Rv0479c Family assigned · medium auto-curated
H37Rv Rv0479c · MTBC0 mtbc0_000504 ·
348 aa ·
571286–572332 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_214993.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | membrane protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | DUF2993 domain-containing protein |
| Revised (this work) | DUF2993 domain-containing protein. Pfam: LmeA (PF11209.14). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.
Rv0479c (4), ML2450 (12).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 30% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 74.1 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 105 aa [0-105] |
carries a substantial disordered region (105/348 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv0480c (Rv0480c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -2.95 (95% CI -3.46 to -2.42). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb0489c
· 99.7% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML2450
· 70.0% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_0804
· 70.5% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_0923
· 55.3% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_000503
· 99.4% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WKV7
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Uncharacterized protein Rv0479c |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv0479c; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | Protein of unknown function (DUF2993) |
| Orthologous group | 2E4QP |
| Gene Ontology (14) |
GO:0005575, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0005887, GO:0008150, GO:0016020, GO:0016021, GO:0031224, GO:0031226, GO:0040007, GO:0044425, GO:0044459 +2 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.707 · quasi-invariant (6 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 2 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 60.2%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 2/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 34.7% detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) essential
| DeJesus 2017 call | ES · essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | essential: insertions absent across the whole ORF |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
13 in the ORF —
12 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
1 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.154,
mean read count 49.5.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 13 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain
This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.
| Hypomorph strain | Rv0479c-FLAG-DAS +pTetON-18-sspB (TetON promoter 18) |
|---|---|
| Baseline knockdown fitness | 4.386 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown |
| Used in target deconvolution | yes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment) |
Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 13 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 297.0 ppm · rank 646/3519 (81.7th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (1 TM helix) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 1 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 348 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 37.0 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 9.32 |
| GRAVY | -0.196 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 88.6 |
| Aromaticity | 0.046 |
| Instability index | 41.5 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LmeA | PF11209.14 | 4.7e-19 | 133–326 | LmeA-like phospholipid-binding |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 74.1, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2
| Upstream (5' on genome) | deoC (+ strand, 24 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv0480c (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv0479c · Rv0480c
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
Rv0479c · Rv0480c
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0497) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv0479c · Rv0480c · Rv0481c
(coverage 30.44)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 23.57) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0480c (amidohydrolase), high confidence (score 882, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 142 partners at medium confidence (21 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 142 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0480c |
amidohydrolase | 882 | 882 ctx | neighborhood:881 |
Rv0481c |
hypothetical protein | 876 | 877 ctx | neighborhood:741 cooccurence:544 |
Rv0227c |
membrane protein | 771 | 772 ctx | cooccurence:760 |
Rv3810 pirG |
cell surface protein | 767 | 767 ctx | cooccurence:759 |
Rv1476 |
membrane protein | 767 | 767 ctx | cooccurence:764 |
Rv0256c PPE2 |
PPE family protein PPE2 | 749 | 749 ctx | cooccurence:746 |
Rv2721c |
hypothetical protein | 745 | 746 ctx | cooccurence:742 |
Rv1275 lprC |
lipoprotein LprC | 744 | 745 ctx | cooccurence:737 |
Rv3244c lpqB |
lipoprotein LpqB | 743 | 744 ctx | cooccurence:742 |
Rv0817c lmeA |
hypothetical protein | 737 | 737 ctx | cooccurence:737 |
Rv2342 |
hypothetical protein | 732 | 733 ctx | cooccurence:729 |
Rv2743c |
hypothetical protein | 730 | 731 ctx | cooccurence:729 |
Rv3668c |
protease | 720 | 721 ctx | cooccurence:720 |
Rv2719c chiZ |
membrane protein | 719 | 719 ctx | cooccurence:718 |
Rv3446c |
hypothetical protein | 718 | 718 ctx | cooccurence:717 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: membrane protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF2993 domain-containing protein
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): LmeA PF11209.14 (E=5e-19)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214993.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — LmeA (PF11209.14)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2E4QP - Curated reference: UniProt P9WKV7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
142 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv0480c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_000504|Rv0479c| MTNPQGPPNDPSPWARPGDQGPLARPPASSEASTGRLRPGEPAGHIQEPVSPPTQPEQQPQTEHLAASHAHTRRSGRQAAHQAWDPTGLLAAQEEEPAAVKTKRRARRDPLTVFLVLIIVFSLVLAGLIGGELYARHVANSKVAQAVACVVKDQATASFGVAPLLLWQVATRHFTNISVETAGNQIRDAKGMQIKLTIQNVRLKNTPNSRGTIGALDATITWSSEGIKESVQNAIPILGAFVTSSVVTHPADGTVELKGLLNNITAKPIVAGKGLELQIINFNTLGFSLPKETVQSTLNEFTSSLTKNYPLGIHADSVQVTSTGVVSRFSTRDAAIPTGIQNPCFSHI
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv0479c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv0479c