Rv2680 Still unknown · low
H37Rv Rv2680 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002854 ·
210 aa ·
3018520–3019152 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_217196.1
Affects: base-resolution coordinates only. Verified by 1:1 H37Rv–MTBC0 position liftover (P19.6/P19.7); annotation_mtbc P19.6/P19.7 — 1:1 liftover (Harrison et al., liftovers/H37Rv_NC_000962.3.on.MTBC0.all.positions.tsv.gz) vs RefSeq NC_000962.3 annotation, similarity by difflib ratio calibrated on 60 correctly anchored controls.
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | DUF3000 domain-containing protein |
| Revised (this work) | Conserved hypothetical protein; DUF domain(s) DUF3000. Function unknown. Foldseek best (non-significant) hit: 8any-assembly1_f Human mitochondrial ribosome in complex with LRPPRC, (prob 0.44, TM 0.39). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
Curation note: P16.24 (2026-08-17): le catalogue Ribo-RET de Smith et al. 2022 (classe "Isoform", traductome H37Rv en culture standard log-phase) place un site de demarrage a 2996003 au lieu du start annote 2996105 (delta -102 nt = 34 codon(s) en amont), MEME stop codon (2996737) donc MEME cadre de lecture -- candidat de mauvais START annote, PAS un changement de fonction (verdict dark maintenu). Aucune densite ribosomique ni peptide MS chiffres pour cette classe dans le supplement (colonnes vides pour "Isoform", contrairement a "Novel"): preuve = appel de pic Ribo-RET seul, non hierarchisable. Ribo-RET ne couvre qu'une condition de croissance : ceci ne dit rien sur les autres dark sans signal ici. Source: Smith C, Canestrari JG, Wang AJ et al., "Pervasive translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis", eLife 2022;11:e73980 (doi:10.7554/eLife.73980; PMC9094748), Supplementary File 1A, classe "Isoform". P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False).
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) variant mention only
1 TB publication mentions this gene. Appears in the TB literature ONLY as a variant in a genomic / drug-resistance screen (GWAS of second-line injectable drug resistance); no functional content — do not over-interpret. reformulation, not a quotation
Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 1 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 1 — both sources find literature. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.
1 record returned by the alias sweep
Searched as: Rv2680, Mb2699, ML1041c, MMAR_2036, MSMEG_2779, MAB_2987
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
| Publication | Journal | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution of Common and Rare Genetic Markers of Second-Line-Injectable-Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Revealed by a Genome-Wide Association Study. doi:10.1128/aac.02075-21 | Antimicrob Agents Chemother | 2022 |
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 16% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 86.3 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 2 IDR(s), longest 20 aa [0-20, 197-210] |
carries a substantial disordered region (33/210 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 7.0
disruption confers tolerance to Ethambutol; required for fitness in vivo (virulence / persistence factor).
| Corroborating evidence | conserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; STRING-coupled to echA15 (enoyl-CoA hydratase EchA15); structural lead available |
|---|
This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.
Integrative functional lead (multi-layer synthesis, hypothesis) 1 convergent handles
candidate accessory/associated component of the RNA-metabolism operon Rv2680-Rv2681 (rnd / RNase D), to validate — no nuclease activity of its own
| Convergent evidence | operon: co-transcribed with rnd/Rv2681 (RNase D, gap 1 bp) — single syntenic handle |
|---|---|
| Real-gene support | conserved (snp_sites=1/145209, 0 nonsense/frameshift), MS-detected (15 datasets), globular cytoplasmic (AF pLDDT 86); DUF3000, no significant Foldseek hit, no M-CSA |
| Adversarial check | skeptic corrected an over-sell: removed the 'exoribonuclease' label (co-transcribed with rnd != is rnd; the RNase D is Rv2681, M-CSA 5/5). Citation fixed to Conkle-Gutierrez et al. AAC 2022 (PMID 35532237). SigH regulon, ethambutol/in-vivo phenotype and promoter->capreomycin-resistance are condition/expression, not function. |
Synthesised across all evidence layers (conservation, operon, STRING, regulon, phenotype, localisation, structure, vulnerability) under an anti-oversell decision checklist. A functional hypothesis to validate, not an established function. integrative multi-layer synthesis (P8), 2026-07-05.
Binding-pocket screen (P2Rank, geometric prediction) no confident pocket
| Pockets found | 0 |
|---|---|
| Model length screened | 210 aa |
Read with care. This protein (210 aa) is above the size where the detector reliably differentiates proven enzymes (60.5% confident-pocket rate) from proteins annotated as non-catalytic (18.9%, i.e. 81.1% specificity; P16.3b calibration). Both rates are measured at the threshold this layer applies, best_probability >= 0.70, which is the best separation the detector reaches on that panel (Youden J = 0.416): even at its optimum it misses 39.5% of proven enzymes. No candidate pocket at all was detected, which is consistent with a non-catalytic role, though it does not rule out a shallow or non-canonical binding site that this geometric detector misses. (Individual read at this confidence level; the GROUP-level dark-vs-non-catalytic contrast is NOT statistically significant at this size, p=0.285 -- read as modest evidence, not proof, cf. P16.3c.) P16.3e, calibration phase72b_pocket_calibration.py, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Rv1828/SigH (Rv1828 or sigH).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
Transcriptional start site (informative, coordinates unchanged)
Primary TSS at position 2996002 (+ strand), 154 bp 5'UTR. TSS-derived candidate start codon: 2996156 -- candidate only, not applied to this record's coordinates.
Genome-wide 5'-triphosphate-enriched RNA-seq TSS mapping (Cortes et al. 2013): informative context on transcript architecture only. reannotated_start_candidate is the authors' TSS-derived candidate start codon -- reported for information, NEVER applied to this atlas's start_mtbc0/end_mtbc0 coordinates (P19 MTBC0<->H37Rv anchoring). Row re-keyed to this locus by matching its genomic boundary against the H37Rv GFF3 (P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15), P49): the original ingestion (P16.23/phase135, 2026-08-17) trusted the source table's own gene-identity column, which was desynchronised from its own numeric columns on 547/651 checkable rows -- see P49 for the full diagnostic. A missing primary_tss here means this gene falls outside the 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset the source table covers, not an absence of transcription. Source: Cortes et al. 2013 (Cell Reports), Table S3 (TSS mapping and re-annotation of start codons), 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset of >4,000 genome-wide TSS -- row re-keyed to this locus by coordinate match (P49).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -0.59 (95% CI -3.66 to 3.54). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.249 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Function unknown |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2699
· 99.5% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML1041c
· 84.4% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_2036
· 89.6% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_2779
· 85.0% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002764
· 99.5% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_2987
· 80.6% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O86317
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Conserved protein |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Conserved protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | Protein of unknown function (DUF3000) |
| Orthologous group | 2AIF4 |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 2 consensus substitution(s) low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 86.4%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 10/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 59.3% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
11 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
11 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 48.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 11 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| fitness after prolonged in vitro passage (in vitro passage) | -4.63 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) | -3.81 | 0.002 | required |
| altered fitness under Ethambutol (drug exposure) | +2.88 | 0.046 | disruption advantageous |
| Differential genetic requirements of clinical Mtb strain (ID=667) from Indo-Oceanic lineage (compared to H37Rv control) (strain background) | +2.81 | 0.0054 | required |
| differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) | +2.25 | 0.003 | disruption advantageous |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 5 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 277.0 ppm · rank 684/3519 (80.6th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 210 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 22.6 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 4.51 |
| GRAVY | -0.243 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 87.0 |
| Aromaticity | 0.057 |
| Instability index | 41.5 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUF3000 | PF11452.14 | 4.0e-72 | 23–202 | Protein of unknown function (DUF3000) |
HHpred profile-profile (no confident hit): No confident hit, single trivial hit, pure noise. Consistent with this gene's already-documented zero-handle status (P8.6/P16.3j). Remains dark.
top hits 3KFW_X structural-genomics unknown-function protein (19.2%, E=130).
Remote homology search on the deep UniRef30 profile (MPI Toolkit), run for the residual dark set.
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 86.3, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 88.0 (confident). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8any-assembly1_f |
0.44 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 9% | 54% / 64% | 6.8e-02 | 8any-assembly1_f Human mitochondrial ribosome in complex with LRPPRC, SLIRP, A-site, P-site, E-site tRNAs and mRNA |
5aj4-assembly1_AJ |
0.38 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 13% | 46% / 70% | 1.4e-01 | 5aj4-assembly1_AJ Structure of the 55S mammalian mitoribosome. |
6bok-assembly1_RA |
0.28 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 0.32 | 16% | 43% / 88% | 1.1e-01 | 6bok-assembly1_RA E. coli release factor 1 (containing deletion 302-304) bound to the 70S ribosome |
3fzb-assembly1_H |
0.25 | 0.40 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 14% | 42% / 64% | 2.0e-01 | 3fzb-assembly1_H Crystal structure of the tail terminator protein from phage lambda (gpU-WT) |
7nqh-assembly1_AJ |
0.21 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 13% | 46% / 65% | 4.3e-01 | 7nqh-assembly1_AJ 55S mammalian mitochondrial ribosome with mtRF1a and P-site tRNAMet |
6vmi-assembly1_f |
0.21 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 10% | 54% / 72% | 4.8e-01 | 6vmi-assembly1_f Structure of the human mitochondrial ribosome-EF-G1 complex (ClassIII) |
9d94-assembly1_If |
0.16 | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 15% | 36% / 52% | 5.8e-01 | 9d94-assembly1_If Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 portal and connector assembly - Composite map and model |
8pk0-assembly1_f |
0.16 | 0.41 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 11% | 51% / 65% | 6.1e-01 | 8pk0-assembly1_f human mitoribosomal large subunit assembly intermediate 1 with GTPBP10-GTPBP7 |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2
| Upstream (5' on genome) | echA15 (+ strand, 159 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2681 (+ strand, 1 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv2680 · Rv2681
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
Rv2680 · Rv2681
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2754) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv2679 · Rv2680 · Rv2681
(coverage 48.11)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 14.13) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2681 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 975, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 53 partners at medium confidence (9 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 53 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2681 |
hypothetical protein | 974 | 975 ctx | neighborhood:882 coexpression:744 |
Rv2676c hemQ |
hypothetical protein | 822 | 822 ctx | neighborhood:694 cooccurence:434 |
Rv2679 echA15 |
enoyl-CoA hydratase EchA15 | 753 | 753 ctx | neighborhood:747 |
Rv2413c |
hypothetical protein | 738 | 739 ctx | cooccurence:738 |
Rv2256c dark |
hypothetical protein | 743 | 733 ctx | cooccurence:728 |
Rv2050 rbpA |
RNA polymerase-binding protein RbpA | 733 | 733 ctx | cooccurence:733 |
Rv2219 |
transmembrane protein | 711 | 712 ctx | cooccurence:710 |
Rv2677c hemY |
protoporphyrinogen oxidase | 703 | 703 ctx | neighborhood:694 |
Rv2678c hemE |
uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase | 698 | 698 ctx | neighborhood:694 |
Rv2699c dark |
hypothetical protein | 680 | 680 ctx | cooccurence:680 |
Rv2708c |
hypothetical protein | 670 | 671 ctx | cooccurence:669 |
Rv2169c dark |
transmembrane protein | 670 | 670 ctx | cooccurence:670 |
Rv1830 |
HTH-type transcriptional regulator | 642 | 643 ctx | cooccurence:634 |
Rv2146c |
transmembrane protein | 641 | 641 ctx | cooccurence:637 |
Rv1087A |
Rv1087A, len: 106 aa (fragment). Conserved hypothetical protein, highly similar to C-terminus of near ORF O53434|YA86_MYCTU|Rv1086|MT1118|MT | 637 | 637 ctx | cooccurence:637 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Partners predicted by a published screen (co-evolution + structure, prediction) predicted, not measured
Contact predicted by a published co-evolution and structure screen; this is a prediction, not a measured interaction; the authors validated 6 of the 12 predictions they tested experimentally (cases they chose), which is a ceiling on precision, not a floor.
| Partner | Partner status in this atlas | Screen score | Novel per authors | STRING score (any channel) | Predicted model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0055 rpsR1
RNA / ribosome partner
30S ribosomal protein S18. Pfam: Ribosomal_S18 (PF01084.27). |
Resolved | 0.9253 | yes | no STRING row | ma-bak-evip-0668 |
Source: Humphreys et al. 2024, Nat Microbiol, DOI 10.1038/s41564-024-01791-x (PMID 39294458),
Supplementary Data 1 (final table of 3613 high-confidence pairs) and the ModelArchive deposit 10.5452/ma-bak-evip; read on 2026-10-10. The authors validated experimentally
6 of the 12 predictions they tested
(cases chosen by the authors): that rate is a ceiling for this channel, not a floor. The screen score is the
screen's own confidence for the pair; no interface score is shown because none is calibrated for this atlas.
A predicted partner orients a hypothesis and does not assign a function; it does not change the verdict of this
gene or the partner chosen by the STRING section.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF3000 domain-containing protein
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DUF3000 PF11452.14 (E=4e-72)
- Foldseek best: 8any-assembly1_f Human mitochondrial ribosome in complex with LRPPRC, SLIRP, A-s (prob 0.44, E=7e-02, TM=0.39)
- (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)
- Ribo-RET (Smith 2022, classe Isoform): site de demarrage alternatif a 2996003 vs start annote 2996105 (delta -102 nt, meme cadre, meme stop 2996737) -- candidat de mauvais START annote
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217196.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF3000 (PF11452.14)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2AIF4 - Curated reference: UniProt O86317 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 88.0, confident)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 86.3)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
53 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv2681 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: Conkle-Gutierrez D, et al. (2022). Mutations Associated with Capreomycin Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antimicrob Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/aac.02075-21
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002854|Rv2680| MTSAGDDAERSDEEERRLTSAEPALFREAVAAMNAVTVRPEIELGPIRPPQRLAPYSYALGAEIKHPELDVIPERSEGDAFGRLIMLYDPDGSDAWDGTIRLVAYVQADLDSSEAVDPLLPEVAWSWLVDALTARTDQVRALGGTVTATTSVRYGDISGPPRAHQLELRASWTATTPDLGAHVQAFCDVLEHAAGLPPAGVTDLGSRSRA
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2680? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2680