mmpL3 Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv0206c · MTBC0 mtbc0_000220 ·
944 aa ·
244836–247670 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_214720.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | transmembrane transport protein MmpL3 |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | trehalose monomycolate RND transporter MmpL3 |
| Revised (this work) | Trehalose monomycolate RND transporter MmpL3. Pfam: MMPL (PF03176.22). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 225 publications
225 TB publications mention this gene. 225 publications discuss this gene. Queried separately, 197 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 68 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 40-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (26), M. abscessus (12), M. leprae (2), M. marinum (2)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (each with its own context filter), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.
232 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 225 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)
Searched as: Rv0206c, mmpL3, Mb0212c, ML2620c, MMAR_0446, MSMEG_0250, MAB_4508
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 21% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 79.3 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 194 aa [750-944] |
carries a substantial disordered region (194/944 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) antiparallel · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv0205 (Rv0205, + strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
antiparallel overlap: this gene may inherit essentiality/conservation signal from its neighbour through shared TA sites or promoter constraint, without any protein of its own being produced (cf. Rv2438A/nadE) Signals attributed to this gene (Tn-seq essentiality via shared TA sites, conservation via promoter constraint) should be cross-checked against the neighbour before being read as its own. P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -11.01 (95% CI -11.40 to -10.60). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Unknown. Thought to be involved in fatty acid transport. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb0212c
· 99.8% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML2620c
· 75.4% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_0446
· 74.6% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_0250
· 72.0% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_000221
· 99.7% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_4508
· 62.6% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WJV5
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Trehalose monomycolate exporter MmpL3 |
| Curated function | Transports trehalose monomycolate (TMM) to the cell wall. Flips TMM across the inner membrane. Membrane potential is not required for this function. Transports probably phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) as well. Binds specifically both TMM and PE, but not trehalose dimycolate (TDM). Also binds diacylglycerol (DAG) and other phospholipids, including phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylinositol (PI), and cardiolipin (CDL). Contributes to membrane potential, cell wall composition, antibiotic susceptibility and fitness (By similarity). Could also be part of a heme-iron acquisition system..; FUNCTIO. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | mmpL3 |
| eggNOG description | lipid transport |
| Orthologous group | COG2409 |
| KEGG orthology |
K06994, K20466, K20470
|
| Gene Ontology (33) |
GO:0005575, GO:0005576, GO:0005618, GO:0005623, GO:0005886, GO:0005887, GO:0006810, GO:0006869, GO:0008150, GO:0009273, GO:0009987, GO:0010876 +21 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.604 · relaxed/neutral |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 6 synonymous, 10 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.121 (low power)
· 4 consensus substitution(s) low power (4 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 73.3%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 8/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 48.3% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) ESD — not strictly essential
These two screens are not in plain contradiction here, but they do not say the same thing either, and the difference matters for what may be written about this gene. Tn-seq (DeJesus 2017) places the requirement on a SUB-REGION of the ORF and explicitly declines to call the whole gene essential; CRISPRi (Bosch 2021) calls the gene essential under partial knockdown. Both point to an important gene; they disagree on the SCOPE of what is required. Locate the domain before concluding, and note that a stretch carrying no TA site is invisible to Himar1 Tn-seq — neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred there. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -11.013), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 26 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 27 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | ESD · essential domain |
|---|---|
| What the call means | essential domain: only a SUB-REGION of the ORF is essential; the gene as a whole is NOT essential. Locate the domain before concluding, and beware that a region devoid of TA sites is invisible to Himar1 TnSeq (neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred). |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
35 in the ORF —
31 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
4 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.114,
mean read count 121.75.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
34 of these 35 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 1 of this ORF's 35 TA sites lies inside Rv0205 (1 site), leaving 34 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 34 exclusive sites. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain validated drug target
This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.
| Hypomorph strain | mmpL3_tetOn_6.2 (TetON promoter 6) |
|---|---|
| Baseline knockdown fitness | 3.962 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown |
| Used in target deconvolution | yes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment) |
| Drug-target cross-reference | annotated mechanism-of-action target MmpL3: 8 reference compound(s) phenocopy its inhibition — chemically-validated druggable target |
Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mutants exhibiting altered fitness in the absence of gene marP (other) | -5.37 | 0.014 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` carries no source in MtbTnDB's own metadata (col_desc.tsv leaves paper_title/paper_URL empty). Traced by the `Rv0537c` companion project (2026-09-12): Weizhen Xu, PhD thesis, Weill Cornell Medicine, 2017, hdl:1813/64728 ("Genetic Screening In Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Utilizing Transposon Insertion Sequencing"), whose abstract describes a TnSeq genetic-interaction screen naming marP. Never published as a peer-reviewed article.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 256.0 ppm · rank 722/3519 (79.5th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (12 TM helixes) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 12 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 944 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 100.9 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 9.48 |
| GRAVY | 0.237 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 102.4 |
| Aromaticity | 0.071 |
| Instability index | 42.6 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MMPL | PF03176.22 | 4.4e-38 | 47–340 | MMPL family |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
Experimental structure 7nvh (PDBe), the strongest available structural
evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default)
shown as sticks.
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 1 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
7nvh |
Electron Microscopy | 3.0 Å | 80% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (1 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 79.3
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7nvh-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 95% | 80% / 100% | 8.9e-95 sig | 7nvh-assembly1_A Cryo-EM structure of the mycolic acid transporter MmpL3 from M. tuberculosis |
7n6b-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.98 | 0.79 | 0.98 | 71% | 80% / 100% | 5.2e-86 sig | 7n6b-assembly1_A Structure of MmpL3 reconstituted into lipid nanodisc in the TMM bound state |
6n40-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 0.98 | 70% | 79% / 100% | 1.1e-80 sig | 6n40-assembly1_A Crystal structure of MmpL3 from Mycobacterium smegmatis |
7k7m-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.96 | 0.77 | 0.96 | 72% | 80% / 100% | 1.5e-81 sig | 7k7m-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of a membrane protein |
8qkk-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.95 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 71% | 78% / 100% | 3.3e-80 sig | 8qkk-assembly1_A Cryo-EM structure of MmpL3 from Mycobacterium smegmatis reconstituted into peptidiscs |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 79.3, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv0205 (+ strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv0207c (- strand, 65 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 3:
mmpL3 · Rv0207c · Rv0208c
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0216) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv0206c · Rv0207c · Rv0208c
(coverage 76.8)
stationary phase: operon of 3, Rv0206c · Rv0207c · Rv0208c
(coverage 34.15)
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0207c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 850, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 41 partners at medium confidence (8 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 41 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0207c |
hypothetical protein | 874 | 850 ctx | neighborhood:798 |
Rv0208c trmB |
tRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase | 862 | 837 ctx | neighborhood:798 |
Rv0210 |
hypothetical protein | 722 | 722 ctx | neighborhood:721 |
Rv3909 dark |
hypothetical protein | 722 | 666 ctx | cooccurence:663 |
Rv3835 |
hypothetical protein | 658 | 658 ctx | cooccurence:653 |
Rv2739c |
transferase | 640 | 640 ctx | cooccurence:638 |
Rv2843 |
hypothetical protein | 588 | 588 ctx | cooccurence:588 |
Rv0007 |
membrane protein | 564 | 551 ctx | cooccurence:464 |
Rv1024 |
membrane protein | 507 | 507 ctx | cooccurence:501 |
Rv0209 |
hypothetical protein | 487 | 487 ctx | neighborhood:485 |
Rv3755c |
hypothetical protein | 448 | 448 ctx | cooccurence:440 |
Rv0444c rskA |
anti-sigma-K factor RskA | 437 | 438 ctx | cooccurence:433 |
Rv3668c |
protease | 430 | 431 ctx | cooccurence:429 |
Rv3494c mce4F |
Mce family protein Mce4 | 411 | 412 ctx | cooccurence:405 |
Rv3682 ponA2 |
bifunctional penicillin-insensitive transglycosylase/penicillin-sensitive transpeptidase | 421 | 387 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: transmembrane transport protein MmpL3
- MTBC0 PGAP product: trehalose monomycolate RND transporter MmpL3
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): MMPL PF03176.22 (E=4e-38)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214720.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — MMPL (PF03176.22)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG2409 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WJV5 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 79.3)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
41 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv0207c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_000220|Rv0206c|mmpL3 MFAWWGRTVYRYRFIVIGVMVALCLGGGVFGLSLGKHVTQSGFYDDGSQSVQASVLGDQVYGRDRSGHIVAIFQAPAGKTVDDPAWSKKVVDELNRFQQDHPDQVLGWAGYLRASQATGMATADKKYTFVSIPLKGDDDDTILNNYKAIAPDLQRLDGGTVKLAGLQPVAEALTGTIATDQRRMEVLALPLVAVVLFFVFGGVIAAGLPVMVGGLCIAGALGIMRFLAIFGPVHYFAQPVVSLIGLGIAIDYGLFIVSRFREEIAEGYDTETAVRRTVITAGRTVTFSAVLIVASAIGLLLFPQGFLKSLTYATIASVMLSAILSITVLPACLGILGKHVDALGVRTLFRVPFLANWKISAAYLNWLADRLQRTKTREEVEAGFWGKLVNRVMKRPVLFAAPIVIIMILLIIPVGKLSLGGISEKYLPPTNSVRQAQEEFDKLFPGYRTNPLTLVIQTSNHQPVTDAQIADIRSKAMAIGGFIEPDNDPANMWQERAYAVGASKDPSVRVLQNGLINPADASKKLTELRAITPPKGITVLVGGTPALELDSIHGLFAKMPLMVVILLTTTIVLMFLAFGSVVLPIKATLMSALTLGSTMGILTWIFVDGHFSKWLNFTPTPLTAPVIGLIIALVFGLSTDYEVFLVSRMVEARERGMSTQEAIRIGTAATGRIITAAALIVAVVAGAFVFSDLVMMKYLAFGLMAALLLDATVVRMFLVPSVMKLLGDDCWWAPRWARRLQTRIGLGEIHLPDERKRPVSNGRPARPPVTAGLVAARAAGDPRPPHDPTHPLAESPRPARSSPASSPELTPALEATAAPAAPSGASTTRMQIGSSTEPPTTRLAAAGRSVQSPASTPPPTPTPPSAPSAGQTRAMPLAANRSTDAAGDPAEPTAALPIIRSDGDDSEAATEQLNARGTSDKTRQRRRGGGALSAQDLLRREGRL
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for mmpL3? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about mmpL3