Rv1488 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1488 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001591 · 381 aa · 1687202–1688347 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_216004.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand acn (Rv1475c) — requalified: iron-regulated aconitate hydratase Acn Rv1476 (Rv1476) — family_assigned: DUF6676 family protein ripA (Rv1477) — family_assigned: NlpC/P60 family peptidoglycan endopeptidase RipA ripA ripB (Rv1478) — family_assigned: NlpC/P60 family peptidoglycan endopeptidase RipB Rv1480 (Rv1480) — family_assigned: DUF58 domain-containing protein Rv1480 Rv1481 (Rv1481) — family_assigned: VWA domain-containing protein Rv1481 Rv1482c (Rv1482c) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv1482c fabG1 (Rv1483) — requalified: 3-oxoacyl-ACP reductase FabG1 inhA (Rv1484) — requalified: NADH-dependent enoyl-ACP reductase InhA hemZ (Rv1485) — requalified: ferrochelatase hemZ Rv1486c (Rv1486c) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv1486c Rv1487 (Rv1487) — family_assigned: NfeD family protein Rv1488 (Rv1488) — family_assigned: SPFH domain-containing protein Rv1488 Rv1490 (Rv1490) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv1490 Rv1491c (Rv1491c) — family_assigned: TVP38/TMEM64 family protein mutA (Rv1492) — family_assigned: methylmalonyl-CoA mutase small subunit mutA mutB (Rv1493) — requalified: methylmalonyl-CoA mutase mutB mazE4 (Rv1494) — requalified: type II toxin-antitoxin system antitoxin MazE4 mazF4 (Rv1495) — requalified: type II toxin-antitoxin system toxin endoribonuclease MazF4 meaB (Rv1496) — requalified: methylmalonyl Co-A mutase-associated GTPase MeaB meaB lipL (Rv1497) — family_assigned: serine hydrolase domain-containing protein lipL 1 676 kb 1 680 kb 1 684 kb 1 688 kb 1 692 kb 1 696 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationSPFH domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)SPFH domain-containing protein. Pfam: Band_7 (PF01145.32).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) cited only under an ortholog name

Found under: M. bovis (1).

1 TB publication mentions this gene. Invisible under its H37Rv locus tag: this gene appears in the literature ONLY under its ortholog identifier(s) (M. bovis). Searching 'Rv1488' alone finds nothing.

PublicationDate
Mycobacterium bovis BCG Surface Antigens Expressed under the Granuloma-Like Conditions as Potential Inducers of the Protective Immunity. doi:10.1155/2019/9167271 2019
1 record returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv1488, Mb1524, ML1802c, MMAR_2294, MSMEG_3155, MAB_2718c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Mycobacterium bovis BCG Surface Antigens Expressed under the Granuloma-Like Conditions as Potential Inducers of the Protective Immunity. doi:10.1155/2019/9167271 Int J Microbiol 2019

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder15% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 83.8
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 60 aa [321-381]

carries a substantial disordered region (60/381 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.14 (95% CI -1.48 to 4.25). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.272 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=12 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1524 · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML1802c · 89.8% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2294 · 94.4% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_3155 · 85.5% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001571 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2718c · 81.1% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WPR9 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv1488

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv1488; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category O Post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
Preferred namehflK
eggNOG descriptionCOG0330 Membrane protease subunits, stomatin prohibitin homologs
Orthologous groupCOG0330
Gene Ontology (9) GO:0005575, GO:0005576, GO:0005618, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0016020, GO:0030312, GO:0044464, GO:0071944

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.35 · quasi-invariant (4 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.14% of strains (203) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) aucun site fixé dans un clade; union over all sites: 373 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:1678536:C:CAATAG · frameshift · 203 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:1678520:GC:G · frameshift · 170 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.088 (low power) · 5 consensus substitution(s)
low power (5 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 92.1% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 11/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 67.2%
detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 16 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 16 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 218.3125. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 16 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 13 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance884.0 ppm · rank 255/3519 (92.8th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (1 TM helix)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)1

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length381 aa
Molecular weight41.3 kDa
Theoretical pI6.12
GRAVY-0.095 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index95.6
Aromaticity0.055
Instability index40.3 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Band_7PF01145.32 1.9e-3729–207 SPFH domain / Band 7 family

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 83.8, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 83.8

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8z5g-assembly1_A 1.00 0.62 0.46 0.62 39% 76% / 100% 3.0e-21 sig 8z5g-assembly1_A Cryo-EM structure of E.coli SPFH-NfeD family protein complex QmcA-YbbJ
3bk6-assembly1_C 1.00 0.87 0.36 0.80 42% 38% / 91% 2.5e-14 sig 3bk6-assembly1_C Crystal structure of a core domain of stomatin from Pyrococcus horikoshii
3bk6-assembly1_A 1.00 0.82 0.35 0.72 42% 38% / 86% 3.4e-14 sig 3bk6-assembly1_A Crystal structure of a core domain of stomatin from Pyrococcus horikoshii
3bk6-assembly1_B 1.00 0.91 0.33 0.86 43% 35% / 94% 1.7e-13 sig 3bk6-assembly1_B Crystal structure of a core domain of stomatin from Pyrococcus horikoshii
8gn9-assembly1_A-2 1.00 0.93 0.27 0.93 42% 28% / 100% 3.3e-12 sig 8gn9-assembly1_A-2 SPFH domain of Pyrococcus horikoshii stomatin

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 83.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1487 (+ strand, 21 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv1489 (+ strand, 9 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv1487 · Rv1488 · Rv1489 · Rv1489A

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv1487 · Rv1488 — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1533.2) exponential phase: operon of 4, Rv1487 · Rv1488 · Rv1489 · Rv1489A (coverage 65.12)
stationary phase: operon of 4, Rv1487 · Rv1488 · Rv1489 · Rv1489A (coverage 41.72) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1487 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 971, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 67 partners at medium confidence (14 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 67 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1487 hypothetical protein 973 971 ctx neighborhood:851 cooccurence:750
Rv3610c ftsH exp (transferred) curated zinc metalloprotease FtsH 963 959 coexpression:467 experimental:805 database:633
Rv1489 hypothetical protein 878 879 ctx neighborhood:828
Rv0038 hypothetical protein 805 806 coexpression:804
Rv2115c mpa proteasome-associated ATPase 821 804 coexpression:779
Rv1110 lytB2 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase 783 783 coexpression:783
Rv1486c hypothetical protein 777 777 ctx neighborhood:767
Rv1019 transcriptional regulator 765 765 coexpression:765
Rv1100 hypothetical protein 757 757 coexpression:757
Rv2782c pepR curated zinc protease 778 751 database:594
Rv2867c GCN5-like N-acetyltransferase 748 748 coexpression:740
Rv2788 sirR transcriptional repressor SirR 734 734 coexpression:734
Rv0903c prrA two component transcriptional regulator PrrA 733 734 coexpression:734
Rv1337 curated integral membrane protein 704 678 database:619
Rv0110 curated integral membrane protein 698 672 database:619

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: SPFH domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Band_7 PF01145.32 (E=2e-37)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216004.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Band_7 (PF01145.32)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0330
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WPR9 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 83.8)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 67 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1487
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001591|Rv1488|
MQGAVAGLVFLAVLVIFAIIVVAKSVALIPQAEAAVIERLGRYSRTVSGQLTLLVPFIDRVRARVDLRERVVSFPPQPVITEDNLTLNIDTVVYFQVTVPQAAVYEISNYIVGVEQLTTTTLRNVVGGMTLEQTLTSRDQINAQLRGVLDEATGRWGLRVARVELRSIDPPPSIQASMEKQMKADREKRAMILTAEGTREAAIKQAEGQKQAQILAAEGAKQAAILAAEADRQSRMLRAQGERAAAYLQAQGQAKAIEKTFAAIKAGRPTPEMLAYQYLQTLPEMARGDANKVWVVPSDFNAALQGFTRLLGKPGEDGVFRFEPSPVEDQPKHAADGDDAEVAGWFSTDTDPSIARAVATAEAIARKPVEGSLGTPPRLTQ