Rv1364c Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1364c · MTBC0 - · 653 aa · 1535683–1537644 H37Rv (-) · RefSeq YP_177802.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)sigma factor regulatory protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)Sigma factor regulatory protein. Pfam: PAS_4 (PF08448.17), SpoIIE (PF07228.18), HATPase_c_2 (PF13581.13), STAS_2 (PF13466.13), STAS (PF01740.27).
Functional category (TubercuList)information pathways

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 10 publications

10 TB publications mention this gene. 10 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 10 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 10: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Tuning the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Alternative Sigma Factor SigF through the Multidomain Regulator Rv1364c and Osmosensory Kinase Protein Kinase D. doi:10.1128/JB.00725-18 2019
[Development and application of homologous recombination knockout system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis]. 2012
The interaction topology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes response to capreomycin and novel clues for more drug targets. doi:10.1002/jcb.23232 2011
Structural characterization of the multidomain regulatory protein Rv1364c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.str.2010.11.010 2011
Role of a PAS sensor domain in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription regulator Rv1364c. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.027 2010
10 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv1364c, Mb1399c, MMAR_3991 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Tuning the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Alternative Sigma Factor SigF through the Multidomain Regulator Rv1364c and Osmosensory Kinase Protein Kinase D. doi:10.1128/JB.00725-18 names it J Bacteriol 2019
[Development and application of homologous recombination knockout system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis]. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 2012
The interaction topology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes response to capreomycin and novel clues for more drug targets. doi:10.1002/jcb.23232 J Cell Biochem 2011
Structural characterization of the multidomain regulatory protein Rv1364c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.str.2010.11.010 names it Structure 2011
Role of a PAS sensor domain in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription regulator Rv1364c. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.027 names it Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010
Interdomain communication in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis environmental phosphatase Rv1364c. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.056168 names it J Biol Chem 2009
Loss of kinase activity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis multidomain protein Rv1364c. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06753.x names it FEBS J 2008
Stress response of genes encoding putative stress signaling molecules of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.2741/2417 Front Biosci 2007
Interactions of anti-sigma factor antagonists of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the yeast two-hybrid system. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2005.08.001 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2005
Increased transcription of a potential sigma factor regulatory gene Rv1364c in Mycobacterium bovis BCG while residing in macrophages indicates use of alternative promoters. doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.02.028 names it FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 2 % of gene

NeighbourRVnc0015 (RVnc0015, - strand)
Overlap34 bp, 2 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

Post-translational modifications

8 reported modified residue(s), incl. 8 phosphosite(s): Phosphothreonine; by PknD @54, Phosphothreonine; by PknD @81, Phosphothreonine; by PknD @299, Phosphothreonine; by PknD @390, Phosphoserine; by PknD @506, Phosphothreonine; by PknD @520, Phosphothreonine; by PknD @568, Phosphoserine; by autocatalysis @600.

Experimentally reported post-translational modification(s). A phosphosite indicates the protein is expressed and is a substrate of the M. tuberculosis Ser/Thr/Tyr kinase signalling network — a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: UniProt (Modified residue features; PTM sites curated from the M. tuberculosis literature).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.86 (95% CI -1.36 to 4.34). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.223 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=9 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionMay be involved in regulating SIGF|Rv3286c

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1399c · 99.7% identity
M. marinum MMAR_3991 · 78.1% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001444 · 99.8% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WLZ7 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameMultidomain regulatory protein Rv1364c
EC (curated) EC 2.7.11.1, EC 3.1.3.16
Curated functionPrimarily acts as an independent SigF regulator that is sensitive to the osmosensory signal, mediating the cross talk of PknD with the SigF regulon. Possesses both phosphatase and kinase activities. The kinase domain functions as a classic anti-sigma factor-like kinase to phosphorylate the anti-anti-sigma factor domain at the canonical regulatory site, and the phosphatase domain antagonizes this activity.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category T Signal transduction mechanisms
Preferred namersbU
eggNOG descriptionStage II sporulation protein E
Orthologous groupCOG1366
Gene Ontology (41) GO:0000287, GO:0003674, GO:0003824, GO:0004035, GO:0005488, GO:0005515, GO:0006355, GO:0006793, GO:0006796, GO:0008150, GO:0008152, GO:0009889 +29 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.427 · purifying
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 5 synonymous, 6 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.267 (low power) · 7 consensus substitution(s)
low power (7 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 45/53 (85%) · mean identity 72.2% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 45/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 2/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 30.8%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 33 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 33 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 84.3636363636. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 33 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -2.520.0 required
differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) +2.170.0 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection, day 45 (in vivo) -1.900.011 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -1.650.0078 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -1.640.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -1.490.0 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) +1.440.012 disruption advantageous
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -1.250.0094 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -1.240.02 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -1.230.014 required
fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) -1.170.034 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 11 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance16.2 ppm · rank 2453/3519 (30.3th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length653 aa
Molecular weight69.5 kDa
Theoretical pI4.88
GRAVY-0.027 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index92.7
Aromaticity0.057
Instability index35.9 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
PAS_4PF08448.17 1.7e-1121–135 PAS fold
SpoIIEPF07228.18 3.8e-41203–396 Stage II sporulation protein E (SpoIIE)
HATPase_c_2PF13581.13 1.2e-16409–522 Histidine kinase-like ATPase domain
STAS_2PF13466.13 1.5e-09555–637 Mlab, STAS domain
STASPF01740.27 4.4e-13560–632 STAS domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 3ke6 (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 4 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
3ke6 X-ray diffraction 2.6 Å 57%
3kx0 X-ray diffraction 2.3 Å 25%
3k3c X-ray diffraction 1.62 Å 24%
3k3d X-ray diffraction 2.3 Å 23%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (4 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 88.1

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
3ke6-assembly3_B-2 1.00 0.97 0.52 0.97 94% 56% / 100% 2.5e-60 sig 3ke6-assembly3_B-2 The crystal structure of the RsbU and RsbW domains of Rv1364c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
3ke6-assembly3_A 1.00 0.96 0.53 0.96 93% 57% / 99% 1.5e-60 sig 3ke6-assembly3_A The crystal structure of the RsbU and RsbW domains of Rv1364c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
3k3c-assembly1_A 1.00 0.96 0.22 0.94 100% 23% / 98% 1.5e-24 sig 3k3c-assembly1_A The N-terminal PAS domain crystal structure of Rv1364c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis at 1.62
3k3d-assembly1_A 1.00 0.94 0.19 0.94 95% 20% / 99% 3.8e-19 sig 3k3d-assembly1_A The N-terminal PAS domain crystal structure of RV1364C from Mycobacterium Tuberculosis at 2.3 angstrom
3kx0-assembly1_X-2 1.00 0.95 0.19 0.95 94% 20% / 99% 3.5e-18 sig 3kx0-assembly1_X-2 Crystal Structure of the PAS domain of Rv1364c

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 88.1, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4

Upstream (5' on genome)mcr15 (- strand, -34 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)rsfA (- strand, 138 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv1362c · Rv1363c · mcr15 · Rv1364c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1410) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv1364c · Rv1365c (coverage 26.0)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 36.65) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) espR (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1354c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 1000, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 175 partners at medium confidence (29 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. Of the 175 partners, 4 rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1354c hypothetical protein 999 1000 ctx neighborhood:544 coexpression:999 textmining:735
Rv1173 fbiC FO synthase 999 999 coexpression:999
Rv1365c rsfA measured in Mtb anti-sigma-F factor antagonist RsfA 998 998 ctx neighborhood:545 coexpression:928 experimental:912
Rv3687c rsfB exp (transferred) anti-anti-sigma factor RsfB 996 996 ctx cooccurence:569 coexpression:929 experimental:859
Rv1904 measured in Mtb hypothetical protein 996 996 coexpression:928 experimental:912
Rv2638 exp (transferred) hypothetical protein 995 994 coexpression:929 experimental:859
Rv0516c oprA exp (transferred) anti-anti-sigma factor 992 991 coexpression:928 experimental:859
Rv3287c rsbW measured in Mtb anti-sigma factor RsbW 990 987 coexpression:959 experimental:658
Rv1876 bfrA bacterioferritin BfrA 959 944 coexpression:944
Rv3286c sigF measured in Mtb RNA polymerase sigma factor SigF 976 935 ctx neighborhood:544 coexpression:713 experimental:471 textmining:643
Rv0990c hypothetical protein 931 931 coexpression:931
Rv3657c membrane protein 930 931 coexpression:920
Rv2896c dprA hypothetical protein 922 922 coexpression:918
Rv3658c transmembrane protein 919 920 coexpression:920
Rv3242c hypothetical protein 892 889 coexpression:874

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): sigma factor regulatory protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): PAS_4 PF08448.17 (E=2e-11), SpoIIE PF07228.18 (E=4e-41), HATPase_c_2 PF13581.13 (E=1e-16), STAS_2 PF13466.13 (E=1e-09), STAS PF01740.27 (E=4e-13)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq YP_177802.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — PAS_4 (PF08448.17), SpoIIE (PF07228.18), HATPase_c_2 (PF13581.13), STAS_2 (PF13466.13), STAS (PF01740.27)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1366
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WLZ7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 88.1)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 175 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1354c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv1364c|
MAAEMDWDKTVGAAEDVRRIFEHIPAILVGLEGPDHRFVAVNAAYRGFSPLLDTVGQPAREVYPELEGQQIYEMLDRVYQTGEPQSGSEWRLQTDYDGSGVEERYFDFVVTPRRRADGSIEGVQLIVDDVTSRVRARQAAEARVEELSERYRNVRDSATVMQQALLAASVPVVPGADIAAEYLVAAEDTAAGGDWFDALALGDRLVLVVGDVVGHGVEAAAVMSQLRTALRMQISAGYTVVEALEAVDRFHKQVPGSKSATMCVGSLDFTSGEFQYCTAGHPPPLLVTADASARYVEPTGAGPLGSGTGFPVRSEVLNIGDAILFYTDGLIERPGRPLEASTAEFADLAASIASGSGGFVLDAPARPIDRLCSDTLELLLRSTGYNDDVTLLAMQRRAPTPPLHITLDATINAARTVRAQLREWLAEIGADHSDIADIVHAISEFVENAVEHGYATDVSKGIVVAAALAGDGNVRASVIDRGQWKDHRDGARGRGRGLAMAEALVSEARIMHGAGGTTATLTHRLSRPARFVTDTMVRRAAFQQTIDSEFVSLVESGRIVVRGDVDSTTAATLDRQIAVESRSGIAPVTIDLSAVTHLGSAGVGALAAACDRARKQGTECVLVAPPGSPAHHVLSLVQLPVVGADTEDIFAQE