rpmF Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv0979A · MTBC0 - ·
57 aa ·
1094886–1095059 H37Rv
(+) ·
RefSeq YP_177635.1
- Both signals are true at once. The 11 PDB entries for this gene are WHOLE-RIBOSOME maps: the protein appears there as a subunit resolved inside the assembly, not as the subject of a study aimed at it. "An experimental structure exists" therefore does not mean, here, that somebody purified and published this protein, and it does not contradict the literature sweep's silence on its locus tag. Reviewed one by one on 2026-09-10. (structure vs unstudied, 2026-09-10)
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | 50S ribosomal protein L32 |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | — |
| Revised (this work) | 50S ribosomal protein L32. Pfam: Ribosomal_L32p (PF01783.30). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | information pathways |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.
Rv0979A (3), rpmF (29), Mb1005 (1), MSMEG_5489 (2).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.
PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 32% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 93.4 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 18 aa [0-18] |
carries a substantial disordered region (18/57 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -6.58 (95% CI -7.90 to -5.29). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Involved in translation mechanism. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb1005
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML0173
· 84.2% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_4530
· 84.2% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_5489
· 75.4% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_001034
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_1075
· 84.2% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WH99
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Large ribosomal subunit protein bL32 |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
J Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | rpmF |
| eggNOG description | Belongs to the bacterial ribosomal protein bL32 family |
| Orthologous group | 2DRA3 |
| KEGG orthology |
K02911
|
| KEGG pathways |
map03010
|
| KEGG modules |
M00178
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.705 · quasi-invariant (3 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 1 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 1 consensus substitution(s) low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 85.2%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 9/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 66.1% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | Uncertain · uncertain |
|---|---|
| What the call means | uncertain (short or TA-poor ORF): no call possible |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
2 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
0 non-essential,
2 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.500,
mean read count 1.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 2 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Statistically thin call: only 2 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 14 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 1277.0 ppm · rank 171/3519 (95.2th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 57 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 6.5 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 12.0 |
| GRAVY | -0.789 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 78.8 |
| Aromaticity | 0.035 |
| Instability index | 90.2 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ribosomal_L32p | PF01783.30 | 6.8e-09 | 2–45 | Ribosomal L32p protein family |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
Experimental structure 7sfr (PDBe), the strongest available structural
evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default)
shown as sticks.
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 11 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
7sfr |
Electron Microscopy | 2.6 Å | 100% |
7kgb |
Electron Microscopy | 2.7 Å | 100% |
7mt7 |
Electron Microscopy | 2.71 Å | 100% |
7mt2 |
Electron Microscopy | 2.76 Å | 100% |
7msm |
Electron Microscopy | 2.79 Å | 100% |
7mt3 |
Electron Microscopy | 2.8 Å | 100% |
7msc |
Electron Microscopy | 2.97 Å | 100% |
7msz |
Electron Microscopy | 3.1 Å | 100% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (11 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 93.4
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7kgb-assembly1_0 |
1.00 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 100% | 95% / 100% | 6.5e-08 sig | 7kgb-assembly1_0 CryoEM structure of A2296-methylated Mycobacterium tuberculosis ribosome bound with SEQ-9 |
7mt7-assembly1_0 |
1.00 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 100% | 95% / 100% | 6.5e-08 sig | 7mt7-assembly1_0 Mtb 70S with P and E site tRNAs |
8fr8-assembly1_8 |
1.00 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 74% | 95% / 100% | 4.3e-06 sig | 8fr8-assembly1_8 Structure of Mycobacterium smegmatis Rsh bound to a 70S translation initiation complex |
5o61-assembly1_b |
1.00 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 74% | 95% / 100% | 4.9e-06 sig | 5o61-assembly1_b The complete structure of the Mycobacterium smegmatis 70S ribosome |
5xym-assembly1_0 |
1.00 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 74% | 96% / 100% | 7.0e-06 sig | 5xym-assembly1_0 Large subunit of Mycobacterium smegmatis |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 93.4, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv0979c (- strand, 21 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | PE_PGRS18 (- strand, 18 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1007) |
expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 63.75)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 16.69) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 240 partners at medium confidence (124 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 240 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv3456c rplQ exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L17 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:851 experimental:999 textmining:570 |
Rv0706 rplV exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L22 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:821 experimental:999 |
Rv1643 rplT exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L20 | 999 | 1000 | coexpression:859 experimental:999 |
Rv0685 tuf exp (transferred) curated |
elongation factor Tu | 993 | 993 | coexpression:845 experimental:928 database:404 |
Rv0708 rplP exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L16 | 991 | 991 | coexpression:822 experimental:928 |
Rv2412 rpsT exp (transferred) |
30S ribosomal protein S20 | 997 | 990 | coexpression:865 experimental:928 textmining:731 |
Rv1642 rpmI exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L35 | 995 | 990 | coexpression:859 experimental:928 textmining:549 |
Rv3461c rpmJ exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L36 | 995 | 990 | coexpression:850 experimental:928 textmining:606 |
Rv2909c rpsP exp (transferred) |
30S ribosomal protein S16 | 993 | 990 | coexpression:861 experimental:928 |
Rv2442c rplU exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L21 | 992 | 990 | coexpression:859 experimental:928 |
Rv2785c rpsO exp (transferred) |
30S ribosomal protein S15 | 992 | 990 | coexpression:859 experimental:928 |
Rv2904c rplS exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L19 | 992 | 990 | coexpression:859 experimental:928 |
Rv0053 rpsF exp (transferred) |
30S ribosomal protein S6 | 992 | 990 | coexpression:857 experimental:928 |
Rv0652 rplL exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 | 992 | 990 | coexpression:860 experimental:928 |
Rv2441c rpmA exp (transferred) |
50S ribosomal protein L27 | 991 | 990 | coexpression:852 experimental:928 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): 50S ribosomal protein L32
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Ribosomal_L32p PF01783.30 (E=7e-09)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_177635.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Ribosomal_L32p (PF01783.30)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2DRA3 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WH99 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 93.4)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 240 functional partner(s)
- Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>H37Rv|Rv0979A|rpmF MAVPKRRKSRSNTRSRRSQWKAAKTELVGVTVAGHAHKVPRRLLKAARLGLIDFDKR
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for rpmF? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about rpmF