mtc28 Family assigned · medium

H37Rv Rv0040c · MTBC0 mtbc0_000045 · 310 aa · 42532–43464 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_214554.2

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationLpqN/LpqT family lipoprotein
Revised (this work)Cell-envelope lipoprotein of the LpqN/LpqT family (Pfam Lpp-LpqN, PF10738). Members are anchored to the mycobacterial envelope; the specific physiological role of this locus is not established here.
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) cited under its protein name

No publication mentions this gene under its H37Rv locus tag or any ortholog tag — but 3 publication(s) are attributed to it under its PROTEIN NAME, "Proline-rich 28 kDa antigen" (PMID 10439323 (Indian J Lepr, 1999); PMID 9874491 (Scand J Immunol, 1998); PMID 9393781 (Infect Immun, 1997)). The atlas annotation therefore does not rest on sequence and structure alone. The locus-tag sweep and the protein-name sweep measure two different things, and only the second one finds this gene: read the silence as a property of the TAG, not of the protein. Attribution basis reported by the sweep: cites_gene_name. A name-based attribution can still be wrong where a family name is shared with a paralogue, so the papers are listed for the reader to judge rather than folded into a functional claim.

This label was rewritten — what changed, and why

Label rewritten on 2026-09-10 (P46.2a). It previously read "no publication mentions this gene", derived from the locus-tag sweep alone while this same layer already carried an attributed protein-name sweep that contradicted it. Only the label changed: no count, no paper and no verdict was touched.

What this page said before (2026-09-10, recovered from the last commit, phase219 having overwritten it without keeping the previous text): « No publication mentions this gene under its locus tag or ortholog tags — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene. A separate sweep by PROTEIN NAME (Proline-rich 28 kDa antigen) does find 3 publication(s) attributable to this gene (see `protein_name_sweep`), so 'unstudied' here means unstudied UNDER ITS TAG, not unstudied. » The label it belonged to was rewritten by P46.2a. It is kept verbatim rather than deleted: it may carry curation that pass could not reconstruct, and a reader is entitled to see what the page said before.

Named in the body of 43 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv0040c (9), mtc28 (32), MSMEG_6919 (1), MAB_4924 (1).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “Proline-rich 28 kDa antigen”: 3 paper(s) attributable to this gene. Read on 2026-08-12 (P18.20a): 1 paper(s) are genuine primary characterisation attributable to this gene, 2 attributed abstract(s) mention the name only tangentially (comparative survey or a different species). See `curated_reading` for the adjudication.

Not read yet: these are curation leads, not an established function. A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

8 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv0040c, mtc28, Mb0041c, ML0031c, MMAR_0056, MSMEG_6919, MAB_4924 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

This count disagrees with the 0 reported above. The two come from different methods and both are shown rather than one being silently overwritten. The figure above comes from the older curated source, which missed this gene; the sweep below queries every alias of the gene in a mycobacterial context. Where they differ this way, the list below is the one you can check line by line.

PublicationJournalYear
Biorecognition and detection of antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis using a sandwich ELISA associated with magnetic nanoparticles. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114749 J Pharm Biomed Anal 2022
The α1β1 region is crucial for biofilm enhancement activity of MTC28 in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12823 names it FEBS Lett 2017
Structure-based Epitope Mapping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Secretary Antigen MTC28. doi:10.1074/jbc.M116.726422 names it J Biol Chem 2016
Comparison of antibody responses to seventeen antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2010.06.014 Clin Chim Acta 2010
Expression and purification of recombinant antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for application in serodiagnosis. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2005.04.014 Protein Expr Purif 2005
Searching for secreted proteins of Mycobacterium leprae. Indian J Lepr 1999
Secreted proteins of Mycobacterium leprae. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3083.1998.00451.x Scand J Immunol 1998
MTC28, a novel 28-kilodalton proline-rich secreted antigen specific for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. doi:10.1128/iai.65.12.4951-4957.1997 names it Infect Immun 1997

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered

Predicted disorder46% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 74.1
Disordered regions2 IDR(s), longest 101 aa [0-101, 270-310]

sequence-based disorder is high but AlphaFold folds it confidently (pLDDT>=70): treat the disorder call with caution (possible metapredict over-call)

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 6.0

required for fitness in vivo (virulence / persistence factor); predicted secreted (signal peptide).

Corroborating evidenceSTRING-coupled to Rv0039c (transmembrane protein); co-transcribed with mtc28; structural lead available

This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): SigH (sigH).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.28 (95% CI -1.01 to 5.21). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.073 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0041c · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML0031c · 63.7% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0056 · 64.8% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_6919 · 53.3% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000045 · 99.7% identity
M. abscessus MAB_4924 · 47.5% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WIM9 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameProline-rich 28 kDa antigen

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
Preferred namemtc28
eggNOG descriptionProbable lipoprotein LpqN
Orthologous group2APGE
Gene Ontology (2) GO:0005575, GO:0005576

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.876 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 3 synonymous, 7 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.188 (low power) · 6 consensus substitution(s)
low power (6 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 73.7% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 2/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 41.0%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 10 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 10 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 156.4. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 10 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -4.680.035 required
fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) -3.460.0055 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 2 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 9 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance182.0 ppm · rank 894/3519 (74.6th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) signal peptide

Predictionpredicted secreted protein (signal peptide)
DeepTMHMM classSP

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length310 aa
Molecular weight31.9 kDa
Theoretical pI6.97
GRAVY0.053 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index86.9
Aromaticity0.058
Instability index45.3 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Lpp-LpqNPF10738.16 1.5e-66103–270 Probable lipoprotein LpqN

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 4pws (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 2 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
4pws X-ray diffraction 2.15 Å 100%
4ol4 X-ray diffraction 2.8 Å 100%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (2 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 74.1

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
4pws-assembly1_A 1.00 1.00 0.57 1.00 100% 57% / 100% 1.5e-30 sig 4pws-assembly1_A Crystal structure of secreted proline rich antigen MTC28 (Rv0040c) at 2.15 A with bound chloride from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
6mna-assembly1_A 1.00 0.85 0.49 0.84 19% 54% / 98% 3.9e-11 sig 6mna-assembly1_A Crystal structure of LpqN involved in cell envelope biogenesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
3lyd-assembly1_A 1.00 0.78 0.40 0.75 18% 47% / 90% 1.9e-08 sig 3lyd-assembly1_A Crystal structure of Putative uncharacterized protein from Jonesia denitrificans
6e8a-assembly1_A-3 1.00 0.70 0.30 0.58 12% 38% / 74% 3.4e-03 sig 6e8a-assembly1_A-3 Crystal structure of DcrB from Salmonella enterica at 1.92 Angstroms resolution
1tu1-assembly1_A 1.00 0.50 0.27 0.50 11% 48% / 91% 1.1e-04 sig 1tu1-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of Protein of Unknown Function PA94 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Putative Regulator

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 74.1, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv0039c (- strand, 81 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)leuS (+ strand, 196 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0046) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv0039c · Rv0040c (coverage 144.9)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 45.57) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (2 TF) Rv1776c (represses) · mtrA (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: leuS (leucine--tRNA ligase), high confidence (score 732, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 15 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3810 pirG cell surface protein 812 812 coexpression:812
Rv0312 hypothetical protein 812 812 coexpression:812
Rv2721c hypothetical protein 803 803 coexpression:803
Rv1477 ripA peptidoglycan endopeptidase RipA 810 800 coexpression:800
Rv0039c dark transmembrane protein 794 794 ctx neighborhood:785
Rv1158c dark hypothetical protein 748 748 coexpression:748
Rv1478 ripB peptidoglycan endopeptidase RipB 738 738 coexpression:738
Rv1566c ripD hypothetical protein 747 734 coexpression:734
Rv0041 leuS leucine--tRNA ligase 731 732 ctx neighborhood:730
Rv0888 spmT hypothetical protein 703 703 coexpression:703
Rv1157c dark hypothetical protein 414 415 coexpression:415
Rv1754c hypothetical protein 415 386
Rv1926c mpt63 immunogenic protein Mpt63 547 46 textmining:545
Rv3279c birA bifunctional biotin operon repressor/biotin--[acetyl-CoA-carboxylase 659 44 textmining:658
Rv3221c TB7.3 acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxyl carrier protein subunit 808 42 textmining:808

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • MTBC0 PGAP product: 'LpqN/LpqT family lipoprotein'
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Lpp-LpqN PF10738 (E=1.5e-66)

ESM Atlas signal (exploratory)

Ancestral protein hash 1f4cb89e38667edbbb0f4d2ccec8f10a. SAE features are orienting indices, not validated domains.

#IndexActivationInterpretation
13621 1.17 Secretory pathway signal motifs
211966 1.16 Low-cysteine small/charged soluble tracts
315441 1.13 Catalysis-adjacent beta-strand micro-motifs
46474 1.12 Acidic/disulfide loops and catalytic Asp/His
5777 1.11 N-terminal targeting signals
61070 0.89 Exposed amphipathic alpha helices
77087 0.70 Extracellular low-complexity repeats
813555 0.68 Small-residue low-complexity tracts

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214554.2)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Lpp-LpqN (PF10738.16)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2APGE
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WIM9 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 74.1)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 15 functional partner(s); context anchor leuS
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000045|Rv0040c|mtc28
MIQIARTWRVFAGGMATGFIGVVLVTAGKASADPLLPPPPIPAPVSAPATVPPVQNLTALPGGSSNRFSPAPAPAPIASPIPVGAPGSTAVPPLPPPVTPAISGTLRDHLREKGVKLEAQRPHGFKALDITLPMPPRWTQVPDPNVPDAFVVIADRLGNSVYTSNAQLVVYRLIGDFDPAEAITHGYIDSQKLLAWQTTNASMANFDGFPSSIIEGTYRENDMTLNTSRRHVIATSGADKYLVSLSVTTALSQAVTDGPATDAIVNGFQVVAHAAPAQAPAPAPGSAPVGLPGQAPGYPPAGTLTPVPPR