Rv2812 Family assigned · low auto-curated

H37Rv Rv2812 · MTBC0 mtbc0_003995 · 24 aa · 4240041–4240416 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_217328.1

⚠ The ancestral MTBC0 locus is annotated as a pseudogene by its own source: mtbc0_003995 carries pseudo=true in the PGAP annotation of the MTBC0 reconstruction, with the reason given as frameshifted; internal stop; incomplete; partial in the middle of a contig; missing C-terminus. Re-translating the ancestral region confirms 1 internal stop codon, the first at residue 25 — which is where the 24 aa protein served here ends, against 469 aa for the H37Rv product. The frameshift is the cause and the stop its downstream consequence, so the two are not interchangeable.

Deliberately not concluded. The outgroup does not stop at this point, but only 15 of 149 outgroup strains carry any called variant at all inside this coding sequence — what a mappability hole looks like in a repeat-rich locus. An uncalled site is not a confirmed reference allele, so the ancestral state of this locus is left open rather than guessed.
Source: MTBC0v1.1_PGAP_annot.gff, Harrison et al. 2024 (imputed MTBC ancestor); polarisation measured in phase244 (P51.2q, 2026-09-18). Polarisation method: the CDS of each strain is rebuilt from its own called variants and translated to the first REAL stop codon, past the annotated bound; a strain counts here when its product stops where the ancestral protein stops (± 5 aa), which is the SAME defect rather than merely another one. No single strain is read on its own (an uncalled site is not a confirmed reference allele), only the fraction over a panel.

The structural and functional layers below were computed on the translated (truncated) sequence.

Ancestral anchor flagged: ancestral protein much shorter than the H37Rv product. The stored ancestral protein is much shorter than the H37Rv product: 24 aa against 469 aa (5%). Because this record's len_aa and every protein-based layer (Pfam domains, Foldseek, ESM, disorder, ProtParam) are computed on the ancestral sequence, they describe that shorter sequence, not the H37Rv product. Two readings are open and this record does not settle between them: a genuine ancestral truncation later extended in H37Rv, which would be a biological result, or a PGAP gene call cut short on the ancestral assembly, which would be an artefact. Compare with the H37Rv product before drawing any functional conclusion.
Affects: protein-based layers. Verified by 1:1 H37Rv–MTBC0 position liftover (P19.6/P19.7); annotation_mtbc P19.6/P19.7 — 1:1 liftover (Harrison et al., liftovers/H37Rv_NC_000962.3.on.MTBC0.all.positions.tsv.gz) vs RefSeq NC_000962.3 annotation, similarity by difflib ratio calibrated on 60 correctly anchored controls.

Arbitrated: frameshift in the ancestral sequence: the 1:1 liftover shows indel(s) not multiple of 3 inside the gene, hence downstream stops. Whether this is a genuine ancestral degradation or a reconstruction error in a repeat-rich region is NOT settled here; both leave the served protein unrepresentative. The protein served here is 24 aa against 469 aa for the H37Rv product.

Measured: 1 liftover offset break(s) inside the gene (pos931:-2bp), at least one not a multiple of 3, followed by 4 internal stop(s) downstream.
Computed on the truncated sequence, therefore not to be read for this gene: domains (Pfam), struct_hits (Foldseek/ESMFold), plddt (ESMFold), esm, protparam, disorder, localization (DeepTMHMM), mcsa, eggnog. Unaffected, because keyed on an external identifier rather than on the ancestral sequence: uniprot, struct_af / plddt_af (AlphaFold DB), orthologs, pdb.

Duplicate catalogue row, arbitrated and REFUSED. The catalogue also offers ancestral locus mtbc0_002992 (3139241–3140652), which the position liftover designates and which PGAP itself called from NP_217328.1. It is not served here.

Measured: the homologous ancestral region aligns to the H37Rv product at 79.09 % identity over 470 residues and carries 4 internal stop codon(s) at 311, 350, 383, 430. Most likely a DISRUPTED ancestral copy: the ancestral region homologous to the H37Rv CDS aligns to the H37Rv product at 79.09 % identity, so it is this gene rather than an unrelated one, but it carries 4 internal stop codon(s) at residues [311, 350, 383, 430] of 470 — the copy is interrupted, not merely mis-called. Standing caveat: MTBC0 is an IMPUTED ancestral sequence, so an internal stop can record a real ancestral disruption OR an imputation error, and this measurement does not separate the two. record LEFT on its current anchor. Re-anchoring it would serve a protein with internal stops; the duplicate row is therefore kept in `gene_xref` on purpose, and this field records why.
annotation_mtbc P18.23 (phase111) — duplicate gene_xref line arbitrated.

No re-anchoring possible. P46.5d closes the reanchor question raised by P46.5c. The only alternative locus available -- the duplicate `gene_xref` row already tested in P18.23 (see `duplicate_row_arbitration` above) -- also carries internal stop codons (4, 79.1 % aligned identity), and the currently anchored locus is itself frame-disrupted (see `arbitration` above, FRAMESHIFT_RECONSTRUCTION). Neither candidate lifts to a complete ORF: there is nowhere to re-anchor to.

Editorial decision (CG, 2026-09-26): documented status quo. The protein-based layers on this record (Pfam domains, disorder, ProtParam...) keep describing the truncated ancestral fragment; no recomputation was triggered and `coord_ref` stays `MTBC0`. This field only records that the reanchor question is closed, not that the truncation is resolved -- the standing MTBC0-is-imputed caveat above still applies.
annotation_mtbc P46.5d (phase270, 2026-09-26).

Conflicting signals on this page. Two layers of this record disagree. Neither has been suppressed; what follows says what is known and what the disagreement means.
  • The strand in the header (-) describes the anchored ancestral locus mtbc0_003995, a PSEUDOGENE at 4,240,041-4,240,416, whereas the context layer describes the H37Rv gene itself (3,139,241-3,140,170, strand +): two different objects. The strand mismatch is a symptom of a faulty MTBC0 anchoring, which the `mtbc0_anchor` banner on this page already declares - a 24 aa ancestral protein against a 469 aa H37Rv product, and every sequence-derived layer on this page describes that fragment. Correcting the `strand` field would hide the defect instead of resolving it: the repair is the anchoring, not the strand. Observed and declared on 2026-09-09. (strand mismatch, 2026-09-09)

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →
+ strand − strand proV (Rv3758c) — family_assigned: glycine betaine/L-proline ABC transporter ATP-binding protei proX (Rv3759c) — family_assigned: glycine betaine/carnitine/choline/L-proline ABC transporter proX fadE36 (Rv3761c) — family_assigned: phosphotransferase family protein fadE36 Rv3762c (Rv3762c) — requalified: alkyl/aryl-sulfatase Rv3762c lpqH (Rv3763) — requalified: lipoprotein LpqH tcrX (Rv3765c) — requalified: two-component system response regulator TcrX Rv3767c (Rv3767c) — requalified: class I SAM-dependent methyltransferase Rv3767c Rv3768 (Rv3768) — family_assigned: nuclear transport factor 2 family protein Rv3769 (Rv3769) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv3770c (Rv3770c) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein Rv2812 (Rv2812) — family_assigned: helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein Rv3771c (Rv3771c) — family_assigned: hypothetical protein hisC2 (Rv3772) — requalified: histidinol-phosphate transaminase hisC2 Rv3773c (Rv3773c) — family_assigned: TIGR03086 family metal-binding protein echA21 (Rv3774) — family_assigned: crotonase/enoyl-CoA hydratase family protein echA21 lipE (Rv3775) — requalified: lipase LipE lipE Rv3778c (Rv3778c) — family_assigned: cysteine desulfurase-like protein Rv3778c Rv3779 (Rv3779) — family_assigned: DUF6541 family protein Rv3779 bpa (Rv3780) — requalified: proteasome activator protein Bpa rfbE (Rv3781) — family_assigned: ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 4 232 kb 4 236 kb 4 240 kb 4 244 kb 4 248 kb 4 252 kb

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)transposase
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationhelix-turn-helix domain-containing protein
Revised (this work)Helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein.
Functional category (TubercuList)insertion seqs and phages

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, with no primary study behind it.

Named in the body of 5 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv2812 (4), Mb2836 (1).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14).

This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) highly disordered

Predicted disorder100% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 80.8
Disordered regions1 IDR(s), longest 24 aa [0-24]

sequence-based disorder is high but AlphaFold folds it confidently (pLDDT>=70): treat the disorder call with caution (possible metapredict over-call)

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourRv2813 (Rv2813, + strand)
Overlap4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 1.27 (95% CI -0.52 to 4.12). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.221 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=14 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser)

Mycobrowser functionRequired for the transposition of the insertion element IS1604.

The legacy Mycobrowser record is shown for verification. Mycobrowser is no longer maintained; its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions, so a class change usually reflects re-numbering, not a conflict.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb2836 · 99.2% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_002900 · 99.6% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt P71639 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt nameProbable transposase

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category L Replication, recombination and repair
eggNOG descriptionPFAM Integrase, catalytic
Orthologous groupCOG2801
KEGG orthology K07497

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS 1.591 · diversifying/relaxed
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 2 synonymous, 8 missense, 1 nonsense, 2 frameshift
Disruption 3 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 4.01% of strains (5712) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) CONVERGENCE inter-clades (sites différents) — Bovis, L4, L6; union over all sites: 6 171 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:3117406:GGT:G · frameshift · 5 712 strains — fixed in 59 sub-clades of Bovis, totalling 5 695 strains — 43.2% of the 13 187 strains in the lineage named (largest: Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.2.9 1761/1763, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.3 480/480, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.3.3 346/346, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.1 244/244, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.7 212/212, Bovis.2.2.1.2.2.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.7.2 191/191, …)
  • NC_000962.3:3118212:GC:G · frameshift · 255 strains — fixed in 14 sub-clades of L6, totalling 229 strains — 15.7% of the 1 457 strains in the lineage named (largest: L6.1.2.1.2.2.2.2 50/50, L6.1.2.2.2.2 36/36, L6.1.2.2.2.3.2 31/31, L6.1.2.1.1.2 21/22, L6.1.2.1.2.2.1 14/14, L6.1.2.2.1.2 11/11, …)
  • NC_000962.3:3117311:G:A · nonsense · 204 strains — fixed in 1 sub-clade of L4, totalling 49 strains — 0.1% of the 54 538 strains in the lineage named (largest: L4.1_proto1 46/49)
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) MTBC-specific

Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 0/53 (0%) · 0/4 closest MTBAP relatives
absent from ALL 53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes tested (incl. the closest MTBAP relatives) — a candidate MTBC-specific genetic innovation / host-adaptation factor (confirm by synteny; rule out a short/low-complexity ORF and extreme divergence)
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

short ORF (24 aa) a shallow stratum may reflect homology-detection failure, not true youth
absent from the whole genus and from all outgroups tested — a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (confirm by synteny; rule out detection failure for short/divergent ORFs)

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
RDsurDR 100% Suricattae n=1, not statistical

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 19 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 19 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.842, mean read count 19.875. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 19 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 2 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance0.08 ppm · rank 3482/3519 (1.1th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length24 aa
Molecular weight2.5 kDa
Theoretical pI8.94
GRAVY-0.433 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index45.0
Aromaticity0.042
Instability index37.2 (stable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 80.8, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 80.8

PDB hitprobTM (aln)TM (query)TM (target)Seq. id.Cov. q / tE-valueDescription
8b4h-assembly1_A 1.00 0.54 0.43 0.54 17% 82% / 98% 4.4e-16 sig 8b4h-assembly1_A IstA transposase cleaved donor complex
9bw1-assembly1_P 1.00 0.54 0.41 0.54 15% 64% / 94% 1.2e-13 sig 9bw1-assembly1_P TnsABCD-DNA transpososome
7ouf-assembly1_E 1.00 0.54 0.33 0.54 18% 64% / 96% 3.6e-11 sig 7ouf-assembly1_E Structure of the STLV intasome:B56 complex bound to the strand-transfer inhibitor XZ450
4fcy-assembly1_A 1.00 0.45 0.43 0.45 14% 93% / 97% 8.1e-13 sig 4fcy-assembly1_A Crystal structure of the bacteriophage Mu transpososome
7pel-assembly1_E 1.00 0.55 0.34 0.55 18% 65% / 100% 3.2e-11 sig 7pel-assembly1_E CryoEM structure of simian T-cell lymphotropic virus intasome in complex with PP2A regulatory subunit B56 gamma

Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 80.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 2

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv2811 (+ strand, 70 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv2813 (+ strand, -4 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv2812 · Rv2813

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (+ strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv2812 · Rv2813 — agrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2879) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: Rv2813 (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 977, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 19 partners at medium confidence (2 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 19 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv2813 hypothetical protein 977 977 ctx neighborhood:882 cooccurence:643
Rv3786c hypothetical protein 738 739 ctx cooccurence:738
Rv2811 hypothetical protein 635 635 ctx neighborhood:620
Rv1978 hypothetical protein 630 630 ctx cooccurence:630
Rv3899c hypothetical protein 612 611 ctx cooccurence:605
Rv3349c transposase 587 587 ctx cooccurence:581
Rv3604c dark transmembrane protein 578 578 ctx cooccurence:577
Rv3887c eccD2 ESX-2 secretion system protein EccD 567 568 ctx cooccurence:565
Rv3912 rsmA anti-sigma-M factor RsmA 554 554 ctx cooccurence:552
Rv3896c hypothetical protein 552 552 ctx cooccurence:551
Rv0804 hypothetical protein 531 532 ctx cooccurence:529
Rv1158c dark hypothetical protein 483 484 ctx cooccurence:482
Rv2633c hypothetical protein 477 477 ctx cooccurence:477
Rv1435c hypothetical protein 465 465 ctx cooccurence:465
Rv2810c Probable transposase; Rv2810c, (MTCY16B7.33), len: 133 aa. Probable transposase for IS1555, similar to C-terminal domain of transposases for 446 446 ctx neighborhood:438

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: transposase
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_217328.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG2801
  • Curated reference: UniProt P71639 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 80.8)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 19 functional partner(s); context anchor Rv2813
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_003995|Rv2812|
MAVGDDKARCARSARGRSDCFGIS