Rv2721c Family assigned · medium auto-curated
H37Rv Rv2721c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002895 ·
699 aa ·
3054935–3057034 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_217237.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | LGFP repeat-containing protein |
| Revised (this work) | LGFP repeat-containing protein. Pfam: LGFP (PF08310.18), ArfC (PF27542.1). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication
Found under: H37Rv (1).
1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| T cell recall response of two hypothetical proteins (Rv2251 and Rv2721c) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in healthy household contacts of TB - Possible subunit vaccine candidates. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2016.06.012 | 2016 |
1 record returned by the alias sweep
Searched as: Rv2721c, Mb2740c, ML1002, MMAR_1991, MSMEG_2739
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
| Publication | Journal | Year |
|---|---|---|
| T cell recall response of two hypothetical proteins (Rv2251 and Rv2721c) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in healthy household contacts of TB - Possible subunit vaccine candidates. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2016.06.012 names it | J Infect | 2016 |
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 36% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 72.4 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 2 IDR(s), longest 245 aa [0-35, 403-648] |
carries a substantial disordered region (280/699 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 3.0
disruption confers tolerance to Isoniazid; disruption advantageous in vivo (growth-restraining in the host); disruption advantageous under 6 weeks hypoxia; predicted secreted (signal peptide).
| Corroborating evidence | STRING-coupled to pirG (cell surface protein) |
|---|
This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
SigH (sigH).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.88 (95% CI -2.14 to 4.87). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.308 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=23 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2740c
· 99.9% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML1002
· 62.1% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_1991
· 65.2% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_2739
· 40.9% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002805
· 99.9% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
I6XF52
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Possible conserved transmembrane alanine and glycine rich protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
M Cell wall / membrane / envelope biogenesis
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | protein potentially involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis |
| Orthologous group | COG5479 |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.62 · relaxed/neutral |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 6 synonymous, 11 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.339 (low power)
· 4 consensus substitution(s) low power (4 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 72.7%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
29 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
29 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 199.068965517.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 29 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Conditional fitness (RB-TnSeq, 95 conditions) pHstress
| Condition | Group | Direction | log2 fitness | t |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rifampicin | stress | mutant enriched (loss advantageous) | 1.42 | 10.775 |
| pH 4.5 | pH | mutant enriched (loss advantageous) | 1.88 | 10.579 |
Randomly-barcoded transposon screen across 95 carbon/nitrogen sources, pH, stressors and antibiotics (2 condition-specific phenotype(s) for this gene). A conditional fitness phenotype is a context lead, not a proven function, and never changes the verdict here. Note the blind spot: RB-TnSeq cannot measure essential genes. Source: RB-TnSeq 95-condition barcoded transposon screen, Mtb (PLoS Biol 2026, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003529).
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | +2.57 | 0.0 | disruption advantageous |
| altered fitness under 6 weeks hypoxia (stress) | +1.43 | 0.0 | disruption advantageous |
| altered fitness under Isoniazid (drug exposure) | +1.26 | 0.014 | disruption advantageous |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 3 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 627.0 ppm · rank 344/3519 (90.3th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) signal peptide
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein with signal peptide (1 TM helix) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | SP+TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 1 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 699 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 72.4 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 4.47 |
| GRAVY | -0.097 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 76.0 |
| Aromaticity | 0.089 |
| Instability index | 33.7 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LGFP | PF08310.18 | 2.7e-11 | 240–289 | LGFP repeat |
ArfC | PF27542.1 | 7.1e-11 | 642–696 | ArfC |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 72.4, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | lexA (+ strand, 21 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2722 (+ strand, 15 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2794) |
expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 95.84)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 19.45) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: pirG (cell surface protein), high confidence (score 918, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 88 partners at medium confidence (12 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 88 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv3810 pirG |
cell surface protein | 918 | 918 ctx | cooccurence:709 coexpression:730 |
Rv0312 |
hypothetical protein | 851 | 850 | coexpression:827 |
Rv1477 ripA |
peptidoglycan endopeptidase RipA | 837 | 831 | coexpression:804 |
Rv0040c mtc28 |
hypothetical protein | 803 | 803 | coexpression:803 |
Rv1157c dark |
hypothetical protein | 798 | 799 | coexpression:730 |
Rv1478 ripB |
peptidoglycan endopeptidase RipB | 803 | 796 | coexpression:796 |
Rv3414c sigD |
ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigD | 785 | 785 | coexpression:785 |
Rv2145c wag31 |
cell wall synthesis protein Wag31 | 751 | 751 | coexpression:751 |
Rv0479c |
membrane protein | 745 | 746 ctx | cooccurence:742 |
Rv1566c ripD |
hypothetical protein | 747 | 738 | coexpression:738 |
Rv2015c |
hypothetical protein | 728 | 729 ctx | cooccurence:727 |
Rv1765c |
hypothetical protein | 704 | 705 ctx | cooccurence:703 |
Rv0941c |
hypothetical protein | 686 | 686 ctx | cooccurence:685 |
Rv0320 |
hypothetical protein | 681 | 681 ctx | cooccurence:677 |
Rv0441c |
hypothetical protein | 679 | 680 ctx | cooccurence:679 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: LGFP repeat-containing protein
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): LGFP PF08310.18 (E=3e-11), ArfC PF27542.1 (E=7e-11)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217237.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — LGFP (PF08310.18), ArfC (PF27542.1)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG5479 - Curated reference: UniProt I6XF52 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
88 functional partner(s); context anchor
pirG - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002895|Rv2721c| MNGQRGQLSTLIGRTLLGLAATAVTAVLLAPTVAASPMGDAEDAMMAAWEKAGGDTSTLGVRKGDVYPIGDGFALDFAGGKMFFTPATGAKYLYGPLLDKYESLGGAADSDLGFPTINEVPGLAGPDSRVSTFSAADNPVIFWTPEHGAFVVRGALNAAWDKLGSSGGVLGAPVGDETYDGEVTAQKFSGGEVSWNRATKEFTTVPAVLAEQLKGLQVAIDPSAAINMAWRAAGGAAGPLGAKKGGQYPIGGDGIAQDFVGGKVFFSPATGANAVEGEILAKYESLGGPVSSDLGFPIANETDGGFGPSSRIVRFSAADKPVIFWTPDHGAFVVRGAMVAAWDKLRGPNGKLGAPVGDQTVDGDVVSQKFTGGMISWNRAKNTFTTDPANLAPLLSGLQVSGQNQPSTSAMPPPGKKFTWHWWWLGAAALGVLLVVMVALVVFGLRRRRRGYDAAAYDDDRAGDVEYGTAADGDWPPDEDFGSEHFGFGDQFPPEPVAPDAGSTPRVSWPRGAGAAVGDAEHLPGEEGYGSDLLSGPSNVGVEEEDTDAVDTTPTPVVSQADLSEVGPDLIVPERVVPETFVPQAFVPEAVAPEAVPPDVHAADLADTGLPAAAVSAAEDRGGRHAAAEPPEPPSAGVRPAIHLPLEDPYQMPNGYPVKASVSFGLYYPPGSALYHDTLAELWFASEEVAQVNGFIRAD
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2721c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2721c