Rv0210 Family assigned · medium
H37Rv Rv0210 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000224 ·
492 aa ·
250472–251950 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_214724.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | Essential ribosome-associated GTPase (eggNOG COG1159, Era/EngA-like P-loop GTPase that binds both GDP and GTP). Near-full-length, very strong orthology. A conserved essential GTPase; precise partner undetermined. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication
Found under: H37Rv (1).
1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| Interaction analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis between the host environment and highly mutated genes from population genetic structure comparison. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000027125 | 2021 |
1 record returned by the alias sweep
Searched as: Rv0210, Mb0216, MMAR_0450, MSMEG_0254, MAB_4504c
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
| Publication | Journal | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Interaction analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis between the host environment and highly mutated genes from population genetic structure comparison. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000027125 | Medicine (Baltimore) | 2021 |
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv0209 (Rv0209, + strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 1.17 (95% CI -1.38 to 4.74). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.209 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb0216
· 99.6% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_0450
· 59.4% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_0254
· 51.9% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_000225
· 99.6% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_4504c
· 44.4% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P96392
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Predicted
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Transmembrane protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | An essential GTPase that binds both GDP and GTP, with rapid nucleotide exchange. Plays a role in 16S rRNA processing and 30S ribosomal subunit biogenesis and possibly also in cell cycle regulation and energy metabolism |
| Orthologous group | COG1159 |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 1.576 · diversifying/relaxed |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 2 synonymous, 7 missense, 1 nonsense, 3 frameshift |
| Disruption | 4 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.44% of strains (628) · convergent |
| Which clade carries which site (attribution) |
site unique fixé — L5;
union over all sites: 1 076
strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
|
Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacteriaceae
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.789 (low power)
· 3 consensus substitution(s) low power (3 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 51/53 (96%) · mean identity 63.1%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 51/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Mycobacteriaceae) · mean identity 45.3% detected in the sister family Mycobacteriaceae (M. abscessus) but not in the broader Corynebacteriales — a Mycobacteriaceae-restricted gene (single-genome rung: interpret with care) |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
13 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
11 non-essential,
2 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 212.461538462.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 13 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected
Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (2 TM helixes) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 2 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 492 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 52.4 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 9.53 |
| GRAVY | 0.177 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 112.1 |
| Aromaticity | 0.035 |
| Instability index | 37.1 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 85.6, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 93.2 (very high). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6j73-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 15% | 92% / 100% | 2.4e-08 sig | 6j73-assembly2_B Crystal structure of IniA from Mycobacterium smegmatis |
6j72-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 14% | 92% / 99% | 2.7e-07 sig | 6j72-assembly1_A Crystal structure of IniA from Mycobacterium smegmatis with GTP bound |
6j73-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 14% | 90% / 99% | 2.2e-07 sig | 6j73-assembly1_A Crystal structure of IniA from Mycobacterium smegmatis |
1mky-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.46 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 16% | 36% / 51% | 4.4e-03 sig | 1mky-assembly1_A Structural Analysis of the Domain Interactions in Der, a Switch Protein Containing Two GTPase Domains |
4aur-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 13% | 91% / 96% | 2.1e-05 sig | 4aur-assembly1_A LeoA bacterial dynamin GTPase from ETEC |
4dcu-assembly1_A |
0.97 | 0.40 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 15% | 36% / 52% | 5.0e-02 | 4dcu-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of B. subtilis EngA in complex with GDP |
4tql-assembly2_B |
0.54 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.32 | 9% | 56% / 98% | 4.3e-01 | 4tql-assembly2_B Computationally designed three helix bundle |
3zx6-assembly1_A |
0.54 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 14% | 65% / 88% | 2.5e-01 | 3zx6-assembly1_A Structure of Hamp(AF1503)-Tsr fusion - Hamp (A291V) mutant |
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 85.6
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6j73-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 15% | 92% / 100% | 3.5e-08 sig | 6j73-assembly2_B Crystal structure of IniA from Mycobacterium smegmatis |
6j73-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 16% | 92% / 99% | 6.4e-07 sig | 6j73-assembly1_A Crystal structure of IniA from Mycobacterium smegmatis |
5oxf-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 11% | 82% / 58% | 3.5e-04 sig | 5oxf-assembly1_A An oligomerised bacterial dynamin pair provides a mechanism for the long range sensing and tethering of membranes |
4aur-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 13% | 96% / 96% | 1.8e-04 sig | 4aur-assembly1_A LeoA bacterial dynamin GTPase from ETEC |
5owv-assembly1_A |
0.99 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 8% | 86% / 63% | 1.9e-04 sig | 5owv-assembly1_A An oligomerised bacterial dynamin pair provides a mechanism for the long-range sensing and tethering of membranes |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 85.6, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv0209 (+ strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | pckA (+ strand, 183 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv0209 · Rv0210
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0220) |
not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase) |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0209 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 976, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 80 partners at medium confidence (11 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 80 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0209 |
hypothetical protein | 976 | 976 ctx | neighborhood:882 coexpression:806 |
Rv0208c trmB |
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase | 801 | 801 ctx | neighborhood:775 |
Rv0207c |
hypothetical protein | 775 | 775 ctx | neighborhood:775 |
Rv2474c |
hypothetical protein | 750 | 750 ctx | cooccurence:750 |
Rv3413c rsdA |
anti-sigma-D factor RsdA | 746 | 746 ctx | cooccurence:746 |
Rv2687c |
antibiotic ABC transporter permease | 739 | 739 ctx | cooccurence:739 |
Rv2686c |
antibiotic ABC transporter permease | 734 | 735 ctx | cooccurence:734 |
Rv1978 |
hypothetical protein | 732 | 733 ctx | cooccurence:732 |
Rv0206c mmpL3 |
transmembrane transport protein MmpL3 | 722 | 722 ctx | neighborhood:721 |
Rv1182 papA3 |
acyltransferase papA3 | 716 | 717 ctx | cooccurence:715 |
Rv0479c |
membrane protein | 703 | 704 ctx | cooccurence:703 |
Rv3824c papA1 |
acyltransferase | 686 | 686 ctx | cooccurence:686 |
Rv2743c |
hypothetical protein | 673 | 674 ctx | cooccurence:672 |
Rv3405c |
HTH-type transcriptional regulator | 666 | 667 ctx | cooccurence:663 |
Rv3527 |
hypothetical protein | 652 | 652 ctx | cooccurence:652 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- eggNOG ortholog COG1159 (COG category S), e-value 2.96e-315
- eggNOG-mapper orthology (COG/EC functional assignment, under-propagated by the auto-curation which keys on cog_cat only). Family/activity-level transfer from orthology, not a substrate demonstrated in M. tuberculosis.
ESM Atlas signal (exploratory)
Ancestral protein hash 2615589eb7f7c6d74965a0ad7a605c15 ·
10 ESM-space neighbours (max similarity 0.923).
SAE features are orienting indices, not validated domains.
| # | Index | Activation | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6012 |
1.42 | Post-GTPase helical scaffolds |
| 2 | 11893 |
1.33 | Dynamin helical stalk/paddle |
| 3 | 2174 |
1.29 | P-loop GTPase coupling helix |
| 4 | 8885 |
1.17 | Coiled-coil machine head domains |
| 5 | 11953 |
1.16 | GTPase-flanking coiled-coil scaffolds |
| 6 | 5138 |
1.16 | Canonical P-loop GTPase G-domain |
| 7 | 4409 |
1.13 | G-domain Walker A P-loop |
| 8 | 1965 |
1.09 | Transmembrane helical hairpins and anchors |
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214724.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG1159 - Curated reference: UniProt P96392 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 93.2, very high)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 85.6)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
80 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv0209 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_000224|Rv0210| MIRAASDDPAGVDELVAAIAPGLAGLGLPVINRREVVLVTGPWLAGVSGVRAALAERLPQRRFVETAELGPGDAPVAVVFVVSAATALTESDCVLLDTAAEHTDAVVAVVSKIDVHRGWRDVLTSNRDRLAARASRYARVPWVGAAAAPELGEPYLDDLVAAIQKQLADPAVARRNMLRAWESRLLMVARRFDGDAQSAGRRARVDALRQQRRTVLRQGRQSKSEHTIALRAQIQHARVKLSYFARNRCSLLRVELQEHVAGLSRKDIARFAAYTRGRVQEVVAEVGEGAVAHLADVAQLLGVPVQPPVLENLPAVLPTVVAPPLTSRRLEIRLTTLLGAGFGLGIALTLSRLVAGLTPGLAASGMVAGVAIGLAVTAWVVNARALLHDRVVVDRWTGEVTASLRSVVEQLVATRVVAVETLLSTAISERDDAENARVADQVSIIDGELREHAVAAARAAALRDREMPAVRAALEAVRAELGEPGTPTTGLF
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv0210? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv0210