Rv0110 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv0110 · MTBC0 - · 249 aa · 133020–133769 H37Rv (+) · RefSeq NP_214624.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)integral membrane protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation—
Revised (this work)Integral membrane protein. Pfam: Rhomboid (PF01694.29).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

Annotated on the H37Rv protein: this gene has no 1:1 ancestral MTBC0 anchor (PE/PPE, paralogue, IS element, or otherwise unanchored CDS).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) studied as much outside M. tuberculosis

The biology of this gene is documented at least as much outside M. tuberculosis as within it — 3 record(s) in a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the verified sample: M. leprae 1, M. smegmatis 2) versus 2 in a TB context, two separate queries. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is “known” about this gene is known by proxy.

Caveat: IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge.

3 TB publications mention this gene. 3 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). **Its biology is documented at least as much OUTSIDE M. tuberculosis as within it**: queried separately, 3 records carry a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 3-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (2), M. leprae (1)) against 2 with a M. tuberculosis context. The context counts come from distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they are not parts of the total above and need not add up to it. Mycobacterial genetics is largely done in M. smegmatis, so part of what is 'known' about this gene is known by proxy. reformulation, not a quotation

PublicationDate
Role of rhomboid proteases in bacteria. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.03.012 2013
Rhomboids of Mycobacteria: characterization using an aarA mutant of Providencia stuartii and gene deletion in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045741 2012
Rhomboid homologs in mycobacteria: insights from phylogeny and genomic analysis. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-272 2010
2 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 3 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv0110, Mb0114, MMAR_0300, MSMEG_5036 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Rhomboids of Mycobacteria: characterization using an aarA mutant of Providencia stuartii and gene deletion in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045741 PLoS One 2012
Rhomboid homologs in mycobacteria: insights from phylogeny and genomic analysis. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-272 BMC Microbiol 2010

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

IMPORTANT — 'better studied elsewhere' does NOT mean 'function established in M. tuberculosis'. Findings obtained in M. smegmatis (a non-pathogenic, fast-growing species with a different lifestyle and regulation), or in M. marinum / M. leprae / M. abscessus, do NOT transfer automatically to M. tuberculosis. Treat this body of work as CONTEXT to verify, not as settled knowledge. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.48 (95% CI -2.15 to 3.80). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.087 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=5 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0114 · 100.0% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0300 · 77.6% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_5036 · 64.1% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000120 · 100.0% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O53632 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Inferred from homology
UniProt nameProbable conserved integral membrane protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category N Cell motility
U Intracellular trafficking, secretion and vesicular transport
Preferred namegluP
eggNOG descriptionRhomboid family
Orthologous groupCOG0705
EC number EC 3.4.21.105
KEGG orthology K19225

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.375 · quasi-invariant (6 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 3 synonymous, 3 missense, 0 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.19% of strains (274) · clonal

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 29/53 (55%) · mean identity 73.8% · 3/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 29/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 12/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 38.6%
detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 13 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 13 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 231.307692308. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 13 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 7 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance7.51 ppm · rank 2785/3519 (20.9th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (7 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)7

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length249 aa
Molecular weight26.9 kDa
Theoretical pI11.0
GRAVY0.727 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index120.2
Aromaticity0.1
Instability index31.3 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
RhomboidPF01694.29 2.7e-3474–205 Rhomboid domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 93.8, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 93.8

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
6pja-assembly1_A 1.00 0.81 0.57 0.78 24% 66% / 94% 4.0e-06 sig 6pja-assembly1_A Time-resolved structural snapshot of proteolysis by GlpG inside the membrane
6pj8-assembly1_A 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.80 23% 71% / 100% 3.7e-06 sig 6pj8-assembly1_A Time-resolved structural snapshot of proteolysis by GlpG inside the membrane
6pj5-assembly1_A 1.00 0.81 0.59 0.81 22% 68% / 97% 7.7e-06 sig 6pj5-assembly1_A Time-resolved structural snapshot of proteolysis by GlpG inside the membrane
6pju-assembly1_A 1.00 0.77 0.55 0.77 24% 66% / 95% 4.2e-06 sig 6pju-assembly1_A Time-resolved structural snapshot of proteolysis by GlpG inside the membrane
3zot-assembly1_A 1.00 0.77 0.55 0.75 25% 66% / 94% 5.6e-06 sig 3zot-assembly1_A Structure of E.coli rhomboid protease GlpG in complex with monobactam L29 (data set 2)

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 93.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)PE_PGRS1 (+ strand, 147 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv0111 (+ strand, 180 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0119) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv0110 · Rv0111 (coverage 47.57)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0108c (hypothetical protein), medium confidence (score 620, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 22 partners at medium confidence (5 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 22 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1488 curated hypothetical protein 698 672 database:619
Rv3090 curated hypothetical protein 697 670 database:619
Rv0108c hypothetical protein 619 620 ctx neighborhood:618
Rv3610c ftsH curated zinc metalloprotease FtsH 650 604 database:596
Rv0992c 5-formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase 523 523 coexpression:496
Rv0109 PE_PGRS1 PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS1 506 505 ctx neighborhood:505
Rv3717 exp (transferred) hypothetical protein 499 500 experimental:465
Rv3915 cwlM exp (transferred) peptidoglycan hydrolase 495 495 experimental:465
Rv2094c tatA exp (transferred) Sec-independent protein translocase membrane-bound protein TatA 575 469 experimental:467
Rv1224 tatB exp (transferred) Sec-independent protein translocase protein TatB 511 468 experimental:467
Rv0111 acyltransferase 930 465 ctx neighborhood:460 textmining:875
Rv3365c hypothetical protein 475 452
Rv2553c mltG membrane protein 434 435 coexpression:410
Rv1338 murI glutamate racemase 673 103 textmining:651
Rv0274 hypothetical protein 875 79 textmining:870

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Annotation from H37Rv (no MTBC0 1:1 anchor; H37Rv protein used): integral membrane protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Rhomboid PF01694.29 (E=3e-34)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214624.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Rhomboid (PF01694.29)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0705
  • Curated reference: UniProt O53632 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Inferred from homology)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 93.8)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 22 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv0108c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>H37Rv|Rv0110|
MRVGPVGHQCAECVREGARAVRQPRTPFGGRQRSATPVVTYTLISLNALVFVMQVTVMGLERQLALWPPAVASGQTYRLVTSAFLHYGAMHLLLNMWALYVVGPPLEMWLGRLRFGALYAVSALGGSVLVYLIAPLNTATAGASGAVFGLFGATFMVARRLHLDVRWVVALIVINLAFTFLAPAISWQGHVGGLVTGALVAATYVYAPRERRNLIQATVTITVLVAFVVLIGWRTVDLLALFGGRLNLS