Rv2191 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2191 · MTBC0 - · 645 aa · 2453819–2455756 H37Rv (+) · RefSeq NP_216707.1

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • Both statements stand. UniProt labels this protein "Evidence at protein level", a curator's judgement whose basis (mass spectrometry, structure, antibody, Edman sequencing) this atlas does not record; PaxDb counts detections in 16 aggregated mass-spectrometry datasets and none detects it, which is not evidence of absence. No other channel in this atlas corroborates the label: no usable Ribo-seq listing, no experimental structure and no experimentally supported annotation on the UniProt entry. Read it as UniProt's claim, not as something this atlas could verify. (uniprot protein level vs ms undetected, 2026-10-09)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)Contains RNase_T (PF00929.32), UvrC_M (PF27096.1) domain(s); putative function inferred from the domain architecture.
Functional category (TubercuList)information pathways

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

Found under: H37Rv (1).

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

PublicationDate
Tuberculosis genes expressed during persistence and reactivation in the resistant rabbit model. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2008.08.004 2009
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2191, Mb2214, MMAR_3235, MSMEG_4259, MAB_1971c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Tuberculosis genes expressed during persistence and reactivation in the resistant rabbit model. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2008.08.004 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2009

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) antiparallel · 6 % of gene

NeighbourtrpD (Rv2192c, - strand)
Overlap126 bp, 6 % of this gene's length

antiparallel overlap: this gene may inherit essentiality/conservation signal from its neighbour through shared TA sites or promoter constraint, without any protein of its own being produced (cf. Rv2438A/nadE) Signals attributed to this gene (Tn-seq essentiality via shared TA sites, conservation via promoter constraint) should be cross-checked against the neighbour before being read as its own. P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): WhiB4 (whiB4).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.30 (95% CI -0.29 to 3.98). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.270 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=10 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2214 · 99.7% identity
M. marinum MMAR_3235 · 75.2% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_4259 · 66.4% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002262 · 99.5% identity
M. abscessus MAB_1971c · 60.0% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WLJ1 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt namePutative bifunctional exonuclease/endonuclease protein Rv2191
EC (curated) EC 3.1.-.-

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Putative bifunctional exonuclease/endonuclease protein Rv2191; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category L Replication, recombination and repair
Preferred namednaQ
eggNOG descriptionDNA polymerase III, epsilon subunit
Orthologous groupCOG0322
EC number EC 2.7.7.7
KEGG orthology K02342
KEGG pathways map00230, map00240, map01100, map03030, map03430, map03440
KEGG modules M00260
Gene Ontology (26) GO:0005575, GO:0005618, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0005737, GO:0005829, GO:0005886, GO:0006950, GO:0006974, GO:0008150, GO:0009380, GO:0009987 +14 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS 1.121 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 3 synonymous, 9 missense, 0 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 1.01% of strains (1445) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) site unique fixé — L4; union over all sites: 1 628 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:2454610:GT:G · frameshift · 1 445 strains — fixed in 2 sub-clades of L4, totalling 26 strains — 0.1% of the 54 538 strains in the lineage named (largest: L4.3.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.1 20/20, L4.3.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.1.1 6/6)
  • NC_000962.3:2455527:AG:A · frameshift · 183 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 1.122 (low power) · 4 consensus substitution(s)
low power (4 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 50/53 (94%) · mean identity 75.7% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 50/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 6/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 55.7%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 27 in the ORF — 1 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 26 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.926, mean read count 153.04. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
26 of these 27 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 1 of this ORF's 27 TA sites lies inside Rv2192c (1 site), leaving 26 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 26 exclusive sites.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length645 aa
Molecular weight69.2 kDa
Theoretical pI9.62
GRAVY-0.092 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index88.3
Aromaticity0.056
Instability index49.0 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
RNase_TPF00929.32 6.9e-3844–207 Exonuclease
UvrC_MPF27096.1 1.2e-08335–425 UvrC/Cho excinuclease, middle domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 83.5, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 83.5

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8h2f-assembly1_A 1.00 0.87 0.24 0.87 28% 27% / 98% 1.5e-11 sig 8h2f-assembly1_A Crystal structure of DnaQ domain in complex witn TMP of Streptococcus thermophilus strain DGCC 7710
2ido-assembly1_A 1.00 0.85 0.24 0.85 28% 26% / 99% 5.5e-10 sig 2ido-assembly1_A Structure of the E. coli Pol III epsilon-Hot proofreading complex
1j53-assembly1_A 1.00 0.83 0.24 0.83 28% 26% / 99% 2.8e-09 sig 1j53-assembly1_A Structure of the N-terminal Exonuclease Domain of the Epsilon Subunit of E.coli DNA Polymerase III at pH 8.5
2p1j-assembly1_A 1.00 0.81 0.21 0.81 38% 26% / 98% 5.0e-10 sig 2p1j-assembly1_A Crystal structure of a polC-type DNA polymerase III exonuclease domain from Thermotoga maritima
4fzz-assembly1_B 1.00 0.75 0.21 0.75 30% 27% / 93% 3.8e-09 sig 4fzz-assembly1_B Exonuclease X in complex with 5' overhanging duplex DNA

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 83.5, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Catalytic-site verification (M-CSA on the structural model) fold only

M-CSA entry754 · EC 3.1.11.-
Catalytic residues2/5 identical (5/5 aligned)
VerdictFOLD-ONLY (2/5 identical although 5/5 aligned: catalytic residues SUBSTITUTED) -> same fold, active site NOT retained

Catalytic residues of the matched M-CSA reference enzyme mapped onto the structural model by alignment. An active-site-conserved verdict upgrades a mere fold match to a likely active enzyme; fold-only flags a shared fold whose catalytic machinery is not retained (a guard against over-calling).

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2190c (- strand, 546 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)trpD (- strand, -126 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2247) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: polA (DNA polymerase I), high confidence (score 740, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 123 partners at medium confidence (20 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 123 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1633 uvrB exp (transferred) excinuclease ABC subunit UvrB 977 967 coexpression:670 experimental:772
Rv3644c exp (transferred) curated DNA polymerase 971 961 experimental:474 database:900
Rv0002 dnaN exp (transferred) curated DNA polymerase III subunit beta 967 954 experimental:481 database:900
Rv1547 dnaE1 exp (transferred) curated DNA polymerase III subunit alpha 976 953 experimental:510 database:900 textmining:515
Rv3721c dnaZX exp (transferred) curated DNA polymerase III subunit gamma/tau 963 949 experimental:474 database:900
Rv2413c exp (transferred) curated hypothetical protein 966 944 experimental:442 database:900 textmining:413
Rv3711c dnaQ curated paralog DNA polymerase III subunit epsilon 932 902 database:900
Rv3202c adnA ATP-dependent DNA helicase 885 841 coexpression:810
Rv3297 nei endonuclease VIII 834 803 coexpression:797
Rv3296 lhr ATP-dependent helicase 767 750 coexpression:735
Rv3585 radA DNA repair protein RadA 812 741 coexpression:734
Rv1629 polA DNA polymerase I 927 740 ctx neighborhood:544 textmining:733
Rv3555c hypothetical protein 730 731 coexpression:730
Rv0651 rplJ curated 50S ribosomal protein L10 732 723 database:588
Rv0722 rpmD curated 50S ribosomal protein L30 728 717 database:583

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): hypothetical protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): RNase_T PF00929.32 (E=7e-38), UvrC_M PF27096.1 (E=1e-08)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216707.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — RNase_T (PF00929.32), UvrC_M (PF27096.1)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0322
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WLJ1 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 83.5)
  • Catalytic-site verification: M-CSA (Ribeiro et al. 2018, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1012), entry 754; catalytic residues aligned onto the structural model
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 123 functional partner(s); context anchor polA
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv2191|
MQGPNVAAMGATGGTQLSFADLAHAQGAAWTPADEMSLRETTFVVVDLETTGGRTTGNDATPPDAITEIGAVKVCGGAVLGEFATLVNPQHSIPPQIVRLTGITTAMVGNAPTIDAVLPMFFEFAGDSVLVAHNAGFDIGFLRAAARRCDITWPQPQVLCTMRLARRVLSRDEAPSVRLAALARLFAVASNPTHRALDDARATVDVLHALIERVGNQGVHTYAELRSYLPNVTQAQRCKRVLAETLPHRPGVYLFRGPSGEVLYVGTAADLRRRVSQYFNGTDRRKRMTEMVMLASSIDHVECAHPLEAGVRELRMLSTHAPPYNRRSKFPYRWWWVALTDEAFPRLSVIRAPRHDRVVGPFRSRSKAAETAALLARCTGLRTCTTRLTRSARHGPACPELEVSACPAARDVTAAQYAEAVLRAAALIGGLDNAALAAAVQQVTELAERRRYESAARLRDHLATAIEALWHGQRLRALAALPELIAAKPDGPREGGYQLAVIRHGQLAAAGRAPRGVPPMPVVDAIRRGAQAILPTPAPLGGALVEEIALIARWLAEPGVRIVGVSNDAAGLASPVRSAGPWAAWAATARSAQLAGEQLSRGWQSDLPTEPHPSREQLFGRTGVDCRTGPPQPLLPGRQPFSTAG