gca Resolved · high

H37Rv Rv0112 · MTBC0 mtbc0_000122 · 318 aa · 136454–137410 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_214626.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationGDP-mannose 4%2C6-dehydratase
Revised (this work)GDP-mannose 4%2C6-dehydratase. Pfam: RmlD_sub_bind (PF04321.24), Epimerase (PF01370.28), GDP_Man_Dehyd (PF16363.12).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 16 publications

16 TB publications mention this gene. 16 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 11 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 3 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 3-record verified sample: M. leprae (3)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 16: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene.
PublicationDate
Giant Cell Aortitis and Tuberculosis: Coincidence or a Causal Link? doi:10.7759/cureus.95972 2025
Molecular Detection of Gene Mutation Related to Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium leprae. doi:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_35_25 2025
Association between fatty acid metabolism gene mutations and Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission revealed by whole genome sequencing. doi:10.1186/s12866-023-03072-9 2023
Giant Cell Arteritis in an Elderly Female With Pulmonary Tuberculosis. doi:10.7759/cureus.37805 2023
Taurocholic Acid and Glycocholic Acid Inhibit Inflammation and Activate Farnesoid X Receptor Expression in LPS-Stimulated Zebrafish and Macrophages. doi:10.3390/molecules28052005 2023

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): Lsr2 (lsr2).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.90 (95% CI -1.26 to 4.08). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.306 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=10 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionPossibly involved in synthesis of a-band common antigen lipopolysaccharide. First of the three steps in the biosynthesis of GDP-fucose from GDP-mannose [catalytic activity: GDP-mannose = GDP-4-dehydro-6-deoxy-D-mannose + H2O].
Mycobrowser EC 4.2.1.47 · differs from the atlas (1.1.1.281) — atlas EC 1.1.1.281 is an eggNOG call; UniProt and Mycobrowser both point to GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (4.2.1.47) — prefer the UniProt annotation

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb0116 · 100.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_000122 · 100.0% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O53634 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt namePossible GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase Gca

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category G Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
M Cell wall / membrane / envelope biogenesis
Preferred namegca
eggNOG descriptionGDP-mannose 4,6 dehydratase
Orthologous groupCOG0451
EC number EC 4.2.1.47 curated (supersedes eggNOG 1.1.1.281)
eggNOG EC 1.1.1.281 (GDP-4-dehydro-6-deoxy-D-mannose reductase) is superseded by curation to EC 4.2.1.47 (GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase), aligning with UniProt (Gca) and Mycobrowser
KEGG orthology K15856
KEGG pathways map00051, map00520

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.721 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 3 synonymous, 6 missense, 1 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.15% of strains (219) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) aucun site fixé dans un clade; union over all sites: 380 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:136411:C:T · nonsense · 219 strains — not fixed in any clade
  • NC_000962.3:136697:GC:G · frameshift · 161 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) undefined (dS = 0) (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 7/53 (13%) · mean identity 33.2% · 1/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (7/53 NTM; in 1 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 30.1%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 31 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 31 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.903, mean read count 44.0357142857. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 31 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain

This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.

Hypomorph straingca-FLAG-tetOn-18 (TetON promoter 18)
Baseline knockdown fitness4.29 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown
Used in target deconvolutionyes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment)

Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) +1.230.025 disruption advantageous

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 10 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance13.0 ppm · rank 2558/3519 (27.3th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length318 aa
Molecular weight35.3 kDa
Theoretical pI5.86
GRAVY-0.097 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index86.8
Aromaticity0.085
Instability index34.9 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
RmlD_sub_bindPF04321.24 2.4e-101–157 RmlD substrate binding domain
EpimerasePF01370.28 9.0e-494–238 NAD dependent epimerase/dehydratase family
GDP_Man_DehydPF16363.12 5.3e-595–304 GDP-mannose 4,6 dehydratase

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 95.9, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 95.9

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
2pk3-assembly1_B 1.00 0.94 0.92 0.94 35% 98% / 100% 3.7e-37 sig 2pk3-assembly1_B Crystal Structure of a GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose reductase
6x3b-assembly1_B 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.91 26% 97% / 99% 9.7e-30 sig 6x3b-assembly1_B Structure of RMD from Pseudomonas aeruginosa complexed with NADPH
6x3b-assembly1_A 1.00 0.90 0.85 0.90 26% 97% / 97% 2.8e-29 sig 6x3b-assembly1_A Structure of RMD from Pseudomonas aeruginosa complexed with NADPH
1rpn-assembly3_C 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.86 26% 96% / 97% 1.6e-29 sig 1rpn-assembly3_C Crystal Structure of GDP-D-mannose 4,6-dehydratase in complexes with GDP and NADPH
6x3b-assembly2_D 1.00 0.90 0.83 0.90 27% 98% / 99% 1.5e-28 sig 6x3b-assembly2_D Structure of RMD from Pseudomonas aeruginosa complexed with NADPH

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 95.9, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv0111 (+ strand, 281 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)gmhA (+ strand, 73 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 4: gca · gmhA · gmhB · hddA — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT0121) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv0112 · Rv0114 · Rv0115 (coverage 10.38)
stationary phase: operon of 4, Rv0112 · Rv0114 · Rv0115 (coverage 67.2) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (3 TF) phoP (activates) · trcR (activates) · tcrX (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: gmhA (phosphoheptose isomerase), high confidence (score 952, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 90 partners at medium confidence (24 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 90 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1511 gmdA curated paralog GDP-D-mannose dehydratase GmdA 956 955 database:900
Rv0113 gmhA phosphoheptose isomerase 954 952 ctx neighborhood:579 coexpression:863
Rv0114 gmhB D-glycero-alpha-D-manno-heptose-1,7-bisphosphate 7-phosphatase 937 934 ctx neighborhood:509 coexpression:829
Rv0115 hddA D-alpha-D-heptose-7-phosphate kinase HddA 934 931 ctx neighborhood:509 coexpression:827
Rv1512 epiA curated paralog nucleotide-sugar epimerase EpiA 911 912 database:900
Rv0705 rpsS exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S19 817 818 experimental:463 database:574
Rv0700 rpsJ exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S10 815 812 experimental:463 database:557
Rv0682 rpsL exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S12 860 807 experimental:463 database:573
Rv3459c rpsK exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S11 805 798 experimental:463 database:558
Rv0710 rpsQ exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S17 804 798 experimental:463 database:578
Rv0707 rpsC exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S3 804 797 experimental:463 database:578
Rv0721 rpsE exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S5 797 790 experimental:463 database:575
Rv2056c rpsN2 exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S14 789 790 experimental:436 database:548
Rv0717 rpsN1 exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S14 788 789 experimental:436 database:548
Rv0718 rpsH exp (transferred) curated 30S ribosomal protein S8 795 788 experimental:463 database:578

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: GDP-mannose 4%2C6-dehydratase
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): RmlD_sub_bind PF04321.24 (E=2e-10), Epimerase PF01370.28 (E=9e-49), GDP_Man_Dehyd PF16363.12 (E=5e-59)
  • (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_214626.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — RmlD_sub_bind (PF04321.24), Epimerase (PF01370.28), GDP_Man_Dehyd (PF16363.12)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0451
  • Curated reference: UniProt O53634 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 95.9)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 90 functional partner(s); context anchor gmhA
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: UniProt Consortium (2024). UniProtKB O53634 (Gca, possible GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase, Mycobacterium tuberculosis) UniProt. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1052

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_000122|Rv0112|gca
MKVWITGAGGMMGSHLAEMLLAAGHDVYATYCRPTIDPSDLQFNGAEVDITDWCSVYDSIATFRPDAVFHLAAQSYPAVSWARPVETLTTNMVGTAIVFEALRRVRPHAKIIVAGSSAEYGFVDPSEVPINERRELRPLHPYGVSKAATDMLAYQYHKSYGMHTVVARIFNCTGPRKVGDALSDFVRRCTWLEHHPEQSAIRVGNLKTKRTIVDVRDLNRALMLMLDKGEAGADYNVGGSIAYEMGDVLKQVIAACKRDDIVPEVDPALLRPTDEKIIYGDCSKLAAITGWQQEICLTQTIADMFDYWRSKSESALMV