Rv2660c Still unknown · low auto-curated
H37Rv Rv2660c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002834 ·
75 aa ·
3003166–3003393 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_217176.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | Conserved hypothetical protein; no recognised domain. Function unknown. Foldseek best (non-significant) hit: 8pui-assembly1_A human PHOX2B C-terminal domain including the polyA fr (prob 0.02, TM 0.30). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
Curation note: 2026-10-02 (mtbc/Rv2660c project, back-propagation P52.2, destination C1, status: unpublished, not peer-reviewed). The dedicated Rv2660c project re-extracted the signal mapped onto this locus across the 647 samples of the RNA-seq compendium behind the iModulon entry above (Yoo et al. 2022). Values are log2 fold changes against the compendium reference condition, not absolute abundances, and the strand-specificity of the 53 source studies is not guaranteed, which matters here because the locus lies on the strand opposite the small RNA ncRv12659 (Houghton et al. 2013). Three observations. (1) The strongest group signal is Rho depletion (Botella et al. 2017; 19 samples, mean +1.53, maximum +5.10 after 9 h), a condition reported to cause pervasive, largely antisense transcription; the project reads it as probable artefact, not regulation. (2) In the oxygen-controlled time course (Peterson et al. 2019, GSE116353, 54 samples) the signal drops to its floor value (-4.32, 10 samples between 40 and 50 h, as dissolved oxygen reaches zero) and is back near the reference at 70 h (+0.52, 2 samples), so it is not a sustained repression. (3) The project reports no frank physiological induction in the compendium. This is a qualitative reading without a stated threshold: 27 of the 647 samples reach +2 or more, 7 of them in Rho depletion and the others in series labelled lipid:dextrose_stat (up to +4.76), sutez:1_days_5.6 (+4.34), JSF_2019 (+3.75), dormant_20d_rifampicin (+3.15) and biofilm (+3.05), so the absence of a frank induction depends on where the line is drawn. This refines the iModulon entry (a co-expression context, not a function); the statement above that induction evidence is disqualified is unchanged and does not demonstrate absence. Transcription only: chronic granulomatous infection is not covered by the compendium.
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) antigen / vaccine
38 TB publications mention this gene. Latency-associated antigen: component of the H56 vaccine candidate (Ag85B-ESAT6-Rv2660c) and of many multistage vaccine constructs (nanoparticle, DNA, fusion proteins) in preclinical/clinical development. Heavily studied immunologically, yet its molecular function remains unknown -- and the PROTECTIVE part of that antigen status is itself contested, on two independent grounds established by the dedicated Rv2660c characterisation project: the H56:IC31 phase 2b efficacy trial missed its primary endpoint (vaccine efficacy -73.8%, 95% CI -246.9 to 9.8, n=831; Borges et al., Lancet Infect Dis 2025, PMID 40056922), and the three historical reports of induction in latency all rest on strand-blind microarrays, while the only strand-resolved measurement ever published at this locus detects neither transcript nor protein (Houghton et al., PLoS ONE 2013, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080047). That disqualifies the EVIDENCE for latency induction; it does not demonstrate absence. Verbatim wording of the counter-expertise, and its own stated limits (transcription only, chronic granulomatous infection not covered), in mtbc/en_cours/Rv2660c/etat_des_decouvertes.md (annotation_mtbc P52.3, 2026-09-29). reformulation, not a quotation
Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 38 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 38 — both sources find literature. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| A fusion protein LT25 containing Rv2660c failed to provide protection against M. bovis infection due to limited humoral immune responses doi:10.1016/j.tube.2026.102771 | 2026-04-27 |
| Novel Multistage Subunit M. tuberculosis Nanoparticle Vaccine (ESAT6-CFP10-Ag85A-Rv2660c-Rv1813c) doi:10.3390/vaccines14010005 | 2025-12-19 |
| Therapeutic vaccination with the Ag85B-Rv2660c-MPT70 fusion protein enhances M. tuberculosis clearance doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1624923 | 2025-08-14 |
42 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 38 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)
Searched as: Rv2660c, Mb2678c
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) dark by construction (IDR-orphan)
| Predicted disorder | 76% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 48.4 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 75 aa [0-75] |
both sequence (metapredict) and structure (low AlphaFold pLDDT) indicate little stable globular structure: this gene is dark BY CONSTRUCTION — there is no confident fold for structure/homology search to match, so its obscurity is expected, not a pipeline failure
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
How to read this gene's constraint (qualifying attributes, not exclusions) WEAK
| Lineage-variable | Overlaps a Region of Difference, i.e. it is DELETED IN AT LEAST ONE LINEAGE. That is a statement about lineage-specific gene loss -- informative for host adaptation -- and not about the gene being mobile or expendable. Rv2660c, deleted in L6/L7/Bovis, is a component of the H56 vaccine. |
|---|
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 2 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv2661c (Rv2661c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 2 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
SG_9.
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2678c
· 98.6% identity |
|---|---|
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002744
· 98.6% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
I6Y1F5
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Predicted
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Uncharacterized protein |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 3 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 1 consensus substitution(s) low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 1/53 (2%) · mean identity 56.4%
· 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives SENSITIVITY DOWNGRADE: a divergent homolog is detectable at relaxed thresholds (weak hit 56%/52%cov in M_paragordonae — likely present but divergent); NOT a robust MTBC-specific innovation — present but divergent. The strict tblastn absence was a coverage/identity-threshold artefact. |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria short ORF (75 aa) a shallow stratum may reflect homology-detection failure, not true youth present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)
| RD | Gene overlap | Deleted in lineages |
|---|---|---|
RD11 |
16% | L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical |
DS10 |
4% | L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical |
198a |
4% | L7, L6, Bovis, La4, Caprae, Canettii (98%), L4.13 (76%), L1 (64%), Mungi n=1, not statistical |
This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
5 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
5 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 94.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 5 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Read with some caution: only 5 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 5 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected
Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 75 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 7.6 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 4.83 |
| GRAVY | 0.127 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 76.8 |
| Aromaticity | 0.067 |
| Instability index | 38.5 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 48.4, very low), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 40.3 (very low). Low-confidence model: the fold may be unreliable, so treat these structural hits with caution.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8pui-assembly1_A |
0.02 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 26% | 76% / 59% | 8.2e+00 | 8pui-assembly1_A human PHOX2B C-terminal domain including the polyA fragment at 298K |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv2659c (- strand, 144 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2661c (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv2660c · Rv2661c
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 6:
Rv2656c · Rv2657c · Rv2658c · Rv2659c · Rv2660c · Rv2661c
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2736) |
not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase) |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2659c (prophage integrase), medium confidence (score 486, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 22 partners at medium confidence (2 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 22 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2661c dark |
hypothetical protein | 776 | 775 ctx | neighborhood:773 |
Rv2662 dark |
hypothetical protein | 577 | 577 ctx | neighborhood:572 |
Rv2659c |
prophage integrase | 486 | 486 ctx | neighborhood:481 |
Rv2658c |
prophage protein | 485 | 484 ctx | neighborhood:481 |
Rv2656c dark |
prophage protein | 476 | 476 ctx | neighborhood:461 |
Rv2654c |
antitoxin | 476 | 476 ctx | neighborhood:461 |
Rv2655c |
prophage protein | 469 | 469 ctx | neighborhood:461 |
Rv2657c |
prophage protein | 511 | 464 ctx | neighborhood:461 |
Rv2663 |
hypothetical protein | 406 | 406 ctx | neighborhood:403 |
Rv1954c |
hypothetical protein | 641 | 70 | textmining:630 |
Rv3288c usfY |
hypothetical protein | 664 | 53 | textmining:660 |
Rv1374c dark |
hypothetical protein | 562 | 50 | textmining:558 |
Rv1168c PPE17 |
PPE family protein PPE17 | 514 | 50 | textmining:510 |
Rv2558 |
hypothetical protein | 731 | 47 | textmining:730 |
Rv2557 |
hypothetical protein | 515 | 47 | textmining:512 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: hypothetical protein
- Foldseek best: 8pui-assembly1_A human PHOX2B C-terminal domain including the polyA fragment at (prob 0.02, E=8e+00, TM=0.30)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217176.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Curated reference: UniProt I6Y1F5 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 40.3, very low)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
22 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv2659c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002834|Rv2660c| MIAGVDQALAATGQASQRAAGASGGVTVGVGVGTEQRNLSVVAPSQFTFSSRSPDFVDETAGQSWCAILGLNQFH
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2660c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2660c