cpnT Resolved · high auto-curated

H37Rv Rv3903c · MTBC0 mtbc0_004137 · 846 aa · 4412144–4414684 MTBC0 (-) · RefSeq NP_218420.1

Genomic neighbourhood (genome browser)

Open in full genome browser →

This gene (outlined) in its genomic context; arrows are neighbouring genes coloured by verdict. Click any gene to navigate. Pan and zoom in the full browser.

Annotation: from legacy to revised

Legacy (H37Rv / Mycobrowser)hypothetical protein
MTBC0 PGAP re-annotationouter membrane channel protein/necrotizing toxin glycohydrolase CpnT
Revised (this work)Outer membrane channel protein/necrotizing toxin glycohydrolase CpnT. Pfam: WXG100_2 (PF25547.2), TNT (PF14021.13).
Functional category (TubercuList)conserved hypotheticals

Auto-curated: this verdict and function were generated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek and have not been hand-reviewed.

In the literature (TB corpus sweep) 1 publication

Found under: H37Rv (1).

1 TB publication mentions this gene. 1 publication(s) mention this gene (title/abstract), verified against the text. The atlas states the function; these are the primary sources that discuss it.

PublicationDate
An outer membrane channel protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with exotoxin activity. doi:10.1073/pnas.1400136111 2014
10 records returned by the alias sweep (a separate sweep from the 1 above; both are shown, neither is exhaustive)

Searched as: Rv3903c, cpnT, Mb3933c, MMAR_5464 — each in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term. Swept 2026-09-07.

PublicationJournalYear
Secreted proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as therapeutic targets for drug discovery. doi:10.3389/ftubr.2026.1736139 Front Tuberc 2026
Integrating Docking, Dynamics, and Assays to Predict Antimicrobial Peptide Interactions with Mycolic Acid Membranes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.5c00126 ACS Meas Sci Au 2025
Control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein secretion by ESX-4 and the outer membrane EsxUT-EsxEF complex. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65061-y Nat Commun 2025
Master control of protein secretion by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1101/2025.03.13.643117 bioRxiv 2025
Comprehensive pan-genome analysis of Mycobacterium marinum: insights into genomic diversity, evolution, and pathogenicity. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-75228-0 Sci Rep 2024
Toxin secretion and trafficking by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26925-1 Nat Commun 2021
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Toxin CpnT Is an ESX-5 Substrate and Requires Three Type VII Secretion Systems for Intracellular Secretion. doi:10.1128/mBio.02983-20 names it mBio 2021
The tuberculosis necrotizing toxin kills macrophages by hydrolyzing NAD. doi:10.1038/nsmb.3064 Nat Struct Mol Biol 2015
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis outer membrane channel protein CpnT confers susceptibility to toxic molecules. doi:10.1128/AAC.04222-14 names it Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015
An outer membrane channel protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with exotoxin activity. doi:10.1073/pnas.1400136111 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014

Title+abstract index only: a paper that names this gene solely in its body text, a figure legend or a supplement is invisible here. That is why this list sits beside the curated layer rather than replacing it - Rv0007's characterisation, found by a full-text sweep, returns zero in this one. Absence from this list is not absence from the literature. Source: PubMed E-utilities sweep (esearch + esummary), every alias of the gene searched in conjunction with a mycobacterial context term; ambiguous common-word aliases excluded. phase198, 2026-09-06.

This layer CITES the literature, it does not change the verdict or the function. A gene may be heavily studied (as an antigen, a resistance determinant, a drug target) while its molecular function is settled elsewhere in the fiche. This distinguishes a gene that is dark because nobody has looked from one that is dark despite having been studied. Source: PubMed (whole), MULTI-ALIAS sweep: H37Rv locus tag AND every ortholog identifier (M. bovis Mb…, M. marinum MMAR_…, M. smegmatis MSMEG_…, M. leprae ML…, M. abscessus MAB_…), each hit VERIFIED against the abstract text (word-boundary regex). phase73/phase75, 2026-07-13.

Intrinsic disorder (sequence + structure) partially disordered

Predicted disorder36% of residues (metapredict) · mean AlphaFold pLDDT 65.1
Disordered regions3 IDR(s), longest 232 aa [0-43, 100-130, 438-670]

carries a substantial disordered region (305/846 residues); disorder is a property, not a function

A property (biophysics), not a function. No LLPS/condensate claim is made from disorder alone. Verdict unchanged. Source: metapredict v3 (Emenecker/Holehouse) per-residue disorder + AlphaFold mean pLDDT (annotation_mtbc P16.13).

Genomic-neighbour overlap (structural caveat) co-directional · 0 % of gene

NeighbourRv3902c (Rv3902c, - strand)
Overlap4 bp, 0 % of this gene's length

co-directional overlap: ordinary (e.g. shared stop/start codons in an operon), not the Rv2438A-type artefact P20.1, derived from GFF3 gene coordinates, 2026-08-03.

CRISPRi vulnerability

Vulnerability index 0.81 (95% CI -1.37 to 3.88). A more negative index = more vulnerable to knockdown (better drug-target quality); indicative threshold VI ≤ -6 = highly vulnerable.

Quantitative CRISPRi knockdown, graded (finer than binary Tn-seq essentiality). Source: CRISPRi vulnerability index (Bosch 2021, supplementary Table S2 'mmc3.xlsx', bulk import via Europe PMC -- supersedes the per-gene pebble.rockefeller.edu scrape of phase46_crispri_vulnerability.py).

Caveat on this estimate. Bosch et al. flag this gene's vulnerability estimate as NOT certain, and here that call has a mechanical cause visible in the library itself: every guide targeting this gene is >=21 nt (str_span=0.318 on a 0-1 scale, near the genome floor), and guide repression strength saturates from 21 nt on -- so the library never sampled a partial knockdown for this gene, only the near-maximal repression plateau. The dose-response fit (and this VI) is therefore essentially unconstrained by data, not merely uncertain -- a limitation of the CRISPRi library design for the non-essential class (Bosch et al. 2021), not a defect in this specific measurement. n_guides=15 is descriptive only and does not predict this. Do not cite this VI as a standalone vulnerability claim.

Legacy record & comparison (Mycobrowser) ahead of Mycobrowser

Mycobrowser classes this locus among conserved hypotheticals; the atlas now assigns a functional handle (curated function (UniProt), EC number, COG category, requalified function). Mycobrowser is no longer maintained, so its EC numbers predate recent nomenclature revisions (e.g. the 2018 EC 7 "translocase" class) — most EC differences are re-numberings of the same enzyme, not conflicts.

Orthologues (reciprocal best hits across mycobacteria)

M. bovis Mb3933c · 100.0% identity
M. marinum MMAR_5464 · 58.5% identity
M. orygis RJtmp_004018 · 99.9% identity

Reciprocal-best-hit orthologues (DIAMOND) against the Mycobrowser reference proteomes. A missing species is informative: e.g. a gene absent from M. leprae was likely lost in its reductive genome evolution. Locus tags link to Mycobrowser.

Curated reference (UniProt)

UniProt O05442 SwissProt · reviewed · Evidence at protein level
UniProt nameOuter membrane channel protein CpnT
EC (curated) EC 3.2.2.5
Curated functionHas a dual function in uptake of nutrients and induction of host cell death. The N-terminal domain (NTD) forms an outer membrane channel and is used for uptake of nutrients across the outer membrane. The secreted C-terminal toxic domain (TNT) acts as a glycohydrolase, which hydrolyzes the essential cellular coenzyme NAD(+) in the cytosol of infected macrophages, leading to necrotic host cell death. Both functions are required for survival, replication and cytotoxicity of M.tuberculosis in macrophages.

Functional vocabulary (eggNOG-mapper, orthology transfer)

COG category P Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
eggNOG descriptionBelongs to the bacterial solute-binding protein 9 family
Orthologous groupCOG0803
Gene Ontology (6) GO:0005575, GO:0005618, GO:0005623, GO:0030312, GO:0044464, GO:0071944

Orthology-based transfer (eggNOG 5.0.2, diamond). EC/KO/GO/CAZy are computed annotations, not manual curation; cross-check against the primary literature before treating a specific reaction as established.

Conservation & selection (intra-MTBC, 142 601 strains, snapshot of 2026-09-29)

pN/pS 0.71 · relaxed/neutral
Polymorphic sites (≥ 0.1% of strains) 10 synonymous, 20 missense, 1 nonsense, 1 frameshift
Disruption 2 distinct premature-stop/frameshift site(s); most common in 0.44% of strains (631) · clonal
Which clade carries which site (attribution) site unique fixé — L5; union over all sites: 940 strains (the count above is a maximum over sites, not a union).
  • NC_000962.3:4388817:GT:G · frameshift · 631 strains — fixed in 23 sub-clades of L5, totalling 614 strains — 97.6% of the 629 strains in the lineage named (largest: L5.2.2.2.2.2.3.2 80/80, L5.2.2.2.2.2.1.1 43/43, L5.2.2.2.2.2.3.1.1 41/41, L5.2.1.2.1 36/36, L5.2.2.2.2.2.3 36/36, L5.2.2.1.2.2.1 35/35, …)
  • NC_000962.3:4388148:G:A · nonsense · 309 strains — not fixed in any clade
Which clade carries which disrupting site — the question the count above never asked. `disrupt_strains` is a MAXIMUM over sites, not a union: two sites carried by two disjoint clades do not add up there. `disrupt_mode` is derived from the NUMBER of sites alone (convergent at 4 or more), so it says nothing about who carries them. Read this field instead for any evolutionary claim, and mind the distinction it enforces: several clades at the SAME site is shared ancestry, not convergence — convergence requires DIFFERENT sites in DIFFERENT clades. SECOND CORRECTION (P44.8, same day): a clade name listed here is the ROOT of the fine clade that fixes the site, not the whole lineage. Across the 789 fixed sites of this atlas, the fixing sub-clades cover a median of 9.2% of the lineage named, and under 10% for half of them — so read the sub-clade sizes given here, never the lineage name alone.

Read the disruption percentage against its ceiling, not against 100%. The strain collection is deeply imbalanced by clade, so a loss fixed in an entire lineage still shows a small overall fraction: a gene disrupted in every L6 strain caps at 0.96% of the collection, in every M. caprae strain at 0.20%, in every M. microti strain at 0.02%. Of the 705 clades in this collection, 689 have a ceiling below 1%. A figure of "0.15% of strains" is therefore uninterpretable on its own — it can be noise or a complete, lineage-defining loss. Use the clade attribution row above, which gives the sub-clade sizes, and never read the percentage alone.

pN/pS from segregating SNPs (singletons removed) normalised by possible sites. Low pN/pS = purifying selection (a strong signal that a "hypothetical" is a real, constrained gene). A high pN/pS is ambiguous: relaxed constraint or positive selection (drug resistance, antigenic variation) inflate it; e.g. rpoB/katG/pncA score high here for resistance, not loss of function. A clonal disruption (one allele over a clade) suggests lineage pseudogenisation; a convergent one (many independent alleles) is typical of resistance loss-of-function.

Outgroup conservation (beyond the MTBC) Mycobacterium

M. canettii dN/dS (deep-divergence selection) 0.0 (low power) · 1 consensus substitution(s)
low power (1 canettii-consensus substitution(s)); present in M. canettii but dN/dS not reliable
Limitation: dN/dS mixes fixed canettii-H37Rv divergence with intra-canettii polymorphism, and is not polarised (the per-gene repolarisation is not viable: 79 % of the consensus SPDI lie outside the polarised table).
Genus-wide presence (~53 non-MTBC Mycobacterium) present in 21/53 (40%) · mean identity 57.4% · 3/4 closest MTBAP relatives
present in a subset of the genus (21/53 NTM; in 3 of the 4 closest MTBAP relatives) — partial/intermediate conservation
Phylostratum (deepest detected homolog) MTBC-specific → Mycobacterium → Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → Bacteria

present across the genus Mycobacterium (NTM) but not detected in any non-Mycobacterium genome — a Mycobacterium-genus gene

Two orthogonal outgroup signals. M. canettii (the immediate outgroup) gives a deep-divergence dN/dS (a low value confirms a constrained, real gene; shown as confident only at ≥8 substitutions, else flagged low-power). Genus-wide presence/absence (tblastn vs assembled non-MTBC genomes) places the gene on the ancient-core ↔ MTBC-specific axis: a gene absent even from the closest MTBAP relatives is a candidate MTBC-specific innovation (possible host-adaptation factor, to confirm by synteny). The phylostratum extends that axis outside the genus (tblastn vs 13 reference genomes spanning Mycobacteriaceae → Corynebacteriales → Actinomycetia → outside the phylum): it is the deepest clade in which a homolog is still detected, i.e. a proxy for gene age. Read it with the null model in mind: a shallow (young) stratum can also reflect homology-detection failure for short or fast-evolving ORFs, so it is a descriptive axis, not a proof of novelty.

Regions of Difference (lineage deletions)

RDGene overlapDeleted in lineages
DS70 18% Canettii (98%)

This locus overlaps a Region of Difference — a large deletion that is absent in the listed lineages (from the consolidated MTBC RD analysis over ~145 000 strains; H37Rv coordinates). The gene-overlap column is the fraction of the gene inside the RD. RD deletions are classic lineage markers (e.g. RD9 absent in the animal / M. africanum lineages); a gene deleted in a whole lineage is dispensable there. Lineages tagged n=…, not statistical are the rarest MTBC ecotypes (e.g. the chimpanzee bacillus, M. mungi, M. suricattae), where only a handful of strains have ever been sequenced: the figure is a single-sample observation, not a population frequency, and is shown rather than silently dropped because for these lineages every sequenced strain is itself informative.

Essentiality (transposon mutagenesis)

DeJesus 2017 callNE · non-essential
What the call meansnon-essential
TA sites (Himar1) 51 in the ORF — 0 in the essential state, 0 growth-defect, 51 non-essential, 0 growth-advantage. Saturation 0.941, mean read count 82.3125. A region of the protein devoid of TA sites is invisible to this assay: nothing can be inferred about it, in either direction.
All 51 sites lie in this ORF alone (no overlapping CDS shares any), so the call is attributable to this gene.

Genome-wide Himar1 transposon essentiality in H37Rv (DeJesus 2017). An essential call (ES/ESD/GD) is strong, independent evidence that a "hypothetical" locus encodes a functional, selectively required gene — orthogonal to intra-species conservation.

Proteomics (mass spectrometry) detected

MS detectiondetected in 1 of 16 independent MS datasets
Integrated abundance2.48 ppm · rank 3124/3519 (11.3th percentile)

Detection by mass spectrometry is direct, experimental evidence that the protein product exists — orthogonal to sequence conservation and to Tn-seq essentiality, and especially decisive for a "hypothetical" locus. Read the dataset count as abundance, not as replication. Measured across this atlas (3,491 detected proteins), the number of datasets a protein appears in tracks its abundance almost monotonically: median 1.2 ppm at 1 dataset of 16, 27 ppm at 10, 392 ppm at 15, 1,325 ppm at 16 — three orders of magnitude. A high count therefore says the protein is abundant more than it says several independent experiments confirmed it. What the count does establish, at any value, is that the product exists.

Predicted localisation (DeepTMHMM + lipobox) lipoprotein

Predictionpredicted lipoprotein (lipobox + signal peptide)
DeepTMHMM classGLOB
Lipoboxsignal-peptidase-II lipobox; lipidated Cys near position 39

Transmembrane topology and signal peptide from DeepTMHMM (deep-learning reference predictor); lipoproteins from a (myco)bacterial lipobox motif. A sequence-based prediction of subcellular context.

Physico-chemical properties (computed, ProtParam)

Length846 aa
Molecular weight88.3 kDa
Theoretical pI5.26
GRAVY-0.323 (hydrophilic)
Aliphatic index71.9
Aromaticity0.061
Instability index45.1 (unstable)

Computed from the ancestral MTBC0 sequence with the ExPASy ProtParam method (Biopython). Descriptive biophysical context: a positive GRAVY flags a hydrophobic (often membrane) protein, a high instability index (>40) predicts a short in-vitro half-life, an extreme pI hints at compartment or binding partner.

Domains (Pfam, hmmscan --cut_ga)

PfamAccessioni-EvalueResiduesDescription
WXG100_2PF25547.2 5.9e-07132–230 WXG100 like domain
TNTPF14021.13 5.1e-14751–846 Tuberculosis necrotizing toxin

3D structure (interactive — Mol*/pdbe-molstar)

Experimental structure 4qlp (PDBe), the strongest available structural evidence for this gene. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom; hetero-groups (ligands, ions, waters hidden by default) shown as sticks.

Experimental structures (Protein Data Bank) 1 solved

PDBMethodResolutionCoverage
4qlp X-ray diffraction 1.1 Å 23%

Experimentally solved structures mapped from the UniProt accession via PDBe/SIFTS (1 total; up to 8 shown, ranked by sequence coverage then resolution). An experimental structure is direct proof of the folded product and the strongest structural evidence — superseding the predicted ESMFold/AlphaFold models below for any covered region.

Genomic context (neighbours & predicted operon) operon of 4

Upstream (5' on genome)Rv3902c (- strand, -4 bp gap)
Downstream (3' on genome)esxE (- strand, 4 bp gap)
Predicted operon Rv3902c · Rv3903c · esxE · esxF

Neighbours from the H37Rv annotation (- strand). The operon is predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (same strand, gaps ≤50 bp) — a transcription-unit hypothesis, not a mapped TSS. For a "hypothetical", co-transcription with a characterised operon is a concrete functional lead (complements the STRING neighborhood channel below).

Published operon evidence (two independent sources)

Roback 2007 (logistic regression: distance + expression correlation, 474 microarrays) operon of 2: Rv3902c · Rv3903c — disagrees with the distance heuristic above
REMap 2016 (RNA-seq coverage continuity, CDC1551, tag MT4022) not expressed (exponential phase)
not expressed (stationary phase)

Two independent published operon maps, cited alongside the distance heuristic above: an association corroborating or contradicting the heuristic, never proof of shared function. REMap's RNA-seq coverage continuity is the most direct of the three signals; Roback's logistic regression and the intergenic-distance heuristic are statistical proxies.

Additional regulons (curated, outside the TFOE-derived TRN)

crp binding site only -- direction not determined (low confidence · CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014))
ChIP-seq : site de fixation CRP (1 des 191 sites de Kahramanoglou et al. 2014) ; aucun changement d'expression rapporte pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp
Caveat: Site de fixation CRP mesure par ChIP-seq (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014), SANS changement d'expression mesure pour ce gene chez le mutant delta-crp : le sens de la regulation n'est PAS determine. Ecrire « site de fixation CRP en amont », jamais « regule par CRP ». L'article ne distingue pas « non differentiellement exprime » de « sous le seuil », donc l'absence de ce gene de la table d'expression n'est pas une preuve de non-regulation. Pic divergent entre Rv3903c et Rv3902c : l'article ne tranche pas lequel des deux genes flanquants est la cible reelle. Les deux loci sont verses avec cette meme reserve.

Curated from primary literature not covered by the ISB signed TRN (Minch 2015 / Rustad 2014): Zur regulon (Maciag et al. 2007, PMID 17098899), SigG regulon (Gaudion et al. 2013, PMID 23871545), LexA/SOS regulon (Smollett et al. 2012, PMID 22528497) — added P16.25 (2026-08-18); CRP regulon (Kahramanoglou et al. 2014, PMID 24957601) — added P16.25b (2026-09-27). Confidence and caveats are per-edge and carried from the source paper — read them before citing a specific gene as "regulated by" its listed TF. An entry reading "binding site only — direction not determined" is not a regulation claim: it records a measured ChIP-seq binding site for which the source reports no expression change, and the absence of such a change is not evidence of absent regulation.

Functional interaction network (STRING v12, guilt-by-association)

Explore full network →

Node colour = verdict, dashed = still uncharacterised; edge colour = evidence (green experimental, orange genomic-context, grey co-expression), width ∝ score. Click a partner to open its page; "Explore full network" to walk the graph.

Closest characterised functional partner: ift (hypothetical protein), high confidence (score 978, all STRING channels except text-mining; the partner is chosen on its genomic-context evidence). The pair rests on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself (own experimental score 817): a measured association in this organism, as opposed to one carried over from other proteomes.

Showing the 15 strongest of this gene's 184 partners at medium confidence (69 at high confidence). The table is an extract, not a neighbourhood: across the proteome the real median degree is 34 while the served median is 15, so no hub, degree distribution or centrality may be read on this table. Of the 184 partners, 1 rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself.

PartnerProductScoreNo text-miningChannels (≥400)
Rv3902c ift measured in Mtb hypothetical protein 996 978 ctx neighborhood:882 experimental:817 textmining:870
Rv3904c esxE ESAT-6 like protein EsxE 985 948 ctx neighborhood:882 coexpression:580 textmining:723
Rv3448 eccD4 ESX-4 secretion system protein EccD4 921 920 ctx cooccurence:595 coexpression:805
Rv3905c esxF ESAT-6 like protein EsxF 981 900 ctx neighborhood:880 textmining:825
Rv3446c hypothetical protein 867 861 coexpression:770
Rv2488c LuxR family transcriptional regulator 820 810 coexpression:804
Rv1359 transcriptional regulator 809 810 coexpression:759
Rv1917c PPE34 PPE family protein PPE34 794 795 ctx cooccurence:757
Rv0339c iniR transcriptional regulator 799 791 ctx cooccurence:562 coexpression:539
Rv3343c PPE54 PPE family protein PPE54 788 788 ctx cooccurence:760
Rv3347c PPE55 PPE family protein PPE55 787 787 ctx cooccurence:760
Rv3350c PPE56 PPE family protein PPE56 786 787 ctx cooccurence:760
Rv0355c PPE8 PPE family protein PPE8 786 787 ctx cooccurence:759
Rv0538 membrane protein 795 782 ctx cooccurence:773
Rv0305c PPE6 PPE family protein PPE6 782 782 ctx cooccurence:755

STRING combines evidence channels (neighborhood, fusion, cooccurrence, coexpression, experimental, database, text-mining) into a 0–1000 score. The ctx badge marks edges carried by the genomic-context channels (conserved neighborhood, fusion, phylogenetic co-occurrence), which are independent of orthology and structure and the strongest signal for an unknown gene. The no text-mining column recomputes the score from data alone, so a link that does not depend on the literature is visible. Association is a function hypothesis, not proof: corroborate with the operon context and the primary literature before assigning a function.

Where the experimental evidence comes from, and why it matters here. STRING's experimental channel fuses interactions measured in M. tuberculosis with interactions measured in another organism and transferred to this pair by orthology. The two are not equivalent for this atlas, whose standing rule is that better studied elsewhere is not a function established in M. tuberculosis. Measured on the served network: of the 38 229 partner pairs shown across the atlas, 13 483 partner rows carry a non-zero experimental channel, and only 106 pairs rest on an interaction measured in M. tuberculosis itself — 0.3 % of the network. Those 106 are long-established complexes (ESX-1/ESAT-6, RNA polymerase with CarD and RbpA, the Pup–Mpa proteasome, gyrase, Emb, GarA with PknB and PknG, the Rel modules); no still-uncharacterised gene is among them. The reason is not a gap in this atlas but in the literature: there is almost no experimental interactome of this bacterium, IntAct holding 134 curated protein pairs for a ~4 000-gene proteome. A exp (transferred) badge is therefore a lead, never a measurement, and an absence of badge is not evidence that the pair does not interact.

Evidence

  • Legacy H37Rv annotation: hypothetical protein
  • MTBC0 PGAP product: outer membrane channel protein/necrotizing toxin glycohydrolase CpnT
  • Pfam (hmmscan --cut_ga): WXG100_2 PF25547.2 (E=6e-07), TNT PF14021.13 (E=5e-14)
  • (auto-curated by rules from PGAP + Pfam + Foldseek; not hand-reviewed)

Sources

  • Ancestral sequence & coordinates: Harrison LB et al. (2024), An imputed ancestral reference genome for the MTBC, doi:10.1101/2023.09.07.556366
  • Product annotation: NCBI PGAP on MTBC0; legacy from H37Rv NC_000962.3 (RefSeq NP_218420.1)
  • Domains: Pfam-A via hmmscan --cut_ga — WXG100_2 (PF25547.2), TNT (PF14021.13)
  • Sequence-level signal: ESM Atlas (EvolutionaryScale × BioHub) — exploratory
  • Controlled vocabulary: eggNOG-mapper 2.1.12 (Cantalapiedra et al. 2021, doi:10.1093/molbev/msab293), eggNOG 5.0 DB (Huerta-Cepas et al. 2019) — OG COG0803
  • Curated reference: UniProt O05442 (SwissProt, reviewed; Evidence at protein level)
  • Intra-MTBC selection: pN/pS and disruption from SPDI variants of 142 601 MTBC strains (this work, local collection vs H37Rv NC_000962.3)
  • Interaction network: STRING v12.0 (Szklarczyk et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000), taxon 83332, CC-BY 4.0 — 184 functional partner(s); context anchor ift
  • Essentiality: genome-wide transposon mutagenesis in H37Rv — DeJesus et al. 2017 (mBio, doi:10.1128/mBio.02133-16, CC BY)
  • Proteomics: integrated mass-spectrometry abundance from PaxDb 5.0 (Huang et al. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100640), taxon 83332 — weighted average of 16 datasets, incl. Schubert et al. 2013 (doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.008) and Albrethsen et al. 2013 (doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.018846)
  • Functional category: TubercuList scheme (Cole et al. 1998, doi:10.1038/31159), via Mycobrowser (Kapopoulou et al. 2011, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006)
  • Orthologues: reciprocal best hits (DIAMOND, Buchfink et al. 2021, doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x) against Mycobrowser release 5 reference proteomes
  • Experimental structures: PDBe/SIFTS UniProt→PDB mapping (Dana et al. 2019, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1114)
  • Regions of Difference: consolidated MTBC RD analysis (H37Rv coordinates); RD framework from Brosch et al. 2002 (doi:10.1073/pnas.052548299) and Gagneux & Small 2007 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70108-1)
  • Genomic context / operon: H37Rv annotation; operon predicted by co-directional intergenic distance (Salgado et al. 2000, doi:10.1073/pnas.030539397)
  • Physico-chemical properties: ExPASy ProtParam method via Biopython (Gasteiger et al. 2005), computed from the MTBC0 sequence
  • Predicted localisation: DeepTMHMM (Hallgren et al. 2022, doi:10.1101/2022.04.08.487609) for transmembrane topology and signal peptide; (myco)bacterial lipobox (Sutcliffe & Harrington 2004, doi:10.1099/mic.0.26804-0)
  • Primary literature: none located yet; annotation rests on the domain/homology sources above.

Ancestral MTBC0 protein sequence

>mtbc0_004137|Rv3903c|cpnT
MAPLAVDPAALDSAGGAVVAAGAGLGAVISSLTAALAGCAGMAGDDPAGAVFGRSYDGSAAALVQAMSVARNGLCNLGDGVRMSAHNYSLAEAMSDVAGRAAPLPAPPPSGCVGVGAPPSAVGGGGGAPKGWGWVAPYIGMIWPNGDSTKLRAAAVAWRSAGTQFALTEIQSTAGPMGVIRAQQLPEAGLIESAFADAYASTTAVVGQCHQLAAQLDAYAARIDAVHAAVLDLLARICDPLTGIKEVWEFLTDQDEDEIQRIAHDIAVVVDQFSGEVDALAAEITAVVSHAEAVITAMADHAGKQWDRFLHSNPVGVVIDGTGQQLKGFGEEAFGMAKDSWDLGPLRASIDPFGWYRSWEEMLTGMAPLAGLGGENAPGVVESWKQFGKSLIHWDEWTTNPNEALGKTVFDAATLALPGGPLSKLGSKGRDILAGVRGLKERLEPTTPHLEPPATPPRPGPQPPRIEPPESGHPAPAPAAKPAPVPANGPLPHSPTESKPPPVDRPAEPVAPSSASAGQPRVSAATTPGTHVPHGLPQPGEHVPAQAPPATTLLGGPPVESAPATAHQPQWATTPAAPAAAPHSTPGGVHSTESGPHGRSLSAHGSEPTHDGASHGSGHGSGSEPPGLHAPHREQQLAMHSNEPAGEGWHRLSDEAVDPQYGEPLSRHWDFTDNPADRSRINPVVAQLMEDPNAPFGRDPQGQPYTQERYQERFNSVGPWGQQYSNFPPNNGAVPGTRIAYTNLEKFLSDYGPQLDRIGGDQGKYLAIMEHGRPASWEQRALHVTSLRDPYHAYTIDWLPEGWFIEVSEVAPGCGQPGGSIQVRIFDHQNEMRKVEELIRRGVLRQ