Rv2908c Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2908c · MTBC0 mtbc0_003090 · 80 aa · 3237734–3237976 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217424.1

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • Silence CONFIRMED on three independent channels: the locus tag and ortholog tags, the full UniProt name, and the short usage name (KhpA), the last of which returns no abstract at all. Measured by a strict PubMed sweep on 2026-09-10 (phase217), with a positive control (katG, 1486 papers) and a decoy (0 papers): without that pair, a zero would prove nothing. Both signals are therefore true at once: the protein has 1 experimental structure(s) and no published study names it. A verified absence is information in its own right - it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. (structure vs unstudied, 2026-09-10)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand viuB (Rv2895c) — requalified: siderophore-interacting protein dprA (Rv2896c) — requalified: DNA-processing protein DprA dprA Rv2897c (Rv2897c) — family_assigned: YifB family Mg chelatase-like AAA ATPase Rv2897c Rv2898c (Rv2898c) — family_assigned: YraN family protein fdhD (Rv2899c) — requalified: formate dehydrogenase accessory sulfurtransferase FdhD fdhD fdhF (Rv2900c) — family_assigned: FdhF/YdeP family oxidoreductase fdhF Rv2901c (Rv2901c) — dark: DUF2469 domain-containing protein rnhB (Rv2902c) — requalified: ribonuclease HII lepB (Rv2903c) — requalified: signal peptidase I lepB rplS (Rv2904c) — requalified: 50S ribosomal protein L19 lppW (Rv2905) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein lppW trmD (Rv2906c) — requalified: tRNA (guanosine(37)-N1)-methyltransferase TrmD rimM (Rv2907c) — requalified: ribosome maturation factor RimM Rv2908c (Rv2908c) — family_assigned: RNA-binding protein rpsP (Rv2909c) — requalified: 30S ribosomal protein S16 Rv2912c (Rv2912c) — family_assigned: TetR/AcrR family transcriptional regulator Rv2913c (Rv2913c) — family_assigned: amidohydrolase family protein Rv2913c pknI (Rv2914c) — requalified: serine/threonine protein kinase PknI pknI Rv2915c (Rv2915c) — family_assigned: amidohydrolase family protein Rv2915c ffh (Rv2916c) — requalified: signal recognition particle protein ffh glnD (Rv2918c) — requalified: [protein-PII] uridylyltransferase 3 228 kb 3 232 kb 3 236 kb 3 240 kb 3 244 kb 3 248 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationRNA-binding protein
Revised (this work)RNA-binding protein. Pfam: KH_KhpA-B (PF13083.14).
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation was built from sequence/structure evidence; UniProt nevertheless carries a reviewed entry with a named function for this protein, and experimental evidence that the protein exists (see below), so the absence of a locus-tag mention should not be read as the absence of any study.

Searched under its usage name too (khpA). Searched under its usage name as well (khpA): no PubMed record at all. The silence of this page is now confirmed on four channels — locus tag, full protein name, orthologue tags and usage name — and a verified absence is itself a result. Checked 2026-09-10 against PubMed title, abstract and author keywords (efetch), not the whole record. A term shared with another locus of this proteome is excluded before being searched, because a count on a shared name measures the neighbour: phase217 once reported 38 papers for Rv1433 that belonged to Rv2518c.
Silent tag, studied protein. No publication mentions this LOCUS TAG, yet UniProt P9WFM7 is a reviewed SwissProt entry named 'RNA-binding protein KhpA', at protein-existence level 1 (the protein has been detected experimentally). So the tag is silent while the protein is named and known to exist: do not read 'unstudied' as 'uncharacterised' here. Note the limit of this cross-check: UniProt's protein-existence level says the PROTEIN was observed, not that its FUNCTION was experimentally established, and this atlas does not store the per-annotation evidence codes that would settle that. Read the UniProt entry itself before citing the function as experimentally demonstrated.
Named in the body of 2 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv2908c (2).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “RNA-binding protein KhpA”: nothing found. no abstract in PubMed contains this protein name in a mycobacterial context: the silence measured under the locus tag is confirmed under the protein name.

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Full-text-only mention found (Europe PMC), not visible to the title/abstract sweep above.

Le résumé mentionne explicitement l'identification de 'novel KH-domain proteins' en interaction avec le dégradosome ARN ; Rv2908c/KhpA est précisément une protéine à domaine KH liant l'ARN (Pfam KH_KhpA-B) — correspondance forte avec la fonction assignée.

CORROBORATES existing atlas assignment (agent-reviewed, title+abstract tier, wave1/2 needs_read consolidation).

Lighter-weight than the dark-gene deep-dive protocol: title+abstract only, no full-text re-read performed here.

Europe PMC full-text sweep (P16.2a-septies, phase138, vagues 1/2), lot 'needs_read' (faible recoupement lexical, phase152), revu par agent general-purpose (titre+resume tbmonitor uniquement, protocole leger proportionne a un enrichissement de gene deja fonctionnel), consolide phase153 (2026-08-18).

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -4.12 (95% CI -5.76 to -2.00). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain (their own confidence call, not a p-value threshold). Its guide library did sample a range of repression strengths (str_span=0.254 on a 0-1 scale, thanks to at least one guide <=18 nt; n_guides=5 descriptive only), so the dose-response fit is not starved of titration the way most 'not certain' genes are -- the uncertainty here is the authors' own confidence call on the fit, not a design limitation of the guide library. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim without checking `certain` first.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (curated function (UniProt)). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2932c · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML1617c · 93.8% identity
M. marinum MMAR_1800 · 96.3% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_2436 · 96.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002999 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_3228c · 94.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WFM7 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameRNA-binding protein KhpA
Curated functionA probable RNA-binding protein.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionBelongs to the UPF0109 family
Orthologous groupCOG1837
KEGG orthology K06960
Gene Ontology (2) GO:0008150, GO:0040007

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.0 · quasi-invariant (1 site), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 1 synonymous, 0 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 95.0% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 10/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 75.3%
detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential

DeJesus 2017 callGD · growth-defect
What the call meansgrowth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential
TA sites (Himar1) 7 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 7 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.571, mean read count 10. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 7 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Read with some caution: only 7 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 7 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance926.0 ppm · rank 241/3519 (93.2th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length80 aa
Molecular weight8.5 kDa
Theoretical pI6.25
GRAVY-0.011 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index113.0
Aromaticity0.0
Instability index5.0 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
KH_KhpA-BPF13083.14 1.7e-207–69 KhpA/KhpB, KH domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 7xqc (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 1 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
7xqc X-ray diffraction 2.8 Å 100%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (1 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 93.3

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
4v6u-assembly1_AC 1.00 0.72 0.70 0.33 20% 96% / 39% 4.9e-04 sig 4v6u-assembly1_AC Promiscuous behavior of proteins in archaeal ribosomes revealed by cryo-EM: implications for evolution of eukaryotic ribosomes
8q87-assembly1_Ac 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.29 14% 99% / 36% 1.1e-03 sig 8q87-assembly1_Ac Structure of the G. gallus 80S rotated ribosome in complex with eEF2 and SERBP1
5iqr-assembly1_h 1.00 0.75 0.74 0.31 19% 98% / 35% 4.1e-03 sig 5iqr-assembly1_h Structure of RelA bound to the 70S ribosome
8fzh-assembly1_c 1.00 0.66 0.66 0.29 20% 99% / 37% 2.6e-03 sig 8fzh-assembly1_c Cryo-EM structure of an E. coli non-rotated ribosome termination complex bound with RF1, P- and E-site tRNAPhe (State II-D)
7oyc-assembly1_D2 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.28 12% 98% / 35% 3.9e-03 sig 7oyc-assembly1_D2 Cryo-EM structure of the Xenopus egg 80S ribosome

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 93.3, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4

Upstream (5' on genome)rimM (- strand, 13 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)rpsP (- strand, 7 bp gap)
Predicted operon trmD · rimM · Rv2908c · rpsP

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv2908c · rpsP — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2976) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv2907c · Rv2908c · Rv2909c (coverage 94.74)
stationary phase: operon of 2, Rv2908c · Rv2909c (coverage 31.38) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (2 TF) ramB (represses) · devR (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: rpsP (30S ribosomal protein S16), high confidence (score 989, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 59 partners at medium confidence (21 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 59 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2909c rpsP 30S ribosomal protein S16 990 989 ctx neighborhood:882 coexpression:911
Rv2907c rimM 16S rRNA processing protein RimM 960 959 ctx neighborhood:872 coexpression:692
Rv3920c exp (transferred) hypothetical protein 992 931 experimental:891 textmining:889
Rv3442c rpsI 30S ribosomal protein S9 902 903 coexpression:896
Rv2906c trmD tRNA (guanine-N1)-methyltransferase 885 885 ctx neighborhood:872
Rv2904c rplS 50S ribosomal protein L19 862 863 coexpression:840
Rv3458c rpsD 30S ribosomal protein S4 830 830 coexpression:827
Rv2785c rpsO 30S ribosomal protein S15 831 826 coexpression:823
Rv1643 rplT 50S ribosomal protein L20 810 811 coexpression:805
Rv1298 rpmE 50S ribosomal protein L31 780 780 coexpression:780
Rv2412 rpsT 30S ribosomal protein S20 780 780 coexpression:780
Rv0652 rplL 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 781 774 coexpression:774
Rv3456c rplQ 50S ribosomal protein L17 738 738 coexpression:730
Rv0979A rpmF 50S ribosomal protein L32 735 736 coexpression:714
Rv2441c rpmA 50S ribosomal protein L27 709 710 coexpression:698

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: RNA-binding protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): KH_KhpA-B PF13083.14 (E=2e-20)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217424.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — KH_KhpA-B (PF13083.14)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1837
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WFM7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 93.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 59 functional partner(s); context anchor rpsP
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_003090|Rv2908c|
MSAVVVDAVEHLVRGIVDNPDDVRVDLITSRRGRTVEVHVHPDDLGKVIGRGGRTATALRTLVAGIGGRGIRVDVVDTDQ