Rv3635 Family assigned · medium
H37Rv Rv3635 · MTBC0 mtbc0_003852 ·
591 aa ·
4097338–4099113 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_218152.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | transmembrane protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | Apolipoprotein-N-acyltransferase-family membrane enzyme (eggNOG COG0815, cell-envelope COG category M): transfers a fatty-acyl group onto membrane lipoproteins (lipoprotein N-acylation / maturation). RefSeq leaves it a 'conserved transmembrane protein'. Family/activity-level; not asserted as the sole M. tuberculosis Lnt. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False).
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.
Rv3635, MT3737, Mb3659, ML0203c, MMAR_5134, MSMEG_6143, MAB_0502c
in Europe PMC full text (2026-09-23).
- Characterizing the pocketome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and application in rationalizing polypharmacological target selection. (2014, open access)
A full-text hit means the gene is NAMED in the body of a paper -- very often in a genome-wide supplementary table -- not that it is characterised. This field exists to retract an absence claim, never to assert a function. Read the hits before concluding anything. Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions. A hit whose full text is not open access is counted in n_unverifiable, not listed: the API cannot read it, so it is neither a proof of mention nor a proof of absence.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -2.31 (95% CI -2.52 to -2.11). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb3659
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML0203c
· 77.2% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_5134
· 79.2% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_6143
· 72.5% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_003735
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_0502c
· 61.7% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
I6Y460
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Probable conserved transmembrane protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
M Cell wall / membrane / envelope biogenesis
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | Transfers the fatty acyl group on membrane lipoproteins |
| Orthologous group | COG0815 |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.386 · purifying |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 5 synonymous, 5 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 1 consensus substitution(s) low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 78.6%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 5/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 47.2% detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential
Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -2.312), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | GD · growth-defect |
|---|---|
| What the call means | growth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
26 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
26 growth-defect,
0 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.231,
mean read count 5.5.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 26 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Chemical-genetic target & druggability (PROSPECT) hypomorph tool strain
This gene is part of the PROSPECT collection of TetON transcriptional-knockdown (hypomorph) strains of essential M. tuberculosis genes, built as a sensitised background for chemical-genetic mechanism-of-action deconvolution. Being in the panel means the gene is an essential / vulnerable target for which a validated knockdown tool strain exists.
| Hypomorph strain | Rv3635-Flag-Das-tetON-18 (TetON promoter 18) |
|---|---|
| Baseline knockdown fitness | 3.866 median doublings (across 6 screen pool(s)) — fewer doublings = stronger growth defect on knockdown |
| Used in target deconvolution | yes (informs phenotypic-cluster / MOA assignment) |
Panel membership reflects essentiality/vulnerability and the availability of a genetic tool, not a specific molecular function; it never changes the verdict here. Source: Bond AN et al., Nat Commun 2025;16:9673 (doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64662-x); PROSPECT chemical-genetic platform.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) | -2.59 | 0.0063 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 8 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 1.03 ppm · rank 3262/3519 (7.3th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (11 TM helixes) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 11 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 591 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 63.5 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 9.48 |
| GRAVY | 0.637 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 119.4 |
| Aromaticity | 0.096 |
| Instability index | 38.5 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 95.2, very high), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 95.2
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8age-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 15% | 67% / 62% | 2.2e-05 sig | 8age-assembly1_A Structure of yeast oligosaccharylransferase complex with acceptor peptide bound |
8agc-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 15% | 67% / 65% | 3.2e-05 sig | 8agc-assembly1_A Structure of yeast oligosaccharylransferase complex with lipid-linked oligosaccharide and non-acceptor peptide bound |
6ezn-assembly1_F |
1.00 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 13% | 71% / 67% | 1.5e-04 sig | 6ezn-assembly1_F Cryo-EM structure of the yeast oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) complex |
7oci-assembly1_F |
1.00 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 12% | 67% / 62% | 1.2e-04 sig | 7oci-assembly1_F Cryo-EM structure of yeast Ost6p containing oligosaccharyltransferase complex |
5f15-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 16% | 76% / 89% | 3.0e-04 sig | 5f15-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of ArnT from Cupriavidus metallidurans bound to Undecaprenyl phosphate |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 95.2, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | galE1 (- strand, 22 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv3638 (+ strand, 1574 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3737) |
not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase) |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: galE1 (UDP-glucose 4-epimerase), high confidence (score 795, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 56 partners at medium confidence (6 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 56 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv3634c galE1 |
UDP-glucose 4-epimerase | 796 | 795 ctx | neighborhood:790 |
Rv0227c |
membrane protein | 731 | 732 ctx | cooccurence:715 |
Rv0226c |
transmembrane protein | 730 | 730 ctx | cooccurence:687 |
Rv1476 |
membrane protein | 715 | 716 ctx | cooccurence:715 |
Rv3035 |
hypothetical protein | 717 | 707 ctx | cooccurence:704 |
Rv3346c dark |
transmembrane protein | 704 | 705 ctx | cooccurence:703 |
Rv2673 aftC |
alpha-(1->3)-arabinofuranosyltransferase | 699 | 699 ctx | cooccurence:695 |
Rv3802c |
membrane protein | 686 | 686 ctx | cooccurence:686 |
Rv3527 |
hypothetical protein | 668 | 668 ctx | cooccurence:668 |
Rv1254 |
acyltransferase | 655 | 640 ctx | cooccurence:627 |
Rv3244c lpqB |
lipoprotein LpqB | 626 | 626 ctx | cooccurence:618 |
Rv0224c |
methyltransferase | 613 | 614 ctx | cooccurence:607 |
Rv0466 |
hypothetical protein | 594 | 594 ctx | cooccurence:593 |
Rv1275 lprC |
lipoprotein LprC | 593 | 594 ctx | cooccurence:591 |
Rv0479c |
membrane protein | 582 | 582 ctx | cooccurence:582 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- eggNOG COG0815 = apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase (transfers fatty-acyl onto membrane lipoprotein)
- Integral membrane (DeepTMHMM, phase8)
- eggNOG-mapper orthology (COG functional assignment, under-propagated by the auto-curation). A family/activity-level assignment from orthology, not a substrate demonstrated in M. tuberculosis.
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218152.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG0815 - Curated reference: UniProt I6Y460 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 95.2)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
56 functional partner(s); context anchor
galE1 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_003852|Rv3635| MPAPRMPRVALVAVLLITVQLVVRVVLAFGGYFYWDDLILVGRAGTGGLLSPSYLFDDHDGHVMPGAFLVAGAIIRVAPLVWTGPAISLVVLQLLESLALLRALYVISSWRPVLLIPLTFALFTPLAVPGFAWWAAALNSLPMLAALAWVCADAILLVRTGNHRYAVTGVLVYLGGLLFFEKAAVIPFVSFAVAALQCHVRGDRSALATVWRAGVRLWTPSLALTVGWVALYLAVVDQRRWSSDLSMTWDLLCRSVTHGIVPALAGGPWDWARWAPASPWATPPAVVMVLGWLVLIAVLALSLVRKRRIGPVWLTAAGYAVACQVPIFLMRSSPFTALELAQTLRYFPDLVVVLALLAAVALQAPNRAGTRWLDASPARAVATVASAVLFLTSSLYSTATFLASWRDNPTEGYLKNAQASLAAAASGAPLLDQEVDPLVLQRVAWPENLASHMFALLRVRPEFATTTTQLRMFTSTGRLVDAKVTWVRTIIAGPVPQCGYFVQPDRPERLILDGPLLPGDWTVELNYLANSDGSMALALSDGPERKVPVHPGLNRVYARLPGAGDAITVRANTTALSLCIGAAPVGFLAPA
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv3635? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv3635