Rv2164c Family assigned · medium
H37Rv Rv2164c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002300 ·
384 aa ·
2454449–2455603 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_216680.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | Cell-division / septum-associated membrane protein (eggNOG COG2919, 'essential cell division protein FtsB-like'; COG category D). RefSeq leaves it 'hypothetical protein'. Division-machinery role at orthology level. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) cited only under an ortholog name
Found under: M. abscessus (1), M. smegmatis (1).
1 TB publication mentions this gene. Invisible under its H37Rv locus tag: this gene appears in the literature ONLY under its ortholog identifier(s) (M. abscessus, M. smegmatis). Searching 'Rv2164c' alone finds nothing.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| Repression of mab_1999 impairs growth and alters cellular morphology of Mycobacterium abscessus. doi:10.1186/s12866-025-04319-3 | 2025 |
1 record returned by the alias sweep
Searched as: Rv2164c, Mb2188c, ML0907, MMAR_3201, MSMEG_4234, MAB_1999
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
| Publication | Journal | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Repression of mab_1999 impairs growth and alters cellular morphology of Mycobacterium abscessus. doi:10.1186/s12866-025-04319-3 names it | BMC Microbiol | 2025 |
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered
| Predicted disorder | 80% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 62.5 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 2 IDR(s), longest 200 aa [0-108, 184-384] |
carries a substantial disordered region (308/384 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | ftsI (Rv2163c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Rv1828/SigH (Rv1828 or sigH).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -8.15 (95% CI -8.55 to -7.78). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2188c
· 99.7% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML0907
· 56.4% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_3201
· 67.3% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_4234
· 66.0% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002235
· 99.2% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_1999
· 50.9% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O06213
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Probable conserved proline rich membrane protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
D Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | Essential cell division protein. May link together the upstream cell division proteins, which are predominantly cytoplasmic, with the downstream cell division proteins, which are predominantly periplasmic |
| Orthologous group | COG2919 |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.874 · relaxed/neutral |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 5 synonymous, 11 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 46/53 (87%) · mean identity 74.4%
· 3/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 46/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential
Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -8.148), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | GD · growth-defect |
|---|---|
| What the call means | growth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
10 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
10 growth-defect,
0 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.100,
mean read count 30.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 10 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 3 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 5.36 ppm · rank 2916/3519 (17.2th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (1 TM helix) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 1 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 384 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 39.6 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 11.47 |
| GRAVY | -0.501 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 69.8 |
| Aromaticity | 0.016 |
| Instability index | 70.2 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 62.5, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 70.3 (confident). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8j07-assembly1_c2 |
0.04 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 16% | 50% / 35% | 2.1e+00 | 8j07-assembly1_c2 96nm repeat of human respiratory doublet microtubule and associated axonemal complexes |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4
| Upstream (5' on genome) | pbpB (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2165c (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
pbpB · Rv2164c · Rv2165c · Rv2166c
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2222) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv2163c · Rv2164c · Rv2165c
(coverage 36.4)
stationary phase: operon of 4, Rv2163c · Rv2164c · Rv2165c · Rv2166c
(coverage 45.0)
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
Rv1816 (activates)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: pbpB (penicillin-binding membrane protein PbpB), high confidence (score 979, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 100 partners at medium confidence (20 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 100 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2163c pbpB |
penicillin-binding membrane protein PbpB | 988 | 979 ctx | neighborhood:881 coexpression:806 textmining:475 |
Rv2151c ftsQ exp (transferred) |
cell division protein FtsQ | 931 | 922 ctx | neighborhood:544 experimental:829 |
Rv2165c rsmH |
rRNA small subunit methyltransferase H | 969 | 910 ctx | neighborhood:882 textmining:673 |
Rv2166c mraZ |
transcriptional regulator MraZ | 978 | 837 ctx | neighborhood:816 textmining:876 |
Rv0538 |
membrane protein | 772 | 773 ctx | cooccurence:767 |
Rv3909 dark |
hypothetical protein | 771 | 772 ctx | cooccurence:769 |
Rv3835 |
hypothetical protein | 923 | 770 ctx | cooccurence:766 textmining:680 |
Rv2709 dark |
transmembrane protein | 770 | 770 ctx | cooccurence:769 |
Rv3658c |
transmembrane protein | 748 | 749 ctx | cooccurence:748 |
Rv3903c cpnT |
hypothetical protein | 747 | 748 ctx | cooccurence:746 |
Rv2843 |
hypothetical protein | 746 | 747 ctx | cooccurence:743 |
Rv2939 papA5 |
phthiocerol/phthiodiolone dimycocerosyl transferase | 742 | 743 ctx | cooccurence:742 |
Rv0007 |
membrane protein | 729 | 729 ctx | cooccurence:723 |
Rv1111c |
hypothetical protein | 724 | 725 ctx | cooccurence:722 |
Rv0339c iniR |
transcriptional regulator | 723 | 723 ctx | cooccurence:719 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- eggNOG ortholog COG2919 (COG category D), e-value 4.33e-214
- eggNOG-mapper orthology (COG/EC functional assignment, under-propagated by the auto-curation which keys on cog_cat only). Family/activity-level transfer from orthology, not a substrate demonstrated in M. tuberculosis.
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216680.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG2919 - Curated reference: UniProt O06213 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 70.3, confident)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
100 functional partner(s); context anchor
pbpB - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002300|Rv2164c| MRAKREAPKSRSSDRRRRADSPAAATRRTTTNSAPSRRIRSRAGKTSAPGRQARVSRPGPQTSPMLSPFDRPAPAKNTSQAKARAKARKAKAPKLVRPTPMERLAARLTSIDLRPRTLANKVPFVVLVIGSLGVGLGLTLWLSTDAAERSYQLSNARERTRMLQQHKEALERDVREAASAPALAEAARRQGMIPTRDTAHLVQDPDGNWVVVGTPKPADGVPPPPLNTKLPEDPPPPPKPAAVPLEVPVRVTPGPDDPAPPARSGPEVLVRTPDGTATLGGATHLPTQAGPQLPGPVPIPGAPGPMPAPPLGAVPSPAPAENPVPLQVGAAPPAGLPGPAPVAATPGLSGGSQPMVAPPAPVPANGEQFGPVTAPVPTAPGAPR
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2164c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2164c