Rv2706c Still unknown · low auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2706c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002880 · 85 aa · 3042615–3042872 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217222.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand Rv2693c (Rv2693c) — dark: DUF3159 domain-containing protein Rv2694c (Rv2694c) — family_assigned: OB-fold nucleic acid binding domain-containing protein Rv2695 (Rv2695) — requalified: alpha/beta fold hydrolase Rv2696c (Rv2696c) — dark: DUF3710 domain-containing protein Rv2698 (Rv2698) — dark: DUF3093 domain-containing protein Rv2699c (Rv2699c) — dark: DUF4193 domain-containing protein cei (Rv2700) — requalified: envelope integrity protein Cei suhB (Rv2701c) — requalified: inositol-1-monophosphatase SuhB suhB ppgK (Rv2702) — family_assigned: ROK family protein sigA (Rv2703) — requalified: RNA polymerase sigma factor sigA Rv2704 (Rv2704) — family_assigned: RidA family protein Rv2705c (Rv2705c) — dark: DUF952 domain-containing protein Rv2706c (Rv2706c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2707 (Rv2707) — family_assigned: YihY/virulence factor BrkB family protein Rv2707 Rv2709 (Rv2709) — dark: DUF3099 domain-containing protein sigB (Rv2710) — family_assigned: sigma-70 family RNA polymerase sigma factor SigB sigB ideR (Rv2711) — family_assigned: iron-dependent transcriptional regulator IdeR Rv2712c (Rv2712c) — dark: DUF4192 domain-containing protein Rv2712c sthA (Rv2713) — requalified: Si-specific NAD(P)(+) transhydrogenase sthA Rv2714 (Rv2714) — family_assigned: PAC2 family protein Rv2714 Rv2715 (Rv2715) — family_assigned: alpha/beta hydrolase Rv2715 Rv2716 (Rv2716) — family_assigned: PhzF family phenazine biosynthesis protein Rv2717c (Rv2717c) — family_assigned: FABP family protein nrdR (Rv2718c) — family_assigned: transcriptional regulator NrdR chiZ (Rv2719c) — requalified: cell wall hydrolase ChiZ lexA (Rv2720) — requalified: transcriptional repressor LexA 3 032 kb 3 036 kb 3 040 kb 3 044 kb 3 048 kb 3 052 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationhypothetical protein
Revised (this work)Conserved hypothetical protein; no recognised domain. Function unknown.
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) antigen / vaccine

1 TB publication mentions this gene. Predicted antigenic protein with promiscuous CTL epitopes (in silico). reformulation, not a quotation

Second-source check (tbmonitor): 1 paper(s) against 1 for the PubMed sweep — both sources find literature.

Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 1 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 1 — both sources find literature. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.

PublicationDate
In silico identification of potential antigenic proteins and promiscuous CTL epitopes in M. tuberculosis doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2012.03.023 2012-08-01
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2706c, Mb2725c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
In silico identification of potential antigenic proteins and promiscuous CTL epitopes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2012.03.023 Infect Genet Evol 2012

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) dark by construction (IDR-orphan)

Predicted disorder100% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 44.5
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 85 aa [0-85]

both sequence (metapredict) and structure (low AlphaFold pLDDT) indicate little stable globular structure: this gene is dark BY CONSTRUCTION — there is no confident fold for structure/homology search to match, so its obscurity is expected, not a pipeline failure

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

How to read this gene's constraint (qualifying attributes, not exclusions) WEAK

Clonal disruptionCarries a clonal disruption in a MINORITY of strains (the 1-50 % window). This is a signal of pseudogenisation UNDER WAY in one clone or lineage, not a verdict on the gene: it is intact, and often translated and constrained, in the rest of the complex. It does not exclude the gene from curation.
Frame disrupted in 2.2 % of strains, i.e. intact in 97.8 %.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 2 % of gene

NeighbourRv2705c (Rv2705c, - strand)
Overlap4 bp, 2 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): SG_9.

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.40 (95% CI -0.70 to 4.70). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.259 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=9 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2725c · 98.8% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002790 · 98.8% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O07207 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 2.14% of strains (3048) · clonal

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Lineage-specific relaxation (candidate, one evidence handle) 1 lineage(s)

L1 disrupted in 12.4% of 25 332 L1 strains, vs 2.2% pooled across the whole MTBC (145k strains) · odds ratio very high (>1000) · FDR q=0.0

Candidate lineage-specific loss-of-function signal: rare/absent in the other well-sampled lineages (<5%) but risen in the listed lineage(s). ONE handle, not a verdict change (P8 two-handle policy) -- the general phenomenon of lineage-specific gene loss reflecting ecotype-specific selective pressure is already established at genome scale (Silva-Pereira et al. 2024); this signal on an individual dark gene needs an independent second handle before any requalification.

Caveat: Sample-size heterogeneity across MTBC lineages (up to 4 orders of magnitude, 16 smaller lineages excluded for n<500); essentiality is NOT resolvable per lineage (TnSeq data is H37Rv-only). For the two smallest adequate lineages (L5 n=630, L6 n=1364) the frequency floor bottoms out at the absolute minimum of 3 carrier strains -- a handful of strains from a SINGLE transmission cluster (clonal outbreak) can pass this floor without representing independent evolutionary origins of the disrupting allele; no phylogenetic correction for clonal sampling was applied. Treat low-count hits in these two lineages with extra caution.

Reference: Silva-Pereira TT, Soler-Camargo NC, Sá Guimarães AM 2024, Microbiology Spectrum, doi:10.1128/spectrum.02289-23

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacteriaceae

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 32/53 (60%) · mean identity 61.9% · 2/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 32/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Mycobacteriaceae) · mean identity 43.3%
detected in the sister family Mycobacteriaceae (M. abscessus) but not in the broader Corynebacteriales — a Mycobacteriaceae-restricted gene (single-genome rung: interpret with care)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callGA · growth-advantage
What the call meansgrowth-advantage: insertions enriched
TA sites (Himar1) 2 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 2 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 475. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 2 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatStatistically thin call: only 2 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length85 aa
Molecular weight8.7 kDa
Theoretical pI10.77
GRAVY0.207 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index74.6
Aromaticity0.071
Instability index52.8 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).

HHpred profile-profile (no confident hit): Converging but weak lean toward the amidase-signature (GatA / peptide-amidase, SCOP c.117.1.1) fold; all probabilities <42% (E>=53) — below the confident threshold, not assertable (the amidase fold is large and promiscuous). Remains dark. top hits GatA amidotransferase / amidase-signature fold, many converging hits but all 28-42% (E=66-150), 1M22 peptide amidase (42%, E=66). Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 44.5, very low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2705c (- strand, -4 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2707 (+ strand, 115 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2705c · Rv2706c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) sigH (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

crp binding site only -- direction not determined (low confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq : site de fixation CRP (1 des 191 sites de Kahramanoglou et al. 2014) ; aucun changement d'expression rapporte pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp
Caveat: Site de fixation CRP mesure par ChIP-seq (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014), SANS changement d'expression mesure pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp : le sens de la regulation n'est PAS determine. Ecrire « site de fixation CRP en amont », jamais « regule par CRP ». L'article ne distingue pas « non differentiellement exprime » de « sous le seuil », donc l'absence de ce gene de la table d'expression n'est pas une preuve de non-regulation.

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2707 (hypothetical protein), medium confidence (score 544, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.

All 11 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2705c dark hypothetical protein 969 774 ctx neighborhood:773 textmining:870
Rv2707 hypothetical protein 544 544 ctx neighborhood:539
Rv3256c hypothetical protein 870 47 textmining:870
Rv3916c hypothetical protein 870 47 textmining:870
Rv3192 hypothetical protein 630 47 textmining:628
Rv2704 hypothetical protein 870 44 textmining:870
Rv2036 hypothetical protein 511 44 textmining:510
Rv0052 hypothetical protein 517 41 textmining:517
Rv1775 hypothetical protein 437 41 textmining:437
Rv3630 integral membrane protein 431 41 textmining:431
Rv0024 NLP/P60 family protein 412 41 textmining:412

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: hypothetical protein
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217222.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Curated reference: UniProt O07207 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 34.2, very low)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 11 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2707
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Lineage-specific relaxation: per-lineage disruption fraction vs the pooled MTBC (145k strains), Fisher exact test with FDR correction; general phenomenon established at genome scale by Silva-Pereira et al. 2024 (doi:10.1128/spectrum.02289-23) -- one evidence handle on this atlas's own dark genes, never sufficient alone for a verdict change
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002880|Rv2706c|
MLVGVMLAEKKLGSGGQLGAHPSCSATAVAAVCSSQLRTGQSCVHGSPFSGIFTFSDVRGSRRVPRPLSGVSFLTTFAPANRAGW