moaR1 Family assigned · medium auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3124 · MTBC0 mtbc0_003321 · 289 aa · 3510871–3511740 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_217640.1

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • Both statements stand. UniProt labels this protein "Evidence at protein level", a curator's judgement whose basis (mass spectrometry, structure, antibody, Edman sequencing) this atlas does not record; PaxDb counts detections in 16 aggregated mass-spectrometry datasets and none detects it, which is not evidence of absence. The UniProt entry carries 7 annotation(s) with experimental support from 2 publications; this atlas has not checked whether any of them measures the protein itself. (uniprot protein level vs ms undetected, 2026-10-09)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transcriptional regulator MoaR
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationtranscriptional regulator MoaR1
Revised (this work)Transcriptional regulator MoaR1. Pfam: Trans_reg_C (PF00486.35), BTAD (PF03704.24).
Functional category (TubercuList)regulatory proteins

Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 2 publications

2 TB publications mention this gene. 2 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 2 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and none a non-TB mycobacterial context. The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

PublicationDate
HigA2 (Rv2021c) Is a Transcriptional Regulator with Multiple Regulatory Targets in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.3390/microorganisms12061244 2024
Characterization of the transcriptional regulator Rv3124 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis identifies it as a positive regulator of molybdopterin biosynthesis and defines the functional consequences of a non-synonymous SNP in the Mycobacterium bovis BCG orthologue. doi:10.1099/mic.0.037200-0 2010
2 records returned by the alias sweep

Searched as: Rv3124, moaR1, Mb3147 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
HigA2 (Rv2021c) Is a Transcriptional Regulator with Multiple Regulatory Targets in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.3390/microorganisms12061244 Microorganisms 2024
Characterization of the transcriptional regulator Rv3124 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis identifies it as a positive regulator of molybdopterin biosynthesis and defines the functional consequences of a non-synonymous SNP in the Mycobacterium bovis BCG orthologue. doi:10.1099/mic.0.037200-0 names it Microbiology (Reading) 2010

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.13 (95% CI -0.32 to 3.51). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.316 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=14 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionInvolved in transcriptional mechanism.

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3147 · 99.7% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O05797 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameTranscriptional regulatory protein MoaR1
Curated functionActs as a positive transcriptional regulator of the molybdopterin biosynthesis moa1 locus, promoting the expression of the moaA1B1C1D1 genes. Binds directly to the moaA1 promoter.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category K Transcription
eggNOG descriptioninvolved in transcriptional mechanism. thought to regulate the biosynthesis of the mycobacterial cell wall arabinan and resistance to ethambutol (Emb
Orthologous groupCOG3629
Gene Ontology (78) GO:0003674, GO:0003676, GO:0003677, GO:0005488, GO:0006139, GO:0006163, GO:0006355, GO:0006725, GO:0006732, GO:0006753, GO:0006793, GO:0006796 +66 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.824 · quasi-invariant (7 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 5 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 46/53 (87%) · mean identity 52.4% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 46/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 5/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 37.8%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RD12can 100% Orygis (82%), Canettii (81%)
RD12oryx* 100% Orygis (99%), Canettii (81%)

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 31 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 31 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.871, mean read count 124.222222222. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 31 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length289 aa
Molecular weight32.3 kDa
Theoretical pI9.22
GRAVY-0.135 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index104.3
Aromaticity0.066
Instability index43.8 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
Trans_reg_CPF00486.35 1.2e-1322–93 Transcriptional regulatory protein, C terminal
BTADPF03704.24 1.3e-48101–246 Bacterial transcriptional activator domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 84.8, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 84.8

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
2ff4-assembly1_A 1.00 0.97 0.80 0.65 54% 82% / 67% 1.6e-25 sig 2ff4-assembly1_A Mycobacterium tuberculosis EmbR in complex with low affinity phosphopeptide
8hvr-assembly1_J 1.00 0.92 0.75 0.92 33% 82% / 97% 2.9e-15 sig 8hvr-assembly1_J Cryo-EM structure of AfsR-dependent transcription activation complex with afsS promoter
5lyn-assembly1_B 1.00 0.75 0.34 0.75 12% 47% / 91% 3.3e-03 sig 5lyn-assembly1_B Structure of the Tpr Domain of Sgt2 in complex with yeast Ssa1 peptide fragment
5lyp-assembly1_A 1.00 0.74 0.35 0.74 12% 47% / 88% 3.3e-03 sig 5lyp-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the Tpr Domain of Sgt2.
7bev-assembly1_A 1.00 0.75 0.33 0.75 11% 46% / 90% 3.5e-03 sig 7bev-assembly1_A NMR structure of an optimized version of the first TPR domain of the human SPAG1 protein

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 84.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv3123 (+ strand, 442 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)PPE49 (- strand, 100 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT3208) expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 22.55)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 11.3) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE) transcription factor

Regulated by (2 TF) Rv0047c (activates) · Rv0081 (activates)
Regulonthis transcription factor regulates 3 target gene(s)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

crp binding site only -- direction not determined (low confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq : site de fixation CRP (1 des 191 sites de Kahramanoglou et al. 2014) ; aucun changement d'expression rapporte pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp
Caveat: Site de fixation CRP mesure par ChIP-seq (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014), SANS changement d'expression mesure pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp : le sens de la regulation n'est PAS determine. Ecrire « site de fixation CRP en amont », jamais « regule par CRP ». L'article ne distingue pas « non differentiellement exprime » de « sous le seuil », donc l'absence de ce gene de la table d'expression n'est pas une preuve de non-regulation.

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv0894 (transcriptional regulator), high confidence (score 989, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 73 partners at medium confidence (54 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 73 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0894 transcriptional regulator 996 989 ctx fusion:899 cooccurence:489 coexpression:802 textmining:663
Rv3055 TetR family transcriptional regulator 885 883 ctx cooccurence:544 coexpression:754
Rv3830c TetR family transcriptional regulator 860 857 coexpression:836
Rv0339c iniR transcriptional regulator 860 856 coexpression:785
Rv3263 DNA methylase 849 850 coexpression:805
Rv3840 transcriptional regulator 847 847 coexpression:827
Rv1674c transcriptional regulator 845 845 coexpression:845
Rv3167c TetR family transcriptional regulator 839 836 coexpression:836
Rv3113 phosphatase 836 836 coexpression:802
Rv2488c LuxR family transcriptional regulator 842 834 coexpression:780
Rv1189 sigI ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor SigI 833 833 coexpression:833
Rv1675c cmr HTH-type transcriptional regulator Cmr 826 826 coexpression:826
Rv0691c mftR mycofactocin biosynthesis transcriptional regulator MftR 827 824 coexpression:824
Rv1453 transcriptional activator protein 824 824 coexpression:798
Rv1190 hypothetical protein 815 815 coexpression:815

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: transcriptional regulator MoaR
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: transcriptional regulator MoaR1
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Trans_reg_C PF00486.35 (E=1e-13), BTAD PF03704.24 (E=1e-48)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217640.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Trans_reg_C (PF00486.35), BTAD (PF03704.24)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG3629
  • Curated reference: UniProt O05797 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 84.8)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 73 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv0894
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_003321|Rv3124|moaR1
MQFNVLGPLELNLRGTKLPLGTPKQRAVLAMLLLSRNQVVAADALVQAIWEKSPPARARRTVHTYICNLRRTLSDAGVDSRNILVSEPPGYRLLIGDRQQCDLDRFVAAKESGLRASAKGYFSEAIRYLDSALQNWRGPVLGDLRSFMFVQMFSRALTEDELLVHTKLAEAAIACGRADVVIPKLERLVAMHPYRESLWKQLMLGYYVNEYQSAAIDAYHRLKSTLAEELGVEPAPTIRALYHKILRQLPMDDLVGRVTRGRVDLRGGNGAKVEELTESDKDLLPIGLA