Rv2693c Still unknown · low auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2693c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002867 · 223 aa · 3033112–3033783 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217209.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand arsA (Rv2684) — family_assigned: ArsB/NhaD family transporter arsA Rv2686c (Rv2686c) — family_assigned: fluoroquinolones efflux ABC transporter permease Rv2687c (Rv2687c) — family_assigned: fluoroquinolone transporter permease Rv2688c (Rv2688c) — family_assigned: ABC transporter ATP-binding protein Rv2688c Rv2689c (Rv2689c) — requalified: class I SAM-dependent RNA methyltransferase Rv2689c Rv2693c (Rv2693c) — dark: DUF3159 domain-containing protein Rv2694c (Rv2694c) — family_assigned: OB-fold nucleic acid binding domain-containing protein Rv2695 (Rv2695) — requalified: alpha/beta fold hydrolase Rv2696c (Rv2696c) — dark: DUF3710 domain-containing protein Rv2698 (Rv2698) — dark: DUF3093 domain-containing protein Rv2699c (Rv2699c) — dark: DUF4193 domain-containing protein cei (Rv2700) — requalified: envelope integrity protein Cei suhB (Rv2701c) — requalified: inositol-1-monophosphatase SuhB suhB ppgK (Rv2702) — family_assigned: ROK family protein sigA (Rv2703) — requalified: RNA polymerase sigma factor sigA Rv2704 (Rv2704) — family_assigned: RidA family protein Rv2705c (Rv2705c) — dark: DUF952 domain-containing protein Rv2706c (Rv2706c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2707 (Rv2707) — family_assigned: YihY/virulence factor BrkB family protein Rv2707 Rv2709 (Rv2709) — dark: DUF3099 domain-containing protein sigB (Rv2710) — family_assigned: sigma-70 family RNA polymerase sigma factor SigB 3 024 kb 3 028 kb 3 032 kb 3 036 kb 3 040 kb 3 044 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)integral membrane protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDUF3159 domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Conserved hypothetical protein; DUF domain(s) DUF3159. Function unknown.
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) antigen / vaccine

1 TB publication mentions this gene. Used as an antigen in IFN-gamma release assays in latent tuberculosis. reformulation, not a quotation

Second-source check (tbmonitor): 1 paper(s) against 1 for the PubMed sweep — both sources find literature.

Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 1 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 1 — both sources find literature. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.

PublicationDate
Effect of isoniazid on antigen-specific interferon-gamma secretion in latent tuberculosis doi:10.1183/09031936.00123314 2015-02-01
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2693c, Mb2712c, MMAR_2021, MSMEG_2770, MAB_2996c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Effect of isoniazid on antigen-specific interferon-γ secretion in latent tuberculosis. doi:10.1183/09031936.00123314 Eur Respir J 2015

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): Rv1776c+WhiB4 (Rv1776c and whiB4 ).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.04 (95% CI -1.95 to 5.00). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.251 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2712c · 99.6% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2021 · 76.7% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_2770 · 61.8% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002777 · 99.6% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2996c · 56.5% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt I6X548 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt nameProbable conserved integral membrane alanine and leucine rich protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionProtein of unknown function (DUF3159)
Orthologous group2AVV0

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 1.475 · quasi-invariant (5 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 1 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 51/53 (96%) · mean identity 73.4% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 51/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 5/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 52.2%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 13 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 13 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 132.230769231. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 13 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 8 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance16.9 ppm · rank 2431/3519 (30.9th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (6 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)6

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length223 aa
Molecular weight23.8 kDa
Theoretical pI10.26
GRAVY0.711 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index117.4
Aromaticity0.112
Instability index37.2 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DUF3159PF11361.14 4.8e-6915–200 Protein of unknown function (DUF3159)

HHpred profile-profile (no confident hit): No confident hit by E-value (all >=18), but an unusually coherent Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) transporter thematic convergence across many distinct MFS subfamilies, most aligning over most of the protein's length -- recorded as an informative but unassertable lead (plausible multi-TM transporter fold). Remains dark. top hits 7-8 independent MFS-transporter-family templates (43-73% Probability, E>=18): dipeptide/tripeptide, oxalate:formate, glycine-betaine, heme (FLVCR1), solute-carrier and lactose permease transporters, most spanning nearly the full 223-residue length. Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 59.5, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)ceoC (+ strand, 10 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2694c (- strand, 30 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2693c · Rv2694c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv2693c · Rv2694c — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2767) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv2693c · Rv2694c (coverage 78.87)
stationary phase: operon of 2, Rv2693c · Rv2694c (coverage 135.58) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2694c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 844, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 22 partners at medium confidence (3 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 22 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2694c hypothetical protein 844 844 ctx neighborhood:839
Rv2695 hypothetical protein 734 734 ctx neighborhood:694
Rv3195 hypothetical protein 677 677 ctx cooccurence:676
Rv2696c dark hypothetical protein 558 558 ctx cooccurence:445
Rv1486c hypothetical protein 557 557 ctx cooccurence:553
Rv1286 cysC adenylyl-sulfate kinase 609 551
Rv3463 hypothetical protein 533 512
Rv2772c transmembrane protein 511 511 ctx cooccurence:511
Rv1382 hypothetical protein 497 498 ctx cooccurence:496
Rv0856 hypothetical protein 483 483 ctx cooccurence:480
Rv0883c sepH hypothetical protein 473 473
Rv0508 hypothetical protein 490 471 ctx cooccurence:435
Rv0775 hypothetical protein 463 464 ctx cooccurence:434
Rv2360c hypothetical protein 463 463 ctx cooccurence:456
Rv0097 oxidoreductase 470 437 coexpression:405

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: integral membrane protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF3159 domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DUF3159 PF11361.14 (E=5e-69)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217209.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF3159 (PF11361.14)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2AVV0
  • Curated reference: UniProt I6X548 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 22 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2694c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002867|Rv2693c|
MNANRTSAQRLLAQAGGVSGLVYSSLPVVTFVVASSAAGLLPAIGFALSMAGLILLWRLLRRESARPVVAGFCGVAVCALIAYLVGQSKGYFLLGIWMSLLWAVVFTLSILIRRPIVGYLWSWLSGRDRAWRDVSRAVFAFDVATLGWTLVFAARFIVQRHLYDADKTGWLGVARIGMGWPLTALAALATYAAIKAAQRAILASHDAAAVGGAAEFDADAGRE