecting the RecA-(In)dependent Response to Mitomycin C in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Using Transcriptional Profiling and Proteomics Analyses. doi:10.3390/cells10051168 Cells 2021
Moxifloxacin Activates the SOS Response in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Dose- and Time-Dependent Manner. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9020255 Microorganisms 2021
The PafBC-mediated response sensitizes a bistable DNA damage response in Mycobacteria. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110462 J Theor Biol 2021
Potential Role of Proteasome Accessory Factor-C in Resistance against Second Line Drugs in Mycobacteria. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1722552 J Lab Physicians 2020
The DNA Damage Inducible SOS Response Is a Key Player in the Generation of Bacterial Persister Cells and Population Wide Tolerance. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01785 Front Microbiol 2020
The extended N-terminus of Mycobacterium smegmatis RecX potentiates its ability to antagonize RecA functions. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2020.140468 Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom 2020
Conditional Silencing by CRISPRi Reveals the Role of DNA Gyrase in Formation of Drug-Tolerant Persister Population in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00070 Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2019
The Anionic Phospholipids in the Plasma Membrane Play an Important Role in Regulating the Biochemical Properties and Biological Functions of RecA Proteins. doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01147 Biochemistry 2019
Biochemical characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA and structural studies of its C-terminal segment. doi:10.1107/S2059798318016066 names it Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2019
Mycobacterial Mutagenesis and Drug Resistance Are Controlled by Phosphorylation- and Cardiolipin-Mediated Inhibition of the RecA Coprotease. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.037 Mol Cell 2018
The Mycobacterial LexA/RecA-Independent DNA Damage Response Is Controlled by PafBC and the Pup-Proteasome System. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.073 names it Cell Rep 2018
Mycobacterium smegmatis PafBC is involved in regulation of DNA damage response. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14410-z Sci Rep 2017
Overexpression of Rv2788 increases mycobacterium stresses survival. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2016.11.007 Microbiol Res 2017
The small 6C RNA of Corynebacterium glutamicum is involved in the SOS response. doi:10.1080/15476286.2016.1205776 RNA Biol 2016
Integration of heterogeneous molecular networks to unravel gene-regulation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1186/s12918-014-0111-5 BMC Syst Biol 2014
Suramin is a potent and selective inhibitor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA protein and the SOS response: RecA as a potential target for antibacterial drug discovery. doi:10.1093/jac/dku080 J Antimicrob Chemother 2014
DNA damage responses in prokaryotes: regulating gene expression, modulating growth patterns, and manipulating replication forks. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012674 Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013
Global analysis of the regulon of the transcriptional repressor LexA, a key component of SOS response in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.357715 names it J Biol Chem 2012
Enhanced expression of recX in Mycobacterium tuberculosis owing to a promoter internal to recA. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.11.002 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2011
Crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies of the C-terminal domain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA. doi:10.1107/S174430911003068X names it Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2010
RecA-independent DNA damage induction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ruvC despite an appropriately located SOS box. doi:10.1128/JB.01066-09 J Bacteriol 2010
Experimental determination of translational start sites resolves uncertainties in genomic open reading frame predictions - application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1099/mic.0.022889-0 Microbiology (Reading) 2009
Functionally important movements in RecA molecules and filaments: studies involving mutation and environmental changes. doi:10.1107/S0907444908028448 Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2008
Inducible SOS response system of DNA repair and mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. doi:10.7150/ijbs.4.338 Int J Biol Sci 2008
Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA repair in response to subinhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin. doi:10.1093/jac/dkn387 J Antimicrob Chemother 2008
Conservation of the LexA repressor binding site in Deinococcus radiodurans. doi:10.2390/biecoll-jib-2008-86 names it J Integr Bioinform 2008
DivS, a novel SOS-inducible cell-division suppressor in Corynebacterium glutamicum. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06069.x Mol Microbiol 2008
Interference of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell division by Rv2719c, a cell wall hydrolase. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05333.x Mol Microbiol 2006
Identification of a promoter motif regulating the major DNA damage response mechanism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.017 FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004
PredictRegulon: a web server for the prediction of the regulatory protein binding sites and operons in prokaryote genomes. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh364 Nucleic Acids Res 2004
The majority of inducible DNA repair genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis are induced independently of RecA. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03765.x Mol Microbiol 2003
Characterization of the two Mycobacterium tuberculosis recA promoters. doi:10.1128/JB.185.20.6005-6015.2003 J Bacteriol 2003
The role of multiple SOS boxes upstream of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis lexA gene--identification of a novel DNA-damage-inducible gene. doi:10.1099/00221287-148-11-3609 names it Microbiology (Reading) 2002
DNA damage induction of recA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis independently of RecA and LexA. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03199.x names it Mol Microbiol 2002
Definition of the mycobacterial SOS box and use to identify LexA-regulated genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1128/JB.184.12.3287-3295.2002 names it J Bacteriol 2002
Inter- and intramolecular domain interactions of the catalase-peroxidase KatG from M. tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03179-9 FEBS Lett 2001
Slow induction of RecA by DNA damage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1099/00221287-147-12-3271 Microbiology (Reading) 2001
Identification of some DNA damage-inducible genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: apparent lack of correlation with LexA binding. doi:10.1128/JB.183.15.4459-4467.2001 names it J Bacteriol 2001
Conservation of the binding site for the arginine repressor in all bacterial lineages. doi:10.1186/gb-2001-2-4-research0013 Genome Biol 2001
SOS induction in mycobacteria: analysis of the DNA-binding activity of a LexA-like repressor and its role in DNA damage induction of the recA gene from Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5731934.x names it Mol Microbiol 1997
Determination of DNA sequences required for regulated Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA expression in response to DNA-damaging agents suggests that two modes of regulation exist. doi:10.1128/jb.179.11.3509-3518.1997 J Bacteriol 1997
Mycobacterial recA is cotranscribed with a potential regulatory gene called recX. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3441697.x Mol Microbiol 1997
Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA: recognition of a Cheo (Bacillus-type SOS) box. doi:10.1099/00221287-143-3-929 names it Microbiology (Reading) 1997

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder22% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 77.2
Disordered regions2 IDR(s), longest 27 aa [0-23, 83-110]

carries a substantial disordered region (50/236 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): WhiB4 (whiB4).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

Transcriptional start site (informative, coordinates unchanged)

Leaderless transcript (no 5'UTR / Shine-Dalgarno). Primary TSS at position 3031788 (+ strand), -57 bp 5'UTR. TSS-derived candidate start codon: 3031731 (111 bp from the annotated start) -- candidate only, not applied to this record's coordinates.

Genome-wide 5'-triphosphate-enriched RNA-seq TSS mapping (Cortes et al. 2013): informative context on transcript architecture only. reannotated_start_candidate is the authors' TSS-derived candidate start codon -- reported for information, NEVER applied to this atlas's start_mtbc0/end_mtbc0 coordinates (P19 MTBC0<->H37Rv anchoring). Row re-keyed to this locus by matching its genomic boundary against the H37Rv GFF3 (P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15), P49): the original ingestion (P16.23/phase135, 2026-08-17) trusted the source table's own gene-identity column, which was desynchronised from its own numeric columns on 547/651 checkable rows -- see P49 for the full diagnostic. A missing primary_tss here means this gene falls outside the 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset the source table covers, not an absence of transcription. Leaderless: transcription starts at or within the annotated start codon, so this transcript carries no 5'UTR/Shine-Dalgarno sequence -- relevant context for translation-start calls on short/dark ORFs (P8). Source: Cortes et al. 2013 (Cell Reports), Table S3 (TSS mapping and re-annotation of start codons), 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset of >4,000 genome-wide TSS -- row re-keyed to this locus by coordinate match (P49).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -1.61 (95% CI -2.10 to -1.19). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionInvolved in regulation of nucleotide excision repair and sos response. Represses a number of genes involved in the response to DNA damage (sos response), including RECA and LEXA. Has been shown to bind to the 14 bp palindromic sequence 5'-cgaacnnnngttcg-3'. In the presence of single-stranded DNA, RECA interacts with LEXA causing an autocatalytic cleavage which disrupts the DNA-binding part of LEXA
Mycobrowser EC 3.4.21.88 · agrees with the atlas

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2739 · 99.1% identity
M. leprae ML1003c · 88.3% identity
M. marinum MMAR_1992 · 84.8% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_2740 · 90.7% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002804 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_3038 · 86.5% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WHR7 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameLexA repressor
EC (curated) EC 3.4.21.88
Curated functionRepresses a number of genes involved in the response to DNA damage (SOS response), including recA and lexA. Has been shown to bind to the 14 bp palindromic sequence 5'-CGAACNNNNGTTCG-3'. In the presence of single-stranded DNA, RecA interacts with LexA causing an autocatalytic cleavage which disrupts the DNA-binding part of LexA, leading to derepression of the SOS regulon and eventually DNA repair.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category K Transcription
Preferred namelexA
eggNOG descriptionRepresses a number of genes involved in the response to DNA damage (SOS response), including recA and lexA. In the presence of single-stranded DNA, RecA interacts with LexA causing an autocatalytic cleavage which disrupts the DNA-binding part of LexA, leading to derepression of the SOS regulon and eventually DNA repair
Orthologous groupCOG1974
EC number EC 3.4.21.88
KEGG orthology K01356
KEGG modules M00729
Gene Ontology (67) GO:0000976, GO:0001067, GO:0001130, GO:0001217, GO:0003674, GO:0003676, GO:0003677, GO:0003690, GO:0003700, GO:0005488, GO:0005575, GO:0005618 +55 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.361 · quasi-invariant (2 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 1 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 89.0% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 12/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 62.9%
detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential

The two screens disagree on this gene: Tn-seq says growth-defect (insertions tolerated, NOT essential) (GD), CRISPRi says essential.

Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -1.608), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.

DeJesus 2017 callGD · growth-defect
What the call meansgrowth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential
TA sites (Himar1) 8 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 8 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.250, mean read count 1. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 8 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Read with some caution: only 8 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 8 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain

This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.

Hypomorph strainlexA-TetOn18.1 (TetON promoter 18)
Baseline knockdown fitness3.222 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown
Used in target deconvolutionyes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment)

Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 16 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance355.0 ppm · rank 562/3519 (84.1th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length236 aa
Molecular weight24.8 kDa
Theoretical pI4.94
GRAVY-0.022 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index97.1
Aromaticity0.038
Instability index35.5 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
LexA_DNA_bindPF01726.23 1.4e-2925–88 LexA DNA binding domain
Peptidase_S24PF00717.29 3.6e-33118–230 Peptidase S24-like

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 6a2q (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 4 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
6a2q X-ray diffraction 1.48 Å 47%
6a2t X-ray diffraction 1.9 Å 47%
6a2r X-ray diffraction 2.25 Å 47%
6a2s X-ray diffraction 2.5 Å 47%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (4 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 77.2

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
6a2r-assembly1_A 1.00 0.92 0.40 0.91 100% 42% / 99% 1.4e-16 sig 6a2r-assembly1_A Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA C-domain II
6a2s-assembly1_C 1.00 0.86 0.38 0.86 99% 42% / 100% 2.3e-16 sig 6a2s-assembly1_C Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA C-domain S160A
3k2z-assembly1_B 1.00 0.59 0.50 0.59 37% 89% / 100% 1.0e-19 sig 3k2z-assembly1_B Crystal structure of a LexA protein from Thermotoga maritima
3k2z-assembly1_A 1.00 0.61 0.50 0.61 36% 89% / 100% 2.1e-18 sig 3k2z-assembly1_A Crystal structure of a LexA protein from Thermotoga maritima
6a2t-assembly1_A 1.00 0.79 0.34 0.79 99% 40% / 100% 3.9e-14 sig 6a2t-assembly1_A Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA C-domain K197A

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 77.2, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Catalytic-site verification (M-CSA on the structural model)

M-CSA entry724 · EC 3.4.21.88
Catalytic residues3/4 identical (4/4 aligned)
VerdictPARTIAL (3/4 identical, 4/4 aligned) -> active site partly retained; verify (possible distant homolog / weak alignment)

Catalytic residues of the matched M-CSA reference enzyme mapped onto the structural model by alignment. An active-site-conserved verdict upgrades a mere fold match to a likely active enzyme; fold-only flags a shared fold whose catalytic machinery is not retained (a guard against over-calling).

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2719c (- strand, 250 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2721c (- strand, 21 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2793) expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 1035.77)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 301.79) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) Rv1049 (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

lexA represses (high confidence · LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012))
ChIP-seq (25 pics, 23 loci distincts)
Caveat: Autoregulation (lexA se reprime lui-meme).

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: chiZ (membrane protein), high confidence (score 773, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 85 partners at medium confidence (20 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 85 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2737c recA exp (transferred) recombinase A 998 977 coexpression:855 experimental:829 textmining:958
Rv2719c chiZ membrane protein 859 773 ctx neighborhood:723 textmining:408
Rv2718c nrdR transcriptional regulator NrdR 799 770 ctx neighborhood:667
Rv1537 dinX exp (transferred) DNA polymerase IV 925 681 experimental:463 textmining:777
Rv1696 recN DNA repair protein RecN 869 651 coexpression:649 textmining:640
Rv3056 dinP exp (transferred) DNA polymerase IV 2 832 601 experimental:463 textmining:598
Rv3394c exp (transferred) hypothetical protein 629 589 experimental:463
Rv2717c hypothetical protein 461 461 ctx neighborhood:454
Rv1931c transcriptional regulator 454 451
Rv0052 hypothetical protein 452 450
Rv1930c hypothetical protein 471 448
Rv2191 hypothetical protein 646 422 textmining:413
Rv3833 AraC family transcriptional regulator 408 409
Rv1657 argR arginine repressor 835 381 textmining:745
Rv0605 IS1536 family serine type transposase 445 380

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: repressor LexA
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: transcriptional repressor LexA
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): LexA_DNA_bind PF01726.23 (E=1e-29), Peptidase_S24 PF00717.29 (E=4e-33)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217236.2)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — LexA_DNA_bind (PF01726.23), Peptidase_S24 (PF00717.29)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1974
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WHR7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 77.2)
  • Catalytic-site verification: M-CSA (Ribeiro et al. 2018, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1012), entry 724; catalytic residues aligned onto the structural model
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 85 functional partner(s); context anchor chiZ
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002894|Rv2720|lexA
MNDSNDTSVAGGAAGADSRVLSADSALTERQRTILDVIRASVTSRGYPPSIREIGDAVGLTSTSSVAHQLRTLERKGYLRRDPNRPRAVNVRGADDAALPPVTEVAGSDALPEPTFVPVLGRIAAGGPILAEEAVEDVFPLPRELVGEGTLFLLKVIGDSMVEAAICDGDWVVVRQQNVADNGDIVAAMIDGEATVKTFKRAGGQVWLMPHNPAFDPIPGNDATVLGKVVTVIRKV