polA Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1629 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001737 · 904 aa · 1842629–1845343 MTBC0 (+) · RefSeq NP_216145.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)DNA polymerase I
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationDNA polymerase I
Revised (this work)DNA polymerase I. Pfam: 5_3_exonuc_N (PF02739.23), 5_3_exonuc (PF01367.26), DNA_polI_exo1 (PF22619.3), DNA_pol_A (PF00476.27).
Functional category (TubercuList)information pathways

Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=True).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 8 publications

8 TB publications mention this gene. 8 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 7 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 6 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 6-record verified sample: M. leprae (3), M. smegmatis (3)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 8: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Genomic Surveillance of 3R Genes Associated with Antibiotic Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Kazakhstan. doi:10.3390/antibiotics15010026 2025
Molecular Insights Into the Structure, Function, and Stability of the DNA Polymerase Processivity Factor From Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169416 2025
Elucidating the mechanism of antimicrobial resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using gene interaction networks. doi:10.1016/bs.apcsb.2022.11.017 2023
Protein-protein interaction networks suggest different targets have different propensities for triggering drug resistance. doi:10.1007/s11693-011-9076-5 2010
The RLEP-flanked polA gene from Mycobacterium leprae is not transcribed in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00707-x 1997
20 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 8 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv1629, polA, Mb1655, ML1381c, MMAR_2432, MSMEG_3839, MAB_2615c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in adults and adolescents for treatment of non-segmental vitiligo (Viti-Up): results of two phase 3 randomised controlled studies. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00896-2 Lancet 2026
Modelling the impact of increasing tuberculosis treatment coverage and addressing determinants of risk in men. doi:10.1038/s43856-026-01536-3 Commun Med (Lond) 2026
Enhancing TB case detection: a case study of Kenya's Global Fund-supported public-private mix. doi:10.5588/pha.26.0002 Public Health Action 2026
Genomic Surveillance of 3R Genes Associated with Antibiotic Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Kazakhstan. doi:10.3390/antibiotics15010026 Antibiotics (Basel) 2025
Associated Factors of Mycobacterium Leprae Infection among People with Leprosy in Kwale County. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012901 PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2025
The effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and return on investment of scaling up tuberculosis screening and preventive treatment in Brazil, Georgia, Kenya, and South Africa: a modelling study. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00321-3 Lancet Glob Health 2025
Molecular Insights Into the Structure, Function, and Stability of the DNA Polymerase Processivity Factor From Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169416 J Mol Biol 2025
IFN-γ and IL-10 Immunosensor with Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Interdigitated Electrodes toward Pen-Side Cattle Paratuberculosis Monitoring. doi:10.1002/gch2.202400021 Glob Chall 2024
Elucidating the mechanism of antimicrobial resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using gene interaction networks. doi:10.1016/bs.apcsb.2022.11.017 Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 2023
Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Infliximab-dyyb and Infliximab in Biologic-Naive Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States. doi:10.1093/crocol/otab051 Crohns Colitis 360 2021
CORR Insights(®): How Long Does Antimycobacterial Antibiotic-loaded Bone Cement Have In Vitro Activity for Musculoskeletal Tuberculosis? doi:10.1007/s11999-017-5490-7 Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017
Surgical treatment of tuberculous spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012
Protein-protein interaction networks suggest different targets have different propensities for triggering drug resistance. doi:10.1007/s11693-011-9076-5 Syst Synth Biol 2010
Diagnostic utility of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA assays in pericardial fluid for the recognition of neoplastic pericarditis. doi:10.5301/JBM.2008.318 Int J Biol Markers 2005
[Pott disease: current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches]. Clin Ter 2001
The RLEP-flanked polA gene from Mycobacterium leprae is not transcribed in Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00707-x names it Gene 1997
Construction by homologous recombination and phenotypic characterization of a DNA polymerase domain polA mutant of Mycobacterium smegmatis. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(96)00350-2 names it Gene 1996
Cloning and sequence analysis of the gene encoding the DNA polymerase I from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(95)00453-d Gene 1995
The Mycobacterium leprae genome: systematic sequence analysis identifies key catabolic enzymes, ATP-dependent transport systems and a novel polA locus associated with genomic variability. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02317.x names it Mol Microbiol 1995
A PCR method for the sequence analysis of the gyrA, polA and rnhA gene segments from mycobacteria. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(93)90481-h names it Gene 1993

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Transcriptional start site (informative, coordinates unchanged)

Leaderless transcript (no 5'UTR / Shine-Dalgarno). Primary TSS at position 1830665 (+ strand), 51 bp 5'UTR. TSS-derived candidate start codon: 1830716 -- candidate only, not applied to this record's coordinates.

Genome-wide 5'-triphosphate-enriched RNA-seq TSS mapping (Cortes et al. 2013): informative context on transcript architecture only. reannotated_start_candidate is the authors' TSS-derived candidate start codon -- reported for information, NEVER applied to this atlas's start_mtbc0/end_mtbc0 coordinates (P19 MTBC0<->H37Rv anchoring). Row re-keyed to this locus by matching its genomic boundary against the H37Rv GFF3 (P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15), P49): the original ingestion (P16.23/phase135, 2026-08-17) trusted the source table's own gene-identity column, which was desynchronised from its own numeric columns on 547/651 checkable rows -- see P49 for the full diagnostic. A missing primary_tss here means this gene falls outside the 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset the source table covers, not an absence of transcription. Leaderless: transcription starts at or within the annotated start codon, so this transcript carries no 5'UTR/Shine-Dalgarno sequence -- relevant context for translation-start calls on short/dark ORFs (P8). Source: Cortes et al. 2013 (Cell Reports), Table S3 (TSS mapping and re-annotation of start codons), 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset of >4,000 genome-wide TSS -- row re-keyed to this locus by coordinate match (P49).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index -0.55 (95% CI -0.64 to -0.46). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionInvolved in post-incision events. In addition to DNA polymerase activity, this DNA polymerase exhibits 3' to 5' and 5' to 3' exonuclease activity [catalytic activity: N deoxynucleoside triphosphate = N diphosphate + {DNA}(N)].
Mycobrowser EC 2.7.7.7 · agrees with the atlas

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1655 · 99.9% identity
M. leprae ML1381c · 85.2% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2432 · 89.8% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_3839 · 84.2% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001703 · 99.9% identity
M. abscessus MAB_2615c · 81.3% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P9WNU5 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameDNA polymerase I
EC (curated) EC 2.7.7.7
Curated functionIn addition to polymerase activity, this DNA polymerase exhibits 3'-5' and 5'-3' exonuclease activity.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category L Replication, recombination and repair
Preferred namepolA
eggNOG descriptionIn addition to polymerase activity, this DNA polymerase exhibits 5'-3' exonuclease activity
Orthologous groupCOG0258
EC number EC 2.7.7.7
KEGG orthology K02335
KEGG pathways map00230, map00240, map01100, map03030, map03410, map03420, map03440
Gene Ontology (61) GO:0003674, GO:0003824, GO:0003887, GO:0004518, GO:0004527, GO:0005575, GO:0005618, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0005737, GO:0005886, GO:0006139 +49 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.426 · purifying
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 9 synonymous, 11 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.14 · 14 consensus substitution(s)
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.14) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 88.1% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 9/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 66.2%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) ESD — not strictly essential

The two screens differ on the SCOPE of what is required: Tn-seq says essential (domain-level only) (ESD), CRISPRi says essential.

These two screens are not in plain contradiction here, but they do not say the same thing either, and the difference matters for what may be written about this gene. Tn-seq (DeJesus 2017) places the requirement on a SUB-REGION of the ORF and explicitly declines to call the whole gene essential; CRISPRi (Bosch 2021) calls the gene essential under partial knockdown. Both point to an important gene; they disagree on the SCOPE of what is required. Locate the domain before concluding, and note that a stretch carrying no TA site is invisible to Himar1 Tn-seq — neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred there. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -0.551), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 26 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 27 showing this direction of disagreement.

DeJesus 2017 callESD · essential domain
What the call meansessential domain: only a SUB-REGION of the ORF is essential; the gene as a whole is NOT essential. Locate the domain before concluding, and beware that a region devoid of TA sites is invisible to Himar1 TnSeq (neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred).
TA sites (Himar1) 42 in the ORF — 13 in the essential state, 23 growth-defect, 6 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.357, mean read count 29.4666666667. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 42 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
Caveat`essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance365.0 ppm · rank 548/3519 (84.5th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length904 aa
Molecular weight98.5 kDa
Theoretical pI5.01
GRAVY-0.222 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index92.9
Aromaticity0.064
Instability index33.7 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
5_3_exonuc_NPF02739.23 3.7e-5916–184 5'-3' exonuclease, N-terminal resolvase-like domain
5_3_exonucPF01367.26 2.6e-29186–279 5'-3' exonuclease, C-terminal SAM fold
DNA_polI_exo1PF22619.3 1.4e-08356–443 DNA polymerase I, ribonuclease H-like domain
DNA_pol_APF00476.27 1.2e-151526–900 DNA polymerase family A

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 89.7, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 89.7

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
6vde-assembly1_A 1.00 0.98 0.94 0.98 81% 99% / 100% 0.0e+00 sig 6vde-assembly1_A Full-length M. smegmatis Pol1
6vdd-assembly1_A 1.00 0.98 0.62 0.98 80% 65% / 100% 5.1e-75 sig 6vdd-assembly1_A POL domain of Pol1 from M. smegmatis complex with DNA primer-template and dNTP
6vdd-assembly2_D 1.00 0.97 0.61 0.97 80% 65% / 100% 3.4e-75 sig 6vdd-assembly2_D POL domain of Pol1 from M. smegmatis complex with DNA primer-template and dNTP
6vdc-assembly1_A 1.00 0.98 0.54 0.98 68% 65% / 100% 5.8e-61 sig 6vdc-assembly1_A POL domain of Pol1 from M. smegmatis
2y1j-assembly1_A 1.00 0.91 0.59 0.91 39% 65% / 100% 7.6e-48 sig 2y1j-assembly1_A CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF A R-DIASTEREOMER ANALOGUE OF THE SPORE PHOTOPRODUCT IN COMPLEX WITH FRAGMENT DNA POLYMERASE I FROM BACILLUS STEAROTHERMOPHILUS

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 89.7, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1628c (- strand, 103 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)rpsA (+ strand, 162 bp gap)

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton)
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1665) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv1629 · Rv1630 · Rv1631 (coverage 157.45)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) kstR (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: coaE (dephospho-CoA kinase CoaE), high confidence (score 856, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 338 partners at medium confidence (97 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 338 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv0002 dnaN exp (transferred) curated DNA polymerase III subunit beta 997 995 coexpression:414 experimental:970 database:630 textmining:508
Rv2116 lppK exp (transferred) curated lipoprotein LppK 995 993 coexpression:414 experimental:970 database:630
Rv2737c recA exp (transferred) curated recombinase A 996 987 coexpression:460 experimental:898 database:585 textmining:750
Rv1277 exp (transferred) curated hypothetical protein 989 980 experimental:836 database:844 textmining:494
Rv2529 exp (transferred) curated hypothetical protein 969 951 experimental:662 database:844 textmining:412
Rv1278 exp (transferred) curated hypothetical protein 952 919 experimental:432 database:844 textmining:430
Rv1329c dinG exp (transferred) curated ATP-dependent helicase DinG 955 897 experimental:721 database:621 textmining:580
Rv2101 helZ exp (transferred) curated helicase HelZ 930 863 experimental:538 database:660 textmining:513
Rv1252c lprE curated lipoprotein LprE 878 861 database:844
Rv1631 coaE dephospho-CoA kinase CoaE 922 856 ctx neighborhood:726 coexpression:405 textmining:488
Rv0938 ligD exp (transferred) curated multifunctional non-homologous end joining DNA repair protein/ATP dependent DNA ligase LigD 949 850 experimental:454 database:569 textmining:680
Rv1630 rpsA 30S ribosomal protein S1 891 844 ctx neighborhood:710
Rv3062 ligB exp (transferred) curated DNA ligase 901 842 experimental:454 database:569 textmining:405
Rv3731 ligC exp (transferred) curated DNA ligase C 906 840 experimental:454 database:569 textmining:439
Rv2464c nei1 DNA glycosylase 865 816 coexpression:791

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: DNA polymerase I
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: DNA polymerase I
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): 5_3_exonuc_N PF02739.23 (E=4e-59), 5_3_exonuc PF01367.26 (E=3e-29), DNA_polI_exo1 PF22619.3 (E=1e-08), DNA_pol_A PF00476.27 (E=1e-151)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216145.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — 5_3_exonuc_N (PF02739.23), 5_3_exonuc (PF01367.26), DNA_polI_exo1 (PF22619.3), DNA_pol_A (PF00476.27)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0258
  • Curated reference: UniProt P9WNU5 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 89.7)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 338 functional partner(s); context anchor coaE
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001737|Rv1629|polA
MVTTASAPSEDRAKPTLMLLDGNSLAFRAFYALPAENFKTRGGLTTNAVYGFTAMLINLLRDEAPTHIAAAFDVSRQTFRLQRYPEYKANRSSTPDEFAGQIDITKEVLGALGITVLSEPGFEADDLIATLATQAENEGYRVLVVTGDRDALQLVSDDVTVLYPRKGVSELTRFTPEAVVEKYGLTPRQYPDFAALRGDPSDNLPGIPGVGEKTAAKWIAEYGSLRSLVDNVDAVRGKVGDALRANLASVVRNRELTDLVRDVPLAQTPDTLRLQPWDRDHIHRLFDDLEFRVLRDRLFDTLAAAGGPEVDEGFDVRGGALAPGTVRQWLAEHAGDGRRAGLTVVGTHLPHGGDATAMAVAAADGEGAYLDTATLTPDDDAALAAWLADPAKPKALHEAKAAVHDLAGRGWTLEGVTSDTALAAYLVRPGQRSFTLDDLSLRYLRRELRAETPQQQQLSLLDDDDTDAETIQTTILRARAVIDLADALDAELARIDSTALLGEMELPVQRVLAKMESAGIAVDLPMLTELQSQFGDQIRDAAEAAYGVIGKQINLGSPKQLQVVLFDELGMPKTKRTKTGYTTDADALQSLFDKTGHPFLQHLLAHRDVTRLKVTVDGLLQAVAADGRIHTTFNQTIAATGRLSSTEPNLQNIPIRTDAGRRIRDAFVVGDGYAELMTADYSQIEMRIMAHLSGDEGLIEAFNTGEDLHSFVASRAFGVPIDEVTGELRRRVKAMSYGLAYGLSAYGLSQQLKISTEEANEQMDAYFARFGGVRDYLRAVVERARKDGYTSTVLGRRRYLPELDSSNRQVREAAERAALNAPIQGSAADIIKVAMIQVDKALNEAQLASRMLLQVHDELLFEIAPGERERVEALVRDKMGGAYPLDVPLEVSVGYGRSWDAAAH