Rv1291c Family assigned · medium
H37Rv Rv1291c · MTBC0 mtbc0_001382 ·
111 aa ·
1454538–1454873 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_215807.1
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | hypothetical protein |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | DUF732 domain-containing protein |
| Revised (this work) | Secreted protein of the mycobacterial DUF732 family. All-vs-all structural clustering (Foldseek on ESMFold models, phase36) places it in a tight fold family (median TM-score 0.67) that includes the characterised host-directed effectors Rv1804c (sequesters host IkappaB-alpha) and Rv3354 (targets the host COP9 signalosome), plus the secreted antigen Rv1271c. It shares the family's N-terminal signal peptide (DeepTMHMM) and the ~110-aa secreted fold. A host-interaction / secreted-effector role is therefore plausible, but the specific molecular target of THIS member is not experimentally established (the DUF732 family is functionally heterogeneous). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | cell wall and cell processes |
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.
Rv1291c (5).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).
A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.
Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered
| Predicted disorder | 32% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 77.1 |
|---|---|
| Disordered regions | 1 IDR(s), longest 35 aa [0-35] |
carries a substantial disordered region (35/111 residues); disorder is a property, not a function
A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).
Phenotype-driven functional lead (hypothesis) priority 2.0
predicted secreted (signal peptide).
| Corroborating evidence | conserved / under constraint intra-MTBC; structural lead available |
|---|
This locus is a "hypothetical" with a conditional Tn-seq phenotype. The statement above is a working hypothesis for its functional context, synthesised from the phenotype pattern and the corroborating layers on this page (conservation, STRING coupling, operon, regulon, localisation, structure) — a prioritised requalification candidate to validate, not an established function.
Structural family (guilt-by-structure, hypothesis)
Assigned by all-vs-all structural clustering: phase36 cluster 1 (DUF732).
Foldseek all-vs-all on ESMFold dark models (phase36) — shared fold with a characterised family member; a candidate association to validate, not an established function.
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index 1.08 (95% CI -0.33 to 3.33). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.076 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=4 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb1323c
· 100.0% identity |
|---|---|
| M. marinum |
MMAR_4121
· 76.1% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_001359
· 100.0% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WM33
SwissProt · reviewed
· Predicted
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Uncharacterized protein Rv1291c |
As checked on 2026-09-23, UniProt listed this protein as Uncharacterized protein Rv1291c; the revised annotation above goes beyond that record. UniProt may have been recurated since: check the live entry.
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
S Function unknown
|
|---|---|
| eggNOG description | Protein of unknown function (DUF732) |
| Orthologous group | 2BN0A |
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.116 · quasi-invariant (4 sites), pN/pS underpowered |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 3 synonymous, 1 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 1 consensus substitution(s) low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 49/53 (92%) · mean identity 52.6%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 49/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)
| DeJesus 2017 call | NE · non-essential |
|---|---|
| What the call means | non-essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
4 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
0 growth-defect,
4 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 1.000,
mean read count 61.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 4 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | Statistically thin call: only 4 TA (Himar1) sites in the whole ORF (atlas median 13; genes under 300 nt typically have very few). A DeJesus 2017 call built on so few independent observations is less robust than the same call on a longer gene, in either direction. Cross-check against the CRISPRi vulnerability index (independent of TA-site density) and, if this gene overlaps a neighbour (see Genomic-neighbour overlap section below), verify how many of its TA sites actually fall inside its own ORF. (P20.3) |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) | -2.42 | 0.0016 | required |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 1 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected
Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) signal peptide
| Prediction | predicted secreted protein (signal peptide) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | SP |
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 111 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 11.0 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 7.8 |
| GRAVY | 0.324 (hydrophobic) |
| Aliphatic index | 80.5 |
| Aromaticity | 0.063 |
| Instability index | 20.1 (stable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUF732 | PF05305.20 | 9.6e-19 | 37–106 | Protein of unknown function (DUF732) |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 77.1, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural neighbours (Foldseek on the ESMFold model, exploratory)
ESMFold model confidence: mean pLDDT 69.7 (low). Low-confidence model: the fold may be unreliable, so treat these structural hits with caution.
Best matches against the PDB, ranked by Foldseek homology probability. A high probability / TM-score suggests a shared fold; unless flagged sig (E < 0.01) these are fold hypotheses, not assignments.
| Target | Prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3j9x-assembly1_A |
0.47 | 0.55 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 29% | 47% / 41% | 1.0e+00 | 3j9x-assembly1_A A Virus that Infects a Hyperthermophile Encapsidates A-Form DNA |
5w7g-assembly1_B |
0.41 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 19% | 62% / 64% | 1.2e+00 | 5w7g-assembly1_B An envelope of a filamentous hyperthermophilic virus carries lipids in a horseshoe conformation |
6wq0-assembly1_A |
0.21 | 0.54 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 29% | 47% / 40% | 2.8e+00 | 6wq0-assembly1_A Cryo-EM of the S. solfataricus rod-shaped virus, SSRV1 |
3f2e-assembly1_A |
0.15 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 18% | 62% / 95% | 3.0e+00 | 3f2e-assembly1_A Crystal structure of Yellowstone SIRV coat protein C-terminus |
2ezk-assembly1_A |
0.15 | 0.53 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 18% | 40% / 61% | 4.1e+00 | 2ezk-assembly1_A SOLUTION NMR STRUCTURE OF THE IBETA SUBDOMAIN OF THE MU END DNA BINDING DOMAIN OF PHAGE MU TRANSPOSASE, REGULARIZED MEAN STRUCTURE |
4fcy-assembly1_B |
0.10 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 16% | 62% / 14% | 3.9e+00 | 4fcy-assembly1_B Crystal structure of the bacteriophage Mu transpososome |
4fcy-assembly1_A |
0.09 | 0.40 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 16% | 62% / 15% | 4.5e+00 | 4fcy-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the bacteriophage Mu transpososome |
4gk5-assembly2_F-3 |
0.08 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 17% | 67% / 83% | 7.0e+00 | 4gk5-assembly2_F-3 Crystal structure of human Rev3-Rev7-Rev1-Polkappa complex |
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon)
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv1290A (+ strand, 126 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | argV (- strand, 358 bp gap) |
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT1330) |
not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase) |
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
All 13 partner(s) at medium confidence are shown. None rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv1157c dark |
hypothetical protein | 657 | 41 | textmining:657 |
Rv3207c |
hypothetical protein | 653 | 41 | textmining:653 |
Rv3742c |
oxidoreductase | 628 | 41 | textmining:628 |
Rv2223c caeB |
carboxylesterase B | 549 | 41 | textmining:549 |
Rv3296 lhr |
ATP-dependent helicase | 546 | 41 | textmining:546 |
Rv1158c dark |
hypothetical protein | 543 | 41 | textmining:543 |
Rv0309 |
hypothetical protein | 518 | 41 | textmining:518 |
Rv2249c glpD1 |
glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | 517 | 41 | textmining:517 |
Rv3201c adnB |
ATP-dependent DNA helicase | 511 | 41 | textmining:511 |
Rv1242 vapC33 |
ribonuclease VapC33 | 505 | 41 | textmining:505 |
Rv3106 fprA |
NADPH-ferredoxin reductase FprA | 434 | 41 | textmining:434 |
Rv2190c ripC |
endopeptidase | 434 | 41 | textmining:434 |
Rv2989 |
transcriptional regulator | 431 | 41 | textmining:431 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
- MTBC0 PGAP product: DUF732 domain-containing protein
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): DUF732 PF05305.20 (E=1e-18)
- Foldseek best: 3j9x-assembly1_A A Virus that Infects a Hyperthermophile Encapsidates A-Form DNA (prob 0.47, E=1e+00, TM=0.55)
- (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_215807.1)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — DUF732 (PF05305.20)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
2BN0A - Curated reference: UniProt P9WM33 (SwissProt, reviewed; Predicted)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Model confidence: ESMFold per-residue pLDDT (mean 69.7, low)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 77.1)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 13 functional partner(s)
- Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: van Kempen M, Kim SS, Tumescheit C, et al. (2024). Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek Nature Biotechnology. doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_001382|Rv1291c| MFTRRFAASMVGTTLTAATLGLAALGFAGTASASSTDEAFLAQLQADGITPPSAARAIKDAHAVCDALDEGHSAKAVIKAVAKATGLSAKGAKTFAVDAASAYCPQYVTSS
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for Rv1291c? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about Rv1291c