Rv0028 Still unknown · low

H37Rv Rv0028 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000033 · 101 aa · 31500–31805 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_214542.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand pbpA (Rv0016c) — requalified: D%2CD-transpeptidase PbpA rodA (Rv0017c) — requalified: cell shape-determining peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase Rod rodA fhaB (Rv0019c) — family_assigned: FHA domain-containing protein fhaA (Rv0020c) — requalified: cell division-associated protein FhaA fhaA Rv0021c (Rv0021c) — family_assigned: nitronate monooxygenase family protein Rv0021c whiB5 (Rv0022c) — family_assigned: transcriptional regulator WhiB5 Rv0023 (Rv0023) — family_assigned: helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulator Rv0024 (Rv0024) — family_assigned: C40 family peptidase Rv0024 Rv0025 (Rv0025) — dark: DUF4226 domain-containing protein Rv0027 (Rv0027) — family_assigned: ESX-1 secretion-associated protein Rv0028 (Rv0028) — dark: DUF2694 domain-containing protein Rv0029 (Rv0029) — dark: DUF5631 domain-containing protein Rv0029 Rv0030 (Rv0030) — family_assigned: DUF2710 domain-containing protein bioF2 (Rv0032) — family_assigned: pyridoxal phosphate-dependent aminotransferase family protei bioF2 acpA (Rv0033) — requalified: acyl carrier protein Rv0034 (Rv0034) — family_assigned: nuclear transport factor 2 family protein Rv0036c (Rv0036c) — family_assigned: TIGR03084 family metal-binding protein Rv0037c (Rv0037c) — requalified: MFS transporter Rv0037c Rv0038 (Rv0038) — family_assigned: YqgE/AlgH family protein Rv0039c (Rv0039c) — dark: hypothetical protein mtc28 (Rv0040c) — family_assigned: LpqN/LpqT family lipoprotein mtc28 20 kb 24 kb 28 kb 32 kb 36 kb 40 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDUF2694 domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Conserved hypothetical protein; DUF2694 domain-containing. Foldseek on the ESMFold model points to a YbaB/EbfC-like fold (nucleoid-associated DNA-binding family), a structural hint of DNA binding; not yet experimentally validated.
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.

Named in the body of 1 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv0028 (1).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Post-translational modifications

1 reported modified residue(s): N-acetylthreonine @2.

Experimentally reported post-translational modification(s). A phosphosite indicates the protein is expressed and is a substrate of the M. tuberculosis Ser/Thr/Tyr kinase signalling network — a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: UniProt (Modified residue features; PTM sites curated from the M. tuberculosis literature).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -0.55 (95% CI -6.50 to 6.08). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.435 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0029 · 100.0% identity
M. marinum MMAR_0047 · 87.1% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000033 · 100.0% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WM97 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv0028

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv0028; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionProtein of unknown function (DUF2694)
Orthologous group2AUU9

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.34 · quasi-invariant (6 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 3 synonymous, 3 missense, 0 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.19% of strains (278) · clonal

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 2 consensus substitution(s)
low power (2 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 47/53 (89%) · mean identity 85.6% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 47/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RDcap_Spain1 100% Caprae

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 5 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 5 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 171. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 5 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatRead with some caution: only 5 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 5 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 7 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance45.5 ppm · rank 1818/3519 (48.4th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length101 aa
Molecular weight10.9 kDa
Theoretical pI5.63
GRAVY-0.063 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index98.6
Aromaticity0.02
Instability index65.0 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
DUF2694PF10904.14 5.8e-611–97 Protein of unknown function (DUF2694)

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 95.4, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)

ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 76.7 (confident). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.

Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.

TargetProbTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
7aor-assembly1_an 1.00 0.75 0.52 0.20 17% 62% / 22% 5.0e-02 7aor-assembly1_an mt-SSU from Trypanosoma cruzi in complex with mt-IF-3.
3f42-assembly1_A-2 0.98 0.75 0.50 0.54 16% 62% / 66% 1.4e-01 3f42-assembly1_A-2 Crystal structure of uncharacterized protein HP0035 from Helicobacter pylori
1j8b-assembly1_A-2 0.97 0.76 0.50 0.55 17% 62% / 67% 2.0e-01 1j8b-assembly1_A-2 Structure of YbaB from Haemophilus influenzae (HI0442), a protein of unknown function
3f42-assembly1_B-2 0.96 0.76 0.49 0.58 16% 60% / 70% 2.0e-01 3f42-assembly1_B-2 Crystal structure of uncharacterized protein HP0035 from Helicobacter pylori
1ybx-assembly1_A 0.90 0.71 0.48 0.53 16% 60% / 68% 2.7e-01 1ybx-assembly1_A Conserved hypothetical protein Cth-383 from Clostridium thermocellum
1pug-assembly1_A 0.87 0.60 0.46 0.49 15% 67% / 76% 1.5e-01 1pug-assembly1_A Structure of E. coli Ybab
1pug-assembly1_B 0.85 0.68 0.44 0.57 17% 57% / 77% 2.6e-01 1pug-assembly1_B Structure of E. coli Ybab
1pug-assembly2_D 0.75 0.69 0.47 0.59 18% 61% / 81% 5.1e-01 1pug-assembly2_D Structure of E. coli Ybab

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv0027 (+ strand, 7 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv0029 (+ strand, 237 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv0027 · Rv0028

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv0027 · Rv0028 — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0030.1) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0027 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 933, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.

All 7 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0027 hypothetical protein 932 933 ctx neighborhood:881 coexpression:458
Rv0029 dark hypothetical protein 730 731 ctx neighborhood:728
Rv0023 transcriptional regulator 670 670 ctx neighborhood:670
Rv0025 dark hypothetical protein 661 661 ctx neighborhood:660
Rv0022c whiB5 transcriptional regulator WhiB5 641 641 ctx neighborhood:638
Rv0026 dark hypothetical protein 535 534 ctx neighborhood:528
Rv0030 hypothetical protein 443 443 ctx neighborhood:439

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • MTBC0 PGAP product: 'DUF2694 domain-containing protein' (a domain of unknown function)
  • No literature hit in tbmonitor (2021-2026); remains genuinely uncharacterised
  • Foldseek on the ESMFold model: strong fold similarity to the YbaB/EbfC family (nucleoid-associated DNA-binding), prob 0.97, TM-score 0.76 -- a structural hint of DNA binding, although no significant sequence/E-value match

ESM Atlas signal (exploratory)

Ancestral protein hash 7d0c86be9dfc224ecfe16be7a29e515d · 3 ESM-space neighbours (max similarity 0.720). SAE features are orienting indices, not validated domains.

#IndexActivationInterpretation
116353 0.71 Acidic catalytic motifs and coiled-coils
2407 0.64 Disordered pre-sequences and tails
38645 0.61 Charged C-terminal helical tails
48723 0.56 Cofactor-anchoring helix-loop caps
57936 0.53 Cofactor-binding beta-loop patches
612593 0.47 Disordered low-complexity regulatory tails
74679 0.47 Active-site gating segments
89873 0.46 Cys/Sec-centered redox/cofactor loops

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214542.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF2694 (PF10904.14)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2AUU9
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WM97 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 76.7, confident)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 95.4)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 7 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv0027
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000033|Rv0028|
MTDANPAFDTVHPSGHILVRSCRGGYMHSVSLSEAAMETDAETLAEAILLTADVSCLKALLEVRNEIVAAGHTPSAQVPTTDDLNVAIEKLLAHQLRRRNR