Rv1780 Family assigned · low
H37Rv Rv1780 · MTBC0 mtbc0_001894 ·
187 aa ·
2032710–2033273 MTBC0
(+) ·
RefSeq NP_216296.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | hypothetical protein |
| Revised (this work) | BPI/SPLUNC1-like lipid-binding fold (PDB 5I7L); putative lipid-binding protein. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.
Rv1780 (3), Mb1809 (3), ML1380 (4).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.
Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 6.3
mixed in vivo signal: required in 16 of 17 significant measurements, disruption advantageous in 1 — the data supports no single direction; disruption advantageous under 6 weeks hypoxia.
| Corroborating evidence | conserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; STRING-coupled to lipE (lipase LipE); structural lead available |
|---|
This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 0.54 (95% CI -1.64 to 3.27). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.401 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=9 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)
| Mycobrowser function | Function unknown |
|---|
The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb1809
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML1380
· 82.4% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_2661
· 89.8% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_3683
· 66.7% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_001855
· 100.0% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_2384
· 63.6% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O53931
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Conserved protein |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Conserved protein; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| Orthologous group | 2ESGC |
|---|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | n/a |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 0 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 1 consensus substitution(s) low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 85.5%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 3/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 57.8% detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | GA · growth-advantage |
|---|---|
| What the call means | growth-advantage: insertions enriched |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
14 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
0 non-essential,
14 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 189.928571429.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 14 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB) in-vivo phenotype
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| fitness after prolonged in vitro passage (in vitro passage) | -3.43 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -2.30 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -2.22 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -1.93 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -1.68 | 0.0 | required |
| altered fitness under 6 weeks hypoxia (stress) | +1.66 | 0.0 | disruption advantageous |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -1.46 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | +1.44 | 0.0078 | disruption advantageous |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -1.37 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -1.35 | 0.0077 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -1.35 | 0.0 | required |
| fitness in mouse infection (in vivo) | -1.35 | 0.029 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 19 significant condition(s) — the table lists the 12 strongest by |log2FC|, not all 19 (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 14 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 229.0 ppm · rank 777/3519 (77.9th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 187 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 20.5 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 5.75 |
| GRAVY | 0.067 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 106.4 |
| Aromaticity | 0.064 |
| Instability index | 32.1 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 88.5, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 90.9 (very high). A confident model makes the fold comparison meaningful.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5i7l-assembly3_A |
1.00 | 0.60 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 17% | 68% / 66% | 4.8e-04 sig | 5i7l-assembly3_A Crystal Structure of SPLUNC1 Disulfide Mutant M2 (A48C, V253C) |
6baq-assembly3_C |
1.00 | 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 12% | 65% / 65% | 1.9e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly3_C Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
6baq-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 11% | 65% / 62% | 2.2e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly1_A Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
6baq-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 12% | 65% / 63% | 2.1e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly2_B Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
6baq-assembly8_H |
1.00 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 9% | 86% / 78% | 1.4e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly8_H Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
6baq-assembly6_F |
1.00 | 0.54 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 13% | 65% / 57% | 2.4e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly6_F Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
6baq-assembly7_G |
0.99 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 11% | 83% / 85% | 1.6e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly7_G Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
6baq-assembly5_E |
0.99 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 13% | 83% / 84% | 4.9e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly5_E Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 88.5
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5i7l-assembly3_A |
1.00 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 14% | 84% / 81% | 1.4e-03 sig | 5i7l-assembly3_A Crystal Structure of SPLUNC1 Disulfide Mutant M2 (A48C, V253C) |
6o1t-assembly1_B-2 |
1.00 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 18% | 62% / 61% | 2.6e-03 sig | 6o1t-assembly1_B-2 BOVINE SALIVARY PROTEIN FORM 30B WITH OLEIC ACID |
6baq-assembly5_E |
1.00 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 11% | 83% / 84% | 5.5e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly5_E Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
6baq-assembly7_G |
0.99 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 10% | 83% / 85% | 2.0e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly7_G Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
6baq-assembly2_B |
0.99 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 10% | 80% / 83% | 3.3e-03 sig | 6baq-assembly2_B Mus musculus BPIFA1 |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 88.5, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv1779c (- strand, 219 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | malQ (- strand, 39 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1830) |
expressed, no multi-gene operon (exponential phase, coverage 62.29)
expressed, no multi-gene operon (stationary phase, coverage 16.05) — agrees with the distance heuristic above |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)
| Regulated by (2 TF) |
Rv0081 (represses) · Rv1049 (represses)
|
|---|
Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.
Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.
Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)
crp |
binding site only -- direction not determined (low confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq : site de fixation CRP (1 des 191 sites de Kahramanoglou et al. 2014) ; aucun changement d'expression rapporte pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp Caveat: Site de fixation CRP mesure par ChIP-seq (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014), SANS changement d'expression mesure pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp : le sens de la regulation n'est PAS determine. Ecrire « site de fixation CRP en amont », jamais « regule par CRP ». L'article ne distingue pas « non differentiellement exprime » de « sous le seuil », donc l'absence de ce gene de la table d'expression n'est pas une preuve de non-regulation. Pic divergent entre Rv1780 et Rv1779c : l'article ne tranche pas lequel des deux genes flanquants est la cible reelle. Les deux loci sont verses avec cette meme reserve. |
|---|
Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2042c (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 757, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 44 partners at medium confidence (3 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 44 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2042c |
hypothetical protein | 757 | 757 ctx | cooccurence:725 |
Rv2342 |
hypothetical protein | 756 | 756 ctx | cooccurence:755 |
Rv3707c |
hypothetical protein | 670 | 670 ctx | cooccurence:670 |
Rv0817c lmeA |
hypothetical protein | 668 | 668 ctx | cooccurence:668 |
Rv0466 |
hypothetical protein | 653 | 653 ctx | cooccurence:652 |
Rv3775 lipE |
lipase LipE | 644 | 644 ctx | cooccurence:641 |
Rv1125 |
hypothetical protein | 636 | 636 ctx | cooccurence:636 |
Rv0479c |
membrane protein | 627 | 628 ctx | cooccurence:624 |
Rv0185 |
hypothetical protein | 615 | 615 ctx | cooccurence:615 |
Rv0356c |
hypothetical protein | 589 | 589 ctx | cooccurence:589 |
Rv0383c ttfA |
hypothetical protein | 571 | 571 ctx | cooccurence:571 |
Rv1610 |
membrane protein | 545 | 545 ctx | cooccurence:545 |
Rv1371 |
membrane protein | 540 | 540 ctx | cooccurence:540 |
Rv3035 |
hypothetical protein | 527 | 527 ctx | cooccurence:526 |
Rv0184 dark |
hypothetical protein | 524 | 524 ctx | cooccurence:524 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- MTBC0 PGAP product: hypothetical protein
- Foldseek best: 5i7l-assembly3_A Crystal Structure of SPLUNC1 Disulfide Mutant M2 (A48C, V253C) (prob 1.00, E=5e-04, TM=0.60)
- (structure-only promotion reviewed by hand, 2026-06-01)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216296.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2ESGC - Curated reference: UniProt O53931 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 90.9, very high)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 88.5)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
44 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv2042c - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_001894|Rv1780| MQNHDYVTYEEFGRRFFEVAVTPDRVAAAFADIAGSEFAMEPISQGPGGIAKVSANVKIREPRVTRKLGDLITFVIHIPLSIDLLLDLRLDKQRFMVAGDIALRATARAAEPLLLIVDVAKPRPSDITVNVSSKSIRGEVLRILAGVDGEIRRFIAQYVSAEIDSPKSQAAQVINVAEQLDSTWSGP
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv1780? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv1780