rplO Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv0723 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000765 · 146 aa · 819383–819823 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_215237.1

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • Both signals are true at once. The 11 PDB entries for this gene are WHOLE-RIBOSOME maps: the protein appears there as a subunit resolved inside the assembly, not as the subject of a study aimed at it. "An experimental structure exists" therefore does not mean, here, that somebody purified and published this protein, and it does not contradict the literature sweep's silence on its locus tag. Reviewed one by one on 2026-09-10. (structure vs unstudied, 2026-09-10)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)50S ribosomal protein L15
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation50S ribosomal protein L15
Revised (this work)50S ribosomal protein L15. Pfam: Ribosomal_L27A (PF00828.26).
Functional category (TubercuList)information pathways

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its atlas annotation was built from sequence/structure evidence; UniProt nevertheless carries a reviewed entry with a named function for this protein, and experimental evidence that the protein exists (see below), so the absence of a locus-tag mention should not be read as the absence of any study.

Silent tag, studied protein. No publication mentions this LOCUS TAG, yet UniProt P9WHD7 is a reviewed SwissProt entry named 'Large ribosomal subunit protein uL15', at protein-existence level 1 (the protein has been detected experimentally). So the tag is silent while the protein is named and known to exist: do not read 'unstudied' as 'uncharacterised' here. Note the limit of this cross-check: UniProt's protein-existence level says the PROTEIN was observed, not that its FUNCTION was experimentally established, and this atlas does not store the per-annotation evidence codes that would settle that. Read the UniProt entry itself before citing the function as experimentally demonstrated.
Named in the body of 35 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv0723 (3), rplO (32).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “Large ribosomal subunit protein uL15”: nothing found. no abstract in PubMed contains this protein name in a mycobacterial context: the silence measured under the locus tag is confirmed under the protein name.

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

1 record returned by the alias sweep — none names this gene

Searched as: Rv0723, rplO, Mb0744, ML1840c, MMAR_1054, MSMEG_1474, MAB_3793c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

This count is not a count of papers about this gene. The alias sweep of 2026-09-07 returned 1 publication(s) for this gene. Of these, 1 carry the string « rplO » in title, abstract or author keywords, but NONE of them names a mycobacterium anywhere in that text: they are about the gene of the same name in another organism, or the string is an unrelated acronym (PMID 24215713 (Biochim Biophys Acta, 2014)). The remaining 0 match elsewhere in the PubMed record (a journal name, a DOI, an affiliation, an author name). A shared gene name is not an attribution: nothing here contradicts the statement above that no publication mentions this gene.

PublicationJournalYear
Classical NF-κB activation impairs skeletal muscle oxidative phenotype by reducing IKK-α expression. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.11.001 same name, other organism Biochim Biophys Acta 2014

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder30% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 95.3
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 43 aa [0-43]

carries a substantial disordered region (43/146 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourrpmD (Rv0722, + strand)
Overlap1 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): WhiB1 (whiB1).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -15.14 (95% CI -17.77 to -12.53). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionThis protein binds directly to 23S ribosomal RNA.

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0744 · 98.6% identity
M. leprae ML1840c · 82.2% identity
M. marinum MMAR_1054 · 88.4% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_1474 · 83.3% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000761 · 98.6% identity
M. abscessus MAB_3793c · 78.1% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WHD7 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameLarge ribosomal subunit protein uL15
Curated functionBinds to the 23S rRNA.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category J Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
Preferred namerplO
eggNOG descriptionBinds to the 23S rRNA
Orthologous groupCOG0200
KEGG orthology K02876
KEGG pathways map03010
KEGG modules M00178, M00179
Gene Ontology (28) GO:0003674, GO:0003735, GO:0005198, GO:0005575, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0005737, GO:0005829, GO:0005840, GO:0005886, GO:0015934, GO:0016020 +16 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS n/a
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.242 (low power) · 5 consensus substitution(s)
low power (5 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 88.7% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 13/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 64.1%
detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callUncertain · uncertain
What the call meansuncertain (short or TA-poor ORF): no call possible
TA sites (Himar1) 3 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 3 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.333, mean read count 105. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 3 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatStatistically thin call: only 3 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 14 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance1400.0 ppm · rank 152/3519 (95.7th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length146 aa
Molecular weight15.5 kDa
Theoretical pI11.34
GRAVY-0.464 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index76.2
Aromaticity0.041
Instability index16.1 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Ribosomal_L27APF00828.26 1.0e-1876–144 Ribosomal proteins 50S-L15, 50S-L18e, 60S-L27A

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 7sfr (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 11 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
7sfr Electron Microscopy 2.6 Å 100%
7kgb Electron Microscopy 2.7 Å 100%
7mt7 Electron Microscopy 2.71 Å 100%
7mt2 Electron Microscopy 2.76 Å 100%
7msm Electron Microscopy 2.79 Å 100%
7mt3 Electron Microscopy 2.8 Å 100%
7msc Electron Microscopy 2.97 Å 100%
7msz Electron Microscopy 3.1 Å 100%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (11 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 95.3

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8kab-assembly1_M 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 83% 99% / 100% 1.1e-21 sig 8kab-assembly1_M Mycobacterium smegmatis 50S ribosomal subunit-HflX complex
7f0d-assembly1_L 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.97 100% 97% / 100% 7.6e-22 sig 7f0d-assembly1_L Cryo-EM structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis 50S ribosome subunit bound with clarithromycin
8cvm-assembly1_k 1.00 0.95 0.93 0.95 60% 99% / 100% 6.2e-17 sig 8cvm-assembly1_k Cutibacterium acnes 50S ribosomal subunit with P-site tRNA and Sarecycline bound in the local refined map
7p7r-assembly1_O 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 49% 99% / 100% 2.0e-13 sig 7p7r-assembly1_O PoxtA-EQ2 antibiotic resistance ABCF bound to E. faecalis 70S ribosome, state I
8qpp-assembly1_i 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 49% 99% / 100% 5.0e-12 sig 8qpp-assembly1_i Bacillus subtilis MutS2-collided disome complex (stalled 70S)

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 95.3, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 7

Upstream (5' on genome)rpmD (+ strand, -1 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)sppA (+ strand, 32 bp gap)
Predicted operon rpsH · rplF · rplR · rpsE · rpmD · rplO · sppA

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 10: rplN · rplX · rplE · rpsN1 · rpsH · rplF · rplR · rpsE · rpmD · rplO — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0748) exponential phase: operon of 12, Rv0714 · Rv0715 · Rv0716 · Rv0717 · Rv0718 · Rv0719 · Rv0720 · Rv0721 · Rv0722 · Rv0723 · Rv0724 (coverage 167.8)
stationary phase: operon of 6, Rv0718 · Rv0719 · Rv0720 · Rv0721 · Rv0722 · Rv0723 (coverage 14.9) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: rplN (50S ribosomal protein L14), high confidence (score 1000, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 314 partners at medium confidence (146 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 314 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0714 rplN exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L14 999 1000 ctx neighborhood:714 coexpression:875 experimental:999 database:635 textmining:456
Rv3460c rpsM exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S13 999 1000 ctx cooccurence:520 coexpression:745 experimental:999
Rv0701 rplC exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L3 999 1000 ctx cooccurence:579 coexpression:911 experimental:999 database:758 textmining:582
Rv2909c rpsP exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S16 999 1000 coexpression:863 experimental:999
Rv1642 rpmI exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L35 999 1000 coexpression:844 experimental:999
Rv0715 rplX exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L24 999 1000 ctx neighborhood:714 coexpression:887 experimental:999 database:546
Rv0710 rpsQ exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S17 999 1000 ctx cooccurence:438 coexpression:968 experimental:999 textmining:470
Rv3461c rpmJ exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L36 999 1000 coexpression:865 experimental:999
Rv0716 rplE exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L5 999 1000 ctx neighborhood:714 cooccurence:532 coexpression:906 experimental:999 database:635
Rv2785c rpsO exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S15 999 1000 ctx cooccurence:502 coexpression:862 experimental:999
Rv0709 rpmC exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L29 999 1000 coexpression:969 experimental:999 database:635
Rv0721 rpsE exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S5 999 1000 ctx neighborhood:882 cooccurence:485 coexpression:976 experimental:999
Rv0718 rpsH exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S8 999 1000 ctx neighborhood:825 cooccurence:477 coexpression:964 experimental:999
Rv0704 rplB exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L2 999 1000 ctx cooccurence:412 coexpression:969 experimental:999 database:613
Rv0055 rpsR1 exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S18 999 1000 coexpression:733 experimental:999

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: 50S ribosomal protein L15
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: 50S ribosomal protein L15
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Ribosomal_L27A PF00828.26 (E=1e-18)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215237.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Ribosomal_L27A (PF00828.26)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0200
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WHD7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 95.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 314 functional partner(s); context anchor rplN
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000765|Rv0723|rplO
MTLKLHDLRPARGSKTARTRVGRGDGSKGKTAGRGTKGTRARKQVPVTFEGGQMPIHMRLPKLKGFRNRFRTEYEIVNVGDINRLFPQGGAVGVDDLVAKGAVRKNALVKVLGDGKLTAKVDVSAHKFSGSARAKITAAGGSATEL