ruvC Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv2594c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002761 ·
188 aa ·
2948370–2948936 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_217110.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC |
| Revised (this work) | Crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC. Pfam: RuvC (PF02075.24). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | information pathways |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 11 publications
11 TB publications mention this gene. 11 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 6 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 3 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 3-record verified sample: M. leprae (2), M. smegmatis (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.
10 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 11 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)
Searched as: Rv2594c, ruvC, Mb2625c, ML0481, MMAR_2109, MSMEG_2943, MAB_2884c
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene
| Neighbour | ruvA (Rv2593c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 1 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 2 independently-modulated gene set(s):
WhiB4 (whiB4), Rv1828/SigH (Rv1828 or sigH).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -3.12 (95% CI -4.21 to -1.90). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Nuclease that resolves holliday junction intermediates in genetic recombination. Cleaves the cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA by nicking to strands with the same polarity at sites symmetrically opposed at the junction in the homologous ARMS and leaves a 5'terminal phosphate and a 3'terminal hydroxyl group [catalytic activity: endonucleolytic cleavage at a junction such as a reciprocal single |
|---|---|
| Mycobrowser EC |
3.1.22.4
· agrees with the atlas
|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2625c
· 99.5% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML0481
· 81.0% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_2109
· 84.6% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_2943
· 76.6% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002685
· 99.5% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_2884c
· 71.9% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WGV9
SwissProt · reviewed
· Inferred from homology
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC |
| EC (curated) |
EC 3.1.21.10
|
| Curated function | The RuvA-RuvB-RuvC complex processes Holliday junction (HJ) DNA during genetic recombination and DNA repair. Endonuclease that resolves HJ intermediates. Cleaves cruciform DNA by making single-stranded nicks across the HJ at symmetrical positions within the homologous arms, yielding a 5'-phosphate and a 3'-hydroxyl group; requires a central core of homology in the junction. The consensus cleavage sequence is 5'-(A/T)TT(C/G)-3'. Cleavage occurs on the 3'-side of the TT dinucleotide at the point of strand exchange. HJ branch migration catalyzed by RuvA-RuvB allows RuvC to scan DNA until it finds. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
L Replication, recombination and repair
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | ruvC |
| eggNOG description | Nuclease that resolves Holliday junction intermediates in genetic recombination. Cleaves the cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA by nicking to strands with the same polarity at sites symmetrically opposed at the junction in the homologous arms and leaves a 5'-terminal phosphate and a 3'-terminal hydroxyl group |
| Orthologous group | COG0817 |
| EC number |
EC 3.1.22.4
|
| KEGG orthology |
K01159
|
| KEGG pathways |
map03440
|
| Gene Ontology (54) |
GO:0000725, GO:0003674, GO:0003824, GO:0004518, GO:0004519, GO:0004520, GO:0004536, GO:0005575, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0006139, GO:0006259 +42 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 83.8%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 11/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 67.2% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential
Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -3.115), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | GD · growth-defect |
|---|---|
| What the call means | growth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
6 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
6 growth-defect,
0 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.667,
mean read count 5.75.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 6 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Read with some caution: only 6 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 6 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 27.1 ppm · rank 2130/3519 (39.5th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 188 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 19.8 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 9.21 |
| GRAVY | 0.11 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 97.8 |
| Aromaticity | 0.027 |
| Instability index | 22.0 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RuvC | PF02075.24 | 1.1e-61 | 3–152 | Crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 94.0, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 94.0
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6lw3-assembly1_B |
1.00 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.92 | 36% | 80% / 97% | 1.2e-16 sig | 6lw3-assembly1_B Crystal structure of RuvC from Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
7xhj-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.93 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 37% | 81% / 98% | 7.4e-16 sig | 7xhj-assembly1_A Crystal structure of RuvC from Deinococcus radiodurans |
6s16-assembly1_B |
1.00 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 35% | 83% / 94% | 1.5e-15 sig | 6s16-assembly1_B T. thermophilus RuvC in complex with Holliday junction substrate |
4ep4-assembly1_B |
1.00 | 0.91 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 35% | 84% / 96% | 8.8e-16 sig | 4ep4-assembly1_B Thermus thermophilus RuvC structure |
4ep5-assembly1_A-2 |
1.00 | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 34% | 83% / 95% | 7.7e-15 sig | 4ep5-assembly1_A-2 Thermus thermophilus RuvC structure |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 94.0, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3
| Upstream (5' on genome) | ruvA (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | vapB40 (+ strand, 108 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
ruvB · ruvA · ruvC
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
ruvA · ruvC
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2671) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv2592c · Rv2593c · Rv2594c
(coverage 35.12)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 18.11) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (2 TF) |
Rv0081 (represses) · whiA (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)
lexA |
represses (high confidence · LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012))
ChIP-seq (25 pics, 23 loci distincts) Caveat: Regulation partiellement RecA-dependante. |
|---|
Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: ruvA (Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvA), high confidence (score 998, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 55 partners at medium confidence (10 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 55 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2593c ruvA exp (transferred) |
Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvA | 999 | 998 ctx | neighborhood:882 coexpression:910 experimental:699 textmining:933 |
Rv2592c ruvB |
Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvB | 999 | 994 ctx | neighborhood:882 cooccurence:529 coexpression:878 textmining:922 |
Rv2897c |
hypothetical protein | 719 | 689 ctx | cooccurence:683 |
Rv2736c recX |
regulatory protein RecX | 859 | 674 | coexpression:663 textmining:588 |
Rv2898c |
hypothetical protein | 606 | 606 ctx | cooccurence:592 |
Rv2600 |
integral membrane protein | 602 | 602 ctx | neighborhood:601 |
Rv2596 vapC40 |
ribonuclease VapC40 | 570 | 571 ctx | neighborhood:567 |
Rv0429c def |
polypeptide deformylase | 621 | 559 ctx | cooccurence:478 |
Rv2595 vapB40 |
antitoxin VapB40 | 554 | 555 ctx | neighborhood:552 |
Rv2926c |
hypothetical protein | 489 | 490 ctx | cooccurence:452 |
Rv2603c |
transcriptional regulator | 496 | 419 | |
Rv2586c secF |
protein translocase subunit SecF | 410 | 411 | |
Rv2597 dark |
membrane protein | 408 | 409 ctx | neighborhood:408 |
Rv2152c murC |
UDP-N-acetylmuramate--alanine ligase | 405 | 406 | |
Rv2965c kdtB |
phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase | 405 | 405 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC
- MTBC0 PGAP product: crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): RuvC PF02075.24 (E=1e-61)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217110.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — RuvC (PF02075.24)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG0817 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WGV9 (SwissProt, reviewed; Inferred from homology)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 94.0)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
55 functional partner(s); context anchor
ruvA - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002761|Rv2594c|ruvC MRVMGVDPGLTRCGLSLIESGRGRQLTALDVDVVRTPSDAALAQRLLAISDAVEHWLDTHHPEVVAIERVFSQLNVTTVMGTAQAGGVIALAAAKRGVDVHFHTPSEVKAAVTGNGSADKAQVTAMVTKILALQAKPTPADAADALALAICHCWRAPTIARMAEATSRAEARAAQQRHAYLAKLKAAR
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for ruvC? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about ruvC