Rv2681 Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2681 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002855 · 438 aa · 3019154–3020470 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_217197.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationribonuclease D
Revised (this work)Ribonuclease D. Pfam: DNA_pol_A_exo1 (PF01612.27), HRDC (PF00570.29), DNA_pol_A_exoN (PF18305.7).
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

Found under: H37Rv (1).

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

PublicationDate
Distribution of Common and Rare Genetic Markers of Second-Line-Injectable-Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Revealed by a Genome-Wide Association Study. doi:10.1128/aac.02075-21 2022
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2681, Mb2700, ML1040c, MMAR_2035, MSMEG_2778, MAB_2988 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Distribution of Common and Rare Genetic Markers of Second-Line-Injectable-Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Revealed by a Genome-Wide Association Study. doi:10.1128/aac.02075-21 Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder16% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 90.2
Disordered regions3 IDR(s), longest 27 aa [0-27, 318-345, 423-438]

carries a substantial disordered region (69/438 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 6.0

disruption confers tolerance to Isoniazid; mixed in vivo signal: required in 3 of 5 significant measurements, disruption advantageous in 2 — the data supports no single direction.

Corroborating evidenceconserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; structural lead available

This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) antiparallel · 0 % of gene

Neighbourdxs (Rv2682c, - strand)
Overlap4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

antiparallel overlap: this gene may inherit essentiality/conservation signal from its neighbour through shared TA sites or promoter constraint, without any protein of its own being produced (cf. Rv2438A/nadE) Signals attributed to this gene (Tn-seq essentiality via shared TA sites, conservation via promoter constraint) should be cross-checked against the neighbour before being read as its own. P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.07 (95% CI -1.54 to 4.62). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.216 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (EC number, COG category, requalified function). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2700 · 99.8% identity
M. leprae ML1040c · 72.4% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2035 · 71.6% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_2778 · 63.5% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002765 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2988 · 58.1% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt I6XF17 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameConserved hypothetical alanine rich protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category J Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
Preferred namernd
eggNOG description3'-5' exonuclease
Orthologous groupCOG0349
EC number EC 3.1.13.5
KEGG orthology K03684

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.279 · quasi-invariant (7 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 4 synonymous, 3 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.124 (low power) · 4 consensus substitution(s)
low power (4 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 77.6% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 11/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 49.0%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) cholesterol-required

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 20 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 20 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.900, mean read count 53.3888888889. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
19 of these 20 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 1 of this ORF's 20 TA sites lies inside Rv2682c (1 site), leaving 19 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 19 exclusive sites.
Cholesterol catabolismrequired for growth on cholesterol (Griffin 2011)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Conditional fitness (RB-TnSeq, 95 conditions) stress

ConditionGroupDirectionlog2 fitnesst
Isoniazid stress mutant enriched (loss advantageous) 1.673 5.657

Randomly-barcoded transposon screen across 95 carbon/nitrogen sources, pH, stressors and antibiotics (1 condition-specific phenotype(s) for this gene). A conditional fitness phenotype is a context lead, not a proven function, and never changes the verdict here. Note the blind spot: RB-TnSeq cannot measure essential genes. Source: RB-TnSeq 95-condition barcoded transposon screen, Mtb (PLoS Biol 2026, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003529).

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) -3.370.002 required
altered fitness under Isoniazid (drug exposure) +2.340.024 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.270.021 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.150.017 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.830.0 disruption advantageous
differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) -1.510.0 required
Mutants exhibiting altered fitness in the absence of gene marP (other) +1.370.0069 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.250.014 disruption advantageous

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 8 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.

Provenance note on a condition above. `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` carries no source in MtbTnDB's own metadata (col_desc.tsv leaves paper_title/paper_URL empty). Traced by the `Rv0537c` companion project (2026-09-12): Weizhen Xu, PhD thesis, Weill Cornell Medicine, 2017, hdl:1813/64728 ("Genetic Screening In Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Utilizing Transposon Insertion Sequencing"), whose abstract describes a TnSeq genetic-interaction screen naming marP. Never published as a peer-reviewed article.

Provenance note on a condition above. This gene's displayed phenotypes include both `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` and a drug-exposure condition from Xu et al. 2017 (AAC 61(12):e01334-17). Both trace to the same experimenter (Weizhen Xu) and very likely the same transposon insertion library -- read them as ONE handle, not two independent ones, when assessing convergence for an `integrative_lead` flip.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 12 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance40.6 ppm · rank 1891/3519 (46.3th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length438 aa
Molecular weight47.2 kDa
Theoretical pI5.57
GRAVY-0.226 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index92.2
Aromaticity0.053
Instability index53.9 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DNA_pol_A_exo1PF01612.27 1.1e-3545–201 3'-5' exonuclease
HRDCPF00570.29 7.0e-13249–314 HRDC domain
DNA_pol_A_exoNPF18305.7 3.3e-24333–424 3' to 5' exonuclease C-terminal domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 90.2, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). The catalytic residues confirmed by the M-CSA active-site check (below) are highlighted in red. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 90.2

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
3cym-assembly1_A 1.00 0.86 0.82 0.86 35% 93% / 100% 6.8e-31 sig 3cym-assembly1_A Crystal structure of protein BAD_0989 from Bifidobacterium adolescentis
1yt3-assembly1_A 1.00 0.73 0.64 0.73 23% 91% / 99% 1.4e-14 sig 1yt3-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an exoribonuclease involved in structured RNA processing
4nlb-assembly1_A 1.00 0.80 0.56 0.68 21% 66% / 80% 2.8e-12 sig 4nlb-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the catalytic core of RRP6 from Trypanosoma brucei
5c0y-assembly1_A 1.00 0.75 0.57 0.64 22% 68% / 81% 9.1e-13 sig 5c0y-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the Rrp6 catalytic domain bound to poly(U) RNA
5k36-assembly1_J 1.00 0.73 0.56 0.53 22% 70% / 67% 7.1e-13 sig 5k36-assembly1_J Structure of an eleven component nuclear RNA exosome complex bound to RNA

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 90.2, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Catalytic-site verification (M-CSA on the structural model) active site conserved

M-CSA entry321 · EC 3.1.13.5
Catalytic residues5/5 identical (5/5 aligned)
VerdictACTIVE-SITE CONSERVED (5/5 catalytic residues identical) -> likely active enzyme

Catalytic residues of the matched M-CSA reference enzyme mapped onto the structural model by alignment. An active-site-conserved verdict upgrades a mere fold match to a likely active enzyme; fold-only flags a shared fold whose catalytic machinery is not retained (a guard against over-calling).

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2680 (+ strand, 1 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)dxs1 (- strand, -4 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2680 · Rv2681

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv2680 · Rv2681 — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2755) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv2679 · Rv2680 · Rv2681 (coverage 48.11)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

crp binding site only -- direction not determined (low confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq : site de fixation CRP (1 des 191 sites de Kahramanoglou et al. 2014) ; aucun changement d'expression rapporte pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp
Caveat: Site de fixation CRP mesure par ChIP-seq (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014), SANS changement d'expression mesure pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp : le sens de la regulation n'est PAS determine. Ecrire « site de fixation CRP en amont », jamais « regule par CRP ». L'article ne distingue pas « non differentiellement exprime » de « sous le seuil », donc l'absence de ce gene de la table d'expression n'est pas une preuve de non-regulation.

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 85 partners at medium confidence (37 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 85 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1340 rphA exp (transferred) curated ribonuclease PH 991 988 experimental:921 database:844
Rv1630 rpsA exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S1 983 982 coexpression:436 experimental:770 database:805
Rv2680 dark hypothetical protein 974 975 ctx neighborhood:882 coexpression:744
Rv3458c rpsD exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S4 965 965 experimental:827 database:788
Rv3459c rpsK exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S11 953 954 experimental:827 database:743
Rv0702 rplD exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L4 920 920 experimental:804 database:555
Rv0703 rplW exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L23 877 878 experimental:714 database:587
Rv0651 rplJ exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L10 854 855 coexpression:413 experimental:449 database:586
Rv0721 rpsE curated 30S ribosomal protein S5 853 853 database:798
Rv0722 rpmD exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L30 852 848 coexpression:417 experimental:431 database:578
Rv0710 rpsQ exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S17 843 844 experimental:840
Rv2785c rpsO exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S15 838 839 experimental:838
Rv0720 rplR exp (transferred) curated 50S ribosomal protein L18 835 835 experimental:629 database:570
Rv0683 rpsG exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S7 829 829 experimental:818
Rv0682 rpsL exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S12 825 825 experimental:818

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: ribonuclease D
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DNA_pol_A_exo1 PF01612.27 (E=1e-35), HRDC PF00570.29 (E=7e-13), DNA_pol_A_exoN PF18305.7 (E=3e-24)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217197.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DNA_pol_A_exo1 (PF01612.27), HRDC (PF00570.29), DNA_pol_A_exoN (PF18305.7)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0349
  • Curated reference: UniProt I6XF17 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 90.2)
  • Catalytic-site verification: M-CSA (Ribeiro et al. 2018, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1012), entry 321; catalytic residues aligned onto the structural model
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 85 functional partner(s)
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY); cholesterol requirement from Griffin et al. 2011 (doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002251)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002855|Rv2681|
MCPEPSHAGAAESEGTESEPTPLLRPAGGIPDLCVTVGEIAAAAELLDRGRGPFAVDAERASGFRYSGRAYLIQIRRAEAGTVLIDPVSHGGDPLTVLAPVAEVLSTNEWILHSADQDLPCLAEVGMRPPALYDTELAGRLAGFDRVNLAAMVERLLGLGLTKGHGAADWSKRPLPSAWLNYAALDVELLIELRAAISRVLAEQGKTDWAAQEFEHLRSFESRPPPAAARQDRWRRTSGIHKVHDRRGLAAVRELWTARDRIAQRRDIAPRRILPDSAIIDAAIADPKSVDDLVALPVFGGRNQRRSAAVWWAALAAARESPDPPEIAEPANGPPPPGRWVRRKPAAAARLDAARAALTEVSQRVRVPTENLVSPDLVRRLCWEWEDISQSSPDPIAAVEAYLRTGQARAWQLELVVPILTAALTGAPDAGAQGDDGS