Rv2645 Family assigned · medium

H37Rv Rv2645 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002820 · 143 aa · 2993684–2994115 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_217161.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand Rv2632c (Rv2632c) — family_assigned: DUF1876 domain-containing protein Rv2633c (Rv2633c) — requalified: non-heme di-iron catalase Rv2635 (Rv2635) — requalified: hypothetical protein Rv2636 (Rv2636) — family_assigned: chloramphenicol phosphotransferase CPT family protein dedA (Rv2637) — family_assigned: DedA family protein Rv2638 (Rv2638) — requalified: anti-sigma factor antagonist Rv2639c (Rv2639c) — family_assigned: YnfA family protein Rv2640c (Rv2640c) — family_assigned: Rv2640c family ArsR-like transcriptional regulator cadI (Rv2641) — requalified: cadmium-induced metalloenzyme CadI Rv2642 (Rv2642) — family_assigned: metalloregulator ArsR/SmtB family transcription factor arsC (Rv2643) — family_assigned: ACR3 family arsenite efflux transporter arsC Rv2645 (Rv2645) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv2646 (Rv2646) — requalified: tyrosine-type recombinase/integrase Rv2646 Rv2650c (Rv2650c) — requalified: phage major capsid protein Rv2650c Rv2651c (Rv2651c) — family_assigned: HK97 family phage prohead protease Rv2653c (Rv2653c) — requalified: type II toxin-antitoxin system toxin Rv2654c (Rv2654c) — requalified: type II toxin-antitoxin system antitoxin Rv2655c (Rv2655c) — family_assigned: DUF3631 domain-containing protein Rv2655c Rv2656c (Rv2656c) — dark: DUF2742 domain-containing protein Rv2657c (Rv2657c) — family_assigned: helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein Rv2658c (Rv2658c) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv2659c (Rv2659c) — requalified: tyrosine-type recombinase/integrase Rv2659c Rv2660c (Rv2660c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2661c (Rv2661c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2662 (Rv2662) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2663 (Rv2663) — requalified: hypothetical protein Rv2664 (Rv2664) — requalified: hypothetical protein Rv2665 (Rv2665) — requalified: arginine RICH protein 2 984 kb 2 988 kb 2 992 kb 2 996 kb 3 000 kb 3 004 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationhypothetical protein
Revised (this work)Immunodominant T-cell antigen encoded in region-of-difference RD13 (present in M. tuberculosis, absent from BCG and M. bovis); a cell-mediated-immunity-based diagnostic/vaccine antigen. Despite this immunological characterisation, its molecular/biochemical function remains unknown (verdict kept 'dark').
Functional category (TubercuList)unknown

Curation note: 2026-07-04 (P7.10c): verdict aligned to the pre-existing hand-curated function_revised (a functional role was already documented but the verdict had remained 'dark').

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 4 publications

Found under: H37Rv (4).

4 TB publications mention this gene. 4 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

PublicationDate
A fusion protein LT25 containing Rv2660c failed to provide protection against Mycobacterium bovis infection due to limited humoral immune responses. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2026.102771 2026
The combination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion proteins LT33 and LT28 induced strong protective immunity in mice. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1450124 2024
Recombinant BCG::Rv2645 elicits enhanced protective immunity compared to BCG in vivo with induced ISGylation-related genes and Th1 and Th17 responses. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.025 2018
Identification of a novel immunodominant antigen Rv2645 from RD13 with potential as a cell-mediated immunity-based TB diagnostic agent. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2015.07.011 2015
4 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2645 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
A fusion protein LT25 containing Rv2660c failed to provide protection against Mycobacterium bovis infection due to limited humoral immune responses. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2026.102771 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2026
The combination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion proteins LT33 and LT28 induced strong protective immunity in mice. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1450124 Front Immunol 2024
Recombinant BCG::Rv2645 elicits enhanced protective immunity compared to BCG in vivo with induced ISGylation-related genes and Th1 and Th17 responses. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.025 names it Vaccine 2018
Identification of a novel immunodominant antigen Rv2645 from RD13 with potential as a cell-mediated immunity-based TB diagnostic agent. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2015.07.011 names it J Infect 2015

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene

NeighbourRv2646 (Rv2646, + strand)
Overlap4 bp, 1 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.47 (95% CI -0.50 to 1.91). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.444 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WL51 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv2645

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv2645; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.353 · quasi-invariant (2 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 1 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 0/53 (0%) · 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives
NOT MTBC-specific despite passing the strict presence filter: no hit at pident>=30 & qcov>=50 across the 53 non-MTBC genomes, BUT sub-threshold tblastn hit(s) exist (M_shinjukuense:76.0id/17cov;n=1;mtbap=1) — the gene is PRESENT BUT DIVERGENT in at least one non-MTBC Mycobacterium, not a genus-level innovation. Do not frame as MTBC-specific nor as a host-adaptation factor. Human non-homology, if needed, must be established directly (BLASTp vs human proteome), never inferred from this field.
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
DS10 100% L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical
198a 100% L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical
RD11 100% L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 4 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 4 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 77.5. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 4 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatStatistically thin call: only 4 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 3 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance0.72 ppm · rank 3319/3519 (5.7th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length143 aa
Molecular weight15.6 kDa
Theoretical pI4.8
GRAVY-0.462 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index72.4
Aromaticity0.063
Instability index44.1 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 63.1, low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3

Upstream (5' on genome)valU (+ strand, 109 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2646 (+ strand, -4 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2645 · Rv2646 · Rv2647

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2723) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (3 TF) Rv0135c (represses) · trcR (represses) · Rv2324 (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2646 (integrase), high confidence (score 953, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 16 partners at medium confidence (8 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 16 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2646 integrase 952 953 ctx neighborhood:774 coexpression:799
Rv2647 hypothetical protein 553 553 ctx neighborhood:529
Rv2661c dark hypothetical protein 871 55 textmining:870
Rv1573 dark phage protein 630 55 textmining:625
Rv3469c mhpE 4-hydroxy-2-oxovalerate aldolase MhpE 804 47 textmining:803
Rv2738c hypothetical protein 810 46 textmining:810
Rv0310c hypothetical protein 808 46 textmining:807
Rv2290 lppO lipoprotein LppO 652 46 textmining:651
Rv1255c HTH-type transcriptional regulator 803 45 textmining:803
Rv2650c prophage protein 816 44 textmining:816
Rv2659c prophage integrase 660 44 textmining:659
Rv3221c TB7.3 acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxyl carrier protein subunit 654 44 textmining:653
Rv2291 sseB thiosulfate sulfurtransferase SseB 631 44 textmining:630
Rv3470c ilvB2 acetolactate synthase large subunit 660 42 textmining:660
Rv3669 transmembrane protein 816 41 textmining:816

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • RD13 immunodominant T-cell antigen; M.tb-specific; CMI diagnostic agent (Luo 2015, PMID 26318635)
  • BCG::Rv2645 enhances protective immunity (Luo 2018, PMID 29681409)
  • Molecular function unknown - documented antigen context only
  • Curated from the literature crible (project 'Still unknown gene function', 2026-06-09)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217161.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WL51 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 16 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2646
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: Luo W, Qu ZL, Xie Y, Xiang J, Zhang XL (2015). Identification of a novel immunodominant antigen Rv2645 from RD13 with potential as a cell-mediated immunity-based TB diagnostic agent J Infect 71(5):534-43. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2015.07.011 PMID:26318635
  • Primary literature: Luo W, Qu Z, Zhang L, Xie Y, Luo F, Tan Y, Pan Q, Zhang XL (2018). Recombinant BCG::Rv2645 elicits enhanced protective immunity compared to BCG in vivo with induced ISGylation-related genes and Th1 and Th17 responses Vaccine 36(21):2998-3009. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.025 PMID:29681409

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002820|Rv2645|
MTTTPRQPLFCAHADTNGDPGRCACGQQLADVGPATPPPPWCEPGTEPIWEQLTERYGGVTICQWTRYFPAGDPVAADVWIAADDRVVDGRVLRTQPAIHYTEPPVLGIGPAAARRLAAELLNAADTLDDGRRQLDDLGEHRR