rpfC Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv1884c · MTBC0 mtbc0_001998 · 176 aa · 2151785–2152315 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_216400.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand lldD2 (Rv1872c) — requalified: quinone-dependent L-lactate dehydrogenase lldD2 Rv1873 (Rv1873) — family_assigned: DUF1810 domain-containing protein Rv1875 (Rv1875) — requalified: PPOX class F420-dependent oxidoreductase Rv1877 (Rv1877) — family_assigned: MDR family MFS transporter Rv1877 glnA3 (Rv1878) — family_assigned: glutamine synthetase family protein glnA3 Rv1879 (Rv1879) — family_assigned: amidohydrolase family protein Rv1879 cyp140 (Rv1880c) — requalified: cytochrome P450 cyp140 lppE (Rv1881c) — requalified: lipoprotein LpqH Rv1882c (Rv1882c) — family_assigned: SDR family oxidoreductase Rv1882c Rv1883c (Rv1883c) — family_assigned: SRPBCC family protein rpfC (Rv1884c) — requalified: resuscitation-promoting factor RpfC Rv1885c (Rv1885c) — requalified: chorismate mutase fbpB (Rv1886c) — requalified: diacylglycerol acyltransferase/mycolyltransferase Ag85B fbpB Rv1887 (Rv1887) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv1887 Rv1891 (Rv1891) — dark: hypothetical protein Rv1892 (Rv1892) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv1893 (Rv1893) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv1894c (Rv1894c) — family_assigned: nitronate monooxygenase family protein Rv1894c Rv1896c (Rv1896c) — requalified: class I SAM-dependent methyltransferase Rv1896c dtd (Rv1897c) — requalified: D-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase Rv1898 (Rv1898) — family_assigned: MTH1187 family thiamine-binding protein 2 144 kb 2 148 kb 2 152 kb 2 156 kb 2 160 kb 2 164 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)resuscitation-promoting factor RpfC
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationresuscitation-promoting factor RpfC
Revised (this work)Resuscitation-promoting factor RpfC. Pfam: Transglycosylas (PF06737.20).
Functional category (TubercuList)cell wall and cell processes

Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=True). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False).

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 20 publications

20 TB publications mention this gene. 20 publications discuss this gene (count verified against title and abstract text). Queried separately, 18 records carry a M. tuberculosis context and 3 a non-TB mycobacterial context (species named in the 3-record verified sample: M. smegmatis (2), M. leprae (1)). The three counts come from three distinct PubMed queries (the total is text-verified, the context counts are raw query volumes), so they neither partition the total nor need to add up to it.

5 of 20: the most recently indexed records of the curated sweep at its date, not necessarily the most recent papers on this gene — the exhaustive list below is later and broader and may hold newer ones.
PublicationDate
Expression of Resuscitation-Promoting Factor C Stimulates the Growth of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Delays DevR Regulon Activation in Hypoxia. doi:10.1155/ijm/2139933 2025
Fermentation broth from fruit and vegetable waste works: Reducing the risk of human bacterial pathogens in soil by inhibiting quorum sensing. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108753 2024
Development of multi-epitope based subunit vaccine against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis using immunoinformatics approach. doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2270065 2024
Mycobacterium leprae and host immune transcriptomic signatures for reactional states in leprosy. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1113318 2023
Uncovering Beta-Lactam Susceptibility Patterns in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through Whole-Genome Sequencing. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00674-22 2022
18 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 20 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv1884c, rpfC, Mb1916c, ML2030, MMAR_2772, MSMEG_4640, MAB_4080c — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Expression of Resuscitation-Promoting Factor C Stimulates the Growth of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Delays DevR Regulon Activation in Hypoxia. doi:10.1155/ijm/2139933 Int J Microbiol 2025
Fermentation broth from fruit and vegetable waste works: Reducing the risk of human bacterial pathogens in soil by inhibiting quorum sensing. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108753 Environ Int 2024
Development of multi-epitope based subunit vaccine against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis using immunoinformatics approach. doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2270065 J Biomol Struct Dyn 2024
Mycobacterium leprae and host immune transcriptomic signatures for reactional states in leprosy. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1113318 Front Microbiol 2023
Uncovering Beta-Lactam Susceptibility Patterns in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through Whole-Genome Sequencing. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00674-22 Microbiol Spectr 2022
Use of DosR and Rpf antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis to screen for latent and relapse tuberculosis infection in a tuberculosis endemic community of Huainan City. doi:10.1007/s10096-022-04459-8 Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2022
Transcriptional Profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in an in vitro Model of Intraocular Tuberculosis. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2018.00330 Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018
Global mapping of MtrA-binding sites links MtrA to regulation of its targets in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1099/mic.0.000585 Microbiology (Reading) 2018
Sub-minimum inhibitory concentration of rifampin: a potential risk factor for resuscitation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1186/s13756-017-0273-1 Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2017
In vitro and in vivo fitness costs associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis RpoB mutation H526D. doi:10.2217/fmb-2017-0022 Future Microbiol 2017
NMR Structure and Dynamics of the Resuscitation Promoting Factor RpfC Catalytic Domain. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142807 names it PLoS One 2015
The RpfC (Rv1884) atomic structure shows high structural conservation within the resuscitation-promoting factor catalytic domain. doi:10.1107/S2053230X1401317X names it Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun 2014
Potential of novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection phase-dependent antigens in the diagnosis of TB disease in a high burden setting. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-10 BMC Infect Dis 2012
Potential of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resuscitation-promoting factors as antigens in novel tuberculosis sub-unit vaccines. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2011.08.011 Microbes Infect 2012
M. tuberculosis intramembrane protease Rip1 controls transcription through three anti-sigma factor substrates. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07232.x Mol Microbiol 2010
Comparative expression analysis of rpf-like genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv under different physiological stress and growth conditions. doi:10.1099/mic.0.037622-0 Microbiology (Reading) 2010
Transcription regulation by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis alternative sigma factor SigD and its role in virulence. doi:10.1128/JB.186.19.6605-6616.2004 J Bacteriol 2004
Global expression profiling of strains harbouring null mutations reveals that the five rpf-like genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis show functional redundancy. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2003.12.004 Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2004

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered

Predicted disorder57% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 73.2
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 101 aa [0-101]

sequence-based disorder is high but AlphaFold folds it confidently (pLDDT>=70): treat the disorder call with caution (possible metapredict over-call)

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.32 (95% CI -0.62 to 4.38). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.198 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=7 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionThought to promote the resuscitation and growth of dormant, nongrowing cell. Could also stimulates the growth of several other high G+C gram+ organisms, e.g. Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium smegmatis.

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb1916c · 99.4% identity
M. leprae ML2030 · 70.2% identity
M. marinum MMAR_2772 · 65.2% identity
M. smegmatis MSMEG_4640 · 64.8% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_001953 · 99.4% identity
M. abscessus MAB_4080c · 57.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O07747 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameResuscitation-promoting factor RpfC
EC (curated) EC 3.-.-.-
Curated functionFactor that stimulates resuscitation of dormant cells. Has peptidoglycan (PG) hydrolytic activity. Active in the pM concentration range. Has little to no effect on actively-growing cells. PG fragments could either directly activate the resuscitation pathway of dormant bacteria or serve as a substrate for endogenous Rpf, resulting in low molecular weight products with resuscitation activity..; FUNCTION: Stimulates growth of stationary phase M.bovis (a slow-growing Mycobacterium), reduces the lag phase of diluted fast-growers M.smegmatis and Micrococcus luteus. Sequential gene disruption indicat.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
Preferred namerpfC
eggNOG descriptionTransglycosylase-like domain
Orthologous groupCOG1652
KEGG orthology K21689
Gene Ontology (20) GO:0005575, GO:0005576, GO:0008150, GO:0009892, GO:0009893, GO:0010468, GO:0010604, GO:0010605, GO:0010628, GO:0010629, GO:0019222, GO:0040008 +8 more

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.336 · quasi-invariant (4 sites), pN/pS underpowered
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 2 missense, 0 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.14% of strains (205) · clonal

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Actinomycetia

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) undefined (dS = 0) (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 51/53 (96%) · mean identity 63.3% · 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 51/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria
detected in 8/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Actinomycetia) · mean identity 51.7%
detected across the class Actinomycetia (beyond Corynebacteriales) but not outside the phylum — an Actinobacteria-level ancient gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callGA · growth-advantage
What the call meansgrowth-advantage: insertions enriched
TA sites (Himar1) 6 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 0 non-essential, 6 growth-advantage. Saturation 1.000, mean read count 133.666666667. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 6 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.
CaveatRead with some caution: only 6 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13). The DeJesus 2017 call rests on fewer independent observations than for a longer gene. If this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), some of these 6 sites may fall inside the neighbour's ORF rather than its own, leaving even fewer truly informative sites than the raw count suggests. (P20.3)

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 6 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance59.9 ppm · rank 1636/3519 (53.5th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) signal peptide

Predictionpredicted secreted protein (signal peptide)
DeepTMHMM classSP

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length176 aa
Molecular weight18.0 kDa
Theoretical pI9.5
GRAVY-0.028 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index80.7
Aromaticity0.051
Instability index32.1 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
TransglycosylasPF06737.20 8.8e-3470–140 Transglycosylase-like domain

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 4ow1 (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 2 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
4ow1 X-ray diffraction 1.9 Å 63%
2n5z Solution NMR — 54%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (2 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 73.2

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
4ow1-assembly1_A 1.00 0.99 0.49 0.99 100% 49% / 100% 6.1e-14 sig 4ow1-assembly1_A Crystal Structure of Resuscitation Promoting Factor C
4ow1-assembly2_B 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00 100% 43% / 100% 8.8e-12 sig 4ow1-assembly2_B Crystal Structure of Resuscitation Promoting Factor C
4cge-assembly1_A 1.00 0.98 0.39 0.96 67% 40% / 97% 1.3e-08 sig 4cge-assembly1_A Crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resuscitation promoting factor E
4cge-assembly2_B 1.00 0.97 0.40 0.94 66% 40% / 96% 1.9e-07 sig 4cge-assembly2_B Crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resuscitation promoting factor E
4cge-assembly6_F 1.00 0.94 0.39 0.93 67% 40% / 99% 1.2e-07 sig 4cge-assembly6_F Crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resuscitation promoting factor E

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 73.2, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 7

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv1883c (- strand, 38 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv1885c (- strand, 11 bp gap)
Predicted operon cyp140 · lppE · Rv1882c · Rv1883c · rpfC · Rv1885c · fbpB

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 6: lppE · Rv1882c · Rv1883c · rpfC · Rv1885c · fbpB — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1932) exponential phase: operon of 7, Rv1880c · Rv1881c · Rv1882c · Rv1883c · Rv1884c · Rv1885c · Rv1886c (coverage 286.37)
stationary phase: operon of 6, Rv1881c · Rv1882c · Rv1883c · Rv1884c · Rv1885c · Rv1886c (coverage 103.01) — agrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (3 TF) Rv0023 (activates) · Rv1990c (represses) · Rv2011c (represses)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1883c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 950, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 28 partners at medium confidence (6 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 28 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv1883c hypothetical protein 950 950 ctx neighborhood:692 coexpression:845
Rv1954A exp (transferred) Rv1954A, len: 100 aa. Hypothetical unknown protein. 881 881 coexpression:490 experimental:769
Rv1815 hypothetical protein 808 768 coexpression:765
Rv1885c chorismate mutase 846 765 ctx neighborhood:762
Rv1886c fbpB diacylglycerol acyltransferase/mycolyltransferase Ag85B 791 744 ctx neighborhood:736
Rv1882c short-chain type dehydrogenase/reductase 658 648 ctx neighborhood:606
Rv1881c lppE lipoprotein LppE 551 550 ctx neighborhood:536
Rv0007 membrane protein 500 500 coexpression:500
Rv3268 hypothetical protein 477 477 ctx cooccurence:474
Rv1880c cyp140 cytochrome P450 Cyp140 471 471 ctx neighborhood:464
Rv0925c hypothetical protein 472 447 coexpression:446
Rv3669 transmembrane protein 446 447
Rv2771c hypothetical protein 468 443 coexpression:442
Rv0819 mshD mycothiol acetyltransferase 453 433 ctx cooccurence:417
Rv2466c hypothetical protein 430 430 ctx cooccurence:430

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: resuscitation-promoting factor RpfC
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: resuscitation-promoting factor RpfC
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Transglycosylas PF06737.20 (E=9e-34)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216400.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Transglycosylas (PF06737.20)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG1652
  • Curated reference: UniProt O07747 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 73.2)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 28 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv1883c
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_001998|Rv1884c|rpfC
MHPLPADHGRSRCNRHPISPLSLIGNASATSGDMSSMTRIAKPLIKSAMAAGLVTASMSLSTAVAHAGPSPNWDAVAQCESGGNWAANTGNGKYGGLQFKPATWAAFGGVGNPAAASREQQIAVANRVLAEQGLDAWPTCGAASGLPIALWSKPAQGIKQIINEIIWAGIQASIPR