Rv1779c Still unknown · low auto-curated
H37Rv Rv1779c · MTBC0 mtbc0_001893 ·
597 aa ·
2030697–2032490 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_216295.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | integral membrane protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | DUF4407 domain-containing protein |
| Revised (this work) | Conserved hypothetical protein; DUF domain(s) DUF4407. Function unknown. |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) variant mention only
1 TB publication mentions this gene. Appears in the TB literature ONLY as a variant in a genomic / drug-resistance screen (co-mentioned in a study of Rv0180c (cell shape / infectivity)); no functional content — do not over-interpret. reformulation, not a quotation
Second-source check (P43.6): tbmonitor finds 1 paper(s) naming this locus tag, the PubMed sweep 1 — both sources find literature. Neither source is complete: across the 210 fiches whose source verdict is dark, 3 are seen only by tbmonitor and 4 only by PubMed, which is why a 'no mention in the literature' statement is never made on a single source here. (The site's own counter reports 209: Rv2438A carries a curated function and is recalled to family_assigned at ingest by the verdict/function coherence guard, so it leaves the dark tally without leaving this cross-check.) A count above zero says the gene has been NAMED in a paper, not that its molecular function is known: Rv2660c carries 38 papers as the latency antigen of the multistage vaccine H56 (Ag85B + ESAT-6 + Rv2660c, Aagaard et al., Nat Med 2011, PMID 21258338) and is still dark on function. Counts are shown side by side and never merged.
1 record returned by the alias sweep
Searched as: Rv1779c, Mb1808c, MMAR_2660
— each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.
| Publication | Journal | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Rv0180c contributes to Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell shape and to infectivity in mice and macrophages. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1010020 | PLoS Pathog | 2021 |
Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.
An antigen status or a virulence phenotype is NOT a molecular function: the verdict stays unchanged. This layer adds the missing context, it does not requalify the gene. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep of title+abstract: the H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 31% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 71.2 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 2 IDR(s), longest 91 aa [375-455, 506-597] |
carries a substantial disordered region (171/597 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Candidate functional site (conserved residues clustered in space, hypothesis) supported (NOT confirmed)
metal-binding (donor geometry, Cys/His/Asp/Glu default BioMetAll set) —
residues C187, C195
(conservation 99.5 %, 99.1 %
on 846 aligned sequences).
| Why this site | Convergence of two INDEPENDENT lines of evidence: (1) sequence conservation on a deep MSA (fetched via the MMseqs2/ColabFold API), (2) BioMetAll backbone-only geometry (no learning, no conservation input). Neither used the other's signal. Within-protein negative control: BioMetAll's OTHER predicted sites in the same apo model are geometrically plausible too but land on less-conserved residues -- conservation is the discriminator, not geometry alone (same pattern validated on Rv1025 and Rv2901c, P17.2 pilot). |
|---|---|
| Within-protein control | 29 other geometrically plausible site(s) in the same model land on less-conserved residues (33.3 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 36.6 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 36.6 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 36.6 %, 45.2 %, 33.3 %, 36.6 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 33.3 %, 41.6 %, 41.6 %, 6.1 %, 36.8 %, 49.4 %, 33.3 %, 62.2 %, 33.3 %, 62.2 %) — conservation is the discriminator, not geometry alone |
Read with care. SUPPORTED, NOT CONFIRMED (anti-circularity guardrail, Rv1025 review): no holo-AF3/Boltz metal-docking run in this extension (CPU cost prohibitive at batch scale, deferred as an optional 3rd line for high-priority candidates). 'Metal-binding site' != 'metalloenzyme' -- catalysis is one hypothesis among several (structural, regulatory, cofactor). BioMetAll's default residue set (Asp/Cys/Glu/His) biases toward metal sites; a non-metal functional site (protein-protein interface, small-molecule pocket) would not be caught by this pipeline. phase183_p17_2_extension.py.
Binding-pocket screen (P2Rank, geometric prediction) no confident pocket
| Pockets found | 1 (best probability 0.299) |
|---|---|
| Model length screened | 597 aa |
Read with care. This protein (597 aa) is above the size where the detector reliably differentiates proven enzymes (60.5% confident-pocket rate) from proteins annotated as non-catalytic (18.9%, i.e. 81.1% specificity; P16.3b calibration). Both rates are measured at the threshold this layer applies, best_probability >= 0.70, which is the best separation the detector reaches on that panel (Youden J = 0.416): even at its optimum it misses 39.5% of proven enzymes. 1 candidate pocket(s) were found but none reached confidence (best probability 0.299), which is consistent with a non-catalytic role, though it does not rule out a shallow or non-canonical binding site that this geometric detector misses. (Individual read at this confidence level; the GROUP-level dark-vs-non-catalytic contrast is NOT statistically significant at this size, p=0.285 -- read as modest evidence, not proof, cf. P16.3c.) P16.3e, calibration phase72b_pocket_calibration.py, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Fumarate Reductase.
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 1.34 (95% CI -0.04 to 3.69). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.283 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=9 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb1808c
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_2660
· 64.4% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_001854
· 100.0% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
O53930
TrEMBL · unreviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Possible integral membrane protein |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | Domain of unknown function (DUF4407) |
| Orthologous group | 2ANPG |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.668 · relaxed/neutral |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 5 synonymous, 8 missense, 1 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
| Disruption | 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.51% of strains (723) · clonal |
Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Lineage-specific relaxation (candidate, one evidence handle) 1 lineage(s)
| L1 | disrupted in 2.9% of 25 332 L1 strains, vs 0.5% pooled across the whole MTBC (145k strains) · odds ratio very high (>1000) · FDR q=0.0 |
|---|
Candidate lineage-specific loss-of-function signal: rare/absent in the other well-sampled lineages (<5%) but risen in the listed lineage(s). ONE handle, not a verdict change (P8 two-handle policy) -- the general phenomenon of lineage-specific gene loss reflecting ecotype-specific selective pressure is already established at genome scale (Silva-Pereira et al. 2024); this signal on an individual dark gene needs an independent second handle before any requalification.
Caveat: Sample-size heterogeneity across MTBC lineages (up to 4 orders of magnitude, 16 smaller lineages excluded for n<500); essentiality is NOT resolvable per lineage (TnSeq data is H37Rv-only). For the two smallest adequate lineages (L5 n=630, L6 n=1364) the frequency floor bottoms out at the absolute minimum of 3 carrier strains -- a handful of strains from a SINGLE transmission cluster (clonal outbreak) can pass this floor without representing independent evolutionary origins of the disrupting allele; no phylogenetic correction for clonal sampling was applied. Treat low-count hits in these two lineages with extra caution.
Reference: Silva-Pereira TT, Soler-Camargo NC, Sá Guimarães AM 2024, Microbiology Spectrum, doi:10.1128/spectrum.02289-23
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Corynebacteriales
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.371
· 10 consensus substitution(s) under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.371) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 44/53 (83%) · mean identity 63.6%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 44/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 1/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Corynebacteriales) · mean identity 45.4% detected across the order Corynebacteriales (Corynebacterium/Nocardia/Rhodococcus/…) but not in more distant Actinomycetia — a Corynebacteriales-level gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
15 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
15 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.867,
mean read count 101.923076923.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 15 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 11 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 13.2 ppm · rank 2553/3519 (27.5th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox)
| Prediction | predicted membrane protein (4 TM helixes) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | TM |
| TM helices (DeepTMHMM) | 4 |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 597 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 63.5 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 6.41 |
| GRAVY | -0.236 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 89.6 |
| Aromaticity | 0.03 |
| Instability index | 45.6 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUF4407 | PF14362.12 | 2.8e-66 | 34–318 | Domain of unknown function (DUF4407) |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 71.2, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv1778c (- strand, 155 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv1780 (+ strand, 219 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1829) |
exponential phase: operon of 2,
Rv1778c · Rv1779c
(coverage 29.96)
stationary phase: operon of 2, Rv1778c · Rv1779c
(coverage 36.25)
— disagrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)
crp |
represses (high confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq (site de fixation CRP) ET RNA-seq du mutant delta-crp : log2FC(WT/delta-crp) = -1.22, padj = 0.0046 Caveat: Pic divergent entre Rv1779c et Rv1780 : l'article ne tranche pas lequel des deux genes flanquants est la cible reelle. Les deux loci sont verses avec cette meme reserve. |
|---|
Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: Rv1780 (hypothetical protein), medium confidence (score 495, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). Read this as a lead toward a shared pathway or operon, not as evidence of a physical complex: when this atlas co-folded 98 such context-only pairs, their predicted interfaces were no more confident than those of length-matched control pairs.
All 15 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv1778c dark |
hypothetical protein | 540 | 540 ctx | neighborhood:540 |
Rv1780 |
hypothetical protein | 496 | 495 ctx | neighborhood:495 |
Rv1592c |
hypothetical protein | 440 | 46 | textmining:438 |
Rv0180c |
transmembrane protein | 755 | 44 | textmining:755 |
Rv0546c |
hypothetical protein | 806 | 41 | textmining:806 |
Rv2564 glnQ |
glutamine ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | 803 | 41 | textmining:803 |
Rv2961 |
transposase | 803 | 41 | textmining:803 |
Rv1086 |
(2Z,6E)-farnesyl diphosphate synthase | 578 | 41 | textmining:578 |
Rv3274c fadE25 |
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase | 545 | 41 | textmining:545 |
Rv1080c greA |
transcription elongation factor GreA | 531 | 41 | textmining:531 |
Rv1419 |
hypothetical protein | 511 | 41 | textmining:511 |
Rv0863 |
hypothetical protein | 446 | 41 | textmining:446 |
Rv0108c |
hypothetical protein | 446 | 41 | textmining:446 |
Rv1159 pimE |
polyprenol-phosphate-mannose-dependent alpha-(1-2)-phosphatidylinositol pentamannoside mannosyltransferase | 437 | 41 | textmining:437 |
Rv2224c caeA |
carboxylesterase A | 434 | 41 | textmining:434 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: integral membrane protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF4407 domain-containing protein
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DUF4407 PF14362.12 (E=3e-66)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216295.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF4407 (PF14362.12)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2ANPG - Curated reference: UniProt O53930 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 71.2)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
15 functional partner(s); context anchor
Rv1780 - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Lineage-specific relaxation: per-lineage disruption fraction vs the pooled MTBC (145k strains), Fisher exact test with FDR correction; general phenomenon established at genome scale by Silva-Pereira et al. 2024 (doi:10.1128/spectrum.02289-23) -- one evidence handle on this atlas's own dark genes, never sufficient alone for a verdict change
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam SZ, et al. (2018). A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core Journal of Molecular Biology. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_001893|Rv1779c| MCAHEYAEQRSAVSGIEGLLTWLGGGHWRELGERHERSTHAVAGVIVAVGAALAGLLASLAVSEAAQGPISSPIGAASLALVLGLLVGAVTRGTASGPARGRAGVTGRASVAVAVGFVVGELAALVMFSGAIDRRLDEQAMHSADATPAAVQASASLQQARNARTALDSAVERARGRLDDALVVARCEYHPTPACPQTRITGVPGRGPETRTANQLLADAQRELDNALAARDHQAPALDAKMAHDEQALAEVRQAVVADAGRGLGSRWVAMNDLTLASAGALTARMLAIAFFALLYLLPLILRLWRGDTTHDRHAAARAERERAELEADTAIAIKRAEVRRAAEIMWAEHQLTQTRLAIEAQAEIDREQQRRRVVEALEGPVRASSERTLQPVEDEVYLPIAAETEAASRTVAQLPAGAAHHRPGIAKNLPAQVQPEGAVEPREKRATPVIRSIPDATKAAARWIRPLVPPFVARMLDNTTAPLRTARQVFEEVEEIAFSFKRTHKVTVNAEGSDPNDQPPLESHSPAAPAESNPIASSDSARRSRLATNDDHPPLAQVPPRDLASLSVGSTGELTQREGPHELRSPDGPRQLPPPR
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv1779c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv1779c