rsmH Resolved · high auto-curated
H37Rv Rv2165c · MTBC0 mtbc0_002301 ·
396 aa ·
2455600–2456790 MTBC0
(-) ·
RefSeq NP_216681.4
Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)
Open in full genome browser →This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.
Annotation: from legacy to revised
| Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser) | rRNA small subunit methyltransferase H |
|---|---|
| MTBC0 PGAP re-annotation | 16S rRNA (cytosine(1402)-N(4))-methyltransferase RsmH |
| Revised (this work) | 16S rRNA (cytosine(1402)-N(4))-methyltransferase RsmH. Pfam: Methyltransf_5 (PF01795.26). |
| Functional category (TubercuList) | conserved hypotheticals |
Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.
In the literature (TB corpus sweep) named only in full text
No publication mentions this gene in its title or abstract — not under its H37Rv locus tag, not under its gene name, and not under any ortholog identifier. Its atlas annotation was built from sequence/structure evidence; UniProt nevertheless carries a reviewed entry with a named function for this protein, and experimental evidence that the protein exists (see below), so the absence of a locus-tag mention should not be read as the absence of any study.
mraW).
This protein's usage name was searched (mraW) and PubMed returned records, but they were read and do not name this gene: the only record is a microbiome study where `mraW` is attached to no mycobacterium. The page's own label therefore stands.
Checked 2026-09-10 against PubMed title, abstract and author keywords (efetch), not the whole record.
A term shared with another locus of this proteome is excluded before being searched, because a count on a shared name measures the neighbour: phase217 once reported 38 papers for Rv1433 that belonged to Rv2518c.
Rv2165c (6), rsmH (33), MAB_1998 (1).
A hit does NOT mean functional characterisation -- it may be a mention in a genome-wide table or screen (e.g. a differential-expression supplementary table), exactly the mechanism that revealed the Rv3222c/Sarkar2021 co-induction. Restricted to hits CORROBORATED by the H37Rv tag itself, the gene name, or a substantial/multi-alias hit count -- single-low-count-ortholog-only hits were excluded pending individual review (cf. Rv0027/Mb0028, a confirmed collision unrelated to Mycobacterium). Coverage limit (P52.4, measured 2026-09-30): the body-text part of this search only sees articles whose full text Europe PMC holds, about 8-13 % of the TB literature published before 2005, 21 % for 2005-2009, 40 % for 2010-2014 and 66 % since 2020, so the absence of a hit says little about older mentions.
A protein name is not a gene identifier: a match may describe an orthologue in another species or a paralogue in H37Rv. Attribution here rests on a discriminant in the name (a paralogue number or a symbol) or on the locus tag / gene name being co-cited in the same abstract.
PubMed (E-utilities), sweep by UniProt PROTEIN NAME and its spelling variants (parentheses/subscript forms), each hit verified by literal match in title+abstract. phase110, 2026-08-10
Scope of the sweep: What was actually swept: the H37Rv locus tag and the ortholog locus tags (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), plus the gene name where one exists. NOT swept: protein and enzyme names, including family shorthands such as Ldt(Mt4) or VapC28, and their orthographic variants. An absent locus-tag mention is therefore evidence about the TAG, and only indirect evidence about the protein (P18.14). Extended on 2026-08-10 (P18.20): the UniProt protein name and its spelling variants were swept as well; the result is in `protein_name_sweep`.
This layer CITES the literature and adds context; it does not change the verdict or the function stated elsewhere in this fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole): H37Rv locus tag + GENE NAME + ortholog identifiers (Mb…, MMAR_…, MSMEG_…, ML…, MAB_…), under a mycobacterial context filter; hits verified against the abstract text. Species-context counts distinguish M. tuberculosis literature from literature on other mycobacteria. phase76/phase77, 2026-07-13.
Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene
| Neighbour | Rv2164c (Rv2164c, - strand) |
|---|---|
| Overlap | 4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length |
co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.
Conditional expression context (iModulons)
Member of 1 independently-modulated gene set(s):
Rv1828/SigH (Rv1828 or sigH).
iModulon membership (independently-modulated gene sets from a 647-sample RNA-seq compendium): the conditional co-expression context. Co-expression is a regulatory context, NOT a molecular function. Source: iModulonDB / modulome_mtb (Yoo 2022).
CRISPRi vulnerability
Vulnerability index -8.39 (95% CI -9.17 to -7.68). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.
Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).
Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser
| Mycobrowser EC |
2.1.1.-
· superseded EC numbering; the atlas uses the current class (2.1.1.199)
|
|---|
Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (curated function (UniProt), EC number, COG category, requalified function). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.
Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)
| M. bovis |
Mb2189c
· 99.7% identity |
|---|---|
| M. leprae |
ML0906
· 73.9% identity |
| M. marinum |
MMAR_3202
· 76.9% identity |
| M. smegmatis |
MSMEG_4235
· 71.0% identity |
| M. orygis |
RJtmp_002236
· 99.7% identity |
| M. abscessus |
MAB_1998
· 66.7% identity |
Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.
Curated reference (UniProt)
| UniProt |
P9WJP1
SwissProt · reviewed
· Evidence at protein level
|
|---|---|
| UniProt name | Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase H |
| EC (curated) |
EC 2.1.1.199
|
| Curated function | Specifically methylates the N4 position of cytidine in position 1402 (C1402) of 16S rRNA. |
Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)
| COG category |
J Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Preferred name | rsmH |
| eggNOG description | Specifically methylates the N4 position of cytidine in position 1402 (C1402) of 16S rRNA |
| Orthologous group | COG0275 |
| EC number |
EC 2.1.1.199
|
| KEGG orthology |
K03438
|
| Gene Ontology (57) |
GO:0000154, GO:0001510, GO:0003674, GO:0003824, GO:0005575, GO:0005622, GO:0005623, GO:0005737, GO:0005886, GO:0006139, GO:0006364, GO:0006396 +45 more
|
Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.
Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)
| pN/pS | 0.671 · relaxed/neutral |
|---|---|
| Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) | 4 synonymous, 7 missense, 0 nonsense, 0 frameshift |
pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.
Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Bacteria
| M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) |
0.0 (low power)
· 3 consensus substitution(s) low power (3 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table). |
|---|---|
| Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) |
present in 53/53 (100%) · mean identity 74.6%
· 4/4 closest MTBAP relatives conserved across the genus (present in 53/53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium genomes, incl. distant relatives) — an ancient core gene predating the genus radiation |
| Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) |
MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria detected in 13/13 non-Mycobacterium reference genomes (down to Bacteria) · mean identity 52.8% detected down to outside the phylum (Proteobacteria/Firmicutes controls) — a universally conserved, ancient bacterial gene |
Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.
Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis) GD — not strictly essential
Two genome-wide screens disagree on this gene, and both are kept as they stand. They do not measure the same thing: the Tn-seq call (DeJesus 2017) reports tolerance to transposon insertion across the ORF, the CRISPRi call (Bosch 2021) reports tolerance to partial knockdown. A gene can absorb an insertion and still be required at full dosage, or the reverse. Here the CRISPRi estimate is a confident one (its `certain` flag is set, vulnerability index -8.395), so the disagreement is a genuine methodological tension rather than a weak fit. Atlas-wide, 89 gene(s) fall in this exact stratum, out of 193 showing this direction of disagreement.
| DeJesus 2017 call | GD · growth-defect |
|---|---|
| What the call means | growth-defect: insertions tolerated but fitness reduced; NOT essential |
| TA sites (Himar1) |
23 in the ORF —
0 in the essential state,
19 growth-defect,
4 non-essential,
0 growth-advantage.
Saturation 0.739,
mean read count 9.88235294118.
A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be
inferred about it, in either direction.
All 23 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene. |
| Caveat | `essential: true` here is the broad union (ES+ESD+GD) kept for backward compatibility; this gene is NOT strictly essential. Read n_sites_* before writing anything about essentiality. |
Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.
Mutant phenotypes (conditional Tn-seq, MtbTnDB)
| Condition | log2FC | q | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| altered fitness under Ethambutol (drug exposure) | +3.84 | 0.023 | disruption advantageous |
| Mutants exhibiting altered fitness in the absence of gene marP (other) | -3.49 | 0.0 | required |
| differential fitness in a comparison whose nature could not be established (upstream metadata defect, see note) (undetermined) | +2.70 | 0.031 | disruption advantageous |
Conditional fitness of transposon-disruption mutants across 3 significant condition(s) (|log2FC|≥1, q≤0.05), from the standardized MtbTnDB compendium. A negative log2FC means the mutant is depleted — the gene contributes to fitness in that condition. An in-vivo defect for a "hypothetical" is strong evidence it matters for infection, even without a known molecular function. Disruption (Tn insertion), not a clean deletion; genetic-interaction screens excluded.
Provenance note on a condition above. MtbTnDB labels this condition in vivo (Collaborative Cross mouse panel) and attributes it to Smith et al. 2022, eLife 74419. Both are wrong and for the same reason: its left arm, `mbio_H37Rv`, is the saturated H37Rv reference of DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio 8(1):e02133-16, fourteen independent Tn libraries grown in standard medium), not a mouse strain, and the upstream generator read the token before `_vs_` as a mouse-strain name. The same sample is the in vitro control of six knockout screens in the same file. Measured here on rank correlation over 3971 genes: this condition tracks the other 81 first-order in vivo conditions at rho = +0.03, where those conditions track each other at +0.270 -- it does not behave like an infection measurement. What the comparison actually is could not be established, so it is reported as undetermined rather than renamed, and it is excluded from the in vivo count of this fiche.
Provenance note on a condition above. `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` carries no source in MtbTnDB's own metadata (col_desc.tsv leaves paper_title/paper_URL empty). Traced by the `Rv0537c` companion project (2026-09-12): Weizhen Xu, PhD thesis, Weill Cornell Medicine, 2017, hdl:1813/64728 ("Genetic Screening In Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Utilizing Transposon Insertion Sequencing"), whose abstract describes a TnSeq genetic-interaction screen naming marP. Never published as a peer-reviewed article.
Provenance note on a condition above. This gene's displayed phenotypes include both `marP_KO_vs_marP_WT` and a drug-exposure condition from Xu et al. 2017 (AAC 61(12):e01334-17). Both trace to the same experimenter (Weizhen Xu) and very likely the same transposon insertion library -- read them as ONE handle, not two independent ones, when assessing convergence for an `integrative_lead` flip.
Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected
| MS detection | detected in 9 of 16 independent MS datasets |
|---|---|
| Integrated abundance | 19.3 ppm · rank 2360/3519 (33.0th percentile) |
Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.
Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) no export signal, no TM helix
| Prediction | no signal peptide, no TM helix (DeepTMHMM class GLOB) |
|---|---|
| DeepTMHMM class | GLOB |
A verified absence of signals, which is not a compartment. No Sec/Tat signal peptide, no transmembrane helix and no lipobox were found on this sequence. The predictor reports topology and export signals; it does not measure where the protein ends up, so this page draws no cytoplasmic conclusion from it. In M. tuberculosis that reservation is not theoretical: the 12 Esx paralogues of this atlas — EsxA/ESAT-6 and EsxB/CFP-10 among them, the best-established secreted proteins of the species — carry this very call, because substrates of the type VII (ESX) secretion system leave no recognisable signal. « Secreted » and « no signal peptide » are true together here.
Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.
Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)
| Length | 396 aa |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 42.5 kDa |
| Theoretical pI | 8.45 |
| GRAVY | -0.105 (hydrophilic) |
| Aliphatic index | 90.6 |
| Aromaticity | 0.066 |
| Instability index | 45.3 (unstable) |
Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.
Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)
| Pfam | Accession | i-Evalue | Residues | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Methyltransf_5 | PF01795.26 | 2.4e-118 | 63–379 | MraW methylase family |
3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)
No experimental structure is deposited for this gene: showing the AlphaFold DB predicted model (mean pLDDT 82.8, confident), coloured by per-residue confidence (dark blue = very high, orange/red = low — treat low-confidence regions as unreliable, especially termini and loops). Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Structural search (AlphaFold DB model, Foldseek vs PDB — genome-wide) pLDDT 82.8
| PDB hit | prob | TM (aln) | TM (query) | TM (target) | Seq. id. | Cov. q / t | E-value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1n2x-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.94 | 0.69 | 0.94 | 40% | 80% / 100% | 5.9e-31 sig | 1n2x-assembly1_A Crystal Structure Analysis of TM0872, a Putative SAM-dependent Methyltransferase, Complexed with SAM |
3tka-assembly1_A-2 |
1.00 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.91 | 39% | 80% / 100% | 1.1e-29 sig | 3tka-assembly1_A-2 crystal structure and solution saxs of methyltransferase rsmh from E.coli |
1wg8-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 0.95 | 41% | 80% / 100% | 1.7e-28 sig | 1wg8-assembly2_B Crystal structure of a predicted S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase TT1512 from Thermus thermophilus HB8. |
8ipl-assembly1_A |
1.00 | 0.90 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 35% | 79% / 100% | 6.6e-28 sig | 8ipl-assembly1_A The structure of human mitochondrial methyltransferase METTL15 with RBFA and SAM |
1n2x-assembly2_B |
1.00 | 0.95 | 0.67 | 0.95 | 39% | 79% / 100% | 9.8e-27 sig | 1n2x-assembly2_B Crystal Structure Analysis of TM0872, a Putative SAM-dependent Methyltransferase, Complexed with SAM |
Foldseek search of the AlphaFold DB model (mean pLDDT 82.8, gated at 70) against the PDB — a genome-wide extension of the ESMFold dark-gene search that also covers proteins beyond the single-sequence length limit. Confident structural neighbours (E < 0.01) shown.
Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4
| Upstream (5' on genome) | Rv2164c (- strand, -4 bp gap) |
|---|---|
| Downstream (3' on genome) | Rv2166c (- strand, 1 bp gap) |
| Predicted operon |
pbpB · Rv2164c · Rv2165c · Rv2166c
|
Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).
Published operon evidence (two independent sources)
| Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) | no multi-gene operon predicted (singleton) — disagrees with the distance heuristic above |
|---|---|
| REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT2223) |
exponential phase: operon of 3,
Rv2163c · Rv2164c · Rv2165c
(coverage 36.4)
stationary phase: operon of 4, Rv2163c · Rv2164c · Rv2165c · Rv2166c
(coverage 45.0)
— agrees
with the distance heuristic above
|
Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.
Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)
Explore full network →Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.
Closest characterised functional partner: mraZ (transcriptional regulator MraZ), high confidence (score 995, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence).
Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 113 partners at medium confidence (24 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. None of the 113 partners rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.
| Partner | Product | Score | No text-mining | Channels (≥400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv2166c mraZ |
transcriptional regulator MraZ | 999 | 995 ctx | neighborhood:817 coexpression:968 textmining:920 |
Rv2163c pbpB |
penicillin-binding membrane protein PbpB | 972 | 945 ctx | neighborhood:881 coexpression:500 textmining:520 |
Rv2164c |
hypothetical protein | 969 | 910 ctx | neighborhood:882 textmining:673 |
Rv3442c rpsI exp (transferred) |
30S ribosomal protein S9 | 834 | 820 | experimental:771 |
Rv2909c rpsP exp (transferred) |
30S ribosomal protein S16 | 810 | 800 | experimental:771 |
Rv0053 rpsF exp (transferred) |
30S ribosomal protein S6 | 798 | 772 | experimental:771 |
Rv1643 rplT |
50S ribosomal protein L20 | 710 | 710 ctx | cooccurence:699 |
Rv2158c murE |
UDP-N-acetylmuramoylalanyl-D-glutamate--2,6-diaminopimelate ligase | 778 | 691 ctx | neighborhood:544 |
Rv2157c murF |
UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-tripeptide--D-alanyl-D-alanine ligase | 755 | 680 ctx | neighborhood:544 |
Rv2404c lepA |
GTP-binding protein LepA | 705 | 667 ctx | cooccurence:586 |
Rv2152c murC |
UDP-N-acetylmuramate--alanine ligase | 731 | 649 ctx | neighborhood:544 |
Rv2151c ftsQ |
cell division protein FtsQ | 729 | 646 ctx | neighborhood:544 |
Rv2785c rpsO exp (transferred) |
30S ribosomal protein S15 | 722 | 637 | experimental:519 |
Rv2367c ybeY exp (transferred) |
endoribonuclease | 652 | 636 | experimental:474 |
Rv2155c murD |
UDP-N-acetylmuramoylalanine--D-glutamate ligase | 705 | 616 ctx | neighborhood:544 |
STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.
Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.
Evidence
- Legacy H37Rv annotation: rRNA small subunit methyltransferase H
- MTBC0 PGAP product: 16S rRNA (cytosine(1402)-N(4))-methyltransferase RsmH
- Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): Methyltransf_5 PF01795.26 (E=2e-118)
- (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)
Sources
- Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
- Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_216681.4)
- Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — Methyltransf_5 (PF01795.26)
- Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
- Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021,
doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB
(Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG
COG0275 - Curated reference: UniProt P9WJP1 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
- Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
- Genome-wide structure: AlphaFold DB model (Jumper et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2; Varadi et al. 2024, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011) searched vs PDB with Foldseek (mean pLDDT 82.8)
- Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023,
doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 —
113 functional partner(s); context anchor
mraZ - Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
- Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
- Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
- Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
- Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
- Mutant phenotypes: standardized Tn-seq compendium MtbTnDB (Jinich et al. 2025, doi:10.1111/mmi.15370), aggregating many primary Tn-seq studies across conditions
- Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
- Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide
- Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.
Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence
>mtbc0_002301|Rv2165c|rsmH MQTRAPWSLPEATLAYFPNARFVSSDRDLGAGAAPGIAASRSTACQTWGGITVADPGSGPTGFGHVPVLAQRCFELLTPALTRYYPDGSQAVLLDATIGAGGHAERFLEGLPGLRLIGLDRDPTALDVARSRLVRFADRLTLVHTRYDCLGAALAESGYAAVGSVDGILFDLGVSSMQLDRAERGFAYATDAPLDMRMDPTTPLTAADIVNTYDEAALADILRRYGEERFARRIAAGIVRRRAKTPFTSTAELVALLYQAIPAPARRVGGHPAKRTFQALRIAVNDELESLRTAVPAALDALAIGGRIAVLAYQSLEDRIVKRVFAEAVASATPAGLPVELPGHEPRFRSLTHGAERASVAEIERNPRSTPVRLRALQRVEHRAQSQQWATEKGDS
Spot an error? Suggest an improvement
Found a mistake, a missing reference, or have a better functional hypothesis for rsmH? Report it below — the message is emailed to the maintainer with this gene's details, reviewed by hand (no automatic edits).
Prefer email directly? ✉ Email a correction about rsmH