Rv2620c Still unknown · low auto-curated
H37Rv Rv2620c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002789 ·
141 aa ·
2971024–2971449 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_217136.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | transmembrane protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | Conserved hypothetical protein; no recognised domain. Function unknown. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No TB publication mentions this locus tag in its title or abstract (sweep of a ~330k-abstract PubMed TB corpus). A full-text search does however find 10 paper(s) naming this gene in their body text — see the full-text field below. The gene remains dark on function, but it is not unmentioned, and this page no longer claims that it is.
Rv2620c, Mb2653c, MMAR_2082, MSMEG_2686, MAB_3132c
in Europe PMC full text (2026-10-02).
- Towards Reverse Vaccinology for Bovine TB: High Throughput Expression of Full Length Recom (2022, open access)
- Aldehyde accumulation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with defective proteasomal degr (2023, open access)
- A proteome-wide atlas of humoral immunity to <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (2026, open access)
- Phosphoglucomutase A-mediated metabolic adaptation is essential for antibiotic and disease (2025, open access)
- Structural insights into RNase J that plays an essential role in Mycobacterium tuberculosi (2023, open access)
- Identification of HLA-A*11:01-restricted Mycobacterium tuberculosis CD8(+) T cell epitopes (2016, open access)
- Mycobacterium abscessus virulence traits unraveled by transcriptomic profiling in amoeba a (2019, open access)
- Tuberculosis vaccines and therapeutic drug: challenges and future directions. (2025, open access)
- The response of mycobacterium tuberculosis to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. (2011, open access)
- Whole genome identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine candidates by comprehens (2008, open access)
A full-text hit means the gene is NAMED in the body of a paper — very often in a genome-wide supplementary table — not that it is characterised. This field exists to retract an absence claim, never to assert a function. Read the hits before concluding anything. Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions. A hit whose full text is not open access is counted in n_unverifiable, not listed: the API cannot read it, so it is neither a proof of mention nor a proof of absence.
Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 0 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 0 — no mention in either source. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Integrative functional lead (multi-layer synthesis, hypothesis) 3 convergent handles
highest-priority case of the P16.3d batch: a small, near-invariant membrane protein with a real ligand-binding site, function unknown
| Convergent evidence | near-invariant purifying selection (pN/pS=0.0, a single synonymous SNP across 145,209 genomes) — the strongest conservation signal of the batch; CRISPRi vulnerability with a 95% CI entirely below zero (VI=-0.277, CI -0.422..-0.138) — the only gene of the five with a statistically resolved vulnerability signal, despite a non-essential Tn-seq call; P2Rank confident pocket (proba 0.838) on a 141-aa protein — remarkable given that proven enzymes under 200 aa reach this confidence only 3.8% of the time (1/26, P16.3b calibration) |
|---|---|
| Real-gene support | strong purifying selection (pN/pS=0.0, snp_sites=1/145209), MS-detected in 7 datasets, 4 TM helices, 141 aa; no recognised Pfam domain |
| Adversarial check | no Pfam domain and no significant Foldseek hit (best sig=False) -> a genuinely novel fold, not an under-annotated known family; operon/STRING neighbours (fdxA ferredoxin, TB31.7 universal stress protein) are neighbourhood-channel only, discounted as handles; co-repression by Rv2034 shared with Rv0537c (also in this batch) is noted as a striking parallel but is NOT evidence of a shared function -> two dark, unrelated-context genes can share a repressor by chance in a genome this size. |
Synthesised across all evidence layers (conservation, operon, STRING, regulon, phenotype, localisation, structure, vulnerability) under an anti-oversell decision checklist. A functional hypothesis to validate, not an established function. P16.3d individual pocket examination, 2026-08-01.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv2621c (Rv2621c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 1 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Binding-pocket screen (P2Rank, geometric prediction) detector blind at this length
| Pockets found | 1 (best probability 0.838) |
|---|---|
| Model length screened | 141 aa |
Read with care. This protein (141 aa) is below the size where this detector has meaningful power: on proven enzymes, only 3.8% (1/26) under 200 aa reach this layer's P2Rank confidence threshold of best_probability >= 0.70, versus 60.5% (75/124) above it (P16.3b calibration, negative control EsxA/EsxB-scale panel). Both figures are recall AT 0.70, which is also the best separation this detector reaches on that panel (Youden J = 0.416) and whose false-positive rate above 200 aa is 18.9% (81.1% specificity); the looser 0.50 that appears elsewhere in this repository would raise recall above 200 aa to 74.2% and drop specificity to 64.9%. A negative or weak pocket result here should NOT be read as evidence against a ligand-binding role -- the test essentially has no power at this length, not that the protein lacks a site. The same holds in the other direction, and that half was missing here: a STRONG score at this length is not a result either. The same calibration panel does carry that other arm below 200 aa, and the two do not separate: the 3.8% above is matched by 6.6% (5/76) of proteins annotated as non-catalytic clearing 0.70 (Fisher p = 1.00; 15.4% against 11.8% at 0.50, p = 0.73). At this length the score therefore carries no measured information in either direction -- which is a stronger statement than untested power, and the reason a strong score here is not a result. P16.3e, calibration phase72b_pocket_calibration.py, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Rv0576 (Rv0576).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -0.28 (95% CI -0.42 to -0.14). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain (their own confidence call, not a p-value threshold). Its guide library did sample a range of repression strengths (str_span=0.773 on a 0-1 scale, thanks to at least one guide <=18 nt; n_guides=38 descriptive only), so the dose-response fit is not starved of titration the way most 'not certain' genes are -- the uncertainty here is the authors' own confidence call on the fit, not a design limitation of the guide library. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim without checking `certain` first.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2653c
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_2082
· 77.1% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_2686
· 61.1% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002713
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_3132c
· 53.2% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
I6Y9U6
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Probable conserved transmembrane protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| Orthologous group | 2E3RQ |
|---|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.0 · quasi-invariant (1 site), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 1 synonymous, 0 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 51/53 (96%) · mean identity 74.8%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 51/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 4/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 57.7% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
6 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
6 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 320.333333333.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 6 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Read with some caution: only 6 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 6 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 7 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 8.02 ppm · rank 2761/3519 (21.6th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (4 TM helixes) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 4 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 141 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 14.6 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 11.83 |
| GRAVY | 1.169 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 150.8 |
| Aromaticity | 0.057 |
| Instability index | 36.7 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 94.2, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv2619c (- strand, 12 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2621c (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv2619c · Rv2620c · Rv2621c
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 3:
Rv2619c · Rv2620c · Rv2621c
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2695) |
exponential phase: operon of 2,
Rv2620c · Rv2621c
(coverage 18.83)
stationary phase: operon of 2, Rv2620c · Rv2621c
(coverage 6.9)
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
Rv2034 (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2619c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 924, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.
All 8 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2619c |
hypothetical protein | 924 | 924 ctx | neighborhood:874 |
Rv2621c |
transcriptional regulator | 920 | 920 ctx | neighborhood:882 |
Rv2622 |
methyltransferase | 615 | 615 ctx | neighborhood:552 |
Rv2007c fdxA |
ferredoxin | 545 | 546 ctx | neighborhood:544 |
Rv2623 TB31.7 |
universal stress protein | 457 | 457 | |
Rv0185 |
hypothetical protein | 426 | 426 ctx | cooccurence:421 |
Rv2237 |
hypothetical protein | 415 | 415 ctx | cooccurence:415 |
Rv1303 |
hypothetical protein | 405 | 406 ctx | cooccurence:404 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: transmembrane protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: hypothetical protein
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217136.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2E3RQ - Curated reference: UniProt I6Y9U6 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 94.2)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
8 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv2619c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002789|Rv2620c| MSAGPAIEVAVAFVWLGMVVAISFLEAPLKFRAAGVTLQIGLGIGRLVFRALNTVEVGFALVILAIVVVGSTPARIAAAFSVALAALAVQLIAVRPRLTRRSNQVLAGLQAPRSRGHHIYVGLEIVKVVALLVAGILLLNG
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv2620c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv2620c