rplE Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv0716 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000758 ·
187 aa ·
816252–816815 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_215230.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | 50S ribosomal protein L5 |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | 50S ribosomal protein L5 |
| Revised (this work) | 50S ribosomal protein L5. Pfam: Ribosomal_L5 (PF00281.25), Ribosomal_L5_C (PF00673.27). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | information pathways |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 2 publications
2 TB publications mention this gene. 2 publication(s) discuss this gene (2 in a M. tuberculosis context).
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| Bioinformatic and mass spectrometry identification of Anaplasma phagocytophilum proteins translocated into host cell nuclei. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00055 | 2015 |
| cDNA-RNA subtractive hybridization reveals increased expression of mycocerosic acid synthase in intracellular Mycobacterium bovis BCG. doi:10.1099/00221287-147-8-2293 | 2001 |
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | rplX (Rv0715, + strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 1 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
WhiB1 (whiB1).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -16.49 (95% CI -17.50 to -15.50). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, pebble.rockefeller.edu).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | This is one of 3 proteins that mediate the attachment of the 5S RNA into the large ribosomal subunit. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb0737
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML1847c
· 91.4% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_1047
· 91.9% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_1467
· 83.4% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_000754
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_3805c
· 82.9% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WH83
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Large ribosomal subunit protein uL5 |
| Curated function | This is one of the proteins that bind and probably mediate the attachment of the 5S RNA into the large ribosomal subunit, where it forms part of the central protuberance. In the 70S ribosome it contacts protein S13 of the 30S subunit (bridge B1b), connecting the 2 subunits; this bridge is implicated in subunit movement. Contacts the P site tRNA; the 5S rRNA and some of its associated proteins might help stabilize positioning of ribosome-bound tRNAs. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
J Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | rplE |
| eggNOG description | This is 1 of the proteins that binds and probably mediates the attachment of the 5S RNA into the large ribosomal subunit, where it forms part of the central protuberance. In the 70S ribosome it contacts protein S13 of the 30S subunit (bridge B1b), connecting the 2 subunits |
| Orthologous group | COG0094 |
| KEGG orthology |
K02931
|
| KEGG pathways |
map03010
|
| KEGG modules |
M00178, M00179
|
| Gene Ontology (76) |
GO:0000027, GO:0003674, GO:0003676, GO:0003723, GO:0003735, GO:0005198, GO:0005488, GO:0005575, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0005737, GO:0005829 +64 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 145 209 strains)
| pN/pS | 0.327 · purifying |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 2 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 2 consensus substitution(s) low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 91.1%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 13/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 73.0% detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) essential
| DeJesus 2017 call | ES · essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | essential: insertions absent across the whole ORF |
| TA sites (Himar1) | 4 in the ORF — 4 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.000, mean read count 0. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction. |
| Caveat | Statistically thin call: only 4 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain
This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.
| Hypomorph strain | Rv0716 (rplE) -FLAG-DAS +pTetON-18 sspB (TetON promoter 18) |
|---|---|
| Baseline knockdown fitness | 3.25 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown |
| Used in target deconvolution | yes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment) |
Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 1415.0 ppm · rank 149/3519 (95.8th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Reproducible detection across several independent datasets (PaxDb) makes the existence claim robust; the integrated abundance places the protein in the proteome's dynamic range.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 187 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 21.0 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 10.09 |
| GRAVY | -0.344 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 88.1 |
| Aromaticity | 0.07 |
| Instability index | 16.3 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ribosomal_L5 | PF00281.25 | 1.1e-26 | 31–87 | Ribosomal protein L5 |
Ribosomal_L5_C | PF00673.27 | 1.0e-38 | 91–184 | ribosomal L5P family C-terminus |
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 11 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
7kgb |
Electron Microscopy | 2.7 Å | 100% |
7mt7 |
Electron Microscopy | 2.71 Å | 100% |
7mt2 |
Electron Microscopy | 2.76 Å | 100% |
7msm |
Electron Microscopy | 2.79 Å | 100% |
7mt3 |
Electron Microscopy | 2.8 Å | 100% |
7msc |
Electron Microscopy | 2.97 Å | 100% |
7msz |
Electron Microscopy | 3.1 Å | 100% |
7msh |
Electron Microscopy | 3.23 Å | 100% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (11 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 91.6
| PDB hit | prob | TM-score | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
8wi7-assembly1_H |
1.00 | 0.99 | 4.7e-33 sig | 8wi7-assembly1_H Cryo- EM structure of Mycobacterium smegmatis 70S ribosome, bS1 and RafH. |
7sfr-assembly1_F |
1.00 | 0.98 | 2.0e-32 sig | 7sfr-assembly1_F Unmethylated Mtb Ribosome 50S with SEQ-9 |
8crx-assembly1_f |
1.00 | 0.98 | 1.5e-29 sig | 8crx-assembly1_f Cutibacterium acnes 70S ribosome with mRNA, P-site tRNA and Sarecycline bound |
8cvm-assembly1_f |
1.00 | 0.98 | 2.9e-29 sig | 8cvm-assembly1_f Cutibacterium acnes 50S ribosomal subunit with P-site tRNA and Sarecycline bound in the local refined map |
8qcq-assembly1_F |
1.00 | 0.99 | 5.3e-28 sig | 8qcq-assembly1_F B. subtilis ApdA-stalled ribosomal complex |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 91.6, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4
| Upstream (5' on genome) | rplX (+ strand, -1 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | rpsN1 (+ strand, 4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
rplN · rplX · rplE · rpsN1
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = hypothetical; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: rplB (50S ribosomal protein L2), high confidence from genomic context alone (score 1000 excluding text-mining).
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0055 rpsR1 exp |
30S ribosomal protein S18 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:733 experimental:999 |
Rv0704 rplB exp |
50S ribosomal protein L2 | 999 | 1000 ctx | cooccurence:748 coexpression:972 experimental:999 database:617 textmining:847 |
Rv2904c rplS exp |
50S ribosomal protein L19 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:827 experimental:999 textmining:594 |
Rv0718 rpsH exp |
30S ribosomal protein S8 | 999 | 1000 ctx | neighborhood:746 cooccurence:749 coexpression:973 experimental:999 textmining:519 |
Rv0053 rpsF exp |
30S ribosomal protein S6 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:864 experimental:999 |
Rv0708 rplP exp |
50S ribosomal protein L16 | 999 | 1000 ctx | cooccurence:609 coexpression:886 experimental:999 database:461 textmining:702 |
Rv0705 rpsS exp |
30S ribosomal protein S19 | 999 | 1000 ctx | cooccurence:732 coexpression:946 experimental:999 textmining:602 |
Rv0703 rplW exp |
50S ribosomal protein L23 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:967 experimental:999 database:597 textmining:858 |
Rv3458c rpsD exp |
30S ribosomal protein S4 | 999 | 1000 ctx | cooccurence:607 coexpression:865 experimental:999 |
Rv0683 rpsG exp |
30S ribosomal protein S7 | 999 | 1000 ctx | cooccurence:423 coexpression:864 experimental:999 |
Rv0714 rplN exp |
50S ribosomal protein L14 | 999 | 1000 ctx | neighborhood:881 cooccurence:747 coexpression:981 experimental:999 database:638 textmining:777 |
Rv2909c rpsP exp |
30S ribosomal protein S16 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:860 experimental:999 textmining:579 |
Rv0701 rplC exp |
50S ribosomal protein L3 | 999 | 1000 ctx | cooccurence:663 coexpression:960 experimental:999 database:620 textmining:721 |
Rv1642 rpmI exp |
50S ribosomal protein L35 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:836 experimental:999 |
Rv3460c rpsM exp |
30S ribosomal protein S13 | 999 | 1000 ctx | cooccurence:763 coexpression:755 experimental:999 textmining:592 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The exp badge marks an experimentally-supported partner (measured interaction, experimental/database channel ≥400) as opposed to a purely predicted one — but note that the M. tuberculosis experimental interactome is dominated by a noisy bacterial-two-hybrid screen, so a strong measured link that contradicts the operon/localisation context is likely a false positive. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: 50S ribosomal protein L5
- MTBC0 PGAP product: 50S ribosomal protein L5
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Ribosomal_L5 PF00281.25 (E=1e-26), Ribosomal_L5_C PF00673.27 (E=1e-38)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215230.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Ribosomal_L5 (PF00281.25), Ribosomal_L5_C (PF00673.27)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG0094 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WH83 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 145 209 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 91.6)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
245 functional partner(s); context anchor
rplB - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_000758|Rv0716|rplE MTTAQKVQPRLKERYRSEIRDALRKQFGYGNVMQIPTVTKVVVNMGVGEAARDAKLINGAVNDLALITGQKPEVRRARKSIAQFKLREGMPVGVRVTLRGDRMWEFLDRLTSIALPRIRDFRGLSPKQFDGVGNYTFGLAEQAVFHEVDVDKIDRVRGMDINVVTSAATDDEGRALLRALGFPFKEN
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for rplE? Email the maintainer — the message is pre-filled with this gene's details.