Rv3896c Resolved · medium

H37Rv Rv3896c · MTBC0 mtbc0_004130 · 302 aa · 4406189–4407097 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_218413.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationtransglycosylase
Revised (this work)Lytic-transglycosylase (lysozyme-like) fold, structurally supported (Foldseek restricted to the 205-285 domain + active-site alignment to Slt70/Rpf catalytic glutamate); enzymatic activity not experimentally verified. UniProt name 'Transglycosylase' is ProtNLM-predicted (machine name, not an independent source). The grand-clade allele (288 aa) retains the catalytic site (E215, motif GVWQ) but loses 43% of the domain fold (frameshift at codon 250, in the best-modelled, structurally central part of the domain). Two independent attempts at a second appui (Boltz-2 docking, dN/dS of the post-frameshift tail) were made in 2026-09-20 and neither succeeds: the docking result is not independent of the Foldseek model, and the dN/dS test is negative/inconclusive. See evidence for full detail -- protocole_flip_dark.md: verdict unchanged, still resting on a single structural appui.
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Curation note: P16.23 (phase135, 2026-08-17): couche tss ajoutee (leaderless=False). P49.1 (phase233, 2026-09-15): couche tss re-clee (leaderless=False). 2026-09-18 (projet mtbc/Rv3896c-Rv3898c, P7.2): evidence/references enrichies (repli lysozyme-like confirme par Foldseek restreint au domaine 205-285, site actif E215/GVWQ aligne sur Slt70 et les Rpf), auto=false. Verdict et confidence INCHANGES : un seul appui structural, la barre des deux appuis independants de protocole_flip_dark.md n'est pas franchie (P4.8 encore ouverte).

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text

No publication in PubMed mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, nor under any of its ortholog identifiers (M. bovis, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. leprae, M. abscessus). The atlas annotation rests on sequence/structure evidence, not on a primary study of this gene.

Named in the body of 2 paper(s) in Europe PMC full text, though in no title or abstract. Matched under Rv3896c (2).

A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.

Also swept under the protein name “Transglycosylase”: nothing found. 14 abstract(s) contain this protein name, but none can be attributed to THIS gene rather than to a homologue or a paralogue (the name carries no gene-specific discriminant and neither the locus tag nor the gene name is co-cited).

A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.

PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10

Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.

A verified absence of literature is itself information: it flags an annotation with no primary study behind it. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.77 (95% CI -1.04 to 3.60). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.230 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=6 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser functionFunction unknown

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (requalified function). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3926c · 98.4% identity
M. marinum MMAR_5461 · 68.0% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_004012 · 98.8% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O05448 TrEMBL · unreviewed · Predicted
UniProt nameTransglycosylase

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category S Function unknown
eggNOG descriptionSLT domain
Orthologous groupCOG3953

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29) pseudogene candidate

pN/pS 0.502 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 5 synonymous, 7 missense, 0 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 1 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 11.00% of strains (15691) · clonal

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.327 · 21 consensus substitution(s)
under purifying selection vs M. canettii (deep divergence; dN/dS=0.327) — a real, constrained gene predating the MTBC clonal expansion
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 28/53 (53%) · mean identity 65.9% · 2/4 closest MTBAP relatives
conserved across the genus (present in 28/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 15 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 15 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.933, mean read count 107.928571429. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 15 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) not detected

Not detected in the mass-spectrometry datasets integrated by PaxDb. This is not evidence of absence, and this atlas can say which bias dominates, because it measured it on its own 482 undetected proteins. Size is the main factor: undetected proteins have a median length of 145 aa against 295 aa for detected ones, and 25.3 % of them are shorter than 100 aa against 6.0 %. Predicted localisation matters far less than usually assumed: detection rates are 89.3 % for globular, 84.9 % for transmembrane, 88.0 % for lipoproteins and 77.8 % for signal-peptide proteins — so a short protein is under-sampled whatever its predicted compartment, and hydrophobicity alone is a weak excuse. Condition-specific expression and few tryptic peptides (PE/PPE repeats) add to this.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix

Predictionno signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB

A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length302 aa
Molecular weight32.9 kDa
Theoretical pI11.24
GRAVY-0.352 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index81.2
Aromaticity0.06
Instability index46.8 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

No Pfam-A domain above the gathering threshold (hmmscan --cut_ga scan completed).

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 80.7, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 3

Upstream (5' on genome)eccB2 (- strand, 2 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)Rv3897c (- strand, 156 bp gap)
Predicted operon eccC2 · eccB2 · Rv3896c

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT4012) exponential phase: operon of 3, Rv3896c · Rv3897c · Rv3898c (coverage 34.49)
stationary phase: operon of 3, Rv3896c · Rv3897c · Rv3898c (coverage 21.02) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Transcriptional regulation (signed TRN: ChIP-seq + TFOE)

Regulated by (1 TF) Rv0324 (activates)

Regulatory edges from the ISB signed transcriptional regulatory network (TF ChIP-seq binding, Minch 2015 + TF-overexpression response, Rustad 2014). An edge is regulatory evidence (binding and/or expression change), not necessarily direct. For a "hypothetical", membership in a known regulon (e.g. DosR dormancy, PhoP virulence) is a physiological-context lead, not a function.

Condition: Condition-blind by construction. These edges come from transcription-factor OVEREXPRESSION in a single laboratory condition, so a listed regulator is not a claim that it governs this gene in every circumstance. Measured counter-examples exist within this atlas (see Rv2516c, where the DosR regulon collapses under moxifloxacin while the gene itself rises). Read a regulator as 'capable of shifting this gene', and look for the condition before building a hypothesis on it.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: eccC2 (ESX-2 type VII secretion system protein EccC), high confidence (score 818, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 42 partners at medium confidence (4 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 42 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3894c eccC2 ESX-2 type VII secretion system protein EccC 818 818 ctx neighborhood:776
Rv3895c eccB2 ESX-2 secretion system protein EccB 812 812 ctx neighborhood:774
Rv2633c hypothetical protein 757 757 ctx cooccurence:756
Rv1978 hypothetical protein 698 699 ctx cooccurence:698
Rv1733c transmembrane protein 695 696 ctx cooccurence:694
Rv3786c hypothetical protein 699 688 ctx cooccurence:641
Rv0804 hypothetical protein 671 671 ctx cooccurence:671
Rv3413c rsdA anti-sigma-D factor RsdA 657 658 ctx cooccurence:656
Rv3604c dark transmembrane protein 643 643 ctx cooccurence:641
Rv3484 cpsA hypothetical protein 610 610 ctx cooccurence:609
Rv1057 hypothetical protein 585 586 ctx cooccurence:584
Rv1435c hypothetical protein 571 571 ctx cooccurence:570
Rv1158c dark hypothetical protein 552 552 ctx cooccurence:552
Rv2812 transposase 552 552 ctx cooccurence:551
Rv0210 hypothetical protein 551 552 ctx cooccurence:545

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: transglycosylase
  • (initial automatic assignment: auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; superseded by hand review)
  • UniProt protein name 'Transglycosylase' (O05448) is machine-generated by ProtNLM (evidence ECO:0008006, source Google), annotationScore 1/5, proteinExistence 'Predicted' -- not independently validated by homology or experiment (project mtbc/Rv3896c-Rv3898c, P4.3, 2026-09-10).
  • InterPro IPR023346 / SUPFAM SSF53955 (Lysozyme-like domain superfamily) over residues 210-279 of the 302-aa H37Rv allele; the grand-clade frameshift (codon 250) removes 43% of this domain (250-279), the structurally best-modelled region of the protein (AlphaFold pLDDT median 96.9 vs 80.6 for the 210-249 region retained) -- the catalytic core is destroyed, not a peripheral extension (project mtbc/Rv3896c-Rv3898c, P4.5, 2026-09-10/11).
  • Foldseek restricted to the 205-285 domain (full-length protein gives zero significant hits, a dilution artefact) returns lytic-transglycosylase folds as best TM-score hits (0.81-0.87): Slt70 of E. coli (PDB 1QSA/1SLY) and M. tuberculosis Rpf domains (PDB 1XSF/3EO5/4EMN/4CGE/4OW1). Active-site check: E215 superposes on Slt70's catalytic Glu478 (Thunnissen et al. 1995 -- structural inference from a transition-state analogue, not mutagenesis) and on the Rpf catalytic glutamate (Cohen-Gonsaud et al. 2005, functional evidence; mutants E54K/E54A tested in vivo by Zhao et al. 2015); motif GVWQ (238-241) aligns with Slt70's GLMQ (493-496). E215 and GVWQ both lie before codon 250, so the grand-clade allele keeps an intact catalytic site inside a domain whose fold is otherwise destroyed (project mtbc/Rv3896c-Rv3898c, P4.5-P4.7, 2026-09-10/15).
  • This is ONE structural appui, well corroborated but not yet independently confirmed by a second, unrelated line of evidence as protocole_flip_dark.md requires: STRING network partners (score>=700) tested and rejected as non-independent (dominated by genomic neighbourhood -- the same ESX-2 synteny fact already used above); a Boltz-2 peptidoglycan-docking campaign was in progress as of 2026-09-15. Verdict left unchanged pending that second appui (project mtbc/Rv3896c-Rv3898c, P4.8, still open).
  • Second independent appui SOUGHT (2026-09-20, project mtbc/Rv3896c-Rv3898c P4.11) and NOT obtained: (i) a Boltz-2 peptidoglycan-docking campaign (GlcNAc-MurNAc vs the full 302-aa allele, positive control RpfE catalytic domain PDB 4CGE, negative control Rv3898c) returned a positive interface signal, but derives from the same Foldseek-based structural model as the appui above and does not count as independent (P4.8/P4.11); (ii) dN/dS of the grand-clade post-frameshift ORF tail (288-aa allele, codons 250-288) across 14,918 carriers (L5/L6/L9/L10/Bovis, `bdd/actuelle`): 9 independent low-frequency substitutions in the tail, 8 non-synonymous / 1 synonymous against a neutral expectation of N:S=2.55 (33.0 synonymous / 84.0 non-synonymous sites, Nei-Gojobori), observed pN/pS ~3.14 (above neutral -- no purifying selection signal, point estimate opposite to the functional hypothesis; exact binomial test p=0.46, not significant, underpowered at n=9). Both routes were the only ones not derived from the in-house 3D model; both are negative or inconclusive. The verdict below is therefore left unchanged, but now rests on a SINGLE non-independent structural appui, not the corroborated appui the wording previously implied -- protocole_flip_dark.md still requires a second, independent, convergent appui before this can be stated as more than a candidate fold resemblance (project mtbc/Rv3896c-Rv3898c, P4.11, P7.5, 2026-09-20).
  • Genomic context corroboration, independent of homology/synteny: Das, Ghosh & Mande 2011 (PMC3227618) already identified the Rv3884c-Rv3896c island as a distinct secretion-system cluster (matching ESX-2) by sequence-composition anomaly detection, citing Rv3896c only as the island's boundary -- a genomic-context signal, not a function signal, and not usable as the second appui protocole_flip_dark.md requires (project mtbc/Rv3896c-Rv3898c, P4.1, P7.5, 2026-09-20).

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218413.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — none above threshold
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG3953
  • Curated reference: UniProt O05448 (TrEMBL, unreviewed; Predicted)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 80.7)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 42 functional partner(s); context anchor eccC2
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Transcriptional regulation: ISB signed TRN — TF ChIP-seq (Minch et al. 2015, doi:10.1038/ncomms6829) + TF overexpression (Rustad et al. 2014, doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-11-502)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
  • Primary literature: Thunnissen AM, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, Dijkstra BW (1995). Structure of the 70-kDa soluble lytic transglycosylase complexed with bulgecin A. Implications for the enzymatic mechanism Biochemistry 34(39):12729-37. doi:10.1021/bi00039a032 PMID:7548026
  • Primary literature: Cohen-Gonsaud M, Barthe P, Bagneris C, Henderson B, Ward J, Roumestand C, Keep NH (2005). The structure of a resuscitation-promoting factor domain from Mycobacterium tuberculosis shows homology to lysozymes Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:270-273. doi:10.1038/nsmb905 PMID:15723078
  • Primary literature: Zhao S, et al. (2015). Protective and therapeutic effects of the resuscitation-promoting factor domain and its mutants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice Pathog Dis 73(3):ftu025. doi:10.1093/femspd/ftu025 PMID:25743472
  • Primary literature: Das C, Ghosh TS, Mande SS (2011). Computational analysis of the ESX-1 region of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: insights into the mechanism of type VII secretion system PLoS One 6(11):e27980. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027980 PMID:22140496

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_004130|Rv3896c|
MSTWHRIGTEGEPLTDPLTTQAIAALSRGHGLFAGGVSGADIDAPQIQQYANAISWVANAVPTAAAYRWRGAARALRRLANTDEALAQIMAAAQIDHAHARTATRALLEAAKTDAMALTDTPLGRREAMARMAARLRAQHRHIARCRSRARLLGLRLRRLRYLRTAAARRPQVTTPGGRAQVLAAIQKALDIKGVHDPAARARWTRGMDLVARRESNYNANAINHWDSNAARGTPSRGVWQFIAPTFAAYHEPGTSTNIHDLVAQACAFINYARGHYGVAADASNLADLIQQADPRRSPRGY