rsdA Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv3413c · MTBC0 mtbc0_003627 ·
299 aa ·
3857585–3858484 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_217930.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | anti-sigma-D factor RsdA |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | anti-sigma D factor RsdA |
| Revised (this work) | Anti-sigma D factor RsdA. Pfam: RsdA_SigD_bd (PF16751.11). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 3 publications
3 TB publications mention this gene. 3 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 2 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| Extracytoplasmic function sigma factor σD confers resistance to environmental stress by enhancing mycolate synthesis and modifying peptidoglycan structures in Corynebacterium glutamicum. doi:10.1111/mmi.13883 | 2018 |
| The Rip1 protease of Mycobacterium tuberculosis controls the SigD regulon. doi:10.1128/JB.01537-14 | 2014 |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis RsdA provides a conformational rationale for selective regulation of σ-factor activity by proteolysis. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1468 | 2013 |
4 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 3 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)
Searched as: Rv3413c, rsdA, Mb3447c, MMAR_1135, MSMEG_1600
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
| Publication | Journal | Year |
|---|---|---|
| The SigD regulon of Mycobacterium abscessus determines cell envelope composition and antibiotic susceptibility. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1012286 | PLoS Genet | 2026 |
| The Rip1 protease of Mycobacterium tuberculosis controls the SigD regulon. doi:10.1128/JB.01537-14 | J Bacteriol | 2014 |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis RsdA provides a conformational rationale for selective regulation of σ-factor activity by proteolysis. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1468 names it | Nucleic Acids Res | 2013 |
| A test of nonrandom segregation. doi:10.1002/gepi.1370010405 | Genet Epidemiol | 1984 |
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered
| Predicted disorder | 44% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 61.9 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 2 IDR(s), longest 117 aa [0-15, 182-299] |
carries a substantial disordered region (132/299 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 1 % of gene
| Neighbour | sigD (Rv3414c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 8 bp, 1 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
SigH (sigH).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.20 (95% CI -1.63 to 2.61). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.233 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser
Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (curated function (UniProt), requalified function). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb3447c
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_1135
· 74.0% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_1600
· 43.7% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_003515
· 100.0% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WJ71
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Anti-sigma-D factor RsdA |
| Curated function | An anti-sigma factor for extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor SigD. ECF sigma factors are held in an inactive form by an anti-sigma factor until released by regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP). RIP occurs when an extracytoplasmic signal triggers a concerted proteolytic cascade to transmit information and elicit cellular responses. The membrane-spanning regulatory substrate protein is first cut extracytoplasmically (site-1 protease, S1P), then within the membrane itself (site-2 protease, S2P), while cytoplasmic proteases finish degrading the regulatory protein, liberating the sigm. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | rsdA |
| eggNOG description | Anti-sigma-D factor RsdA to sigma factor binding region |
| Orthologous group | 2DVAJ |
| Gene Ontology (2) |
GO:0005575, GO:0005576
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 1 frameshift |
| Disruption | 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.39% of strains (556) · clonal |
Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
undefined (dS = 0) (low power)
· 1 consensus substitution(s) low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 45/53 (85%) · mean identity 69.5%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 45/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
7 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
7 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 114.857142857.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 7 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Read with some caution: only 7 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 7 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| fitness after prolonged in vitro passage (in vitro passage) | -5.45 | 0.017 | required |
| Mutants exhibiting altered fitness in the absence of gene marP (other) | -1.54 | 0.0086 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 2 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` carries no source in MtbTnDB's own metadata (col_desc.tsv leaves paper_title/paper_URL empty). Traced by the `Rv0537c` companion project (2026-09-12): Weizhen Xu, PhD thesis, Weill Cornell Medicine, 2017, hdl:1813/64728 ("Genetic Screening In Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Utilizing Transposon Insertion Sequencing"), whose abstract describes a TnSeq genetic-interaction screen naming marP. Never published as a peer-reviewed article.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 8 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 17.3 ppm · rank 2414/3519 (31.4th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (1 TM helix) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 1 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 299 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 31.2 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 4.52 |
| GRAVY | -0.324 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 80.7 |
| Aromaticity | 0.03 |
| Instability index | 53.4 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RsdA_SigD_bd | PF16751.11 | 7.0e-17 | 14–58 | Anti-sigma-D factor RsdA to sigma factor binding region |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
Experimental structure 3vep (PDBe), the strongest available structural
evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default)
shown as sticks.
Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 1 solved
| PDB | Method | Resolution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
3vep |
X-ray diffraction | 2.5 Å | 27% |
Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (1 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv3412 (+ strand, 9 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | sigD (- strand, -8 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
Rv3413c · sigD · Rv3415c
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) |
operon of 2:
Rv3413c · sigD
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3522) |
exponential phase: operon of 2,
Rv3413c · Rv3414c
(coverage 131.92)
stationary phase: operon of 2, Rv3413c · Rv3414c
(coverage 59.74)
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (3 TF) |
Rv0081 (represses) · Rv2324 (activates) · sigD (activates)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: sigD (ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigD), high confidence (score 1000, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair's experimental or database support is transferred from orthologous pairs in other proteomes only: nothing was measured in M. tuberculosis, so it is an association inferred by orthology rather than measured in this organism.
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 95 partners at medium confidence (8 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 95 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv3414c sigD exp (transferred) |
ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigD | 999 | 1000 ctx | neighborhood:882 cooccurence:488 experimental:999 |
Rv3415c |
hypothetical protein | 868 | 869 ctx | neighborhood:767 cooccurence:459 |
Rv0210 |
hypothetical protein | 746 | 746 ctx | cooccurence:746 |
Rv0556 |
transmembrane protein | 714 | 714 ctx | cooccurence:714 |
Rv2360c |
hypothetical protein | 712 | 712 ctx | cooccurence:712 |
Rv0996 |
transmembrane protein | 711 | 711 ctx | cooccurence:711 |
Rv0481c |
hypothetical protein | 699 | 699 ctx | cooccurence:699 |
Rv2138 lppL |
lipoprotein LppL | 694 | 695 ctx | cooccurence:654 |
Rv3071 |
hypothetical protein | 689 | 689 ctx | cooccurence:689 |
Rv3438 |
hypothetical protein | 681 | 682 ctx | cooccurence:672 |
Rv2474c |
hypothetical protein | 668 | 668 ctx | cooccurence:668 |
Rv2732c |
transmembrane protein | 667 | 667 ctx | cooccurence:667 |
Rv3217c dark |
integral membrane protein | 665 | 665 ctx | cooccurence:665 |
Rv0431 |
tuberculin-like peptide | 663 | 663 ctx | cooccurence:663 |
Rv3212 |
hypothetical protein | 661 | 661 ctx | cooccurence:660 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: anti-sigma-D factor RsdA
- MTBC0 PGAP product: anti-sigma D factor RsdA
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): RsdA_SigD_bd PF16751.11 (E=7e-17)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217930.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — RsdA_SigD_bd (PF16751.11)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2DVAJ - Curated reference: UniProt P9WJ71 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
95 functional partner(s); context anchor
sigD - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_003627|Rv3413c|rsdA MREFGNPLGDRPPLDELARTDLLLDALAEREEVDFADPRDDALAALLGQWRDDLRWPPASALVSQDEAVAALRAGVAQRRRARRSLAAVGSVAAALLVLSGFGAVVADARPGDLLYGLHAMMFNRSRVSDDQIVLSAKANLAKVEQMIAQGQWAEAQDELAEVSSTVQAVTDGSRRQDLINEVNLLNTKVETRDPNATLRPGSPSNPAAPGSVGNSWTPLAPVVEPPTPPTPASAAEPSMSAGVSESPMPNSTSTVAASPSTPSSKPEPGSIDPSLEPADEATNPAGQPAPETPVSPTH
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for rsdA? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about rsdA