whiB1 Family assigned · medium auto-curated
H37Rv Rv3219 · MTBC0 - ·
84 aa ·
3595713–3595967 H37Rv
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_217735.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | transcriptional regulator WhiB1 |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | — |
| Revised (this work) | Transcriptional regulator WhiB1. Pfam: Whib (PF02467.22). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | regulatory proteins |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 23 publications
23 TB publications mention this gene. 23 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 21 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 7 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 7-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (6), M. abscessus (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| Cell-free genomics reveals fundamental regulatory principles of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription cycle. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2026.01.028 | 2026 |
| Genomic Analyses of Longitudinal Mycobacterium abscessus Isolates in a Multicenter Cohort Reveal Parallel Signatures of In-Host Adaptation. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiad187 | 2023 |
| Structural basis of DNA binding by the WhiB-like transcription factor WhiB3 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104777 | 2023 |
| Structural insights into the functional divergence of WhiB-like proteins in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.002 | 2021 |
| Structural basis of non-canonical transcriptional regulation by the σA-bound iron-sulfur protein WhiB1 in M. tuberculosis. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1133 | 2020 |
26 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 23 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)
Searched as: Rv3219, whiB1, Mb3245, ML0804c, MMAR_1338, MSMEG_1919, MAB_3539
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 19% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 85.4 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 17 aa [67-84] |
carries a substantial disordered region (17/84 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -10.92 (95% CI -11.72 to -10.13). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Involved in transcriptional mechanism. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb3245
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML0804c
· 95.2% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_1338
· 96.4% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_1919
· 96.4% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_003318
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_3539
· 89.3% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WF43
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Transcriptional regulator WhiB1 |
| Curated function | Acts as a transcriptional repressor, inhibiting expression in vitro. Probably redox-responsive. The apo- but not holo-form binds to its own promoter as well as that of groEL2. Oxidized apo-form and nitrosylated holo-form also bind DNA. The apo-form has been shown to act as a protein disulfide reductase, but also not to act as a protein disulfide reductase. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
K Transcription
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | whiB |
| eggNOG description | Acts as a transcriptional regulator. Probably redox- responsive. The apo- but not holo-form probably binds DNA |
| Orthologous group | 2DMIE |
| KEGG orthology |
K18955
|
| Gene Ontology (66) |
GO:0000302, GO:0003674, GO:0003676, GO:0003677, GO:0003824, GO:0005488, GO:0006355, GO:0006950, GO:0006979, GO:0008150, GO:0008152, GO:0009889 +54 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.0 · quasi-invariant (1 site), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 1 synonymous, 0 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 97.2%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 11/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 83.4% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential
Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -10.916), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | GD · growth-defect |
|---|---|
| What the call means | growth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
4 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
4 growth-defect,
0 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.250,
mean read count 1.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 4 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Statistically thin call: only 4 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain
This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.
| Hypomorph strain | Rv3219-whiB1-TetOn2.1 (TetON promoter 2) |
|---|---|
| Baseline knockdown fitness | 3.109 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown |
| Used in target deconvolution | yes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment) |
Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Differential genetic requirements of clinical Mtb strain (ID=631) from East Asian lineage (compared to H37Rv control) (strain background) | +7.76 | 0.0092 | required |
| Differential genetic requirements of clinical Mtb strain (ID=621) from East Asian lineage (compared to H37Rv control) (strain background) | +5.03 | 0.0082 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 2 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 8 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 88.4 ppm · rank 1389/3519 (60.6th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 84 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 9.3 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 8.47 |
| GRAVY | -0.587 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 63.9 |
| Aromaticity | 0.06 |
| Instability index | 63.4 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Whib | PF02467.22 | 5.5e-28 | 3–71 | Transcription factor WhiB |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
Experimental structure 5oay (PDBe), the strongest available structural
evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default)
shown as sticks.
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 3 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
5oay |
Solution NMR | — | 100% |
6ono |
X-ray diffraction | 1.85 Å | 91% |
6onu |
X-ray diffraction | 1.85 Å | 91% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (3 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 85.4
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6onu-assembly3_E |
1.00 | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 100% | 84% / 99% | 2.4e-12 sig | 6onu-assembly3_E Complex structure of WhiB1 and region 4 of SigA in P21 space group. |
8cwt-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 44% | 84% / 97% | 2.4e-06 sig | 8cwt-assembly1_A Complex structure of WhiB3 and the SigmaAr4-RNAP Beta flap tip chimera in space group P43212 |
8dy9-assembly1_H |
1.00 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 42% | 87% / 91% | 1.8e-06 sig | 8dy9-assembly1_H Streptomyces venezuelae RNAP unconstrained open promoter complex with WhiA and WhiB transcription factors |
8dy7-assembly1_H |
1.00 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 42% | 87% / 80% | 6.1e-06 sig | 8dy7-assembly1_H Streptomyces venezuelae RNAP transcription open promoter complex with WhiA and WhiB transcription factors |
8cwr-assembly1_A-3 |
1.00 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 45% | 82% / 84% | 9.1e-06 sig | 8cwr-assembly1_A-3 Complex structure of WhiB3 and the SigmaAr4-RNAP Beta flap tip chimera in space group R3 |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 85.4, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv3218 (+ strand, 279 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv3220c (- strand, 61 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3315) |
expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 757.55)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 1039.34) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE) transcription factor
| Regulon | this transcription factor regulates 5 target gene(s) |
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)
crp |
represses (high confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq (site de fixation CRP) ET RNA-seq du mutant delta-crp : log2FC(WT/delta-crp) = -1.13, padj = 7.6e-05 |
|---|
Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1830 (HTH-type transcriptional regulator), high confidence (score 775, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 55 partners at medium confidence (14 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 55 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2703 sigA exp (transferred) |
RNA polymerase sigma factor SigA | 999 | 999 | experimental:999 textmining:504 |
Rv2710 sigB exp (transferred) |
RNA polymerase sigma factor SigB | 880 | 823 | experimental:821 |
Rv1830 |
HTH-type transcriptional regulator | 775 | 775 ctx | cooccurence:772 |
Rv2901c dark |
hypothetical protein | 773 | 773 ctx | cooccurence:770 |
Rv1440 secG |
protein-export membrane protein SecG | 771 | 772 ctx | cooccurence:769 |
Rv1390 rpoZ |
DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit omega | 768 | 768 ctx | cooccurence:758 |
Rv1321 nucS |
endonuclease NucS | 735 | 736 ctx | cooccurence:732 |
Rv3218 |
hypothetical protein | 869 | 722 ctx | neighborhood:720 textmining:550 |
Rv3195 |
hypothetical protein | 701 | 701 ctx | cooccurence:701 |
Rv2050 rbpA |
RNA polymerase-binding protein RbpA | 711 | 677 ctx | cooccurence:672 |
Rv1025 dark |
hypothetical protein | 656 | 656 ctx | cooccurence:656 |
Rv3907c pcnA |
poly(A) polymerase PcnA | 640 | 640 ctx | cooccurence:640 |
Rv2699c dark |
hypothetical protein | 636 | 637 ctx | cooccurence:633 |
Rv0525 |
hypothetical protein | 629 | 629 ctx | cooccurence:627 |
Rv0807 |
hypothetical protein | 621 | 621 ctx | cooccurence:621 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): transcriptional regulator WhiB1
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Whib PF02467.22 (E=5e-28)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217735.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Whib (PF02467.22)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2DMIE - Curated reference: UniProt P9WF43 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 85.4)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
55 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv1830 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>H37Rv|Rv3219|whiB1 MDWRHKAVCRDEDPELFFPVGNSGPALAQIADAKLVCNRCPVTTECLSWALNTGQDSGVWGGMSEDERRALKRRNARTKARTGV
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for whiB1? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about whiB1