Rv1509 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1509 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001615 · 293 aa · 1710021–1710902 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_216025.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationmethyltransferase domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Methyltransferase domain-containing protein. Pfam: Methyltransf_23 (PF13489.13), Methyltransf_11 (PF08241.19).
Functional category (TubercuList)unknown

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 8 publications

Found under: H37Rv (8).

8 TB publications mention this gene. 8 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

5 of 8: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
In silico Designing of a Multiepitope Vaccine using the Hallmark Proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Involved in Different Aspects of Virulence. doi:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_86_26 2026
Vaccine development against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a PRISMA-guided systematic review of conventional and computational multi-epitope approaches. doi:10.7774/cevr.2026.15.e15 2026
Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific protein Rv1509 modulates osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation via TLR2 signaling. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112107 2025
Expression of a unique M. tuberculosis DNA MTase Rv1509 in M. smegmatis alters the gene expression pattern and enhances virulence. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1344857 2024
Structural and Biophysical properties of therapeutically important proteins Rv1509 and Rv2231A of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125455 2023
8 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv1509 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
In silico Designing of a Multiepitope Vaccine using the Hallmark Proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Involved in Different Aspects of Virulence. doi:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_86_26 Int J Mycobacteriol 2026
Vaccine development against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a PRISMA-guided systematic review of conventional and computational multi-epitope approaches. doi:10.7774/cevr.2026.15.e15 Clin Exp Vaccine Res 2026
Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific protein Rv1509 modulates osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation via TLR2 signaling. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112107 names it iScience 2025
Expression of a unique M. tuberculosis DNA MTase Rv1509 in M. smegmatis alters the gene expression pattern and enhances virulence. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1344857 names it Front Microbiol 2024
Structural and Biophysical properties of therapeutically important proteins Rv1509 and Rv2231A of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125455 names it Int J Biol Macromol 2023
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Specific Protein Rv1509 Evokes Efficient Innate and Adaptive Immune Response Indicative of Protective Th1 Immune Signature. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.706081 names it Front Immunol 2021
Use of Rv0222-Rv2657c-Rv1509 Fusion Protein to Improve the Accuracy of an Antibody ELISA for Extra-Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Humans. doi:10.3390/pathogens10070828 names it Pathogens 2021
Two interacting ATPases protect Mycobacterium tuberculosis from glycerol and nitric oxide toxicity. doi:10.1128/JB.00202-20 J Bacteriol 2020

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 2 % of gene

Neighbourgmd (Rv1508A, + strand)
Overlap17 bp, 2 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.33 (95% CI -0.62 to 4.59). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.280 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=13 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. orygis RJtmp_001595 · 99.3% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WLW3 SwissProt · reviewed · Predicted
UniProt nameUncharacterized protein Rv1509

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv1509; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category H Coenzyme transport and metabolism
eggNOG descriptionMethyltransferase domain
Orthologous groupCOG2227

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.643 · quasi-invariant (6 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 4 missense, 0 nonsense, 5 frameshift
Disruption 5 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.65% of strains (920) · convergent
Which clade carries which site (attribution) site unique fixé — L4; union over all sites: 2 985 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:1700414:C:CG · frameshift · 920 strains — fixed in 2 sub-clades of L4, totalling 13 strains — 0.0% of the 54 538 strains in the lineage named (largest: L4.3.2.2.2.1.3.1.1.1.1.1 8/8, L4.3.2.2.2.1.2.2.2 5/5)
  • NC_000962.3:1701066:AT:A · frameshift · 885 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:1700414:C:CGG · frameshift · 668 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:1700414:CG:C · frameshift · 308 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:1700414:C:CGGGG · frameshift · 204 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) undefined (dS = 0) (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 1/53 (2%) · mean identity 81.5% · 1/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (1/53 NTM; in 1 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RD4 100% Bovis

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 21 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 21 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.810, mean read count 63.0588235294. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
20 of these 21 sites are exclusively this ORF's; Measured, not hypothetical: 1 of this ORF's 21 TA sites lies inside Rv1508A (1 site), leaving 20 sites that are exclusively its own. A transposon insertion cannot be assigned to one reading frame rather than the other, so the essentiality call rests on those 20 exclusive sites.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 8 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance15.2 ppm · rank 2485/3519 (29.4th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length293 aa
Molecular weight33.1 kDa
Theoretical pI8.83
GRAVY-0.015 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index91.3
Aromaticity0.096
Instability index45.9 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Methyltransf_23PF13489.13 1.0e-0845–160 Methyltransferase domain
Methyltransf_11PF08241.19 6.8e-0765–160 Methyltransferase domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 92.9, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 92.9

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
4htf-assembly1_B 1.00 0.60 0.51 0.60 15% 87% / 92% 3.4e-09 sig 4htf-assembly1_B Crystal structure of S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase from Escherichia coli in complex with S-adenosylmethionine.
8joz-assembly1_A 1.00 0.57 0.51 0.57 13% 93% / 96% 3.1e-09 sig 8joz-assembly1_A Crystal structure of CmoM from E. coli complexed with sinefungin and cellularly expressed tRNA Ser
4kri-assembly1_A 1.00 0.45 0.45 0.33 17% 92% / 58% 4.1e-10 sig 4kri-assembly1_A Haemonchus contortus Phospholethanolamine N-methyltransferase 2 in complex with phosphomonomethylethanolamine and S-adenosylhomocysteine
4ine-assembly1_A 1.00 0.51 0.46 0.33 14% 83% / 51% 9.9e-09 sig 4ine-assembly1_A Crystal structure of N-methyl transferase (PMT-2) from Caenorhabditis elegant complexed with S-adenosyl homocysteine and phosphoethanolamine
3bus-assembly2_B 1.00 0.52 0.44 0.52 17% 85% / 94% 5.7e-09 sig 3bus-assembly2_B Crystal Structure of RebM

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 92.9, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1508A (+ strand, -17 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv1510 (+ strand, 201 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv1508A · Rv1509

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 3: Rv1508c · Rv1508A · Rv1509 — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1557) exponential phase: operon of 2, Rv1509 (coverage 20.79)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 14.63) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (3 TF) Rv0047c (activates) · mmpR5 (activates) · trcR (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1508A (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 833, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 17 partners at medium confidence (8 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 17 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1508A hypothetical protein 971 833 ctx neighborhood:780 textmining:835
Rv1508c membrane protein 577 577 ctx neighborhood:572
Rv1510 hypothetical protein 811 469 ctx neighborhood:461 textmining:660
Rv1507c hypothetical protein 708 200 textmining:651
Rv1503c Rv1503c, (MTCY277.25c), len: 182 aa. Conserved hypothetical protein, similar to C-terminal region of P27833|RFFA_ECOLI lipopolysaccharide bi 497 114 textmining:456
Rv1511 gmdA GDP-D-mannose dehydratase GmdA 870 82 textmining:865
Rv3915 cwlM peptidoglycan hydrolase 460 82 textmining:437
Rv3717 hypothetical protein 456 69 textmining:440
Rv1493 mutB methylmalonyl-CoA mutase large subunit 443 55 textmining:435
Rv3594 hypothetical protein 659 50 textmining:656
Rv1521 fadD25 fatty-acid--CoA ligase FadD25 870 49 textmining:869
Rv1495 mazF4 mRNA interferase MazF4 549 46 textmining:547
Rv1494 mazE4 antitoxin MazE4 631 45 textmining:630
Rv3679 anion transporter ATPase 870 44 textmining:870
Rv2370c hypothetical protein 870 44 textmining:870

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: methyltransferase domain-containing protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Methyltransf_23 PF13489.13 (E=1e-08), Methyltransf_11 PF08241.19 (E=7e-07)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216025.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Methyltransf_23 (PF13489.13), Methyltransf_11 (PF08241.19)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG2227
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WLW3 (SwissProt, reviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 92.9)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 17 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1508A
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001615|Rv1509|
MFALSNNLNRVNACMDGFLARIRSHVDAHAPELRSLFDTMAAEARFARDWLSEDLARLPVGAALLEVGGGVLLLSCQLAAEGFDITAIEPTGEGFGKFRQLGDIVLELAAARPTIAPCKAEDFISEKRFDFAFSLNVMEHIDLPDEAVRRVSEVLKPGASYHFLCPNYVFPYEPHFNIPTFFTKELTCRVMRHRIEGNTGMDDPKGVWRSLNWITVPKVKRFAAKDATLTLRFHRAMLVWMLERALTDKEFAGRRAQWMVAAIRSAVKLRVHHLAGYVPATLQPIMDVRLTKR