Rv1508c Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1508c · MTBC0 mtbc0_001613 · 599 aa · 1707904–1709703 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_216024.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)membrane protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationglycosyltransferase 87 family protein
Revised (this work)Glycosyltransferase 87 family protein. Pfam: GT87 (PF09594.17).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 5 publications

5 TB publications mention this gene. 5 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 5 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 1 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 1-record verified sample: M. marinum (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
Interaction analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis between the host environment and highly mutated genes from population genetic structure comparison. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000027125 2021
The Impact of Genome Region of Difference 4 (RD4) on Mycobacterial Virulence and BCG Efficacy. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00239 2017
The conservation and application of three hypothetical protein coding gene for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073955 2013
Identification, diagnostic potential, and natural expression of immunodominant seroreactive peptides encoded by five Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific genomic regions. doi:10.1128/CVI.00405-10 2011
Identification and evaluation of a new nucleic acid amplification test target for specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2010.296 2010
5 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv1508c, MMAR_2327 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Interaction analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis between the host environment and highly mutated genes from population genetic structure comparison. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000027125 Medicine (Baltimore) 2021
The Impact of Genome Region of Difference 4 (RD4) on Mycobacterial Virulence and BCG Efficacy. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00239 Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017
The conservation and application of three hypothetical protein coding gene for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073955 PLoS One 2013
Identification, diagnostic potential, and natural expression of immunodominant seroreactive peptides encoded by five Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific genomic regions. doi:10.1128/CVI.00405-10 Clin Vaccine Immunol 2011
Identification and evaluation of a new nucleic acid amplification test target for specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2010.296 Clin Chem Lab Med 2010

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder24% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 78.9
Disordered regions2 IDR(s), longest 91 aa [0-91, 550-599]

carries a substantial disordered region (140/599 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) antiparallel · 2 % of gene

Neighbourgmd (Rv1508A, + strand)
Overlap29 bp, 2 % of this gene's length

antiparallel overlap: this gene may inherit essentiality/conservation signal from its neighbour through shared TA sites or promoter constraint, without any protein of its own being produced (cf. Rv2438A/nadE) Signals attributed to this gene (Tn-seq essentiality via shared TA sites, conservation via promoter constraint) should be cross-checked against the neighbour before being read as its own. P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.00 (95% CI -0.43 to 3.33). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.315 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=25 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. marinum MMAR_2327 · 55.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001593 · 99.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P71787 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameProbable membrane protein

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionGlycosyltransferase family 87
Orthologous group2A18W

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 1.829 · diversifying/relaxed
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 9 missense, 1 nonsense, 3 frameshift
Disruption 4 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.24% of strains (349) · convergent
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — L4, L5; union over all sites: 1 348 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:1699038:G:A · nonsense · 349 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:1699858:GA:G · frameshift · 346 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of L4, totalling 10 strains — 0.0% of the 54 538 strains in the lineage named (largest: L4.1.2.1.1 10/10)
  • NC_000962.3:1699106:AC:A · frameshift · 340 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:1699172:GC:G · frameshift · 313 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of L5, totalling 32 strains — 5.1% of the 629 strains in the lineage named (largest: L5.2.2.2.1 18/32)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.732 (low power) · 3 consensus substitution(s)
low power (3 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 22/53 (42%) · mean identity 54.9% · 3/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (22/53 NTM; in 3 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RD4 100% Bovis

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 44 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 44 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 218.386363636. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 44 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 11 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance72.9 ppm · rank 1503/3519 (57.3th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)

Predictionpredicted membrane protein (12 TM helixes)
DeepTMHMM classTM
TM helices (DeepTMHMM)12

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length599 aa
Molecular weight63.9 kDa
Theoretical pI10.08
GRAVY0.502 (hydrophobic)
Aliphatic index110.7
Aromaticity0.092
Instability index38.7 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
GT87PF09594.17 1.5e-06201–433 Glycosyltransferase family 87

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 78.9, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1507A (+ strand, 235 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv1508A (+ strand, -29 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 3: Rv1508c · Rv1508A · Rv1509 — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1556) exponential phase: operon of 6, Rv1498A · Rv1498c · Rv1505c · Rv1506c · Rv1507c · Rv1508c (coverage 42.97)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 12.87) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

crp binding site only -- direction not determined (low confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq : site de fixation CRP (1 des 191 sites de Kahramanoglou et al. 2014) ; aucun changement d'expression rapporte pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp
Caveat: Site de fixation CRP mesure par ChIP-seq (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014), SANS changement d'expression mesure pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp : le sens de la regulation n'est PAS determine. Ecrire « site de fixation CRP en amont », jamais « regule par CRP ». L'article ne distingue pas « non differentiellement exprime » de « sous le seuil », donc l'absence de ce gene de la table d'expression n'est pas une preuve de non-regulation.

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1508A (hypothetical protein), medium confidence (score 598, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

All 11 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1508A hypothetical protein 598 598 ctx neighborhood:595
Rv1509 hypothetical protein 577 577 ctx neighborhood:572
Rv1510 hypothetical protein 762 360 textmining:644
Rv1516c sugar transferase 807 55 textmining:805
Rv2284 lipM esterase LipM 659 55 textmining:654
Rv3234c tgs3 diacyglycerol O-acyltransferase 440 52 textmining:434
Rv2536 transmembrane protein 804 50 textmining:803
Rv0927c oxidoreductase 630 50 textmining:627
Rv0261c narK3 nitrate/nitrite transporter 546 47 textmining:544
Rv3707c hypothetical protein 428 44 textmining:427
Rv0559c hypothetical protein 651 41 textmining:651

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: membrane protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: glycosyltransferase 87 family protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): GT87 PF09594.17 (E=2e-06)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216024.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — GT87 (PF09594.17)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG 2A18W
  • Curated reference: UniProt P71787 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 11 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1508A
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001613|Rv1508c|
MIPVMSARFTGFPLLSVALRHGITSGRGCGFILDVGAQRPFGNDVLLSVATRKIRSRLPGDRVGNHGALLPFRAEPRRIQMKRPPEVLRGAVTASRERLWAIGSQSERTLMLGTILLASVISAATAYALSQWYAVDVFSTLLVVPGDCWLDWGMNIGRHCFSDYAMVAAAGIQPNPADYLISLPADYQPTAVAAWAPARIPYAIFGLPSHWLGAPRLGLICYLVALTMAVISPAIWAARGARGLERVVIFVTLGAAAIPAWGVIDRGNSTGFVVPIALAYFVALSRQRWGLATITVILAVLVKPQFVVLGVVLLAARQWRWAGIGITGVVVSNIAAFLLWPRGFPGTIAQSIHGIIKFNSSFGGLRDPRNVSFGKALLLIPDSIKNYQSGKIPEGFLTGPRTQIGFAVLVIVVVAVLALGRRIPPVMVGIVLLATATFSPADVAFYYLVFVLPIAALVARDPNGPPGAGIFDQLAAHGDRRRAVGVCVSLAVALSIVNVAVPGQPFYVPLYGQLGAKGVVGTTPLVFTTVTWAPFLWLVTCVVIIVSYARKPARPHDSHNGPTRESDQDTAASTTSCLPNPVEESSPRGPGPICQNYTP