Rv2219 Family assigned · low

H37Rv Rv2219 · MTBC0 mtbc0_002355 · 250 aa · 2512392–2513144 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_216735.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transmembrane protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDUF4191 domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Membrane protein (2 predicted TM helices) co-transcribed with lipB and lipA — the octanoyltransferase and lipoyl synthase of lipoic-acid cofactor biosynthesis — in the lipB-lipA-Rv2219 operon, under purifying selection. Contextual candidate: a component associated with lipoyl-cofactor biosynthesis/utilisation. Its molecular role is not established.
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication discusses this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 1 record carries a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Proteomic changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv under hyperglycemic conditions favour its growth through altered expression of Tgs3(Rv3234c) and supportive proteins (Rv0547c, AcrA1 and Mpa). doi:10.1016/j.tube.2019.03.006 2019
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv2219, Mb2242, ML0857c, MMAR_3287, MSMEG_4287, MAB_1940c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Proteomic changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv under hyperglycemic conditions favour its growth through altered expression of Tgs3(Rv3234c) and supportive proteins (Rv0547c, AcrA1 and Mpa). doi:10.1016/j.tube.2019.03.006 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2019

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder17% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 82.3
Disordered regions2 IDR(s), longest 28 aa [0-14, 222-250]

carries a substantial disordered region (42/250 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Operon-context functional lead (hypothesis)

Co-transcribed within the operon lipB-lipA-Rv2219, pointing to lipoyl-cofactor biosynthesis.

Basis: co-transcription in operon lipB-lipA-Rv2219 + purifying selection + coherent localisation. This is a contextual candidate association (guilt-by-co-transcription), not an established molecular function.

Roback 2007 check: NOT corroborated by the independently published operon map (Roback et al. 2007) — called group for this locus: Rv2219, predicted co-transcription probability for the cited neighbour: 0.000459. Roback et al. 2007 (peer-reviewed operon map, PMID 17652327) does NOT corroborate the co-transcription claimed above (cited operon: lipB-lipA-Rv2219; Roback's called group for this locus: Rv2219; predicted co-transcription probability for the cited neighbour: 0.000459). Verdict and function_revised are unchanged: the genomic neighbourhood and the named neighbour remain factual; only the co-transcription argument itself is now qualified by this independent source.

Two-source operon check: PARTAGÉ 1/2 Whether the CITED NEIGHBOUR Rv2218 is co-transcribed, according to each independently published map — Roback 2007: different operons; REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage): same operon. Base rates over the adjacent gene pairs that could be an operon at all, i.e. the co-directional ones: Roback 39.2 %, REMap 67.7 % — an agreement is only informative above its own base rate, and that rate has to be read on the right denominator (over ALL adjacent pairs, opposite-strand ones included, the same rates read 26.3 % and 45.6 %, diluted by pairs that cannot be co-transcribed). Three-way operon check (PARTAGÉ 1/2). The requalification argues co-transcription with Rv2218 (cited operon: lipB-lipA-Rv2219). Independent published maps: Roback et al. 2007 does NOT place it in the same operon (predicted probability 0.000459); REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage) places it in the same operon. This tests the claim actually made — whether the CITED NEIGHBOUR is co-transcribed — and not whether the three maps draw identical operon boundaries, which is a different question (strict group identity: Roback False, REMap False). Read each map against its own base rate, and against the RIGHT one: all twelve operon-based requalifications concern CO-DIRECTIONAL adjacent pairs, so the null is the rate over those pairs only — Roback calls co-transcription for 39.2 % of them (2429 pairs), REMap for 67.7 % (2230 pairs). Over all adjacent pairs, opposite-strand ones included, the same rates read 26.3 % and 45.6 %, but a divergent or convergent pair cannot form a transcription unit at all and neither map calls one (Roback 0.2 %, REMap 0.0 %), so that denominator dilutes the null instead of describing it. Against the conditioned null, REMap does not agree more often than chance across the twelve requalifications (9/10, one-sided binomial p = 0.116) and Roback does not either (5/12, p = 0.538). Correction of record (2026-10-09): until that date this sentence quoted the unconditioned null and reported REMap as significant (p = 0.00502); that significance does not survive the right denominator. So a lone REMap agreement is not a validation, and a lone Roback disagreement is weak evidence against the claim. Verdict, confidence and function_revised are unchanged; co-transcription remains an association, never a proof of shared function.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -6.50 (95% CI -7.07 to -5.89). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2242 · 99.6% identity
M. leprae ML0857c · 80.8% identity
M. marinum MMAR_3287 · 84.4% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_4287 · 76.8% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002290 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_1940c · 68.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WLI1 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv2219

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv2219; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionDomain of unknown function (DUF4191)
Orthologous group2AUFS
Gene Ontology (14) GO:0005575, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0005887, GO:0008150, GO:0016020, GO:0016021, GO:0031224, GO:0031226, GO:0040007, GO:0044425, GO:0044459 +2 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.497 · quasi-invariant (7 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 3 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 85.0% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 11/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 49.2%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential

The two screens disagree on this gene: Tn-seq says growth-defect (insertions tolerated, NOT essential) (GD), CRISPRi says essential.

Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -6.498), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.

DeJesus 2017 callGD · growth-defect
What the call meansgrowth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential
TA sites (Himar1) 9 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 7 growth-defect, 2 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.444, mean read count 82. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 9 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Read with some caution: only 9 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 9 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain

This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.

Hypomorph strainRv2219-tetOn-18.1 (TetON promoter 18)
Baseline knockdown fitness3.931 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown
Used in target deconvolutionyes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment)

Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 11 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance226.0 ppm · rank 785/3519 (77.7th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (2 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)2

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length250 aa
Molecular weight26.9 kDa
Theoretical pI11.6
GRAVY-0.039 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index94.9
Aromaticity0.056
Instability index32.4 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DUF4191PF13829.12 1.4e-8623–242 Domain of unknown function (DUF4191)

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 82.3, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3

Upstream (5' on genome)lipA (+ strand, 26 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2219A (- strand, 6 bp gap)
Predicted operon lipB · lipA · Rv2219

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2276) exponential phase: operon of 5, Rv2215 · Rv2216 · Rv2217 · Rv2218 · Rv2219 (coverage 99.97)
stationary phase: operon of 5, Rv2215 · Rv2216 · Rv2217 · Rv2218 · Rv2219 (coverage 43.98) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: lipB (octanoyltransferase), high confidence (score 847, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 67 partners at medium confidence (13 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 67 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2217 lipB octanoyltransferase 846 847 ctx neighborhood:843
Rv2218 lipA lipoyl synthase 846 847 ctx neighborhood:843
Rv2216 epimerase family protein 786 787 ctx neighborhood:780
Rv2215 dlaT pyruvate dehydrogenase E2 component dihydrolipoamide acyltransferase 782 783 ctx neighborhood:780
Rv2708c hypothetical protein 755 755 ctx cooccurence:753
Rv1830 HTH-type transcriptional regulator 750 751 ctx cooccurence:747
Rv2050 rbpA RNA polymerase-binding protein RbpA 736 737 ctx cooccurence:733
Rv2413c hypothetical protein 725 726 ctx cooccurence:725
Rv2680 dark hypothetical protein 711 712 ctx cooccurence:710
Rv3195 hypothetical protein 709 709 ctx cooccurence:709
Rv1002c pmt dolichyl-phosphate-mannose--protein mannosyltransferase 698 699 ctx cooccurence:696
Rv2699c dark hypothetical protein 696 696 ctx cooccurence:693
Rv2731 hypothetical protein 693 694 ctx cooccurence:692
Rv1440 secG protein-export membrane protein SecG 693 694 ctx cooccurence:686
Rv3753c hypothetical protein 691 692 ctx cooccurence:690

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: transmembrane protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF4191 domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DUF4191 PF13829.12 (E=1e-86)
  • (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216735.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF4191 (PF13829.12)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2AUFS
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WLI1 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 82.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 67 functional partner(s); context anchor lipB
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002355|Rv2219|
MAKPRNAAESKAAKAQANAARKAAARQRRAQLWQAFTLQRKEDKRLLPYMIGAFLLIVGASVGVGVWAGGFTMFTMIPLGVLLGALVAFVIFGRRAQRTVYRKAEGQTGAAAWALDNLRGKWRVTPGVAATGNLDAVHRVIGRPGVIFVGEGSAARVKPLLAQEKKRTARLVGDVPIYDIIVGNGDGEVPLAKLERHLTRLPANITVKQMDTVESRLAALGSRAGAGVMPKGPLPTTAKMRSVQRTVRRK