rplQ Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3456c · MTBC0 mtbc0_003674 · 180 aa · 3902774–3903316 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217973.1

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • Both signals are true at once. The 11 PDB entries for this gene are WHOLE-RIBOSOME maps: the protein appears there as a subunit resolved inside the assembly, not as the subject of a study aimed at it. "An experimental structure exists" therefore does not mean, here, that somebody purified and published this protein, and it does not contradict the literature sweep's silence on its locus tag. Reviewed one by one on 2026-09-10. (structure vs unstudied, 2026-09-10)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)50S ribosomal protein L17
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation50S ribosomal protein L17
Revised (this work)50S ribosomal protein L17. Pfam: Ribosomal_L17 (PF01196.25).
Functional category (TubercuList)information pathways

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.

Named in the body of 38 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv3456c (3), rplQ (34), MSMEG_1525 (1).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “Large ribosomal subunit protein bL17”: nothing found. no abstract in PubMed contains this protein name in a mycobacterial context: the silence measured under the locus tag is confirmed under the protein name.

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder32% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 81.8
Disordered regions2 IDR(s), longest 43 aa [0-15, 137-180]

carries a substantial disordered region (58/180 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): WhiB1 (whiB1).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -13.11 (95% CI -14.92 to -11.04). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionInvolved in translation mechanism.

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3485c · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML1956c · 92.0% identity
M. marinum MMAR_1091 · 90.8% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_1525 · 91.3% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_003564 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_3769c · 83.3% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WHD3 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameLarge ribosomal subunit protein bL17

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category J Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
Preferred namerplQ
eggNOG descriptionribosomal protein L17
Orthologous groupCOG0203
KEGG orthology K02879
KEGG pathways map03010
KEGG modules M00178
Gene Ontology (30) GO:0003674, GO:0003735, GO:0005198, GO:0005575, GO:0005618, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0005737, GO:0005829, GO:0005840, GO:0005886, GO:0015934 +18 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.221 · purifying
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 6 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.133 (low power) · 7 consensus substitution(s)
low power (7 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 93.5% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 13/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 67.7%
detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential

The two screens disagree on this gene: Tn-seq says growth-defect (insertions tolerated, NOT essential) (GD), CRISPRi says essential.

Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -13.11), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.

DeJesus 2017 callGD · growth-defect
What the call meansgrowth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential
TA sites (Himar1) 9 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 9 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.111, mean read count 1. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 9 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Read with some caution: only 9 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 9 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain

This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.

Hypomorph strainH37RvMA::Rv3456c(rplQ)-FLAG/DAS+pTetON-18 sspB (TetON promoter 18)
Baseline knockdown fitness4.616 median doublings (across 1 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown
Used in target deconvolutionno (Excluded - not in all screening waves)

Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance1413.0 ppm · rank 150/3519 (95.8th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length180 aa
Molecular weight19.5 kDa
Theoretical pI9.52
GRAVY-0.672 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index72.3
Aromaticity0.033
Instability index51.3 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Ribosomal_L17PF01196.25 3.8e-4021–116 Ribosomal protein L17

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 7sfr (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 11 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
7sfr Electron Microscopy 2.6 Å 100%
7kgb Electron Microscopy 2.7 Å 100%
7mt7 Electron Microscopy 2.71 Å 100%
7mt2 Electron Microscopy 2.76 Å 100%
7msm Electron Microscopy 2.79 Å 100%
7mt3 Electron Microscopy 2.8 Å 100%
7msc Electron Microscopy 2.97 Å 100%
7msz Electron Microscopy 3.1 Å 100%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (11 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 81.8

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
5v7q-assembly1_N 1.00 0.99 0.64 0.99 100% 64% / 100% 2.2e-19 sig 5v7q-assembly1_N Cryo-EM structure of the large ribosomal subunit from Mycobacterium tuberculosis bound with a potent linezolid analog
7f0d-assembly1_N 1.00 0.98 0.64 0.98 100% 64% / 100% 2.3e-18 sig 7f0d-assembly1_N Cryo-EM structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis 50S ribosome subunit bound with clarithromycin
5zep-assembly1_O 1.00 0.97 0.64 0.97 92% 65% / 100% 1.9e-16 sig 5zep-assembly1_O M. smegmatis hibernating state 70S ribosome structure
8cvm-assembly1_m 1.00 0.96 0.65 0.96 59% 67% / 100% 6.2e-15 sig 8cvm-assembly1_m Cutibacterium acnes 50S ribosomal subunit with P-site tRNA and Sarecycline bound in the local refined map
7ryh-assembly1_M 1.00 0.91 0.61 0.91 48% 66% / 100% 5.2e-13 sig 7ryh-assembly1_M A. baumannii Ribosome-TP-6076 complex: Empty 70S

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 81.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)truA (- strand, 67 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)rpoA (- strand, 31 bp gap)
Predicted operon rplQ · rpoA

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 8: truA · rplQ · rpoA · rpsD · rpsK · rpsM · rpmJ · infA — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3563) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv3455c · Rv3456c · Rv3457c (coverage 154.46)
stationary phase: operon of 3, Rv3455c · Rv3456c · Rv3457c (coverage 27.96) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: rplO (50S ribosomal protein L15), high confidence (score 1000, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 286 partners at medium confidence (139 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 286 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0723 rplO exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L15 999 1000 ctx cooccurence:608 coexpression:970 experimental:999 textmining:625
Rv0706 rplV exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L22 999 1000 coexpression:968 experimental:999 textmining:717
Rv3459c rpsK exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S11 999 1000 ctx neighborhood:726 coexpression:936 experimental:999 textmining:622
Rv0700 rpsJ exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S10 999 1000 coexpression:968 experimental:999 textmining:434
Rv0979A rpmF exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L32 999 1000 coexpression:851 experimental:999 textmining:570
Rv3442c rpsI exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S9 999 1000 coexpression:866 experimental:999 textmining:843
Rv0717 rpsN1 exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S14 999 1000 coexpression:738 experimental:999
Rv0682 rpsL exp (transferred) 30S ribosomal protein S12 999 1000 coexpression:946 experimental:999
Rv1643 rplT exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L20 999 1000 coexpression:865 experimental:999
Rv1015c rplY exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L25/general stress protein Ctc 999 1000 coexpression:834 experimental:999
Rv0634B rpmG2 exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L33 999 1000 coexpression:730 experimental:999
Rv0720 rplR exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L18 999 1000 coexpression:886 experimental:999 textmining:566
Rv2441c rpmA exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L27 999 1000 ctx cooccurence:456 coexpression:858 experimental:999
Rv1298 rpmE exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L31 999 1000 coexpression:563 experimental:999
Rv3443c rplM exp (transferred) 50S ribosomal protein L13 999 1000 ctx cooccurence:606 coexpression:866 experimental:999

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: 50S ribosomal protein L17
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: 50S ribosomal protein L17
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Ribosomal_L17 PF01196.25 (E=4e-40)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217973.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Ribosomal_L17 (PF01196.25)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0203
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WHD3 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 81.8)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 286 functional partner(s); context anchor rplO
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_003674|Rv3456c|rplQ
MPKPTKGPRLGGSSSHQKAILANLATSLFEHGRITTTEPKARALRPYAEKLITHAKKGALHNRREVLKKLRDKDVVHTLFAEIGPFFADRDGGYTRIIKIEARKGDNAPMAVIELVREKTVTSEANRARRVAAAQAKAKKAAAMPTEESEAKPAEEGDVVGASEPDAKAPEEPPAEAPEN