Rv2609c Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2609c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002777 · 351 aa · 2960363–2961418 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217125.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand ruvC (Rv2594c) — requalified: crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC vapB40 (Rv2595) — family_assigned: AbrB/MazE/SpoVT family DNA-binding domain-containing protein vapC40 (Rv2596) — family_assigned: type II toxin-antitoxin system VapC family toxin Rv2597 (Rv2597) — dark: DUF4178 domain-containing protein Rv2598 (Rv2598) — family_assigned: DUF2617 family protein Rv2599 (Rv2599) — family_assigned: DUF4247 domain-containing protein vapC41 (Rv2602) — family_assigned: type II toxin-antitoxin system VapC family toxin Rv2603c (Rv2603c) — family_assigned: YebC/PmpR family DNA-binding transcriptional regulator snoP (Rv2604c) — family_assigned: pyridoxal 5'-phosphate synthase glutaminase subunit PdxT tesB2 (Rv2605c) — requalified: acyl-CoA thioesterase II tesB2 snzP (Rv2606c) — family_assigned: pyridoxal 5'-phosphate synthase lyase subunit PdxS snzP pdxH (Rv2607) — requalified: pyridoxamine 5'-phosphate oxidase Rv2609c (Rv2609c) — family_assigned: NUDIX domain-containing protein Rv2609c pimA (Rv2610c) — requalified: phosphatidyl-myo-inositol alpha-mannosyltransferase pimA Rv2611c (Rv2611c) — requalified: phosphatidylinositol mannoside acyltransferase Rv2611c Rv2613c (Rv2613c) — requalified: ATP adenylyltransferase thrS (Rv2614c) — requalified: threonine--tRNA ligase thrS Rv2616 (Rv2616) — family_assigned: DUF1990 family protein Rv2617c (Rv2617c) — family_assigned: DoxX family membrane protein Rv2619c (Rv2619c) — family_assigned: cupin domain-containing protein Rv2620c (Rv2620c) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv2621c (Rv2621c) — family_assigned: helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein Rv2622 (Rv2622) — family_assigned: methyltransferase domain-containing protein 2 952 kb 2 956 kb 2 960 kb 2 964 kb 2 968 kb 2 972 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)membrane protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationNUDIX domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)NUDIX domain-containing protein. Pfam: NUDIX (PF00293.35).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication discusses this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 0 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 1 a non-TB mycobacterial context (no species could be confirmed in the 1-record verified sample). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Mycobacterial Populations Partly Change the Proportions of the Cells Undergoing Asymmetric/Symmetric Divisions in Response to Glycerol Levels in Growth Medium. doi:10.3390/cells10051160 2021

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourpimA (Rv2610c, - strand)
Overlap1 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -2.32 (95% CI -2.54 to -2.10). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2641c · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML0451c · 77.7% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2093 · 78.3% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_2936 · 66.2% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002701 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2893c · 60.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt I6YDV4 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameProbable conserved membrane protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category L Replication, recombination and repair
eggNOG descriptionpfam nudix
Orthologous groupCOG0494

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.188 · quasi-invariant (3 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) undefined (dS = 0) (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 77.1% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 5/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 55.2%
detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) ESD — not strictly essential

The two screens differ on the SCOPE of what is required: Tn-seq says essential (domain-level only) (ESD), CRISPRi says essential.

These two screens are not in plain contradiction here, but they do not say the same thing either, and the difference matters for what may be written about this gene. Tn-seq (DeJesus 2017) places the requirement on a SUB-REGION of the ORF and explicitly declines to call the whole gene essential; CRISPRi (Bosch 2021) calls the gene essential under partial knockdown. Both point to an important gene; they disagree on the SCOPE of what is required. Locate the domain before concluding, and note that a stretch carrying no TA site is invisible to Himar1 Tn-seq — neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred there. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -2.317), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 26 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 27 showing this direction of disagreement.

DeJesus 2017 callESD · essential domain
What the call meansessential domain: only a SUB-REGION of the ORF is essential; the gene as a whole is NOT essential. Locate the domain before concluding, and beware that a region devoid of TA sites is invisible to Himar1 TnSeq (neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred).
TA sites (Himar1) 13 in the ORF — 6 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 7 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.538, mean read count 126.285714286. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 13 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness after prolonged in vitro passage (in vitro passage) -2.840.023 required
differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) -1.280.0016 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 2 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 11 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance20.9 ppm · rank 2317/3519 (34.2th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (1 TM helix)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)1

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length351 aa
Molecular weight38.1 kDa
Theoretical pI6.27
GRAVY-0.035 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index102.5
Aromaticity0.066
Instability index39.6 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
NUDIXPF00293.35 7.4e-20177–316 NUDIX domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 87.6, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 6

Upstream (5' on genome)PPE42 (+ strand, 21 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)pimA (- strand, -1 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2609c · pimA · Rv2611c · pgsA1 · Rv2613c · thrS

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 3: Rv2609c · pimA · Rv2611c — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2684) exponential phase: operon of 6, Rv2609c · Rv2610c · Rv2611c · Rv2612c · Rv2613c · Rv2614c (coverage 27.63)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

crp binding site only -- direction not determined (low confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq : site de fixation CRP (1 des 191 sites de Kahramanoglou et al. 2014) ; aucun changement d'expression rapporte pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp
Caveat: Site de fixation CRP mesure par ChIP-seq (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014), SANS changement d'expression mesure pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp : le sens de la regulation n'est PAS determine. Ecrire « site de fixation CRP en amont », jamais « regule par CRP ». L'article ne distingue pas « non differentiellement exprime » de « sous le seuil », donc l'absence de ce gene de la table d'expression n'est pas une preuve de non-regulation.

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: pimA (alpha-(1-2)-phosphatidylinositol mannosyltransferase), high confidence (score 968, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 152 partners at medium confidence (10 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 152 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2610c pimA alpha-(1-2)-phosphatidylinositol mannosyltransferase 982 968 ctx neighborhood:781 cooccurence:506 coexpression:732 textmining:479
Rv3433c nnr exp (transferred) curated bifunctional ADP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase/NAD(P)H-hydrate epimerase 941 933 experimental:787 database:643
Rv2611c phosphatidylinositol mannoside acyltransferase 951 893 ctx neighborhood:798 cooccurence:490 textmining:566
Rv2613c AP-4-A phosphorylase 934 831 ctx neighborhood:798 textmining:631
Rv2614c thrS threonine--tRNA ligase 877 819 ctx neighborhood:798
Rv2612c pgsA1 CDP-diacylglycerol--inositol 3-phosphatidyltransferase 884 814 ctx neighborhood:798 textmining:402
Rv3211 rhlE exp (transferred) curated ATP-dependent RNA helicase RhlE 783 770 experimental:403 database:615
Rv1253 deaD exp (transferred) curated ATP-dependent RNA helicase DeaD 782 769 experimental:403 database:615
Rv2524c fas curated fatty acid synthase 715 705 database:406
Rv2418c octT hypothetical protein 703 704 ctx cooccurence:680
Rv0556 transmembrane protein 656 656 ctx cooccurence:651
Rv1340 rphA curated ribonuclease PH 683 652 database:636
Rv1109c hypothetical protein 650 650 ctx cooccurence:649
Rv3415c hypothetical protein 649 649 ctx cooccurence:648
Rv3196 hypothetical protein 648 648 ctx cooccurence:625

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: membrane protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: NUDIX domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): NUDIX PF00293.35 (E=7e-20)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217125.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — NUDIX (PF00293.35)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0494
  • Curated reference: UniProt I6YDV4 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 87.6)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 152 functional partner(s); context anchor pimA
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_002777|Rv2609c|
MTWLVLAGAVLLVVLVAFGAWGYQTANRLNRLNVRYDLSWQSLDSALARRAVVARAVAIDAYGGAPQGSRLAALADAAEGAPRHARENAENELSAALAMVNPASLPAALIAELADAEARVLLARRFHNDAVRDTLALGERRLVRLLRLGGTAVLPTYFEIVERPHALVHGDQGASGRRTSARVVLLDDSGAVLLLCGSDPANPAFRDGAAPKWWFTVGGQVRPGERLAQAAARELAEETGLRVAPADMIGPIWRRDEVFEFNGSLIDSEEFYLVHRTRRFEPAVQGRTELERRYIRDARWCDANDIAQLVAAGERVYPLQLGELLPAANRLVDVALDNGAARDAGVPQPIR