Rv2658c Family assigned · low

H37Rv Rv2658c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002832 · 120 aa · 3001529–3001891 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217174.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand cadI (Rv2641) — requalified: cadmium-induced metalloenzyme CadI Rv2642 (Rv2642) — family_assigned: metalloregulator ArsR/SmtB family transcription factor arsC (Rv2643) — family_assigned: ACR3 family arsenite efflux transporter arsC Rv2645 (Rv2645) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv2646 (Rv2646) — requalified: tyrosine-type recombinase/integrase Rv2646 Rv2650c (Rv2650c) — requalified: phage major capsid protein Rv2650c Rv2651c (Rv2651c) — family_assigned: HK97 family phage prohead protease Rv2653c (Rv2653c) — requalified: type II toxin-antitoxin system toxin Rv2654c (Rv2654c) — requalified: type II toxin-antitoxin system antitoxin Rv2655c (Rv2655c) — family_assigned: DUF3631 domain-containing protein Rv2655c Rv2656c (Rv2656c) — dark: DUF2742 domain-containing protein Rv2657c (Rv2657c) — family_assigned: helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein Rv2658c (Rv2658c) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv2659c (Rv2659c) — requalified: tyrosine-type recombinase/integrase Rv2659c Rv2660c (Rv2660c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2661c (Rv2661c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2662 (Rv2662) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2663 (Rv2663) — requalified: hypothetical protein Rv2664 (Rv2664) — requalified: hypothetical protein Rv2665 (Rv2665) — requalified: arginine RICH protein Rv2668 (Rv2668) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv2669 (Rv2669) — requalified: N-acetyltransferase zapE (Rv2670c) — requalified: cell division protein ZapE zapE ribD (Rv2671) — requalified: bifunctional diaminohydroxyphosphoribosylaminopyrimidine dea Rv2672 (Rv2672) — requalified: alpha/beta fold hydrolase Rv2672 aftC (Rv2673) — requalified: arabinofuranan 3-O-arabinosyltransferase aftC msrB (Rv2674) — requalified: peptide-methionine (R)-S-oxide reductase MsrB Rv2675c (Rv2675c) — requalified: class I SAM-dependent methyltransferase 2 992 kb 2 996 kb 3 000 kb 3 004 kb 3 008 kb 3 012 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)prophage protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationhypothetical protein
Revised (this work)Protein of prophage phiRv2, within region-of-difference RD11; hypoxia-induced and recognised as an antigen. A prophage-encoded protein whose enzymatic/molecular function is unknown.
Functional category (TubercuList)insertion seqs and phages

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 2 publications

2 TB publications mention this gene. 2 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 2 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Distribution and function of prophage phiRv1 and phiRv2 among Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. doi:10.1080/07391102.2015.1022602 2016
Hypoxia induces an immunodominant target of tuberculosis specific T cells absent from common BCG vaccines. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001237 2010
2 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2658c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Distribution and function of prophage phiRv1 and phiRv2 among Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. doi:10.1080/07391102.2015.1022602 J Biomol Struct Dyn 2016
Hypoxia induces an immunodominant target of tuberculosis specific T cells absent from common BCG vaccines. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001237 PLoS Pathog 2010

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): PyrR (pyrR).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.97 (95% CI -0.29 to 2.78). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.371 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WL47 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv2658c

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv2658c; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 2/53 (4%) · mean identity 34.8% · 1/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (2/53 NTM; in 1 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
DS10 100% L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical
198a 100% L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical
RD11 100% L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 13 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 13 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.923, mean read count 176.583333333. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 13 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance130.0 ppm · rank 1110/3519 (68.5th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length120 aa
Molecular weight13.3 kDa
Theoretical pI5.49
GRAVY-0.179 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index83.9
Aromaticity0.067
Instability index52.5 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 81.2, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 6

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2657c (- strand, 16 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2659c (- strand, 2 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2654c · Rv2655c · Rv2656c · Rv2657c · Rv2658c · Rv2659c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 6: Rv2656c · Rv2657c · Rv2658c · Rv2659c · Rv2660c · Rv2661c — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2734.1) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv2657c · Rv2658c · Rv2659c (coverage 70.12)
stationary phase: operon of 3, Rv2657c · Rv2658c · Rv2659c (coverage 65.76) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (3 TF) whiB5 (activates) · Rv1816 (activates) · Rv1985c (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2659c (prophage integrase), high confidence (score 953, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 14 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2659c prophage integrase 993 953 ctx neighborhood:773 coexpression:801 textmining:861
Rv2657c prophage protein 877 757 ctx neighborhood:755 textmining:514
Rv2655c prophage protein 747 748 ctx neighborhood:746
Rv2654c antitoxin 852 747 ctx neighborhood:746 textmining:441
Rv2656c dark prophage protein 901 746 ctx neighborhood:746 textmining:629
Rv2653c toxin 770 543 ctx neighborhood:541 textmining:516
Rv2661c dark hypothetical protein 816 484 ctx neighborhood:481 textmining:659
Rv2660c dark hypothetical protein 485 484 ctx neighborhood:481
Rv2652c prophage protein 476 476 ctx neighborhood:473
Rv1986 lysE amino acid transporter 444 55 textmining:436
Rv1978 hypothetical protein 439 51 textmining:434
Rv1981c nrdF1 ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase subunit beta NrdF1 548 47 textmining:546
Rv1511 gmdA GDP-D-mannose dehydratase GmdA 630 41 textmining:630
Rv3429 PPE59 PPE family protein PPE59 511 41 textmining:511

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Prophage phiRv2 / RD11 protein; expression varies with stress (Fan 2016, PMID 25855385)
  • Hypoxia-induced antigen (Gideon 2010, PMID 21203487)
  • Curated from the literature crible (project 'Still unknown gene function', 2026-06-09)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217174.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WL47 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 81.2)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 14 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2659c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: Fan X, Abd Alla AA, Xie J (2016). Distribution and function of prophage phiRv1 and phiRv2 among Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex J Biomol Struct Dyn 34(2):233-8. doi:10.1080/07391102.2015.1022602 PMID:25855385
  • Primary literature: Gideon HP, Wilkinson KA, Rustad TR, Oni T, Guio H, Kozak RA, Sherman DR, Meintjes G, Behr MA, Vordermeier HM, Young DB, Wilkinson RJ (2010). Hypoxia induces an immunodominant target of tuberculosis specific T cells absent from common BCG vaccines PLoS Pathog 6(12):e1001237. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001237 PMID:21203487

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002832|Rv2658c|
MADAVKYVVMCNCDDEPGALIIAWIDDERPAGGHIQMRSNTRFTETQWGRHIEWKLECRACRKYAPISEMTAAAILDGFGAKLHELRTSTIPDADDPSIAEARHVIPFSALCLRLSQLGG