iniR Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv0339c · MTBC0 mtbc0_000359 · 832 aa · 409273–411771 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_214853.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transcriptional regulator
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationisoniazid response ATPase/transcriptional regulator IniR
Revised (this work)Isoniazid response ATPase/transcriptional regulator IniR. Pfam: GerE (PF00196.26).
Functional category (TubercuList)regulatory proteins

Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication discusses this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 1 record carries a M. tuberculosis context and 1 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 1-record verified sample: M. marinum (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Cell envelope stress in mycobacteria is regulated by the novel signal transduction ATPase IniR in response to trehalose. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007131 2017
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv0339c, iniR, Mb0346c, MMAR_0612, MSMEG_0691, MAB_4292 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Cell envelope stress in mycobacteria is regulated by the novel signal transduction ATPase IniR in response to trehalose. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007131 names it PLoS Genet 2017

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Transcriptional start site (informative, coordinates unchanged)

Primary TSS at position 408465 (- strand), 65 bp 5'UTR. TSS-derived candidate start codon: 408400 -- candidate only, not applied to this record's coordinates.

Genome-wide 5'-triphosphate-enriched RNA-seq TSS mapping (Cortes et al. 2013): informative context on transcript architecture only. reannotated_start_candidate is the authors' TSS-derived candidate start codon -- reported for information, NEVER applied to this atlas's start_mtbc0/end_mtbc0 coordinates (P19 MTBC0<->H37Rv anchoring). Row re-keyed to this locus by matching its genomic boundary against the H37Rv GFF3 (P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15), P49): the original ingestion (P16.23/phase135, 2026-08-17) trusted the source table's own gene-identity column, which was desynchronised from its own numeric columns on 547/651 checkable rows -- see P49 for the full diagnostic. A missing primary_tss here means this gene falls outside the 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset the source table covers, not an absence of transcription. Source: Cortes et al. 2013 (Cell Reports), Table S3 (TSS mapping and re-annotation of start codons), 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset of >4,000 genome-wide TSS -- row re-keyed to this locus by coordinate match (P49).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.19 (95% CI -0.47 to 3.66). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.269 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=17 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionCould be involved in transcriptional mechanism.

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0346c · 99.9% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0612 · 68.7% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_0691 · 56.1% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000355 · 99.9% identity
M. abscessus MAB_4292 · 46.0% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O33269 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt namePossible transcriptional regulatory protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category K Transcription
Preferred namegerE
eggNOG descriptionTranscriptional regulator
Orthologous groupCOG2771

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.51 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 12 synonymous, 15 missense, 1 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 3 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.27% of strains (390) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Bovis, L6; union over all sites: 934 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:407715:G:A · nonsense · 390 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:406625:AG:A · frameshift · 364 strains — fixed in 13 sub-clades of L6, totalling 330 strains — 22.7% of the 1 457 strains in the lineage named (largest: L6.2.1.2.2.3 74/74, L6.2.1.2.2.2.2.2 56/56, L6.2.1.2.2.1 33/33, L6.2.1.2.2.2.2.1 29/29, L6.2.1.1 25/25, L6.2.1.2.1 20/20, …)
  • NC_000962.3:406233:TG:T · frameshift · 180 strains — fixed in 2 sub-clades of Bovis, L6, totalling 22 strains — 0.1% of the 14 644 strains in the lineages named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.1.1.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.2.2.2 14/14, L6.1.1.1.1.1.1.3 6/8)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.479 · 9 consensus substitution(s)
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.479) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 32/53 (60%) · mean identity 72.0% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 32/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 3/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 41.2%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 30 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 30 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.967, mean read count 59.0689655172. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 30 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
altered fitness under Ethambutol (drug exposure) -1.560.0 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 9 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance9.55 ppm · rank 2708/3519 (23.1th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length832 aa
Molecular weight87.8 kDa
Theoretical pI6.26
GRAVY0.001 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index100.6
Aromaticity0.028
Instability index39.5 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
GerEPF00196.26 8.6e-14762–816 Bacterial regulatory proteins, luxR family

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 87.5, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 87.5

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8fgw-assembly1_D 1.00 0.28 0.28 0.20 12% 84% / 56% 2.6e-04 sig 8fgw-assembly1_D Human IFT-A complex structures provide molecular insights into ciliary transport
4ui9-assembly1_O 1.00 0.39 0.33 0.39 12% 70% / 92% 6.6e-03 sig 4ui9-assembly1_O Atomic structure of the human Anaphase-Promoting Complex
5a31-assembly1_O 1.00 0.39 0.33 0.39 12% 70% / 92% 7.1e-03 sig 5a31-assembly1_O Structure of the human APC-Cdh1-Hsl1-UbcH10 complex.

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 87.5, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv0338c (- strand, 108 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv0340 (+ strand, 185 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0353) expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 16.39)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE) transcription factor

Regulated by (1 TF) iniR (activates)
Regulonthis transcription factor regulates 11 target gene(s)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

crp binding site only -- direction not determined (low confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq : site de fixation CRP (1 des 191 sites de Kahramanoglou et al. 2014) ; aucun changement d'expression rapporte pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp
Caveat: Site de fixation CRP mesure par ChIP-seq (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014), SANS changement d'expression mesure pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp : le sens de la regulation n'est PAS determine. Ecrire « site de fixation CRP en amont », jamais « regule par CRP ». L'article ne distingue pas « non differentiellement exprime » de « sous le seuil », donc l'absence de ce gene de la table d'expression n'est pas une preuve de non-regulation.

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: embR (transcriptional regulator EmbR), high confidence (score 897, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 116 partners at medium confidence (58 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 116 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1267c embR transcriptional regulator EmbR 899 897 ctx cooccurence:506 coexpression:800
Rv1963c mce3R transcriptional repressor Mce3R 891 891 ctx cooccurence:608 coexpression:734
Rv3263 DNA methylase 889 889 coexpression:859
Rv1776c transcriptional regulator 867 868 ctx cooccurence:500 coexpression:746
Rv3124 moaR1 transcriptional regulator MoaR 860 856 coexpression:785
Rv3736 AraC/XylS family transcriptional regulator 859 854 coexpression:802
Rv1675c cmr HTH-type transcriptional regulator Cmr 847 842 coexpression:818
Rv0342 iniA isoniazid inductible protein IniA 837 837 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv3183 higA3 transcriptional regulator 840 835 coexpression:812
Rv0343 iniC iIsoniazid inductible protein IniC 852 834 ctx cooccurence:774
Rv1359 transcriptional regulator 834 834 coexpression:813
Rv0691c mftR mycofactocin biosynthesis transcriptional regulator MftR 833 833 coexpression:833
Rv2488c LuxR family transcriptional regulator 835 828 coexpression:806
Rv3840 transcriptional regulator 824 822 coexpression:822
Rv1027c kdpE transcriptional regulator KdpE 823 817 coexpression:795

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: transcriptional regulator
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: isoniazid response ATPase/transcriptional regulator IniR
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): GerE PF00196.26 (E=9e-14)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214853.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — GerE (PF00196.26)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG2771
  • Curated reference: UniProt O33269 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 87.5)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 116 functional partner(s); context anchor embR
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000359|Rv0339c|iniR
MQHRGCKNRGQAYDASVTDSLTEVPPAARRALLELANAPTVPVKVLITGGIGTGKTTVLAAARDTLRRSGLTVLACPPPDGEPPETALVIDDAQLLTDTELLRLTERVADSRLTVVAAAEAREHHRALRALTMALERDRPRISLGPLPVAEHLRDCTAGLPFLIHAVSARAQAPAQAAKVALIERLRRLDEPTLDTLLMMSLTHELGVSDVAAALGISVTDARGLVDRAHASGLIESSHTAAFLQSVHDAIAQIVGNAHHHEVETSLLRSQLDISPVSAELALRLAEHGLRDERLADILTRYAADTRDASVRCARLYRAAVHAGAKGLTVRLADALARTGDCTAAATLADDLLSSPDATERAAAVRVAASVAVHDGNTGHAAELFGWLGPHPDTMVSSAATIVFAANGDLATARATLRLKDAGPPTMAARCARNLAEGLLLTMDQPYPVAMAKLGQAIATEQSLSQVIPDSPAALVTLAAIHAGDPVRARSVIGRAVRAGADPLFQRRHLLLSGWIKMQEGQLPSASADVAAASAGTHLHRRDALWAAALQTAISRRTGDIGALQQHWYAAMEALAEYSLDLFALLPLGELWVAAARMRQVDQLQHTLDQALTLLDSLGNPALWSNSLHWAGVHAGILANSPESVAPHGQALGAMVAHSTLAQALSDAGRTWLRVLAENVDADEVTAAARSLSHVGLTSDATRLAGQAALQTSDARVSGAMLQLARDLKLGNDFGEPPSGAGDTEPASGTPPAPRQPPAGSPLSDREREVAELLLLGMPYRDIGARLFISAKTVEHHVARIRQRLGAGSRSEMLSMLRAMLAPESLTADERR