Rv0250c Family assigned · low
H37Rv Rv0250c · MTBC0 mtbc0_000266 ·
97 aa ·
302117–302410 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_214764.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | No Pfam domain above threshold, but Foldseek strongly matches a sensor / HD-domain fold (CpxA-like, prob 0.95, TM=0.88): a putative signal-transduction / sensor-associated module. Structure-based. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 2 publications
Found under: H37Rv (1), M. smegmatis (1).
2 TB publications mention this gene. 2 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.
| Publication | Date |
|---|---|
| Role of intragenic binding of cAMP responsive protein (CRP) in regulation of the succinate dehydrogenase genes Rv0249c-Rv0247c in TB complex mycobacteria. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv420 | 2015 |
| Essentiality of succinate dehydrogenase in Mycobacterium smegmatis and its role in the generation of the membrane potential under hypoxia. doi:10.1128/mBio.01093-14 | 2014 |
This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 2 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Fumarate Reductase, Rv1776c+WhiB4 (Rv1776c and whiB4 ).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
Post-translational modifications
1 reported modified residue(s):
N-acetylserine @2.
Experimentally reported post-translational modification(s). A phosphosite indicates the protein is expressed and is a substrate of the M. tuberculosis Ser/Thr/Tyr kinase signalling network — a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: UniProt (Modified residue features; PTM sites curated from the M. tuberculosis literature).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.26 (95% CI -0.83 to 1.79). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, pebble.rockefeller.edu).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Function unknown. Possibly down-regulated by HSPR|Rv0353. |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb0256c
· 99.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML2557
· 73.7% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_0513
· 70.5% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_0420
· 55.1% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_000266
· 99.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_4420
· 54.2% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O53672
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Uncharacterized protein Rv0250c |
UniProt still lists this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv0250c; the revised annotation above is ahead of the current UniProt record.
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| Orthologous group | 2DP0M |
|---|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 145 209 strains)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 75.6%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
|---|---|
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 4/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 38.6% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) | 4 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 4 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 59.5. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction. |
| Caveat | Statistically thin call: only 4 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 16 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 771.0 ppm · rank 289/3519 (91.8th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Reproducible detection across several independent datasets (PaxDb) makes the existence claim robust; the integrated abundance places the protein in the proteome's dynamic range.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 97 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 10.9 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 4.47 |
| GRAVY | -0.435 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 94.5 |
| Aromaticity | 0.052 |
| Instability index | 40.4 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (or not yet scanned).
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 61.1 (low). Low-confidence model: the fold may be unreliable, so treat these structural hits with caution.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
4biy-assembly1_B |
0.95 | 0.88 | 9.6e-01 | 4biy-assembly1_B Crystal structure of CpxAHDC (monoclinic form 2) |
4biy-assembly2_D |
0.89 | 0.71 | 6.9e-01 | 4biy-assembly2_D Crystal structure of CpxAHDC (monoclinic form 2) |
6ahx-assembly1_A-2 |
0.75 | 0.81 | 2.0e+00 | 6ahx-assembly1_A-2 Copper-Sensing Operon Regulator Protein (CsoRGz) |
7ls2-assembly1_b2 |
0.57 | 0.58 | 1.3e+00 | 7ls2-assembly1_b2 80S ribosome from mouse bound to eEF2 (Class I) |
6z6l-assembly1_Lh |
0.54 | 0.58 | 1.3e+00 | 6z6l-assembly1_Lh Cryo-EM structure of human CCDC124 bound to 80S ribosomes |
8ir1-assembly1_H |
0.51 | 0.57 | 1.3e+00 | 8ir1-assembly1_H human nuclear pre-60S ribosomal particle - State A |
8ink-assembly1_H |
0.38 | 0.58 | 2.1e+00 | 8ink-assembly1_H human nuclear pre-60S ribosomal particle - State D |
7nfx-assembly1_h |
0.28 | 0.59 | 3.4e+00 | 7nfx-assembly1_h Mammalian ribosome nascent chain complex with SRP and SRP receptor in early state A |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv0249c (- strand, 79 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | hsp (- strand, 144 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
Rv1776c (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a strong physiological-context lead.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = hypothetical; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0249c (succinate dehydrogenase membrane anchor subunit), high confidence from genomic context alone (score 879 excluding text-mining). This association is the citable seed of a function hypothesis for this hypothetical protein.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0249c |
succinate dehydrogenase membrane anchor subunit | 940 | 879 ctx | neighborhood:787 cooccurence:451 textmining:527 |
Rv0248c |
succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit | 911 | 819 ctx | neighborhood:734 textmining:531 |
Rv0247c |
succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur subunit | 928 | 812 ctx | neighborhood:735 textmining:637 |
Rv0431 |
tuberculin-like peptide | 737 | 738 ctx | cooccurence:736 |
Rv3415c hyp |
hypothetical protein | 731 | 731 ctx | cooccurence:730 |
Rv2138 lppL |
lipoprotein LppL | 721 | 722 ctx | cooccurence:721 |
Rv0882 |
transmembrane protein | 716 | 717 ctx | cooccurence:715 |
Rv1632c hyp |
hypothetical protein | 704 | 705 ctx | cooccurence:701 |
Rv2743c hyp |
hypothetical protein | 704 | 704 ctx | cooccurence:700 |
Rv0556 |
transmembrane protein | 655 | 655 ctx | cooccurence:653 |
Rv2732c |
transmembrane protein | 640 | 640 ctx | cooccurence:640 |
Rv2360c hyp |
hypothetical protein | 627 | 627 ctx | cooccurence:625 |
Rv1109c hyp |
hypothetical protein | 626 | 626 ctx | cooccurence:621 |
Rv1081c |
membrane protein | 624 | 624 ctx | cooccurence:622 |
Rv3212 hyp |
hypothetical protein | 623 | 623 ctx | cooccurence:621 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The exp badge marks an experimentally-supported partner (measured interaction, experimental/database channel ≥400) as opposed to a purely predicted one — but note that the M. tuberculosis experimental interactome is dominated by a noisy bacterial-two-hybrid screen, so a strong measured link that contradicts the operon/localisation context is likely a false positive. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Evidence
- MTBC0 PGAP product: 'hypothetical protein'
- Pfam: none above threshold
- Foldseek on the ESMFold model: strong match to a CpxA-like sensor / HD-domain fold (TM=0.88)
ESM Atlas signal (exploratory)
Ancestral protein hash ca27799c8163182369fb3521d1974fcd ·
10 ESM-space neighbours (max similarity 0.957).
SAE features are orienting indices, not validated domains.
| # | Index | Activation | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1448 |
0.54 | Chromatin DNA-binding and scaffold domains |
| 2 | 1101 |
0.49 | Acidic N-terminal disordered region |
| 3 | 16 |
0.46 | Modified peptide core detector |
| 4 | 8102 |
0.45 | Membrane-proximal PTM-rich IDRs |
| 5 | 8724 |
0.45 | Amphipathic helical packing interfaces |
| 6 | 1688 |
0.43 | Acidic low-complexity interaction segments |
| 7 | 10164 |
0.42 | N-terminal helical assembly modules |
| 8 | 6600 |
0.42 | Disordered charged terminal tails |
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214764.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2DP0M - Curated reference: UniProt O53672 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 145 209 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 61.1, low)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 85.6)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
67 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv0249c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_000266|Rv0250c| MSTTAELAELHDLVGGLRRCVTALKARFGDNPATRRIVIDADRILTDIELLDTDVSELDLERAAVPQPSEKIAIPDTEYDREFWRDVDDEGVGGHRY
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv0250c? Email the maintainer — the message is pre-filled with this gene's details.