ruvA Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv2593c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002760 ·
196 aa ·
2947783–2948373 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_217109.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvA |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | Holliday junction branch migration protein RuvA |
| Revised (this work) | Holliday junction branch migration protein RuvA. Pfam: RuvA_N (PF01330.28), HHH_5 (PF14520.13), RuvA_C (PF07499.20). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | information pathways |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) studied as much outside M. tuberculosis
The biology of this gene is documented at least as much outside M. tuberculosis as within it — 4 record(s) in a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the verified sample: M. leprae 4) versus 4 in a TB context, two separate queries. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is “known” about this gene is known by proxy.
- A tetramer-octamer equilibrium in Mycobacterium leprae and Escherichia coli RuvA by analytical ultracentrifugation. (2003)
- Functional interactions of Mycobacterium leprae RuvA with Escherichia coli RuvB and RuvC on holliday junctions. (2000)
- A synthetic holliday junction is sandwiched between two tetrameric Mycobacterium leprae RuvA structures in solution: new insights from neutron scattering contrast variation and modelling. (1998)
Caveat: IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge.
9 TB publications mention this gene. 9 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). **Its biology is documented at least as much OUTSIDE M. tuberculosis as within it**: queried separately, 4 records carry a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 4-record verified sample: M. leprae (4)) against 4 with a M. tuberculosis context. The context counts come from distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they are not parts of the total above and need not add up to it. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is 'known' about this gene is known by proxy. reformulation, not a quotation
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| A comparative analysis of the DNA recombination repair pathway in mycobacterial genomes. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2016.04.011 | 2016 |
| Functional analysis of DNA replication fork reversal catalyzed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvAB proteins. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.304741 | 2012 |
| Crystallographic and modelling studies on Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvA Additional role of RuvB-binding domain and inter species variability. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.04.003 | 2009 |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvA induces two distinct types of structural distortions between the homologous and heterologous Holliday junctions. doi:10.1021/bi8016526 | 2009 |
| Structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvA, a protein involved in recombination. doi:10.1107/S1744309106024791 | 2006 |
10 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 9 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)
Searched as: Rv2593c, ruvA, Mb2624c, ML0482, MMAR_2110, MSMEG_2944, MAB_2883c
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene
| Neighbour | ruvB (Rv2592c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 1 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 2 independently-modulated gene set(s):
WhiB4 (whiB4), Rv1828/SigH (Rv1828 or sigH).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -2.54 (95% CI -3.25 to -1.89). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | forms a complex with RUVB. RUVA stimulates, in the presence of DNA, the weak ATPase activity of RUVB. The RUVA-RUVB complex in the presence of ATP renatures cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA with palindromic sequence, indicating that it may promote strand exchange reactions in homologous recombination. RUVAB is an helicase that mediates the holliday junction migration by localized denaturatio |
|---|---|
| Mycobrowser EC |
3.6.4.12
· agrees with the atlas
|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2624c
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML0482
· 76.4% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_2110
· 84.8% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_2944
· 78.9% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002684
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_2883c
· 73.8% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WGW3
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Holliday junction branch migration complex subunit RuvA |
| Curated function | The RuvA-RuvB-RuvC complex processes Holliday junction (HJ) DNA during genetic recombination and DNA repair, while the RuvA-RuvB complex plays an important role in the rescue of blocked DNA replication forks via replication fork reversal (RFR). Binds HJ DNA. RuvA specifically binds to HJ cruciform DNA, conferring on it an open structure. The RuvB hexamer acts as an ATP-dependent pump, pulling dsDNA into and through the RuvAB complex. HJ branch migration allows RuvC to scan DNA until it finds its consensus sequence, where it cleaves and resolves the cruciform DNA. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
L Replication, recombination and repair
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | ruvA |
| eggNOG description | The RuvA-RuvB complex in the presence of ATP renatures cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA with palindromic sequence, indicating that it may promote strand exchange reactions in homologous recombination. RuvAB is a helicase that mediates the Holliday junction migration by localized denaturation and reannealing. RuvA stimulates, in the presence of DNA, the weak ATPase activity of RuvB |
| Orthologous group | COG0632 |
| EC number |
EC 3.6.4.12
|
| KEGG orthology |
K03550
|
| KEGG pathways |
map03440
|
| Gene Ontology (56) |
GO:0000724, GO:0000725, GO:0003674, GO:0003678, GO:0003824, GO:0004386, GO:0005575, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0006139, GO:0006259, GO:0006281 +44 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.201 · quasi-invariant (6 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 4 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 83.3%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 13/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 51.0% detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential
Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -2.543), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | GD · growth-defect |
|---|---|
| What the call means | growth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
6 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
6 growth-defect,
0 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.833,
mean read count 3.8.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 6 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Read with some caution: only 6 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 6 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) | +2.32 | 0.044 | disruption advantageous |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 12 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 101.0 ppm · rank 1288/3519 (63.4th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 196 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 20.2 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 6.42 |
| GRAVY | 0.308 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 109.6 |
| Aromaticity | 0.026 |
| Instability index | 26.5 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RuvA_N | PF01330.28 | 6.6e-22 | 1–61 | RuvA N terminal domain |
HHH_5 | PF14520.13 | 4.1e-14 | 71–129 | Helix-hairpin-helix domain |
RuvA_C | PF07499.20 | 7.0e-10 | 151–192 | RuvA, C-terminal domain |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
Experimental structure 2ztd (PDBe), the strongest available structural
evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default)
shown as sticks.
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 4 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
2ztd |
X-ray diffraction | 2.4 Å | 100% |
2h5x |
X-ray diffraction | 2.7 Å | 100% |
2ztc |
X-ray diffraction | 2.8 Å | 100% |
2zte |
X-ray diffraction | 3.2 Å | 100% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (4 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 90.2
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2h5x-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 94% | 99% / 100% | 9.4e-28 sig | 2h5x-assembly1_A RuvA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis |
2ztd-assembly1_B |
1.00 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 92% | 98% / 98% | 6.4e-28 sig | 2ztd-assembly1_B MtRuvA Form III |
2h5x-assembly1_B-2 |
1.00 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 94% | 98% / 100% | 1.3e-27 sig | 2h5x-assembly1_B-2 RuvA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis |
2ztd-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 93% | 99% / 96% | 7.5e-28 sig | 2ztd-assembly1_A MtRuvA Form III |
2ztc-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 93% | 99% / 96% | 1.5e-26 sig | 2ztc-assembly1_A MtRuvA Form II |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 90.2, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3
| Upstream (5' on genome) | ruvB (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | ruvC (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
ruvB · ruvA · ruvC
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
ruvA · ruvC
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2670) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv2592c · Rv2593c · Rv2594c
(coverage 35.12)
not expressed (stationary phase) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (2 TF) |
Rv0081 (represses) · whiA (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)
lexA |
represses (low confidence · LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012))
ChIP-seq (25 pics, 23 loci distincts) Caveat: PP=0.18 -- pic tres fragile (ruvA). |
|---|
Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: ruvB (Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvB), high confidence (score 1000, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 74 partners at medium confidence (12 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 74 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2592c ruvB exp (transferred) |
Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvB | 999 | 1000 ctx | neighborhood:882 cooccurence:765 coexpression:976 experimental:928 textmining:934 |
Rv2594c ruvC exp (transferred) |
crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RuvC | 999 | 998 ctx | neighborhood:882 coexpression:910 experimental:699 textmining:933 |
Rv2600 |
integral membrane protein | 604 | 603 ctx | neighborhood:601 |
Rv2596 vapC40 |
ribonuclease VapC40 | 572 | 572 ctx | neighborhood:567 |
Rv2595 vapB40 |
antitoxin VapB40 | 554 | 555 ctx | neighborhood:552 |
Rv3433c nnr |
bifunctional ADP-dependent (S)-NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase/NAD(P)H-hydrate epimerase | 546 | 546 | |
Rv1901 cinA |
competence damage-inducible protein CinA | 552 | 535 | |
Rv2737c recA |
recombinase A | 925 | 510 | coexpression:471 textmining:854 |
Rv3198c uvrD2 |
ATP-dependent DNA helicase UvrD | 615 | 492 | |
Rv1696 recN |
DNA repair protein RecN | 815 | 486 | textmining:656 |
Rv3202c adnA |
ATP-dependent DNA helicase | 513 | 467 | |
Rv1014c pth |
peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase | 460 | 460 | coexpression:425 |
Rv2152c murC |
UDP-N-acetylmuramate--alanine ligase | 451 | 452 ctx | cooccurence:407 |
Rv1629 polA |
DNA polymerase I | 706 | 440 | textmining:498 |
Rv0949 uvrD1 |
ATP-dependent DNA helicase UvrD | 751 | 429 | textmining:583 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase RuvA
- MTBC0 PGAP product: Holliday junction branch migration protein RuvA
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): RuvA_N PF01330.28 (E=7e-22), HHH_5 PF14520.13 (E=4e-14), RuvA_C PF07499.20 (E=7e-10)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217109.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — RuvA_N (PF01330.28), HHH_5 (PF14520.13), RuvA_C (PF07499.20)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG0632 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WGW3 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 90.2)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
74 functional partner(s); context anchor
ruvB - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002760|Rv2593c|ruvA MIASVRGEVLEVALDHVVIEAAGVGYRVNATPATLATLRQGTEARLITAMIVREDSMTLYGFPDGETRDLFLTLLSVSGVGPRLAMAALAVHDAPALRQVLADGNVAALTRVPGIGKRGAERMVLELRDKVGVAATGGALSTNGHAVRSPVVEALVGLGFAAKQAEEATDTVLAANHDATTSSALRSALSLLGKAR
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for ruvA? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about ruvA