ruvC Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2594c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002761 · 188 aa · 2948370–2948936 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217110.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand secF (Rv2586c) — family_assigned: protein translocase subunit SecF secF secD (Rv2587c) — family_assigned: protein translocase subunit SecD secD yajC (Rv2588c) — family_assigned: preprotein translocase subunit YajC gabT (Rv2589) — requalified: 4-aminobutyrate--2-oxoglutarate transaminase gabT fadD9 (Rv2590) — requalified: carboxylic acid reductase fadD9 ruvB (Rv2592c) — requalified: Holliday junction branch migration DNA helicase RuvB ruvB ruvA (Rv2593c) — requalified: Holliday junction branch migration protein RuvA ruvC (Rv2594c) — requalified: crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC vapB40 (Rv2595) — family_assigned: AbrB/MazE/SpoVT family DNA-binding domain-containing protein vapC40 (Rv2596) — family_assigned: type II toxin-antitoxin system VapC family toxin Rv2597 (Rv2597) — dark: DUF4178 domain-containing protein Rv2598 (Rv2598) — family_assigned: DUF2617 family protein Rv2599 (Rv2599) — family_assigned: DUF4247 domain-containing protein vapC41 (Rv2602) — family_assigned: type II toxin-antitoxin system VapC family toxin Rv2603c (Rv2603c) — family_assigned: YebC/PmpR family DNA-binding transcriptional regulator snoP (Rv2604c) — family_assigned: pyridoxal 5'-phosphate synthase glutaminase subunit PdxT tesB2 (Rv2605c) — requalified: acyl-CoA thioesterase II tesB2 snzP (Rv2606c) — family_assigned: pyridoxal 5'-phosphate synthase lyase subunit PdxS snzP pdxH (Rv2607) — requalified: pyridoxamine 5'-phosphate oxidase Rv2609c (Rv2609c) — family_assigned: NUDIX domain-containing protein 2 940 kb 2 944 kb 2 948 kb 2 952 kb 2 956 kb 2 960 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationcrossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC
Revised (this work)Crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC. Pfam: RuvC (PF02075.24).
Functional category (TubercuList)information pathways

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 11 publications

11 TB publications mention this gene. 11 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 6 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 3 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 3-record verified sample: M. leprae (2), M. smegmatis (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 11: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Mycobacterium smegmatis putative Holliday junction resolvases RuvC and RuvX play complementary roles in the processing of branched DNA structures. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107732 2024
Novel insights into ATP-Stimulated Cleavage of branched DNA and RNA Substrates through Structure-Guided Studies of the Holliday Junction Resolvase RuvX. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167014 2021
A comparative analysis of the DNA recombination repair pathway in mycobacterial genomes. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2016.04.011 2016
Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvX is a Holliday junction resolvase formed by dimerisation of the monomeric YqgF nuclease domain. doi:10.1111/mmi.13338 2016
RecA-independent DNA damage induction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ruvC despite an appropriately located SOS box. doi:10.1128/JB.01066-09 2010
10 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 11 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv2594c, ruvC, Mb2625c, ML0481, MMAR_2109, MSMEG_2943, MAB_2884c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Mycobacterium smegmatis putative Holliday junction resolvases RuvC and RuvX play complementary roles in the processing of branched DNA structures. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107732 names it J Biol Chem 2024
Novel insights into ATP-Stimulated Cleavage of branched DNA and RNA Substrates through Structure-Guided Studies of the Holliday Junction Resolvase RuvX. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167014 J Mol Biol 2021
A comparative analysis of the DNA recombination repair pathway in mycobacterial genomes. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2016.04.011 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2016
Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvX is a Holliday junction resolvase formed by dimerisation of the monomeric YqgF nuclease domain. doi:10.1111/mmi.13338 Mol Microbiol 2016
RecA-independent DNA damage induction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ruvC despite an appropriately located SOS box. doi:10.1128/JB.01066-09 names it J Bacteriol 2010
Structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvA, a protein involved in recombination. doi:10.1107/S1744309106024791 Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2006
Definition of the mycobacterial SOS box and use to identify LexA-regulated genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1128/JB.184.12.3287-3295.2002 J Bacteriol 2002
Identification of some DNA damage-inducible genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: apparent lack of correlation with LexA binding. doi:10.1128/JB.183.15.4459-4467.2001 J Bacteriol 2001
Functional interactions of Mycobacterium leprae RuvA with Escherichia coli RuvB and RuvC on holliday junctions. doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4009 names it J Mol Biol 2000
Crystal structure of an octameric RuvA-Holliday junction complex. doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80280-4 Mol Cell 1998

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene

NeighbourruvA (Rv2593c, - strand)
Overlap4 bp, 1 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 2 independently-modulated gene set(s): WhiB4 (whiB4), Rv1828/SigH (Rv1828 or sigH).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -3.12 (95% CI -4.21 to -1.90). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionNuclease that resolves holliday junction intermediates in genetic recombination. Cleaves the cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA by nicking to strands with the same polarity at sites symmetrically opposed at the junction in the homologous ARMS and leaves a 5'terminal phosphate and a 3'terminal hydroxyl group [catalytic activity: endonucleolytic cleavage at a junction such as a reciprocal single
Mycobrowser EC 3.1.22.4 · agrees with the atlas

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2625c · 99.5% identity
M. leprae ML0481 · 81.0% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2109 · 84.6% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_2943 · 76.6% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002685 · 99.5% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2884c · 71.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WGV9 SwissProt · reviewed · Inferred from homology
UniProt nameCrossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC
EC (curated) EC 3.1.21.10
Curated functionThe RuvA-RuvB-RuvC complex processes Holliday junction (HJ) DNA during genetic recombination and DNA repair. Endonuclease that resolves HJ intermediates. Cleaves cruciform DNA by making single-stranded nicks across the HJ at symmetrical positions within the homologous arms, yielding a 5'-phosphate and a 3'-hydroxyl group; requires a central core of homology in the junction. The consensus cleavage sequence is 5'-(A/T)TT(C/G)-3'. Cleavage occurs on the 3'-side of the TT dinucleotide at the point of strand exchange. HJ branch migration catalyzed by RuvA-RuvB allows RuvC to scan DNA until it finds.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category L Replication, recombination and repair
Preferred nameruvC
eggNOG descriptionNuclease that resolves Holliday junction intermediates in genetic recombination. Cleaves the cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA by nicking to strands with the same polarity at sites symmetrically opposed at the junction in the homologous arms and leaves a 5'-terminal phosphate and a 3'-terminal hydroxyl group
Orthologous groupCOG0817
EC number EC 3.1.22.4
KEGG orthology K01159
KEGG pathways map03440
Gene Ontology (54) GO:0000725, GO:0003674, GO:0003824, GO:0004518, GO:0004519, GO:0004520, GO:0004536, GO:0005575, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0006139, GO:0006259 +42 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 83.8% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 11/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 67.2%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential

The two screens disagree on this gene: Tn-seq says growth-defect (insertions tolerated, NOT essential) (GD), CRISPRi says essential.

Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -3.115), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.

DeJesus 2017 callGD · growth-defect
What the call meansgrowth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential
TA sites (Himar1) 6 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 6 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.667, mean read count 5.75. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 6 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Read with some caution: only 6 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 6 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance27.1 ppm · rank 2130/3519 (39.5th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length188 aa
Molecular weight19.8 kDa
Theoretical pI9.21
GRAVY0.11 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index97.8
Aromaticity0.027
Instability index22.0 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
RuvCPF02075.24 1.1e-613–152 Crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 94.0, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 94.0

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
6lw3-assembly1_B 1.00 0.93 0.75 0.92 36% 80% / 97% 1.2e-16 sig 6lw3-assembly1_B Crystal structure of RuvC from Pseudomonas aeruginosa
7xhj-assembly1_A 1.00 0.93 0.76 0.92 37% 81% / 98% 7.4e-16 sig 7xhj-assembly1_A Crystal structure of RuvC from Deinococcus radiodurans
6s16-assembly1_B 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.89 35% 83% / 94% 1.5e-15 sig 6s16-assembly1_B T. thermophilus RuvC in complex with Holliday junction substrate
4ep4-assembly1_B 1.00 0.91 0.78 0.88 35% 84% / 96% 8.8e-16 sig 4ep4-assembly1_B Thermus thermophilus RuvC structure
4ep5-assembly1_A-2 1.00 0.88 0.74 0.88 34% 83% / 95% 7.7e-15 sig 4ep5-assembly1_A-2 Thermus thermophilus RuvC structure

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 94.0, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3

Upstream (5' on genome)ruvA (- strand, -4 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)vapB40 (+ strand, 108 bp gap)
Predicted operon ruvB · ruvA · ruvC

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: ruvA · ruvC — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2671) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv2592c · Rv2593c · Rv2594c (coverage 35.12)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 18.11) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (2 TF) Rv0081 (represses) · whiA (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

lexA represses (high confidence · LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012))
ChIP-seq (25 pics, 23 loci distincts)
Caveat: Regulation partiellement RecA-dependante.

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: ruvA (Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvA), high confidence (score 998, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 55 partners at medium confidence (10 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 55 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2593c ruvA exp (transferred) Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvA 999 998 ctx neighborhood:882 coexpression:910 experimental:699 textmining:933
Rv2592c ruvB Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvB 999 994 ctx neighborhood:882 cooccurence:529 coexpression:878 textmining:922
Rv2897c hypothetical protein 719 689 ctx cooccurence:683
Rv2736c recX regulatory protein RecX 859 674 coexpression:663 textmining:588
Rv2898c hypothetical protein 606 606 ctx cooccurence:592
Rv2600 integral membrane protein 602 602 ctx neighborhood:601
Rv2596 vapC40 ribonuclease VapC40 570 571 ctx neighborhood:567
Rv0429c def polypeptide deformylase 621 559 ctx cooccurence:478
Rv2595 vapB40 antitoxin VapB40 554 555 ctx neighborhood:552
Rv2926c hypothetical protein 489 490 ctx cooccurence:452
Rv2603c transcriptional regulator 496 419
Rv2586c secF protein translocase subunit SecF 410 411
Rv2597 dark membrane protein 408 409 ctx neighborhood:408
Rv2152c murC UDP-N-acetylmuramate--alanine ligase 405 406
Rv2965c kdtB phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase 405 405

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): RuvC PF02075.24 (E=1e-61)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217110.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — RuvC (PF02075.24)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0817
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WGV9 (SwissProt, reviewed; Inferred from homology)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 94.0)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 55 functional partner(s); context anchor ruvA
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002761|Rv2594c|ruvC
MRVMGVDPGLTRCGLSLIESGRGRQLTALDVDVVRTPSDAALAQRLLAISDAVEHWLDTHHPEVVAIERVFSQLNVTTVMGTAQAGGVIALAAAKRGVDVHFHTPSEVKAAVTGNGSADKAQVTAMVTKILALQAKPTPADAADALALAICHCWRAPTIARMAEATSRAEARAAQQRHAYLAKLKAAR