polA Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv1629 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001737 ·
904 aa ·
1842629–1845343 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_216145.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | DNA polymerase I |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | DNA polymerase I |
| Revised (this work) | DNA polymerase I. Pfam: 5_3_exonuc_N (PF02739.23), 5_3_exonuc (PF01367.26), DNA_polI_exo1 (PF22619.3), DNA_pol_A (PF00476.27). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | information pathways |
Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=True).
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 8 publications
8 TB publications mention this gene. 8 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 7 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 6 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 6-record verified sample: M. leprae (3), M. smegmatis (3)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.
20 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 8 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)
Searched as: Rv1629, polA, Mb1655, ML1381c, MMAR_2432, MSMEG_3839, MAB_2615c
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Transcriptional start site (informative, coordinates unchanged)
Leaderless transcript (no 5'UTR / Shine-Dalgarno). Primary TSS at position 1830665 (+ strand), 51 bp 5'UTR. TSS-derived candidate start codon: 1830716 -- candidate only, not applied to this record's coordinates.
Genome-wide 5'-triphosphate-enriched RNA-seq TSS mapping (Cortes et al. 2013): informative context on transcript architecture only. reannotated_start_candidate is the authors' TSS-derived candidate start codon -- reported for information, NEVER applied to this atlas's start_mtbc0/end_mtbc0 coordinates (P19 MTBC0<->H37Rv anchoring). Row re-keyed to this locus by matching its genomic boundary against the H37Rv GFF3 (P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15), P49): the original ingestion (P16.23/phase135, 2026-08-17) trusted the source table's own gene-identity column, which was desynchronised from its own numeric columns on 547/651 checkable rows -- see P49 for the full diagnostic. A missing primary_tss here means this gene falls outside the 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset the source table covers, not an absence of transcription. Leaderless: transcription starts at or within the annotated start codon, so this transcript carries no 5'UTR/Shine-Dalgarno sequence -- relevant context for translation-start calls on short/dark ORFs (P8). Source: Cortes et al. 2013 (Cell Reports), Table S3 (TSS mapping and re-annotation of start codons), 680-gene re-annotation-candidate subset of >4,000 genome-wide TSS -- row re-keyed to this locus by coordinate match (P49).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -0.55 (95% CI -0.64 to -0.46). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Involved in post-incision events. In addition to DNA polymerase activity, this DNA polymerase exhibits 3' to 5' and 5' to 3' exonuclease activity [catalytic activity: N deoxynucleoside triphosphate = N diphosphate + {DNA}(N)]. |
|---|---|
| Mycobrowser EC |
2.7.7.7
· agrees with the atlas
|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb1655
· 99.9% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML1381c
· 85.2% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_2432
· 89.8% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_3839
· 84.2% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_001703
· 99.9% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_2615c
· 81.3% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WNU5
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | DNA polymerase I |
| EC (curated) |
EC 2.7.7.7
|
| Curated function | In addition to polymerase activity, this DNA polymerase exhibits 3'-5' and 5'-3' exonuclease activity. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
L Replication, recombination and repair
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | polA |
| eggNOG description | In addition to polymerase activity, this DNA polymerase exhibits 5'-3' exonuclease activity |
| Orthologous group | COG0258 |
| EC number |
EC 2.7.7.7
|
| KEGG orthology |
K02335
|
| KEGG pathways |
map00230, map00240, map01100, map03030, map03410, map03420, map03440
|
| Gene Ontology (61) |
GO:0003674, GO:0003824, GO:0003887, GO:0004518, GO:0004527, GO:0005575, GO:0005618, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0005737, GO:0005886, GO:0006139 +49 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.426 · purifying |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 9 synonymous, 11 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.14
· 14 consensus substitution(s) under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.14) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 88.1%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 9/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 66.2% detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) ESD — not strictly essential
These two screens are not in plain contradiction here, but they do not say the same thing either, and the difference matters for what may be written about this gene. Tn-seq (DeJesus 2017) places the requirement on a SUB-REGION of the ORF and explicitly declines to call the whole gene essential; CRISPRi (Bosch 2021) calls the gene essential under partial knockdown. Both point to an important gene; they disagree on the SCOPE of what is required. Locate the domain before concluding, and note that a stretch carrying no TA site is invisible to Himar1 Tn-seq — neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred there. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -0.551), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 26 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 27 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | ESD · essential domain |
|---|---|
| What the call means | essential domain: only a SUB-REGION of the ORF is essential; the gene as a whole is NOT essential. Locate the domain before concluding, and beware that a region devoid of TA sites is invisible to Himar1 TnSeq (neither essential nor dispensable can be inferred). |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
42 in the ORF —
13 in the essential state,
23 growth-defect,
6 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.357,
mean read count 29.4666666667.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 42 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 15 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 365.0 ppm · rank 548/3519 (84.5th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 904 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 98.5 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 5.01 |
| GRAVY | -0.222 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 92.9 |
| Aromaticity | 0.064 |
| Instability index | 33.7 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5_3_exonuc_N | PF02739.23 | 3.7e-59 | 16–184 | 5'-3' exonuclease, N-terminal resolvase-like domain |
5_3_exonuc | PF01367.26 | 2.6e-29 | 186–279 | 5'-3' exonuclease, C-terminal SAM fold |
DNA_polI_exo1 | PF22619.3 | 1.4e-08 | 356–443 | DNA polymerase I, ribonuclease H-like domain |
DNA_pol_A | PF00476.27 | 1.2e-151 | 526–900 | DNA polymerase family A |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 89.7, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 89.7
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6vde-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 81% | 99% / 100% | 0.0e+00 sig | 6vde-assembly1_A Full-length M. smegmatis Pol1 |
6vdd-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.98 | 0.62 | 0.98 | 80% | 65% / 100% | 5.1e-75 sig | 6vdd-assembly1_A POL domain of Pol1 from M. smegmatis complex with DNA primer-template and dNTP |
6vdd-assembly2_D |
1.00 | 0.97 | 0.61 | 0.97 | 80% | 65% / 100% | 3.4e-75 sig | 6vdd-assembly2_D POL domain of Pol1 from M. smegmatis complex with DNA primer-template and dNTP |
6vdc-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.98 | 0.54 | 0.98 | 68% | 65% / 100% | 5.8e-61 sig | 6vdc-assembly1_A POL domain of Pol1 from M. smegmatis |
2y1j-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.91 | 0.59 | 0.91 | 39% | 65% / 100% | 7.6e-48 sig | 2y1j-assembly1_A CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF A R-DIASTEREOMER ANALOGUE OF THE SPORE PHOTOPRODUCT IN COMPLEX WITH FRAGMENT DNA POLYMERASE I FROM BACILLUS STEAROTHERMOPHILUS |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 89.7, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv1628c (- strand, 103 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | rpsA (+ strand, 162 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1665) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv1629 · Rv1630 · Rv1631
(coverage 157.45)
not expressed (stationary phase) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (1 TF) |
kstR (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: coaE (dephospho-CoA kinase CoaE), high confidence (score 856, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 338 partners at medium confidence (97 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 338 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0002 dnaN exp (transferred) curated |
DNA polymerase III subunit beta | 997 | 995 | coexpression:414 experimental:970 database:630 textmining:508 |
Rv2116 lppK exp (transferred) curated |
lipoprotein LppK | 995 | 993 | coexpression:414 experimental:970 database:630 |
Rv2737c recA exp (transferred) curated |
recombinase A | 996 | 987 | coexpression:460 experimental:898 database:585 textmining:750 |
Rv1277 exp (transferred) curated |
hypothetical protein | 989 | 980 | experimental:836 database:844 textmining:494 |
Rv2529 exp (transferred) curated |
hypothetical protein | 969 | 951 | experimental:662 database:844 textmining:412 |
Rv1278 exp (transferred) curated |
hypothetical protein | 952 | 919 | experimental:432 database:844 textmining:430 |
Rv1329c dinG exp (transferred) curated |
ATP-dependent helicase DinG | 955 | 897 | experimental:721 database:621 textmining:580 |
Rv2101 helZ exp (transferred) curated |
helicase HelZ | 930 | 863 | experimental:538 database:660 textmining:513 |
Rv1252c lprE curated |
lipoprotein LprE | 878 | 861 | database:844 |
Rv1631 coaE |
dephospho-CoA kinase CoaE | 922 | 856 ctx | neighborhood:726 coexpression:405 textmining:488 |
Rv0938 ligD exp (transferred) curated |
multifunctional non-homologous end joining DNA repair protein/ATP dependent DNA ligase LigD | 949 | 850 | experimental:454 database:569 textmining:680 |
Rv1630 rpsA |
30S ribosomal protein S1 | 891 | 844 ctx | neighborhood:710 |
Rv3062 ligB exp (transferred) curated |
DNA ligase | 901 | 842 | experimental:454 database:569 textmining:405 |
Rv3731 ligC exp (transferred) curated |
DNA ligase C | 906 | 840 | experimental:454 database:569 textmining:439 |
Rv2464c nei1 |
DNA glycosylase | 865 | 816 | coexpression:791 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: DNA polymerase I
- MTBC0 PGAP product: DNA polymerase I
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): 5_3_exonuc_N PF02739.23 (E=4e-59), 5_3_exonuc PF01367.26 (E=3e-29), DNA_polI_exo1 PF22619.3 (E=1e-08), DNA_pol_A PF00476.27 (E=1e-151)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216145.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — 5_3_exonuc_N (PF02739.23), 5_3_exonuc (PF01367.26), DNA_polI_exo1 (PF22619.3), DNA_pol_A (PF00476.27)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG0258 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WNU5 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 89.7)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
338 functional partner(s); context anchor
coaE - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_001737|Rv1629|polA MVTTASAPSEDRAKPTLMLLDGNSLAFRAFYALPAENFKTRGGLTTNAVYGFTAMLINLLRDEAPTHIAAAFDVSRQTFRLQRYPEYKANRSSTPDEFAGQIDITKEVLGALGITVLSEPGFEADDLIATLATQAENEGYRVLVVTGDRDALQLVSDDVTVLYPRKGVSELTRFTPEAVVEKYGLTPRQYPDFAALRGDPSDNLPGIPGVGEKTAAKWIAEYGSLRSLVDNVDAVRGKVGDALRANLASVVRNRELTDLVRDVPLAQTPDTLRLQPWDRDHIHRLFDDLEFRVLRDRLFDTLAAAGGPEVDEGFDVRGGALAPGTVRQWLAEHAGDGRRAGLTVVGTHLPHGGDATAMAVAAADGEGAYLDTATLTPDDDAALAAWLADPAKPKALHEAKAAVHDLAGRGWTLEGVTSDTALAAYLVRPGQRSFTLDDLSLRYLRRELRAETPQQQQLSLLDDDDTDAETIQTTILRARAVIDLADALDAELARIDSTALLGEMELPVQRVLAKMESAGIAVDLPMLTELQSQFGDQIRDAAEAAYGVIGKQINLGSPKQLQVVLFDELGMPKTKRTKTGYTTDADALQSLFDKTGHPFLQHLLAHRDVTRLKVTVDGLLQAVAADGRIHTTFNQTIAATGRLSSTEPNLQNIPIRTDAGRRIRDAFVVGDGYAELMTADYSQIEMRIMAHLSGDEGLIEAFNTGEDLHSFVASRAFGVPIDEVTGELRRRVKAMSYGLAYGLSAYGLSQQLKISTEEANEQMDAYFARFGGVRDYLRAVVERARKDGYTSTVLGRRRYLPELDSSNRQVREAAERAALNAPIQGSAADIIKVAMIQVDKALNEAQLASRMLLQVHDELLFEIAPGERERVEALVRDKMGGAYPLDVPLEVSVGYGRSWDAAAH
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for polA? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about polA