Rv3920c Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3920c · MTBC0 mtbc0_004154 · 187 aa · 4432585–4433148 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_218437.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationR3H domain-containing nucleic acid-binding protein
Revised (this work)R3H domain-containing nucleic acid-binding protein. Pfam: R3H (PF01424.29).
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.

Named in the body of 8 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv3920c (6), MMAR_5484 (1), MSMEG_6941 (1).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “protein similar to jag protein”: nothing found. no abstract in PubMed contains this protein name in a mycobacterial context: the silence measured under the locus tag is confirmed under the protein name.

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Full-text-only mention found (Europe PMC), not visible to the title/abstract sweep above.

Enrichment pass (not a full re-read): the wave-1/2 triage already recorded this claim as identity_claim=yes with reasoning that shares specific technical vocabulary with this atlas's own function assignment (R3H domain-containing nucleic acid-binding protein. Pfam: R3). Treated as corroborating, not as new evidence changing the verdict.

CORROBORATES existing atlas assignment (lexical cross-check, wave1/2 enrichment pass, not independently re-read in full).

Lighter-weight than the dark-gene deep-dive protocol (phase141-151): no tbmonitor/fullTextXML re-read performed here, only a lexical consistency check against the pre-existing triage reasoning. Sufficient for an already-functional gene (enrichment), not for resolving a hypothetical.

Europe PMC full-text sweep (P16.2a-septies, phase138, vagues 1/2), passe d'enrichissement en masse (phase152, 2026-08-18) : corroboration etablie par chevauchement LEXICAL entre le raisonnement du triage initial et la fonction deja assignee dans l'atlas -- PAS une relecture integrale du papier (protocole delibere plus leger que le deep-dive dark, proportionne a une tache d'enrichissement de gene deja fonctionnel, pas de resolution d'un hypothetical).

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder28% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 88.8
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 44 aa [0-44]

carries a substantial disordered region (44/187 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 5.0

disruption confers tolerance to Ethambutol, Isoniazid.

Corroborating evidenceconserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; STRING-coupled to yidC (membrane protein insertase YidC); structural lead available

This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.

Conditional expression context (iModulons)

Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s): WhiB1 (whiB1).

iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -1.95 (95% CI -3.22 to -0.28). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.301 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3951c · 99.5% identity
M. leprae ML2709c · 73.1% identity
M. marinum MMAR_5484 · 76.2% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_6941 · 77.8% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_004035 · 99.5% identity
M. abscessus MAB_4952c · 82.6% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O53598 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameConserved protein similar to jag protein

As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Conserved protein similar to jag protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
Preferred namejag
eggNOG descriptionRNA-binding protein
Orthologous groupCOG1847
KEGG orthology K06346

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 1.134 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 7 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) undefined (dS = 0) (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 91.7% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 9/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 68.8%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 4 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 4 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 56.75. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 4 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatStatistically thin call: only 4 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)

Conditionlog2FCqEffect
altered fitness under Ethambutol (drug exposure) +3.590.0 disruption advantageous
Mutants exhibiting altered fitness in the absence of gene marP (other) +2.830.0 disruption advantageous
altered fitness under Isoniazid (drug exposure) +2.290.0 disruption advantageous
differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) +2.260.0052 disruption advantageous
Differential genetic requirements of clinical Mtb strain (ID=621) from East Asian lineage (compared to H37Rv control) (strain background) +2.220.046 required
altered fitness under Ethambutol (drug exposure) +2.030.0 disruption advantageous
altered fitness under Isoniazid (drug exposure) +1.990.0 disruption advantageous
Differential genetic requirements of clinical Mtb strain (ID=641) from Indo-Oceanic lineage (compared to H37Rv control) (strain background) +1.600.041 required

Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 8 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.

Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.

Provenance note on a condition above. `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` carries no source in MtbTnDB's own metadata (col_desc.tsv leaves paper_title/paper_URL empty). Traced by the `Rv0537c` companion project (2026-09-12): Weizhen Xu, PhD thesis, Weill Cornell Medicine, 2017, hdl:1813/64728 ("Genetic Screening In Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Utilizing Transposon Insertion Sequencing"), whose abstract describes a TnSeq genetic-interaction screen naming marP. Never published as a peer-reviewed article.

Provenance note on a condition above. This gene's displayed phenotypes include both `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` and a drug-exposure condition from Xu et al. 2017 (AAC 61(12):e01334-17). Both trace to the same experimenter (Weizhen Xu) and very likely the same transposon insertion library -- read them as ONE handle, not two independent ones, when assessing convergence for an `integrative_lead` flip.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance610.0 ppm · rank 352/3519 (90.0th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length187 aa
Molecular weight20.6 kDa
Theoretical pI4.31
GRAVY-0.486 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index93.3
Aromaticity0.027
Instability index52.1 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
R3HPF01424.29 4.1e-18126–185 R3H domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 88.8, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 88.8

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
3gku-assembly1_A 1.00 0.72 0.58 0.54 33% 77% / 70% 4.2e-13 sig 3gku-assembly1_A Crystal structure of a probable RNA-binding protein from Clostridium symbiosum ATCC 14940
3gku-assembly1_B 1.00 0.76 0.62 0.60 33% 77% / 75% 1.9e-12 sig 3gku-assembly1_B Crystal structure of a probable RNA-binding protein from Clostridium symbiosum ATCC 14940
2pt7-assembly1_H 1.00 0.58 0.48 0.58 17% 75% / 96% 2.4e-06 sig 2pt7-assembly1_H Crystal structure of Cag VirB11 (HP0525) and an inhibitory protein (HP1451)
3gku-assembly2_C-2 1.00 0.78 0.39 0.53 29% 45% / 63% 3.1e-04 sig 3gku-assembly2_C-2 Crystal structure of a probable RNA-binding protein from Clostridium symbiosum ATCC 14940
8b2l-assembly1_a1 0.95 0.35 0.31 0.28 16% 82% / 70% 2.4e-03 sig 8b2l-assembly1_a1 Cryo-EM structure of the plant 80S ribosome

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 88.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)gid (- strand, 131 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv3921c (- strand, 71 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 7: parA · gid · Rv3920c · Rv3921c · Rv3922c · rnpA · rpmH — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT4039) exponential phase: operon of 10, Rv3916c · Rv3917c · Rv3918c · Rv3919c · Rv3920c · Rv3921c · Rv3922c · Rv3923c · Rv3924c (coverage 60.51)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 10.3) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: yidC (membrane protein insertase YidC), high confidence (score 986, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 46 partners at medium confidence (29 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 46 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3921c yidC membrane protein insertase YidC 987 986 ctx neighborhood:792 coexpression:909
Rv3923c rnpA ribonuclease P protein component 961 960 ctx neighborhood:792 coexpression:814
Rv3922c yidD membrane protein insertion efficiency factor 955 955 ctx neighborhood:792 coexpression:794
Rv3919c gid 16S rRNA (guanine(527)-N(7))-methyltransferase RsmG 947 938 ctx neighborhood:727 coexpression:783
Rv2908c exp (transferred) hypothetical protein 992 931 experimental:891 textmining:889
Rv3917c parB chromosome partitioning protein ParB 842 833 ctx neighborhood:758
Rv1297 rho transcription termination factor Rho 817 806 coexpression:805
Rv0708 rplP 50S ribosomal protein L16 804 804 coexpression:804
Rv1613 trpA tryptophan synthase subunit alpha 804 804 coexpression:804
Rv0706 rplV 50S ribosomal protein L22 803 803 coexpression:803
Rv0721 rpsE 30S ribosomal protein S5 802 802 coexpression:802
Rv0705 rpsS 30S ribosomal protein S19 801 801 coexpression:801
Rv0723 rplO 50S ribosomal protein L15 800 800 coexpression:800
Rv0710 rpsQ 30S ribosomal protein S17 799 799 coexpression:799
Rv0704 rplB 50S ribosomal protein L2 794 795 coexpression:795

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: R3H domain-containing nucleic acid-binding protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): R3H PF01424.29 (E=4e-18)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218437.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — R3H (PF01424.29)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1847
  • Curated reference: UniProt O53598 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 88.8)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 46 functional partner(s); context anchor yidC
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_004154|Rv3920c|
MADADTTDFDVDAEAPGGGVREDTATDADEADDQEERLVAEGEIAGDYLEELLDVLDFDGDIDLDVEGNRAVVSIDGSDDLNKLVGRGGEVLDALQELTRLAVHQKTGVRSRLMLDIARWRRRRREELAALADEVARRVAETGDREELVPMTPFERKIVHDAVAAVPGVHSESEGVEPERRVVVLRD