Rv2908c Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2908c · MTBC0 mtbc0_003090 · 80 aa · 3237734–3237976 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217424.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand viuB (Rv2895c) — requalified: siderophore-interacting protein dprA (Rv2896c) — requalified: DNA-processing protein DprA dprA Rv2897c (Rv2897c) — family_assigned: YifB family Mg chelatase-like AAA ATPase Rv2897c Rv2898c (Rv2898c) — family_assigned: YraN family protein fdhD (Rv2899c) — requalified: formate dehydrogenase accessory sulfurtransferase FdhD fdhD fdhF (Rv2900c) — family_assigned: FdhF/YdeP family oxidoreductase fdhF Rv2901c (Rv2901c) — dark: DUF2469 domain-containing protein rnhB (Rv2902c) — requalified: ribonuclease HII lepB (Rv2903c) — requalified: signal peptidase I lepB rplS (Rv2904c) — requalified: 50S ribosomal protein L19 lppW (Rv2905) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein lppW trmD (Rv2906c) — requalified: tRNA (guanosine(37)-N1)-methyltransferase TrmD rimM (Rv2907c) — requalified: ribosome maturation factor RimM Rv2908c (Rv2908c) — family_assigned: RNA-binding protein rpsP (Rv2909c) — requalified: 30S ribosomal protein S16 Rv2912c (Rv2912c) — family_assigned: TetR/AcrR family transcriptional regulator Rv2913c (Rv2913c) — family_assigned: amidohydrolase family protein Rv2913c pknI (Rv2914c) — requalified: serine/threonine protein kinase PknI pknI Rv2915c (Rv2915c) — family_assigned: amidohydrolase family protein Rv2915c ffh (Rv2916c) — requalified: signal recognition particle protein ffh glnD (Rv2918c) — requalified: [protein-PII] uridylyltransferase 3 228 kb 3 232 kb 3 236 kb 3 240 kb 3 244 kb 3 248 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationRNA-binding protein
Revised (this work)RNA-binding protein. Pfam: KH_KhpA-B (PF13083.14).
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) never studied

No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -4.12 (95% CI -5.76 to -2.00). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, pebble.rockefeller.edu).

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (curated function (UniProt)). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2932c · 100.0% identity
M. leprae ML1617c · 93.8% identity
M. marinum MMAR_1800 · 96.3% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_2436 · 96.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002999 · 100.0% identity
M. abscessus MAB_3228c · 94.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WFM7 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameRNA-binding protein KhpA
Curated functionA probable RNA-binding protein.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionBelongs to the UPF0109 family
Orthologous groupCOG1837
KEGG orthology K06960
Gene Ontology (2) GO:0008150, GO:0040007

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 145 209 strains)

pN/pS 0.0 · strong purifying
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 1 synonymous, 0 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 52/53 (98%) · mean identity 95.0% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 52/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific Mycobacterium Mycobacteriaceae Corynebacteriales Actinomycetia Bacteria
detected in 10/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 75.3%
detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential

DeJesus 2017 callGD · growth-defect
What the call meansgrowth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential
TA sites (Himar1) 7 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 7 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.571, mean read count 10. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. Read with some caution: only 7 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 7 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance926.0 ppm · rank 241/3519 (93.2th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Reproducible detection across several independent datasets (PaxDb) makes the existence claim robust; the integrated abundance places the protein in the proteome's dynamic range.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length80 aa
Molecular weight8.5 kDa
Theoretical pI6.25
GRAVY-0.011 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index113.0
Aromaticity0.0
Instability index5.0 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
KH_KhpA-BPF13083.14 1.7e-207–69 KhpA/KhpB, KH domain

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 1 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
7xqc X-ray diffraction 2.8 Å 100%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (1 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 93.3

PDB hitprobTM-scoreE-valueDescription
4v6u-assembly1_AC 1.00 0.72 4.9e-04 sig 4v6u-assembly1_AC Promiscuous behavior of proteins in archaeal ribosomes revealed by cryo-EM: implications for evolution of eukaryotic ribosomes
8q87-assembly1_Ac 1.00 0.72 1.1e-03 sig 8q87-assembly1_Ac Structure of the G. gallus 80S rotated ribosome in complex with eEF2 and SERBP1
5iqr-assembly1_h 1.00 0.75 4.1e-03 sig 5iqr-assembly1_h Structure of RelA bound to the 70S ribosome
8fzh-assembly1_c 1.00 0.66 2.6e-03 sig 8fzh-assembly1_c Cryo-EM structure of an E. coli non-rotated ribosome termination complex bound with RF1, P- and E-site tRNAPhe (State II-D)
7oyc-assembly1_D2 1.00 0.69 3.9e-03 sig 7oyc-assembly1_D2 Cryo-EM structure of the Xenopus egg 80S ribosome

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 93.3, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4

Upstream (5' on genome)rimM (- strand, 13 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)rpsP (- strand, 7 bp gap)
Predicted operon trmD · rimM · Rv2908c · rpsP

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (2 TF) ramB (represses) · devR (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a strong physiological-context lead.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = hypothetical; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: rpsP (30S ribosomal protein S16), high confidence from genomic context alone (score 989 excluding text-mining). This association is the citable seed of a function hypothesis for this hypothetical protein.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2909c rpsP 30S ribosomal protein S16 990 989 ctx neighborhood:882 coexpression:911
Rv2907c rimM 16S rRNA processing protein RimM 960 959 ctx neighborhood:872 coexpression:692
Rv3920c hyp exp hypothetical protein 992 931 experimental:891 textmining:889
Rv3442c rpsI 30S ribosomal protein S9 902 903 coexpression:896
Rv2906c trmD tRNA (guanine-N1)-methyltransferase 885 885 ctx neighborhood:872
Rv2904c rplS 50S ribosomal protein L19 862 863 coexpression:840
Rv3458c rpsD 30S ribosomal protein S4 830 830 coexpression:827
Rv2785c rpsO 30S ribosomal protein S15 831 826 coexpression:823
Rv1643 rplT 50S ribosomal protein L20 810 811 coexpression:805
Rv1298 rpmE 50S ribosomal protein L31 780 780 coexpression:780
Rv2412 rpsT 30S ribosomal protein S20 780 780 coexpression:780
Rv0652 rplL 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 781 774 coexpression:774
Rv3456c rplQ 50S ribosomal protein L17 738 738 coexpression:730
Rv0979A rpmF 50S ribosomal protein L32 735 736 coexpression:714
Rv2441c rpmA 50S ribosomal protein L27 709 710 coexpression:698

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The exp badge marks an experimentally-supported partner (measured interaction, experimental/database channel ≥400) as opposed to a purely predicted one — but note that the M. tuberculosis experimental interactome is dominated by a noisy bacterial-two-hybrid screen, so a strong measured link that contradicts the operon/localisation context is likely a false positive. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: RNA-binding protein
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): KH_KhpA-B PF13083.14 (E=2e-20)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217424.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — KH_KhpA-B (PF13083.14)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1837
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WFM7 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 145 209 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 93.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 59 functional partner(s); context anchor rpsP
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_003090|Rv2908c|
MSAVVVDAVEHLVRGIVDNPDDVRVDLITSRRGRTVEVHVHPDDLGKVIGRGGRTATALRTLVAGIGGRGIRVDVVDTDQ