rsfA Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv1365c · MTBC0 mtbc0_001467 ·
128 aa ·
1548485–1548871 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_215881.1
- Both statements stand. UniProt labels this protein "Evidence at protein level", a curator's judgement whose basis (mass spectrometry, structure, antibody, Edman sequencing) this atlas does not record; PaxDb counts detections in 16 aggregated mass-spectrometry datasets and none detects it, which is not evidence of absence. Translation is also attested independently of mass spectrometry: Smith et al. 2022 (eLife) list it among the ORFs identified by Ribo-RET. This shows that the ORF is translated, not that a stable protein accumulates. The UniProt entry carries 5 annotation(s) with experimental support from 2 publications; this atlas has not checked whether any of them measures the protein itself. (uniprot protein level vs ms undetected, 2026-10-09)
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | anti-sigma-F factor antagonist RsfA |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | anti-sigma-F factor antagonist RsfA |
| Revised (this work) | Anti-sigma-F factor antagonist RsfA. Pfam: STAS (PF01740.27), STAS_2 (PF13466.13). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | information pathways |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) studied as much outside M. tuberculosis
The biology of this gene is documented at least as much outside M. tuberculosis as within it — 3 record(s) in a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the verified sample: M. smegmatis 3) versus 3 in a TB context, two separate queries. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is “known” about this gene is known by proxy.
- The RsfSR two-component system regulates SigF function by monitoring the state of the respiratory electron transport chain in Mycobacterium smegmatis. (2024)
- The Partner Switching System of the SigF Sigma Factor in Mycobacterium smegmatis and Induction of the SigF Regulon Under Respiration-Inhibitory Conditions. (2020)
- Characterization of Mycobacterium smegmatis sigF mutant and its regulon: overexpression of SigF antagonist (MSMEG_1803) in M. smegmatis mimics sigF mutant phenotype, loss of pigmentation, and sensitivity to oxidative stress. (2015)
Caveat: IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge.
6 TB publications mention this gene. 6 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). **Its biology is documented at least as much OUTSIDE M. tuberculosis as within it**: queried separately, 3 records carry a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 3-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (3)) against 3 with a M. tuberculosis context. The context counts come from distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they are not parts of the total above and need not add up to it. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is 'known' about this gene is known by proxy. reformulation, not a quotation
6 records returned by the alias sweep
Searched as: Rv1365c, rsfA, Mb1400c
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.13 (95% CI -0.66 to 1.08). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.296 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=5 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Regulates negatively Rv3287c|RSBW|USFX. Regulated by redox potential. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb1400c
· 99.2% identity |
|---|---|
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_001445
· 99.2% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WGE3
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Anti-sigma-F factor antagonist RsfA |
| Curated function | Positive, redox-sensitive regulator of sigma-F (SigF) activity. When reduced binds to anti-sigma-F factor RsbW (UsfX) preventing its binding to SigF, thus activating transcription. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
K Transcription
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | rsfA |
| eggNOG description | STAS domain |
| Orthologous group | COG1366 |
| Gene Ontology (39) |
GO:0000988, GO:0000989, GO:0003674, GO:0006355, GO:0008150, GO:0009889, GO:0009891, GO:0009893, GO:0010468, GO:0010556, GO:0010557, GO:0010604 +27 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 1.045 · quasi-invariant (4 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 1 synonymous, 3 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 51/53 (96%) · mean identity 54.1%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 51/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 3/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 33.9% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
6 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
6 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 160.833333333.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 6 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Read with some caution: only 6 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 6 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected
Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 128 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 13.6 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 6.35 |
| GRAVY | 0.013 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 91.6 |
| Aromaticity | 0.031 |
| Instability index | 30.0 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
STAS | PF01740.27 | 7.4e-24 | 20–124 | STAS domain |
STAS_2 | PF13466.13 | 2.3e-10 | 20–115 | Mlab, STAS domain |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 91.3, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 91.3
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8ih8-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 24% | 89% / 95% | 2.7e-08 sig | 8ih8-assembly1_A anti-sigmaF factor and Anti-sigmaF factor antagonist complex(usfx-RsfB) |
1th8-assembly1_B |
1.00 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 20% | 85% / 94% | 3.2e-08 sig | 1th8-assembly1_B Crystal Structures of the ADP and ATP bound forms of the Bacillus Anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB in complex with the Anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA: inhibitory complex with ADP, crystal form II |
1vc1-assembly1_B |
1.00 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 22% | 85% / 98% | 3.7e-08 sig | 1vc1-assembly1_B Crystal structure of the TM1442 protein from Thermotoga maritima, a homolog of the Bacillus subtilis general stress response anti-anti-sigma factor RsbV |
4qtp-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 24% | 91% / 95% | 6.2e-08 sig | 4qtp-assembly2_B Crystal Structure of an Anti-sigma Factor Antagonist from Mycobacterium paratuberculosis |
1til-assembly1_B |
1.00 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 20% | 91% / 99% | 6.6e-08 sig | 1til-assembly1_B Crystal Structures of the ADP and ATP bound forms of the Bacillus Anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB in complex with the Anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA:Poised for phosphorylation complex with ATP, crystal form II |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 91.3, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv1364c (- strand, 138 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv1366 (+ strand, 220 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1411) |
exponential phase: operon of 2,
Rv1364c · Rv1365c
(coverage 26.0)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 17.05) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1364c (sigma factor regulatory protein), high confidence (score 998, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself (own experimental score 399): a measured association in this organism, as opposed to one carried over from other proteomes.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 92 partners at medium confidence (6 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. Of the 92 partners, 3 rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv1364c measured in Mtb |
sigma factor regulatory protein | 998 | 998 ctx | neighborhood:545 coexpression:928 experimental:912 |
Rv3287c rsbW measured in Mtb |
anti-sigma factor RsbW | 952 | 901 ctx | cooccurence:441 coexpression:507 experimental:658 textmining:538 |
Rv1354c |
hypothetical protein | 750 | 735 | coexpression:648 |
Rv1173 fbiC |
FO synthase | 658 | 659 | coexpression:648 |
Rv0655 mkl exp (transferred) |
ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | 644 | 645 | experimental:629 |
Rv3899c |
hypothetical protein | 632 | 633 ctx | cooccurence:561 |
Rv3687c rsfB |
anti-anti-sigma factor RsfB | 920 | 613 ctx | cooccurence:611 textmining:803 |
Rv1752 |
hypothetical protein | 611 | 612 ctx | cooccurence:607 |
Rv2079 |
hypothetical protein | 590 | 591 ctx | cooccurence:587 |
Rv3912 rsmA |
anti-sigma-M factor RsmA | 560 | 561 ctx | cooccurence:547 |
Rv1366 |
hypothetical protein | 829 | 559 ctx | neighborhood:496 textmining:630 |
Rv0497 |
transmembrane protein | 556 | 557 ctx | cooccurence:554 |
Rv2721c |
hypothetical protein | 552 | 552 ctx | cooccurence:551 |
Rv0020c fhaA |
FHA domain-containing protein FhaA | 542 | 542 | |
Rv0172 mce1D |
Mce family protein Mce1D | 536 | 536 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: anti-sigma-F factor antagonist RsfA
- MTBC0 PGAP product: anti-sigma-F factor antagonist RsfA
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): STAS PF01740.27 (E=7e-24), STAS_2 PF13466.13 (E=2e-10)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215881.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — STAS (PF01740.27), STAS_2 (PF13466.13)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG1366 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WGE3 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 91.3)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
92 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv1364c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_001467|Rv1365c|rsfA MNPTQAGSFTTPVSNALKATIQHHDSAVIIHARGEIDAANEHTWQDLVTKAAAATTAPEPLVVNLNGLDFMGCCAVAVLAHEAERCRRRGVDVRLVSRDRAVARIIHACGYGDVLPVHPTTESALSAT
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for rsfA? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about rsfA